Posted on 11/14/2004 5:46:16 AM PST by topher
Planned Parenthood clinics, National Abortion Federation clinics and others in the abortion clinic business make their money by selling abortions, birth control pills, pregnancy tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. But in order to push sales to minors, NAF & Planned Parenthood abortion clinics have been ignoring child abuse reporting laws and promising to conceal statutory rape and ongoing child sexual molestation.
We have over 800 tape recordings that show how Planned Parenthood and NAF abortion workers secure business from victims of statutory rape by undermining parental authority, encouraging children to lie and promising minors that their employees will ignore mandatory reporting laws. Hundreds of Planned Parenthood clinic and National Abortion Federation clinic employees have been caught on tape expressing their willingness to conceal the statutory rape of a 13-year-old girl by a 22-year-old man. Even though many of these Planned Parenthood and NAF employees openly acknowledged that statutory rape is a crime and that they are required by law to report it, they made it clear that they do not abide by the law.
Planned Parenthood speaks - Click to hear the evidence for yourself
Planned Parenthood report - Click to see the evidence for yourself
This is part of the Arlen Specter issue, for I am certain he has received funding from various pro-abortion groups.
It is time to start arresting these people who protect child pretators and help children to be a victim of Planned Parenthood.
The judges that Arlen Specter will allow are only ones that allow sexual predators to get off without being punished.
This should start being a part of the letters to the Senate -- with a comment that Arlen Specter is part of this problem -- not the solution.
The abortion industry is driven by blood money, what do you expect?
Of course, one might find that Hillary's lovely legs are protecting them...
This type of law breaking must stop by Planned Parenthood. The new AG can start by investigating these tapes.
And I still think that Planned Parenthood and Arlen Specter sleep in the same bed...
The "abortuary" industry also murders children, such as teenager Holly Patterson in Alameda County, California last year, after visiting the local killing center without her parents being notified.
National Abortion Rights Action League Pro Choice America ordered flags in front of the nation's abortion clinics to be flown at half-staff "to show the empathy and support of professional abortion providers for our amateur brother, Scott Peterson," according to a NARAL news release.
"We feel Scott's pain," said an unnamed NARAL spokesperson. "And we ask all Americans to rally to the cause of this man who is being persecuted for his personal interpretation of the freedoms we have under Roe v. Wade. He has done little more than doctors at our women's health clinics nationwide do everyday, and yet he's treated as a criminal."
Bttt.
Is there any evidence of that?
"We feel Scott's pain," said an unnamed NARAL spokesperson. "And we ask all Americans to rally to the cause of this man who is being persecuted for his personal interpretation of the freedoms we have under Roe v. Wade. He has done little more than doctors at our women's health clinics nationwide do everyday, and yet he's treated as a criminal."
Groan. I did not see this. This is really sick.
There is this web page from Planned Parenthood:
http://www.ppaction.org/ppaction/home.html
In the page above, Planned Parenthood is asking for counter action against the phone calls being made now to block Specter's nomination of the Judiciary Committee.
In the Pennsylvania primary, where Toomey was narrowly defeated by Specter, there is the Freerepublic article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1126254/posts
There is a direct contribution to the Specter campaign, in that Planned Parenthood waged a mailing and other efforts to get voters out. There is a monetary value assigned to these mailings (postage, ink, letters, envelopes, as well as the stuffing process). A portion of it below is:
To: National DeskContact: Steve Smith of Planned Parenthood, 202-973-4972
WASHINGTON, April 28 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Pro-choice Republicans played a decisive role in defeating anti-choice extremist Pat Toomey's bid to oust Sen. Arlen Specter in Tuesday's Pennsylvania Senate primary, spurred by mail and phone calls from Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates.
In the final week of the heated race between Toomey and Specter, Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates sent mail and made phone calls that reached more than 39,000 pro-choice Republicans, urging them to protect family planning and a woman's right to choose by voting against Toomey in the primary. Specter defeated Toomey by an estimated 16,000 votes, indicating the messages about Toomey's anti-choice record may have been key to his defeat.
