Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 12/23/2004 10:40:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

XXIII: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1307764/posts



Skip to comments.

Threat Matrix: Daily Terror Threat - Thread Twenty-Two

Posted on 11/17/2004 9:24:29 PM PST by nwctwx

Image Created By : TheCabal
Threat Matrix: Daily Terror Threat
Thread Twenty-Two (Index)

Click to Search
The Threat Matrix

The title refers to a daily report given to the president of the United States detailing the most serious terrorist threats against the country. To tackle those threats, the government has formed a top-notch task force to infiltrate the terror cells and cut off the danger.

"Every morning, the president receives a list of the top ten terrorist threats - this list is known as the threat matrix."

We here at FR are trying to be in conjunction with the daily reports around the world that involve threats. We try to provide a storehouse of information that takes hours of research.

YOU be the judge and get informed!
Threat Matrix - Daily Terrorism Threat

Connect these dots, now
Full Story
"We should have secured the Mexican border."

That could be the pitiful lament we hear from negligent U.S. officials if Al Qaeda pulls off an attack on the United States using weapons of mass destruction smuggled across our southern frontier.

Were that horrendous event to happen, leaders in the administration and Congress would be justly hit with the same question that was perhaps unjustly cast at them and their predecessors after the unprecedented Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: Why didn't they connect the dots?

Related:
Bordering on Nukes?
'Bin Laden has fatwa for nuclear attack'
Jihadists Anticipate Imminent Nuclear Strike Against U.S.

"I will never cower before any master nor bend to any threat."



TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: terror; threat; threatmatrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,101-2,1202,121-2,1402,141-2,160 ... 4,401-4,405 next last
To: JustPiper

"It was not clear what caused the blaze, although several explosions were reported, likely caused by the propane."

I hope there is follow-up for us to read on this incident.


2,121 posted on 12/05/2004 2:38:44 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2097 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

No, I didn't know either.
At this time, though, at least for me;
that was just an interesting tidbit and
nothing more.


2,122 posted on 12/05/2004 2:40:11 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2098 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

Ok.


2,123 posted on 12/05/2004 2:44:09 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2099 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2004/12/004161print.html

December 05, 2004
"Cashing in on Osama"


2,124 posted on 12/05/2004 2:55:12 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2123 | View Replies]

To: All

December 5, 2004

http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?subchannel_id=25&story_id=14712&name=Soldier+threatens+to+blow+up+French+depot

"Soldier threatens to blow up French depot"

ARTICLE SNIPPET: "LILLE, France, Dec 5 (AFP) - A French soldier barricaded himself inside an explosives depot in northern France on Sunday, threatening to blow up the building and forcing the evacuation of hundreds of residents, regional officials said.

"We are trying to make contact with him to find out exactly what his motives are. We believe he was recently told he must take compulsory retirement," an official said."


2,125 posted on 12/05/2004 3:07:39 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2124 | View Replies]

To: All

See something suspicious?
Pick up the phone and call the police.
You do not have to wait for a crime to
actually occur to report it.

The REPORT IT Resource Links:

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.rewardsforjustice.net
http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/contactus


2,126 posted on 12/05/2004 3:33:10 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2125 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

Didn't the 09.11 killers hang out at stripper bars?


2,127 posted on 12/05/2004 4:47:57 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2095 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

On your Los Alamos link I noted this:

http://www.falconview.org


2,128 posted on 12/05/2004 4:53:25 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2070 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
"As a parent you have a right to snoop..."

Snooping should include any possible "secret hiding places" they may have (under dresser drawers, in socks, folded in clothes, under mattresses, etc. etc. etc.). They're generally smart enough to know you might discover what they don't want found :)

2,129 posted on 12/05/2004 5:06:56 PM PST by MamaDearest (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2019 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
Falconview indeed!
2,130 posted on 12/05/2004 5:11:53 PM PST by MamaDearest (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2128 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

Isn't Navarro Spanish? There is some high level spokesman for the Vatican...Joquin - Navarro I think the name is.


2,131 posted on 12/05/2004 5:12:15 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2100 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,140543,00.html

"French Police Nix Terror Training Exercise"


Sunday, December 05, 2004








STORIES




Jet Searched in L.A. for Missing Explosives




ARTICLE SNIPPET: "PARIS — French police on Sunday ended their practice of hiding plastic explosives in air passengers' luggage to train bomb-sniffing dogs after one such bag got lost, possibly ending up on a flight out of Paris' Charles de Gaulle (search) airport.


The luggage that police used Friday for the exercise has yet to turn up. Three flights that arrived in Los Angeles and New York were searched, but it was not found.


And no passenger has contacted French authorities to report the surprise discovery of a bag of nearly five ounces of explosives tucked into his or her suitcase."


2,132 posted on 12/05/2004 5:48:28 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2125 | View Replies]

To: piasa; backhoe; RaceBannon; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog; Shermy; Sabertooth; FairOpinion; Godzilla; ...

FYI. Note: The following text is an exact quote:
===
===


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/12/20041203-9.html

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
December 3, 2004

Executive Order








2004 AMENDMENTS TO THE MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL, UNITED STATES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. (a) Paragraph 4 of the Preamble to Part I of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended by adding a third subparagraph to read as follows:

"The Department of Defense Joint Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice reviews the Manual for Courts-Martial and proposes amendments to the Department of Defense for con-sideration by the President on an annual basis. In conducting its annual review, the JSC is guided by DoD Directive 5500.17, "The Roles and Responsibilities of the Joint Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice." DoD Directive 5500.17 includes provisions allowing public participation in the annual review process."

(b) Department of Defense Directive 5500.17 shall be included as Appendix 26 to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States.

Sec. 2. Part II of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows:

(a) R.C.M. 307(c)(3) is amended to read as follows:

"Specification. A specification is a plain, concise, and definite statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. A specification is sufficient if it alleges every element of the charged offense expressly or by necessary implication. Except for aggravating factors under R.C.M. 1003(d) and R.C.M. 1004, facts that increase the maximum authorized punishment must be alleged in order to permit the possible increased punishment. No particular format is required."

(b) R.C.M. 707(b)(3)(D) is amended to read as follows:

"Rehearings. If a rehearing is ordered or authorized by an appellate court, a new 120-day time period under this rule shall begin on the date that the responsible convening authority receives the record of trial and the opinion authorizing or directing a rehearing. An accused is brought to trial within the meaning of this rule at the time of arraignment under R.C.M. 904 or, if arraignment is not required (such as in the case of a sentence-only rehearing), at the time of the first session under R.C.M. 803."

(c) R.C.M. 707(c) is amended to read as follows:

"(c) Excludable delay. All periods of time during which appellate courts have issued stays in the proceedings, or the accused is absent without authority, or the accused is hospitalized due to incompetence, or is otherwise in the custody of the Attorney General, shall be excluded when determining whether the period in subsection (a) of this rule has run. All other pretrial delays approved by a military judge or the convening authority shall be similarly excluded."

(d) R.C.M. 707(d) is amended to read as follows:

"(d) Remedy. A failure to comply with this rule will result in dismissal of the affected charges, or, in a sentence-only rehearing, sentence relief as appropriate.

"(1) Dismissal. Dismissal will be with or without prejudice to the government's right to reinstitute court-martial pro-ceedings against the accused for the same offense at a later date. The charges must be dismissed with prejudice where the accused has been deprived of his or her constitutional right to a speedy trial. In determining whether to dismiss charges with or without prejudice, the court shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: the seriousness of the offense; the facts and circumstances of the case that lead to dismissal; the impact of a re-prosecution on the administration of justice; and any prejudice to the accused resulting from the denial of a speedy trial.

"(2) Sentence relief. In determining whether or how much sentence relief is appropriate, the military judge shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the accused's demand for speedy trial, and any prejudice to the accused from the delay. Any sentence relief granted will be applied against the sentence approved by the convening authority."

(e) R.C.M. 806(b) is amended to read as follows:

"(b) Control of spectators and closure.

"(1) Control of spectators. In order to maintain the dignity and decorum of the proceedings or for other good cause, the military judge may reasonably limit the number of spectators in, and the means of access to, the courtroom, and exclude specific persons from the courtroom. When excluding specific persons, the military judge must make findings on the record establishing the reason for the exclusion, the basis for the military judge's belief that exclusion is necessary, and that the exclusion is as narrowly tailored as possible.

"(2) Closure. Courts-martial shall be open to the public unless (1) there is a substantial probability that an overriding interest will be prejudiced if the proceedings remain open; (2) closure is no broader than necessary to protect the over-riding interest; (3) reasonable alternatives to closure were considered and found inadequate; and (4) the military judge makes case-specific findings on the record justifying closure."

(f) R.C.M. 916(k)(2) is amended to read as follows:

"(2) Partial mental responsibility. A mental condition not amounting to a lack of mental responsibility under subsection (k)(1) of this rule is not an affirmative defense."

(g) R.C.M. 1103(f)(2) is amended to read as follows:

"(2) Direct a rehearing as to any offense of which the accused was found guilty if the finding is supported by the summary of the evidence contained in the record, provided that the convening authority may not approve any sentence imposed at such a rehearing more severe than or in excess of that adjudged by the earlier court-martial."

(h) The following subsection (iv) is inserted after R.C.M. 1107(e)(1)(B)(iii) to read as follows:

"(iv) Sentence reassessment. If a superior authority has approved some of the findings of guilty and has authorized a rehearing as to other offenses and the sentence, the convening authority may, unless otherwise directed, reassess the sentence based on the approved findings of guilty and dismiss the remaining charges. Reassessment is appropriate only where the convening authority determines that the accused's sentence would have been at least of a certain magnitude had the pre-judicial error not been committed and the reassessed sentence is appropriate in relation to the affirmed findings of guilty."

(i) R.C.M. 1108(b) is amended to read as follows:

"(b) Who may suspend and remit. The convening authority may, after approving the sentence, suspend the execution of all or any part of the sentence of a court-martial, except for a sentence of death. The general court-martial convening authority over the accused at the time of the court-martial may, when taking the action under R.C.M. 1112(f), suspend or remit any part of the sentence. The Secretary concerned and, when designated by the Secretary concerned, any Under Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Judge Advocate General, or commanding officer may suspend or remit any part or amount of the unexecuted part of any sentence other than a sentence approved by the President or a sentence of confinement for life without eligi-bility for parole that has been ordered executed. The Secretary concerned may, however, suspend or remit the unexecuted part of a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole only after the service of a period of confinement of not less than 20 years. The commander of the accused who has the authority to convene a court-martial of the kind that adjudged the sentence may suspend or remit any part of the unexecuted part of any sentence by summary court-martial or of any sentence by special court-martial that does not include a bad-conduct discharge regardless of whether the person acting has previously approved the sentence. The "unexecuted part of any sentence" is that part that has been approved and ordered executed but that has not actually been carried out."

(j) R.C.M. 1305(c) is amended to read as follows:

"(c) Authentication. The summary court-martial shall authenticate the record by signing the original record of trial."

(k) R.C.M. 1306(b)(1) is amended to read as follows:

"(1) Who shall act. Except as provided herein, the convening authority shall take action in accordance with R.C.M. 1107. The convening authority shall not take action before the period prescribed in R.C.M. 1105(c)(2) has expired, unless the right to submit matters has been waived under R.C.M. 1105(d)."

Sec. 3. Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows:

(a) Mil. R. Evid. 103(a)(2) is amended to read as follows:

"(2) Offer of proof. In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the military judge by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked. Once the military judge makes a definitive ruling on the record admitting or excluding evidence, either at or before trial, a party need not renew an objection or offer of proof to preserve a claim of error for appeal. The standard provided in this subdivision does not apply to errors involving requirements imposed by the Constitution of the United States as applied to members of the armed forces except insofar as the error arises under these rules and this subdivision provides a standard that is more advantageous to the accused than the constitutional standard."

(b) Mil. R. Evid. 404(a) is amended to read as follows:

"(a) Character evidence generally. Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except:

"(1) Character of accused. Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same, or if evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the alleged victim of the crime is offered by an accused and admitted under Mil. R. Evid. 404(a)(2), evidence of the same trait of character, if relevant, of the accused offered by the prosecution;

"(2) Character of alleged victim. Evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the alleged victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same, or evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the alleged victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide or assault case to rebut evidence that the alleged victim was an aggressor;

"(3) Character of witness. Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in Mil. R. Evid. 607, 608, and 609."

(c) Mil. R. Evid. 701 is amended to read as follows:

"If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences that are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness, (b) helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and (c) not based in scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702."

(d) Mil. R. Evid. 702 is amended to read as follows:

"If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case."

(e) Mil. R. Evid. 703 is amended to read as follows:

"The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert, at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence in order for the opinion or inference to be admitted. Facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible shall not be disclosed to the members by the proponent of the opinion or inference unless the military judge determines that their probative value in assisting the members to evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect."

