|This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.|
|Locked on 12/23/2004 10:40:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:|
Skip to comments.Threat Matrix: Daily Terror Threat - Thread Twenty-Two
Posted on 11/17/2004 9:24:29 PM PST by nwctwx
You know everything I don't ;)
under daily threads, right by the hobbitt hole LOL
When and what?!?!
Another 100,000 doses of flu vaccine are available to doctors, hospitals and private health providers in Chicago, thanks to a national vaccine-redistribution plan.
Bush Comments on Thompson Terror Worries
Why intelligence bill is failing in Congress
Republican opposition wants states to stop providing illegal aliens with driver's licenses
Iran threatens 'Top Secret' counter-attacks
Warns any state that acts against country's nuclear facilities
Many rumors and stories have been floated over the past decade. Some mention one transaction, others mention two as the first set of four reportedly had PALs they could not circumvent and they had to purchase two additional warheads. In any case, if any of the variants are true, whether or not they acquired working weapons, they may have acquired the materials internationally independent of their extensive indigenous program. Also worth noting the dozens if not hundreds of North Korean personnel working inside Iran on missile and possibly nuclear-related projects over the same period.
If any of these rumors have any basis in reality, it begs the question of why Israel has not acted, and what red line could be crossed that would be so intolerable that after living with a secretly nuclear Iran for all this time, they (or we) would be forced to act now.
The 100 million figure probably would result from the use of the entire Israeli arsenal (a couple hundred warheads or so?) in vindictive retaliation after a substantial portion of the Israeli population has been annihilated in a series of WMD strikes. I have no doubt Mecca would be high on that list, but it would be retaliation, not a deterrent to further escalation.
It would be Samson bringing the temple down on all our heads.
Iran paid $25m. for nuclear weapons, documents show
The Jerusalem Post
Friday, April 10, 1998 14 Nisan 5758
By STEVE RODAN (snipped)
JERUSALEM (April 10) - Iran paid $25 million for what appears to have been two tactical atomic weapons smuggled out of the former Soviet Union in a highly classified operation aided by technicians from Argentina, according to Iranian government documents marked top secret and obtained by The Jerusalem Post. The documents, which have been in US government hands for several years and are currently being studied by Israel, contain correspondence between Iranian intelligence officials and those working on Teheran's nuclear program in 1991-92. . . .
Asked about yesterday's Jerusalem Post story claiming that Iran has acquired nuclear weapons from Kazakhstan, State Department spokesman James Rubin said the US believes this is false. The US looked into the matter in 1992, when reports first surfaced, and concluded "there was no evidence to substantiate such claims," he said. "While we remain concerned about Iranian intentions to acquire nuclear weapons capability, we have no information suggesting that Iran is in possession of nuclear warheads acquired from the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan," Rubin said. "But we do believe Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program, and as an organized structure dedicated to acquiring and developing nuclear weapons by seeking the capability to produce both plutonium and highly enriched uranium, which are the critical materials for a nuclear weapon. We are aware of this through a variety of data, including information on Iran's procurement activities that are clearly at variance with a purely peaceful nuclear program," he added. "Our view is that Iran does not have a nuclear weapon and... that they are seeking a nuclear weapons capability. And our view is that this report that Iran received nuclear weapons from Kazakhstan, we have no reason to believe is true."
It is our worst nightmare: A terrorist group builds a nuclear device and smuggles it into a major American city. Could it happen? Unfortunately, experts say yes. Three years after September 11, has the threat of nuclear terrorism grown worse? CNN Presents investigates in this special report.
Airs Sunday, December 5, 8 p.m.
My aikido teacher was one of the initial 10 people sent from Japan to teach aikido in the U.S. I was making great progress in the class. Unfortunately, I decided to teach a microprocessor class and the aikido class met at the same time. Too bad. It was lots of fun.
IMHO though, Iran already has the Nukes
I second that IMHO
2107 see callmejoe posts. The Jerusalem Post is not helping anything.
JERUSALEM (April 10) - Iran paid $25 million for what appears to have been two tactical atomic weapons smuggled out of the former Soviet Union in a highly classified operation aided by technicians from Argentina, according to Iranian government documents marked top secret and obtained by The Jerusalem Post
It would be Samson bringing the temple down on all our heads.
Well said. And it only takes one well equipped Islamic group to cause this to happen. Al Qaida claims to have the capability. Iran certainly will shortly, if they do not already.
If it escalates to this level, the world will go through a period of violence the likes which we have never seen. Anything and everything the Muslims have will be used in short order.
Two things are holding this apocalyptic scenario back, in my opinion. Overall leadership of Islam, and timing.
The Islamic world is not unified under a single leader, and many are vying for this spot. OBL has the potential to unify the conflicting factions, but the Mullahs of Iran and Immans of Saudi Arabia are major contenders. Likewise, the various dictators are not inclined to share power.
The wild card in the leadership equation is the apparent willingness and ability of both Iran and Al Qaida to act, even in the absence of Islamic unity. Perhaps they believe action itself will serve a unifying purpose. As I mentioned in an earlier post, an easy way to start the unification process would be to blow up the Dome of the Rock Mosque. Since this is fully within their control, we could not keep this from occuring. Much of the Muslim world would explode.
Which leaves only the question of timing. For those willing to act even without pre-existing unity, this becomes a strategic question of "when", not "whether".
I am not sure this disaster can be prevented, but we must try. A good start would be the removal of the current government of Iran by the people of Iran themselves. It would also help to find OBL, and blow him into a million pieces.
(Note: To view the graphic containing the letter click on the url.) NOTE: The following text is an exact quote:
December 05, 2004
It appears Hamas is profoundly unhappy with the Al Hagana
And I thought we were getting along so well...
The author seeks to reveal the "true" agenda of Al Hagana, insinuates that we have something to do with the development of computer viruses (because some computer viruses appear to originate in Israel), takes cheap shots at MEMRI and TerrorTracker and Google too (the latter for responding to complaints about anti-semitic sites) and closes with a swipe at New York City (described as a land of "gangs of mafia, pimps and drugs and killers"). He also claims we're in league with the FBI...
Yeah, right. Whatever...
Now, will someone, anyone, please tell me why the official English-language site of Hamas is still hosted in Washington, DC?
Posted by aaron at December 05, 2004 02:26 PM
Note: Please click on the url below for further information:
December 5, 2004
December 04, 2004
"Stoned to death... why Europe is starting to lose its faith in Islam"
By Charles Bremner
Note: The latest edition of INTERNET-HAGANAH.US is now online.
I agree, too.
Interesting and disturbing
JP, I'll take that question.
As I web surf those sites of interest; I'll come across links some of them have and sure enough it's bimbo babes and/or dope on some of those links.
As you know, I abhor porn and would never knowingly go there, but sometimes when link checking -- there you are. The big thing with
them is boobs, long hair, and that string thing they wear as "underwear"
if you know what I mean.
Sorry, this is a distasteful subject so that's all I want to say on this subject.
"It was not clear what caused the blaze, although several explosions were reported, likely caused by the propane."
I hope there is follow-up for us to read on this incident.
No, I didn't know either.
At this time, though, at least for me;
that was just an interesting tidbit and
December 05, 2004
"Cashing in on Osama"
December 5, 2004
"Soldier threatens to blow up French depot"
ARTICLE SNIPPET: "LILLE, France, Dec 5 (AFP) - A French soldier barricaded himself inside an explosives depot in northern France on Sunday, threatening to blow up the building and forcing the evacuation of hundreds of residents, regional officials said.
"We are trying to make contact with him to find out exactly what his motives are. We believe he was recently told he must take compulsory retirement," an official said."
See something suspicious?
Pick up the phone and call the police.
You do not have to wait for a crime to
actually occur to report it.
The REPORT IT Resource Links:
Didn't the 09.11 killers hang out at stripper bars?
On your Los Alamos link I noted this:
Snooping should include any possible "secret hiding places" they may have (under dresser drawers, in socks, folded in clothes, under mattresses, etc. etc. etc.). They're generally smart enough to know you might discover what they don't want found :)
Isn't Navarro Spanish? There is some high level spokesman for the Vatican...Joquin - Navarro I think the name is.
"French Police Nix Terror Training Exercise"
Sunday, December 05, 2004
Jet Searched in L.A. for Missing Explosives
ARTICLE SNIPPET: "PARIS French police on Sunday ended their practice of hiding plastic explosives in air passengers' luggage to train bomb-sniffing dogs after one such bag got lost, possibly ending up on a flight out of Paris' Charles de Gaulle (search) airport.
The luggage that police used Friday for the exercise has yet to turn up. Three flights that arrived in Los Angeles and New York were searched, but it was not found.
And no passenger has contacted French authorities to report the surprise discovery of a bag of nearly five ounces of explosives tucked into his or her suitcase."
FYI. Note: The following text is an exact quote:
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
December 3, 2004
2004 AMENDMENTS TO THE MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL, UNITED STATES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. (a) Paragraph 4 of the Preamble to Part I of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended by adding a third subparagraph to read as follows:
"The Department of Defense Joint Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice reviews the Manual for Courts-Martial and proposes amendments to the Department of Defense for con-sideration by the President on an annual basis. In conducting its annual review, the JSC is guided by DoD Directive 5500.17, "The Roles and Responsibilities of the Joint Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice." DoD Directive 5500.17 includes provisions allowing public participation in the annual review process."
(b) Department of Defense Directive 5500.17 shall be included as Appendix 26 to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States.
Sec. 2. Part II of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows:
(a) R.C.M. 307(c)(3) is amended to read as follows:
"Specification. A specification is a plain, concise, and definite statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. A specification is sufficient if it alleges every element of the charged offense expressly or by necessary implication. Except for aggravating factors under R.C.M. 1003(d) and R.C.M. 1004, facts that increase the maximum authorized punishment must be alleged in order to permit the possible increased punishment. No particular format is required."
(b) R.C.M. 707(b)(3)(D) is amended to read as follows:
"Rehearings. If a rehearing is ordered or authorized by an appellate court, a new 120-day time period under this rule shall begin on the date that the responsible convening authority receives the record of trial and the opinion authorizing or directing a rehearing. An accused is brought to trial within the meaning of this rule at the time of arraignment under R.C.M. 904 or, if arraignment is not required (such as in the case of a sentence-only rehearing), at the time of the first session under R.C.M. 803."
(c) R.C.M. 707(c) is amended to read as follows:
"(c) Excludable delay. All periods of time during which appellate courts have issued stays in the proceedings, or the accused is absent without authority, or the accused is hospitalized due to incompetence, or is otherwise in the custody of the Attorney General, shall be excluded when determining whether the period in subsection (a) of this rule has run. All other pretrial delays approved by a military judge or the convening authority shall be similarly excluded."
(d) R.C.M. 707(d) is amended to read as follows:
"(d) Remedy. A failure to comply with this rule will result in dismissal of the affected charges, or, in a sentence-only rehearing, sentence relief as appropriate.
"(1) Dismissal. Dismissal will be with or without prejudice to the government's right to reinstitute court-martial pro-ceedings against the accused for the same offense at a later date. The charges must be dismissed with prejudice where the accused has been deprived of his or her constitutional right to a speedy trial. In determining whether to dismiss charges with or without prejudice, the court shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: the seriousness of the offense; the facts and circumstances of the case that lead to dismissal; the impact of a re-prosecution on the administration of justice; and any prejudice to the accused resulting from the denial of a speedy trial.
"(2) Sentence relief. In determining whether or how much sentence relief is appropriate, the military judge shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the accused's demand for speedy trial, and any prejudice to the accused from the delay. Any sentence relief granted will be applied against the sentence approved by the convening authority."
(e) R.C.M. 806(b) is amended to read as follows:
"(b) Control of spectators and closure.
"(1) Control of spectators. In order to maintain the dignity and decorum of the proceedings or for other good cause, the military judge may reasonably limit the number of spectators in, and the means of access to, the courtroom, and exclude specific persons from the courtroom. When excluding specific persons, the military judge must make findings on the record establishing the reason for the exclusion, the basis for the military judge's belief that exclusion is necessary, and that the exclusion is as narrowly tailored as possible.
"(2) Closure. Courts-martial shall be open to the public unless (1) there is a substantial probability that an overriding interest will be prejudiced if the proceedings remain open; (2) closure is no broader than necessary to protect the over-riding interest; (3) reasonable alternatives to closure were considered and found inadequate; and (4) the military judge makes case-specific findings on the record justifying closure."
(f) R.C.M. 916(k)(2) is amended to read as follows:
"(2) Partial mental responsibility. A mental condition not amounting to a lack of mental responsibility under subsection (k)(1) of this rule is not an affirmative defense."
(g) R.C.M. 1103(f)(2) is amended to read as follows:
"(2) Direct a rehearing as to any offense of which the accused was found guilty if the finding is supported by the summary of the evidence contained in the record, provided that the convening authority may not approve any sentence imposed at such a rehearing more severe than or in excess of that adjudged by the earlier court-martial."
(h) The following subsection (iv) is inserted after R.C.M. 1107(e)(1)(B)(iii) to read as follows:
"(iv) Sentence reassessment. If a superior authority has approved some of the findings of guilty and has authorized a rehearing as to other offenses and the sentence, the convening authority may, unless otherwise directed, reassess the sentence based on the approved findings of guilty and dismiss the remaining charges. Reassessment is appropriate only where the convening authority determines that the accused's sentence would have been at least of a certain magnitude had the pre-judicial error not been committed and the reassessed sentence is appropriate in relation to the affirmed findings of guilty."
(i) R.C.M. 1108(b) is amended to read as follows:
"(b) Who may suspend and remit. The convening authority may, after approving the sentence, suspend the execution of all or any part of the sentence of a court-martial, except for a sentence of death. The general court-martial convening authority over the accused at the time of the court-martial may, when taking the action under R.C.M. 1112(f), suspend or remit any part of the sentence. The Secretary concerned and, when designated by the Secretary concerned, any Under Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Judge Advocate General, or commanding officer may suspend or remit any part or amount of the unexecuted part of any sentence other than a sentence approved by the President or a sentence of confinement for life without eligi-bility for parole that has been ordered executed. The Secretary concerned may, however, suspend or remit the unexecuted part of a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole only after the service of a period of confinement of not less than 20 years. The commander of the accused who has the authority to convene a court-martial of the kind that adjudged the sentence may suspend or remit any part of the unexecuted part of any sentence by summary court-martial or of any sentence by special court-martial that does not include a bad-conduct discharge regardless of whether the person acting has previously approved the sentence. The "unexecuted part of any sentence" is that part that has been approved and ordered executed but that has not actually been carried out."
(j) R.C.M. 1305(c) is amended to read as follows:
"(c) Authentication. The summary court-martial shall authenticate the record by signing the original record of trial."
(k) R.C.M. 1306(b)(1) is amended to read as follows:
"(1) Who shall act. Except as provided herein, the convening authority shall take action in accordance with R.C.M. 1107. The convening authority shall not take action before the period prescribed in R.C.M. 1105(c)(2) has expired, unless the right to submit matters has been waived under R.C.M. 1105(d)."
Sec. 3. Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows:
(a) Mil. R. Evid. 103(a)(2) is amended to read as follows:
"(2) Offer of proof. In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the military judge by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked. Once the military judge makes a definitive ruling on the record admitting or excluding evidence, either at or before trial, a party need not renew an objection or offer of proof to preserve a claim of error for appeal. The standard provided in this subdivision does not apply to errors involving requirements imposed by the Constitution of the United States as applied to members of the armed forces except insofar as the error arises under these rules and this subdivision provides a standard that is more advantageous to the accused than the constitutional standard."
(b) Mil. R. Evid. 404(a) is amended to read as follows:
"(a) Character evidence generally. Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except:
"(1) Character of accused. Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same, or if evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the alleged victim of the crime is offered by an accused and admitted under Mil. R. Evid. 404(a)(2), evidence of the same trait of character, if relevant, of the accused offered by the prosecution;
"(2) Character of alleged victim. Evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the alleged victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same, or evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the alleged victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide or assault case to rebut evidence that the alleged victim was an aggressor;
"(3) Character of witness. Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in Mil. R. Evid. 607, 608, and 609."
(c) Mil. R. Evid. 701 is amended to read as follows:
"If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences that are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness, (b) helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and (c) not based in scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702."
(d) Mil. R. Evid. 702 is amended to read as follows:
"If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case."
(e) Mil. R. Evid. 703 is amended to read as follows:
"The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert, at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence in order for the opinion or inference to be admitted. Facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible shall not be disclosed to the members by the proponent of the opinion or inference unless the military judge determines that their probative value in assisting the members to evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect."
(f) Mil. R. Evid. 803(6) is amended to read as follows:
"Records of regularly conducted activity. A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, or by certification that complies with Mil. R. Evid. 902(11) or any other statute permitting certification in a criminal proceeding in a court of the United States, unless the source of the information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness. The term "business" as used in this paragraph includes the armed forces, a business, institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind, whether or not conducted for profit. Among those memoranda, reports, records, or data compilations normally admissible pursuant to this paragraph are enlistment papers, physical examination papers, outline-figure and fingerprint cards, forensic laboratory reports, chain of custody documents, morning reports and other personnel accountability documents, service records, officer and enlisted qualification records, logs, unit personnel diaries, individual equipment records, daily strength records of prisoners, and rosters of prisoners."
(g) The following subsection (11) is inserted after Mil. R. Evid. 902(10) to read as follows:
"(11) Certified domestic records of regularly conducted activity. The original or a duplicate of a domestic record of regularly conducted activity that would be admissible under Mil. R. Evid. 803(6) if accompanied by a written declaration of its custodian or other qualified person, in a manner complying with any Act of Congress or rule prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority, certifying that the record (A) was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of those matters; (B) was kept in the course of the regularly conducted activity; and (C) was made by the regularly conducted activity as a regular practice. A party intending to offer a record into evidence under this paragraph must provide written notice of that intention to all adverse parties, and must make the record and declaration available for inspection sufficiently in advance of their offer into evidence to provide an adverse party with a fair opportunity to challenge them."
(h) Mil. R. Evid. 1102 is amended to read as follows:
"(a) Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply to the Military Rules of Evidence 18 months after the effective date of such amendments, unless action to the contrary is taken by the President.
"(b) Rules Determined Not To Apply. The President has determined that the following Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to the Military Rules of Evidence: Rules 301, 302, 415, and 902(12)."
Sec. 4. Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, is amended as follows:
(a) Paragraph 45(b)(2) is amended by deleting paragraph 45(b)(2)(c) and inserting the following after paragraph 45(b)(2)(b):
"(c)(1) That at the time of the sexual intercourse the person was under the age of 12; or
"(2) That at the time of the sexual intercourse the person had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16."
(b) Paragraph 45(f) is amended to read as follows:
"f. Sample specifications.
"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20 , rape , (a person under the age of 12) (a person who had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16).
"(2) Carnal Knowledge.
"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20 , commit the offense of carnal knowledge with , (a person under the age of 12) (a person who attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16)."
(c) Paragraph 51(b) is amended to read as follows:
"(1) That the accused engaged in unnatural carnal copulation with a certain other person or with an animal.
"(Note: Add any of the following as applicable)
"(2) That the act was done with a child under the age of 12.
"(3) That the act was done with a child who had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16.
"(4) That the act was done by force and without the consent of the other person."
(d) Paragraph 51(f) is amended to read as follows:
"f. Sample specification.
"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on boardlocation) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about _________ 20__, commit sodomy with
, (a child under the age of 12) (a child who had attained the age of 12 but was under the age of 16) (by force and without the consent of the said )."
(e) Paragraph 57(c)(2)(b) is amended to read as follows:
"(b) Material matter. The false testimony must be with respect to a material matter, but that matter need not be the main issue in the case. Thus, perjury may be committed by giving false testimony with respect to the credibility of a material witness or in an affidavit in support of a request for a continuance, as well as by giving false testimony with respect to a fact from which a legitimate inference may be drawn as to the existence or nonexistence of a fact in issue."
(f) Paragraph 100a(c)(1) is amended to read as follows:
"(1) In general. This offense is intended to prohibit and therefore deter reckless or wanton conduct that wrongfully creates a substantial risk of death or grievous bodily harm to others."
(g) Paragraph 100a(f) is amended to read as follows:
"f. Sample specification.
"In that (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on boardlocation) (subject-matter jurisdiction data, if required), on or about 20 , wrongfully and (recklessly) (wantonly) engage in conduct, to wit: (describe conduct), conduct likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to __________________."
Sec. 5. These amendments shall take effect 30 days from the date of this order.
(a) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the effective date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.
(b) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the effective date of this order, and any such nonjudicial proceeding, restraint, investi-gation, referral of charges, trial, or other action may proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if these amendments had not been prescribed.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 3, 2004.
# # #
SNIP: Airport Security
MOSCOW (AP) -- The State Duma gave preliminary backing Friday to a bill aimed at significantly increasing the security presence at Russia's airports, three months after terrorist bombs downed two civilian aircraft, killing 90 people.
The amendments to the Air Code -- unanimously approved by lawmakers in the first of three readings -- would add a further 3,071 Interior Ministry workers to security at the country's 184 airports.
As well as guarding Russia's airports, police will be able to accompany suspect flights, withhold luggage and cargo, and demand information and documentation from air companies and airport administration. The bill also requires carriers to transfer passengers' ticket data to police.
re: "Stoned to death... "
Let's stop the PC tap-dancing around the issue. Let's just call it a religous war and get this party started!
Thank you ExSoldier.
Some of them did, and as they were leaving they were heard to make some threatening statements to some of the patrons, along the lines of "Enjoy it while you can." Does anyone remember the exact quote?
In Sign of a Thaw, Egypt, Israel Swap Prisoners
By Ken Ellingwood, Times Staff Writer
JERUSALEM -- Egypt released an Israeli man convicted of spying and Israel freed six Egyptian students Sunday in a prisoner swap viewed as a sign of warming relations between the two neighbors.
Azzam Azzam, an Israeli Arab, crossed into Israel from Taba in the Sinai Peninsula after his release by Egyptian authorities. Azzam was sentenced to 15 years in prison after Egypt convicted him in 1997 of spying, a charge Israel steadfastly denied during the seven years it sought his release.
The prisoner swap, kept under wraps until Sunday, is the latest in a series of actions that suggest at least a temporary warming between Israel and Egypt,
In a sign of the apparent conciliation, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak last week offered a warm endorsement of Sharon, urging the Palestinians to work with him as their best chance for achieving peace.
Yet the two countries plan to sign an agreement next week for the creation of special joint Israeli-Egyptian ventures that would manufacture products for export to the United States. Similar operations export textiles from Jordan.
Food for thought...
24 In that day Israel will be the third party with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth,
note: Iraq = Geographically, Assyria occupies the northern and middle part of Mesopotamia, situated between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris; while the southern half, extending as far south as the Persian Gulf, constitutes the countries of Babylonia and Chaldea
Long interesting read.
A nuclear Iran poses extreme threat to U.S.
Special for The Republic
Dec. 5, 2004 12:00 AM
Armed only with boxcutters, the 19 al-Qaida hijackers on Sept. 11, 2001 killed 3,000 people and caused hundreds of billions of dollars in damage to New York City, the Pentagon and the global economy.
This toll pales in comparison with the damage that would be caused by a nuclear 9/11 a terrorist state or group using a nuclear weapon against the United States or its allies. Detonation of a single small nuclear weapon in a U.S. city such as Phoenix could kill more than 500,000 and cause over $1 trillion in damage.
Irans track record
A nuclear-armed Iran would be extremely dangerous for a number of reasons. Irans hard-line fundamentalist regime continues to blatantly threaten the United States, which it routinely refers to as the Great Satan.
In May, on the first day of its new session, Irans parliament broke into chants of Death to America. At Irans annual military parade in September, a long-range missile had draped over it a banner proclaiming, We will crush America under our feet.
South Korea asks U.S. to aid in hunt for subs
December 06, 2004 ¤Ñ South Korea has requested help from the U.S. Seventh Fleet in searching for submarines that have frequently been detected in the East Sea (Sea of Japan), a Navy official said.
According to a Navy official, "Kim Jong-hwan, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently asked Vice Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert, the commander of the U.S. Seventh Fleet, for aid in maritime patrol activities using P-3C submarine spotter planes." Admiral Greenert reportedly responded positively.
The request for support follows a failed attempt on Oct. 10 by the South Korean Navy to find an unidentified vessel, presumed to be a North Korean submarine, that showed up in the northern-most area of the East Sea.
The Navy official said that North Korea possesses more than 100 submarines.
And the plot thickens some more!
ICCWBO.org: "THE WEEKLY PIRACY REPORT"
US-CERT.gov: "Current Activity"
GCN.com - GOVERNMENT COMPUTER NEWS.com: "Insecure credentials worry states, feds"
By Susan M. Menke
TKB.org: "EARTH LIBERATION FRONT (ELF)"
Bookmark, and Goodnight, all.
Goodnight Little Jeremiah.