Yes, it is obviously a homo church.
They should sell Church properties and return the money to the people. Sounds me to like they've had it.
Glad to see that humour is still alive and well...
Could you point me to ANY evidence that connects this with homosexuality?
This is actually the members of a choir raising charitable funds by posing in photographs which are actually far less risque than what one sees walking down a typical street in the summer; and certainly less so than some of the calendars that my female colleagues have near their desks at work.
As for giving the church's property to the people. What has that to do with anything at all? This is not part of the Church's mission, rather it is charity on the part of active church-members - if it has a side-angle of making some people re-evaluate their misguided perceptions of the Church, then I see that as a benefit.
posted on 11/11/2004 6:00:36 AM PST
("The English, the English, the English are best; I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest")
I'm inclined to agree with you. But it's in poor taste to do this for a church charity.
posted on 11/11/2004 6:04:06 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson