Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU Opposes Safe Air Travel
CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | NOVEMBER 18, 2004 | ISAIAH Z. STERRETT

Posted on 11/17/2004 9:04:01 PM PST by CHARLITE

The ACLU people are at it again. Instead of bleating about some Ten Commandments poster in Indiana, now they're hot about airport safety. In a startling development, they oppose it.

Flying, per se, doesn't usually bother me. It's the possibility of being threatened with box-cutters by insane Islamist savages that fuels my airport woes. My trepidation, insignificant as it may be, is not likely to cease for many years to come. (If they'll change, I'll change.) But if Kerry had been elected, it would be worse. Kerry would have been Clinton all over again--and the Clinton counterterrorism efforts led to nothing but the perception that, as Osama said, the American soldier is a ''paper tiger.''

Bush is indeed good news for America's travelers. On foreign policy, he is the polar opposite of Kerry, and I guarantee that air travel would have sizably decreased if the Massachusetts liberal had won. Just as many Americans waited apprehensively after September 11 to fly again, many more Americans would have chosen different means of transportation under a President-Elect Kerry. The only people in the industry who would have been pleased by a Kerry victory are Amtrak workers.

Unlike President Bush, the American Civil Liberties Union is not interested in air security. Like Sen. Kerry, it prefers sensitivity to safety.

Last week, the ''nonpartisan'' ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging Logan International Airport's ''behavior pattern recognition program'' on the grounds that it ''condones'' racial- and ethnic-profiling. The suit alleges that Logan's safety procedures are unconstitutional, and the litigants are asking for monetary damages.

John Reinstein, head of the Massachusetts ACLU, says that the program ''is another unfortunate example'' of how we poor, poor Americans ''are being asked to surrender basic freedoms in the name of security,'' adding, ''[t]his allows the police to stop anyone, any time, for any reason.''

Imagine! In an airport, you could be stopped! At any time! Where, exactly, has Reinstein been hiding for the last three years? Has he not been to an airport? Has he not turned on the TV? Airport employees are completely devoted to stopping passengers. This is their career goal. Everything at an airport, save for the airplanes and the newspaper shops, is designed to stop you from arriving at your gate. Instead of babbling about Logan, Reinstein should visit it.

The ACLU's suit is based on the heartrending story of King Downing, a black man who was briefly detained at Logan in October. When MassPort troopers at the airport asked for Downing's identification, he refused to produce it. That's the story that's making liberals around the country tear-up with disdain for airport safety: law-enforcement officers responsibly demanded ID from a man whom they deemed suspicious-looking, and the suspicious-looking man responded suspiciously.

At the risk of pointing out the blindingly obvious, King Downing is one of the most authentically stupid men in America. If there's one thing I've learned from hanging out in American airports since 9/11, it's that, as a passenger, you Do What You're Told. At New York's JFK last year, a large, belligerent security officer asked for my ID just before I boarded the airplane--which I concluded was based on the recent rash of terrorist attacks foisted on America by skinny WASP boys from California. Needless to say, I was not pleased. But, not in the mood for further inconvenience, I politely complied and got on the plane.

King was neither polite nor compliant. While he was whimpering about the Fourth Amendment--which, strangely, doesn't prohibit police officers from policing--Downing was stealing the valuable time of airport security personnel. Instead of thwarting terrorist attacks, potentially saving American lives, they had to endure a civics lesson from King Downing. (I would mention that taxpayers probably don't want their hard-earned money to be used for these purposes, but that would only be true in places where citizens actually dislike paying taxes.)

Fittingly, King is not merely a concerned citizen. He's no hero of the people. He's the ACLU's national coordinator against racial-profiling. Literally a professional activist, spewing legalistic illogic is his essence. By pretending to be offended, he's made himself the toast of the anti-war left, and it's all at the expense of your safety.

© Copyright 2004 by Isaiah Z. Sterrett

About the Writer: Isaiah Sterrett is a young man from the California coastal area with wide interests, including writing and keeping up with current events and politics. He aspires to one day be an author, columnist, or attorney. Isaiah receives e-mail at dsterrett@earthlink.net


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aclu; airlinesecurity; airport; fourthamendment; logan; privacy; profiling; racialprofiling; security
For an eye-opener on the subject of Logan Airport, and What John "I Have A PLAN" Kerry Knew and When He Knew it, BEFORE 9/11!!!........and what, if anything, he did about the information handed to him, check out Joan Swirsky's NewsMax.com article:

May 27, 2004: Kerry & Company's Homeland Insecurity: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/5/27/101900.shtml

1 posted on 11/17/2004 9:04:02 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I'd sure like to get blown up rather than have to show my id. Thanks, ACLU.


2 posted on 11/17/2004 9:06:17 PM PST by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I am not surprised. I think the ACLU is eventually going to oppose breathing.


3 posted on 11/17/2004 9:09:05 PM PST by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

If someone came up to me and arbitrarily asked for ID - my first reaction is to ask WHY? and I better get a good answer.

Now --- if there were a requirement for EVERYONE to show ID to get on board, then there is no problem.

I do not subject myself to petty dictatorship - that is why I don't fly anymore - I will NOT allow petty thuggery.


4 posted on 11/17/2004 9:09:19 PM PST by steplock (http://www.outoftimeradio.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE




Thanks for the logo Safrguns!

5 posted on 11/17/2004 9:16:42 PM PST by LiberalBassTurds (Islam is a religion of peace. Strange every murdering psychopath in the world is attracted to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
If these scumbags at the ACLU are successful in this intimidation suit, and there is an airport incident anywhere anyone even remotely connected to anyone injured should sue the ACLU for causing the injury. In addition, the ACLU should be indicted for aiding and abetting terrorism.

Since when does even the most stupid of people go to an airport and not be expected to show ID?

6 posted on 11/17/2004 9:34:02 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Dear ACLU:
I have a Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. I don't have a constitutional right to fly in airplanes.

Why is it that I need to go through a background check and waiting period to purchase a firearm, but you feel it is unconstitutional if I am asked a few questions when I fly on an airplane?

7 posted on 11/17/2004 10:33:30 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
I don't have a constitutional right to fly in airplanes.

Sure you do. I think you're looking at the Constitution backwards, i.e., that rights, such as the one to keep and bear arms, are explicitly granted to us.

That is not true. Those are inalienable rights that may not be taken from us. The Constitution defines what the government may do; all other rights are retained by the states or the citizenry. A "right" doesn't have to be granted by the Constitution in order for us to have it. We have the right. The Constitution allows, or prohibits, the government to take it away.

8 posted on 11/18/2004 7:25:15 AM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jammer

Thank you for the civics refresher course. Your right of course.


9 posted on 11/18/2004 7:33:53 AM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson