Click the Pic
Posted on 11/07/2004 8:57:00 PM PST by Pikamax
Howard refuses to congratulate Bush
Nicholas Watt, political correspondent Monday November 8, 2004 The Guardian
Michael Howard deepened his feud with the White House yesterday when he pointedly refused to offer the traditional post-election congratulations to George Bush.
Angered by a White House edict banning him from meeting the president - as punishment for criticising Tony Blair over Iraq - Mr Howard said it would be wrong for him to express any view on the poll.
In an interview with the Sunday Telegraph the arch-Atlanticist was asked whether he was pleased that a fellow rightwinger had beaten a liberal. He said: "I made it clear that I could work perfectly well with both President Bush and President Kerry ... I don't think it's appropriate to express a view on those elections."
Mr Howard's remarks may appear bland. But in the language of diplomacy they amount to a rebuke to Mr Bush - and in particular to his polling guru, Karl Rove, who told him he would not be welcome at the White House after he criticised Mr Blair's use of intelligence before the Iraq war.
Mr Rove was reported by the Sun as telling Howard aides: "You can forget about him meeting the president. Don't bother coming."
In his interview Mr Howard hit back at Mr Rove, who is widely credited with masterminding President Bush's decisive victory. Criticising the White House for being "very protective" of Mr Blair, he added: "I am not going to be told by anyone how to do my job and if it displeases those in the White House, that's tough."
Mr Howard's decision to distance himself from the White House reflects his belief that Mr Bush is so unpopular in Britain that voters will be impressed by a politician who stands up to him. This has created a unprecedented situation in which a Labour prime minister will be feted at the White House while a Tory leader is cold-shouldered.
Well now I won't be able to sleep
Who is Howard?
~grin~
That must explain the crying going on at the White House. Does this guy think anyone at the White House give's a rat's ass over this?
Who?
Howard?
Who's Howard?
ROTFLMAO:-)
Howard who?
Why do we even give a rat's turd what these idiot limeys think?
Australia's got the only Howard worth anything!
Okay. Glad to read it all and see it had NOTHING to do with Australia's (John) Howard, whom I thought the title was referencing.
(whom? who?)
Who is Michael Howard and why is he even worth mentioning?
If he can't even win his own country's government, why should WE give a rats azz?
Is the British conservative party on crack? I think they've tossed the mantle of Thatcher into the fire. Even if they take the left-wing position on the war, there should at least be some right-wing ideology on which they can agree with their American brethren. I hope the British-American backchannels in D.C. get this worked out.
Click the Pic
I don't think tghe President is losing any sleep over him
Yes, and I was worried that's who the article was about.
I should have known better. :-)
Yes, it would appear that the better part of the strain was transported.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