"Pro-choice, moderate Republicans understand the threat an anti-choice hardliner like Pat Toomey poses to the future of reproductive rights," Planned Parenthood Action Fund President Gloria Feldt said. "By turning out in force to reject Toomey's politics of anti-choice extremism, moderates sent a powerful message that they aren't about to let the radical right-wing define who is a true Republican."
In Congress, Toomey consistently votes to undermine reproductive rights and restrict access to family planning, earning a reputation as one of the most anti-choice members of the House of Representatives. Toomey's extreme agenda includes opposition to medically accurate sex education, family planning funding and a woman's right to choose.
"The voters showed once again yesterday that pro-choice candidates can and do win in Pennsylvania," said Patrick Hopkins, executive director of Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates. "For three years in a row, pro-choice candidates have defeated anti-choice hardliners in statewide elections. Planned Parenthood's efforts to mobilize tens of thousands of pro-choice Republicans to fight back against right-wing hardliners played a decisive role in Pat Toomey's defeat. Yesterday's election continues to show that choice is a keystone value in the Keystone State."
Toomey's defeat serves as yet another example of the resonance Planned Parenthood's pro-choice, pro-family planning messages have with moderate Republican and independent swing voters. The national Planned Parenthood Action Fund has an aggressive, multi- tiered plan in place to mobilize these voters and other key voting blocs throughout the country in the 2004 elections. For more information about the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, go to http://www.plannedparenthoodvotes.org
Good to know, thanks, but this is something that they did on their own and Specter wouldn't be able to stop. It's a bit different than Planned Parenthood contributing directly to his campaign and him accepting the checks.
Arlen Specter has had a consistent Pro-Abortion voting record. This is something that Planned Parenthood likes.
Showing Arlen Specter readily accepts their help is now the problem.
Nope. I don't like Specter but it's deceitful to imply he is worse than he is. That goes for stating he has accepting money from Planned Parenthood if he actually didn't, and it goes for insisting he has a "consistent pro-abortion voting record". He voted to pass the Partial Birth Abortion Ban and he voted to pass Laci and Conner's Law.
He's not conservative or pro-life, no, but you guys attempting to paint him as extreme as Kerry, Kennedy, etc, is a distortion. I don't like it when either side engages in that garbage.
I will have to punt on this issue.
There is a more important issue tied to this. Planned Parenthood is infiltrating into Girl Scout Councils.
Now this is the time of year that these little girls are out selling cookies.
I recently visited a site that had about the Planned Parenthood and Girl Scout links.
My biggest problem with the financial link between Specter and the Pro-Abortion groups is that he is on the Republican party. Emily's List is a Democratic only list.
It is important to get Planned Parenthood out of the Girl Scouts first.
And it can be said that Planned Parenthood came to the rescue of Arlen Specter in the Primary -- whether he wanted it or not -- but he is a strong and proud supporter of abortion rights...
Partial Birth Abortion is considered Infanticide, not abortion. The reason is that a healthy baby is delivered, with the exception the head is left in the Birth Contol. At this point in the process, the baby with beating heart and brain activity, has the brain crushed.
Then the baby is allowed to be delivered.
The Planned Parenthood help that Specter received was not directly rebuked by Specter -- Planned Parenthood saw a potential ally going down to defeat, and Specter did not warn Republicans that Planned Parenthood was not speaking for his campaign.
He did not directly rebuke the help, but he did not directly accept the help.
As for Conner's law, the woman was in the 8 month of a pregnancy. Many people consider this a general protection for pregnant women and their unborn.
I imagine that people in Pennsylvania who have contributed heavily to Planned Parenthood have also contributed to Arlen Specter.
Rick Santorium would not get such money because of his Pro-Life stance.
I think it is sarcasm, without the HTML tags.
You couldn't despise Planned Parenthood any more than I do, but it's false to say that they donated to Specter's campaign. That implies a cash payment that Specter blatantly accepted.
From:
http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?can_id=S0761103
Arlen Specter states:
Abortions should always be legal.
He does say:
PBA should be Illegal.
But my response is that this is Infanticide not abortion, because this is the position of the majority of MD's [doctors] in the country.
For this discussion, the web page:
http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0761103
is of interest.
According to this web page:
In 2001, Arlen Specter voted in the preferred position of Planned Parenthood 75% of the time.
In 1999, Arlen Specter voted in the preferred position of Planned Parenthood 71% of the time.
In 1996-2003, Arlen Specter voted in the preferred position of Planned Parenthood 67% of the time.
However, there are gray areas:
In 2001, NARAL rated his votes that were most important to NARAL to be 0% in their preferred positions.
But in 2000, NARAL rated his votes to be 90% of their preferred position.
Also, in 2001-2002, NARAL rated his position as being 0% supportive of NARAL important votes.
National Right to Life shows that his votes goes almost one side to the other.
In 1999-2000, Arlen Specter had a 22% rating on the preferred position of NRLC (National Right to Life Comittee).
This was even worse in 2001-2002, where Arlen Specter's rating with NRLC votes was 0%.
But the contradiction comes in 2003-2004, where Arlen Specter's votes were 64% in the preferred position of NRLC.
The point here is not so much Arlen Specter waffling on positions, it is the votes that he supported were not that controversal.
A man killing a pregnant woman is different from a woman having an abortion.
Arlen voted for the former, but still supports the right of a woman to have an abortion.
It is true that Arlen Specter has received support that amounts to support that has a financial value -- the support of the chapter of Planned Parenthood in Pennsylvania trying to get votes for Specter.
My question is reversal of yours -- where has Arlen Specter ever come out and condemned Planned Parenthood.
And where has Arlen Specter come out and condemned Planned Parenthood on this particular issue.
The Life Dynamics information is from 2002.
This has given Arlen Specter plenty of time to condemn Planned Parenthood.
No. There is a smoking gun. Arlen Specter has received critical support from Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood even boasts about this support.
That was in the primary against Toomey. Planned Parenthood claims their efforts gave Specter enough votes to beat the conservative Toomey.
Overall in the in the Senate, Specter has a 67% favorable rating with Planned Parenthood.
I will consider PBA not abortion but infanticide, so that means that Arlen Specter is still an abortion supporter, even though he has recently supported the PBA Ban (I ever voted to support Clinton's veto or not).
That I can not prove. But Arlen Specter received critical help in the primary to defeat a Pro-Life candidate (Toomey). There was money that was spent in the form of aid of phone calls and mailings.
Though he may not have endorsed this aid, he welcomed the votes that it produced in defeating Toomey.
This is basically similar but very different than what the Swift Boat Veterans did.
The important point is that Specter did receive aid from Planned Parenthood, just as Bush received help from the Swift Boat Veterans.
Bush has not rebuked this support. Neither has Specter rebuked support from Planned Parenthood.
This is different from being able to prove that Senator John Kerry received $2000 from late term abortionist George Tiller of Wichita.
The reason I feel I should not back off is that this support was critical. Planned Parenthood claims their support was what helped Specter beat Toomey. That is what I found on the Internet.
If I drive a car around with Specter Signs on it, pay for a telephone bank, and staff it, and then send out mailings, there is a cost associated with that.
Where has Arlen Specter ever condemned Planned Parenthood? What is to prevent Planned Parenthood members and associations from providing financial support to his campaign.
He supports abortion.
He has come out against PBA, which I consider Infanticide. [Because the birthing process is used to kill the unborn baby -- the birth canal is enlarged so that the unborn baby is delivered but killed before totally delivered].
There is no direct exchange of money, which is a given.
But given what Planned Parenthood is exposed as doing, if this person is going to be head of the powerful Judiciary Committe, he should condemn Planned Parenthood, and rebuke the support they have given him.
This he has not done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.