(f) Mil. R. Evid. 803(6) is amended to read as follows:

"Records of regularly conducted activity. A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, or by certification that complies with Mil. R. Evid. 902(11) or any other statute permitting certification in a criminal proceeding in a court of the United States, unless the source of the information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness. The term "business" as used in this paragraph includes the armed forces, a business, institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind, whether or not conducted for profit. Among those memoranda, reports, records, or data compilations normally admissible pursuant to this paragraph are enlistment papers, physical examination papers, outline-figure and fingerprint cards, forensic laboratory reports, chain of custody documents, morning reports and other personnel accountability documents, service records, officer and enlisted qualification records, logs, unit personnel diaries, individual equipment records, daily strength records of prisoners, and rosters of prisoners."

(g) The following subsection (11) is inserted after Mil. R. Evid. 902(10) to read as follows:

"(11) Certified domestic records of regularly conducted activity. The original or a duplicate of a domestic record of regularly conducted activity that would be admissible under Mil. R. Evid. 803(6) if accompanied by a written declaration of its custodian or other qualified person, in a manner complying with any Act of Congress or rule prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority, certifying that the record (A) was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of those matters; (B) was kept in the course of the regularly conducted activity; and (C) was made by the regularly conducted activity as a regular practice. A party intending to offer a record into evidence under this paragraph must provide written notice of that intention to all adverse parties, and must make the record and declaration available for inspection sufficiently in advance of their offer into evidence to provide an adverse party with a fair opportunity to challenge them."

(h) Mil. R. Evid. 1102 is amended to read as follows:

"(a) Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply to the Military Rules of Evidence 18 months after the effective date of such amendments, unless action to the contrary is taken by the President.

"(b) Rules Determined Not To Apply. The President has determined that the following Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to the Military Rules of Evidence: Rules 301, 302, 415, and 902(12)."

Sec. 4. Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows:

(a) Paragraph 45(b)(2) is amended by deleting paragraph 45(b)(2)(c) and inserting the following after paragraph 45(b)(2)(b):

"(c)(1) That at the time of the sexual intercourse the person was under the age of 12; or

"(2) That at the time of the sexual intercourse the person had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16."

(b) Paragraph 45(f) is amended to read as follows:

"f. Sample specifications.

"(1) Rape.

"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20 , rape , (a person under the age of 12) (a person who had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16).

"(2) Carnal Knowledge.

"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20 , commit the offense of carnal knowledge with , (a person under the age of 12) (a person who attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16)."

(c) Paragraph 51(b) is amended to read as follows:

"(1) That the accused engaged in unnatural carnal copulation with a certain other person or with an animal.

"(Note: Add any of the following as applicable)

"(2) That the act was done with a child under the age of 12.

"(3) That the act was done with a child who had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16.

"(4) That the act was done by force and without the consent of the other person."

(d) Paragraph 51(f) is amended to read as follows:

"f. Sample specification.

"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on boardlocation) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about _________ 20__, commit sodomy with

, (a child under the age of 12) (a child who had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16) (by force and without the consent of the said )."

(e) Paragraph 57(c)(2)(b) is amended to read as follows:

"(b) Material matter. The false testimony must be with respect to a material matter, but that matter need not be the main issue in the case. Thus, perjury may be committed by giving false testimony with respect to the credibility of a material witness or in an affidavit in support of a request for a continuance, as well as by giving false testimony with respect to a fact from which a legitimate inference may be drawn as to the existence or nonexistence of a fact in issue."

(f) Paragraph 100a(c)(1) is amended to read as follows:

"(1) In general. This offense is intended to prohibit and therefore deter reckless or wanton conduct that wrongfully creates a substantial risk of death or grievous bodily harm to others."

(g) Paragraph 100a(f) is amended to read as follows:

"f. Sample specification.

"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on boardlocation) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20 , wrongfully and (recklessly) (wantonly) engage in conduct, to wit: (describe conduct), conduct likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to __________________."

Sec. 5. These amendments shall take effect 30 days from the date of this order.

(a) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the effective date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the effective date of this order, and any such nonjudicial proceeding, restraint, investi-gation, referral of charges, trial, or other action may proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if these amendments had not been prescribed.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 3, 2004.

# # #


2,133 posted on 12/05/2004 6:18:12 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2132 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Returning Fallujans will face clampdowns

TB becoming drug resistant

Chinese discover substance suppresses cancer cell growth

US-Pakistan deal on F-16's to Islambad discussed again

Russian children victims of pesticide chemical cocktail on fruits

Security tightened on eve of 12th anniversary Babri mosque demolition

Approximately 16,000 Punjab women paid dowrys to foreign men who married them then deserted them and took dowries with them

Brother of slain terrorist arrested in Saudi Arabia

European Muslims and rising ethnic tensions

Jalalabad tribal elders vow not to let coalition forces search their homes

2 Taliban refuse to attend Guantanamo hearings

November 22nd issue of Newsweek banned due to descrecration of Koran and offensiveness to Islam

Russia experiencing invasion of English language

Moroccan children deported by thousands to Cuba

Rafsanjani claims US presence in Iraq inflicts misfortunes on whole Muslim world

SNIP: Airport Security

MOSCOW (AP) -- The State Duma gave preliminary backing Friday to a bill aimed at significantly increasing the security presence at Russia's airports, three months after terrorist bombs downed two civilian aircraft, killing 90 people.

The amendments to the Air Code -- unanimously approved by lawmakers in the first of three readings -- would add a further 3,071 Interior Ministry workers to security at the country's 184 airports.

As well as guarding Russia's airports, police will be able to accompany suspect flights, withhold luggage and cargo, and demand information and documentation from air companies and airport administration. The bill also requires carriers to transfer passengers' ticket data to police.

2,134 posted on 12/05/2004 6:28:18 PM PST by MamaDearest (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2093 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

re: "Stoned to death... "

Great article.

Let's stop the PC tap-dancing around the issue. Let's just call it a religous war and get this party started!

Thanks, Cindy.

sub6


2,135 posted on 12/05/2004 6:54:47 PM PST by subsea06 (A simple guy living in a complicated world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2116 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Prayers UP!
2,136 posted on 12/05/2004 7:37:11 PM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2049 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Thank you ExSoldier.


2,137 posted on 12/05/2004 7:43:37 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2136 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Didn't the 09.11 killers hang out at stripper bars?

Some of them did, and as they were leaving they were heard to make some threatening statements to some of the patrons, along the lines of "Enjoy it while you can." Does anyone remember the exact quote?

2,138 posted on 12/05/2004 7:46:01 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (Couldn't you have stopped shooting at us and watched your baby grow instead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2127 | View Replies]

To: All

ON THE NET...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shahed4pal/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Intifada/
http://intifada2000.jeeran.com/images/intifada-2000.jpg
http://infejar.jeeran.com/Palflag---1.gif


2,139 posted on 12/05/2004 8:14:08 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2136 | View Replies]

To: Quix; All

In Sign of a Thaw, Egypt, Israel Swap Prisoners

By Ken Ellingwood, Times Staff Writer

JERUSALEM -- Egypt released an Israeli man convicted of spying and Israel freed six Egyptian students Sunday in a prisoner swap viewed as a sign of warming relations between the two neighbors.

Azzam Azzam, an Israeli Arab, crossed into Israel from Taba in the Sinai Peninsula after his release by Egyptian authorities. Azzam was sentenced to 15 years in prison after Egypt convicted him in 1997 of spying, a charge Israel steadfastly denied during the seven years it sought his release.

snip

The prisoner swap, kept under wraps until Sunday, is the latest in a series of actions that suggest at least a temporary warming between Israel and Egypt,

snip

In a sign of the apparent conciliation, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak last week offered a warm endorsement of Sharon, urging the Palestinians to work with him as their best chance for achieving peace.

snip

Yet the two countries plan to sign an agreement next week for the creation of special joint Israeli-Egyptian ventures that would manufacture products for export to the United States. Similar operations export textiles from Jordan.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-swap6dec06,0,6033071.story?coll=la-home-headlines


Food for thought...
Isaiah 19
24 In that day Israel will be the third party with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth,

note: Iraq = Geographically, Assyria occupies the northern and middle part of Mesopotamia, situated between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris; while the southern half, extending as far south as the Persian Gulf, constitutes the countries of Babylonia and Chaldea


2,140 posted on 12/05/2004 8:30:41 PM PST by DAVEY CROCKETT (Character exalts Liberty and Freedom, Righteous exalts a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,101-2,1202,121-2,1402,141-2,160 ... 4,401-4,405 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson