Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Katie Couric and John Edwards are disgusting
NBC Today Show | 11/18/04 | Jose Roberto

Posted on 11/18/2004 4:47:02 AM PST by Jose Roberto

Katie Couric supposedly was going to interview Elizabeth Edwards (and John Edwards) about her breast cancer but instead ended up concentrating on that "difficult and disappointing loss" to President Bush. Lightweight John Edwards also said that Bush has "no mandate" and "The election was so close" and he gave up his seat but "will continue to fight to move America forward" implying that Bush will stampede his program to hurt America (I was vomiting violently by this time) . Kouric continued to talk about that loss (I was repulsed by Katie's dramatic emphasis on syllables for effect) while Johnny tried to talk about his "struggle" with his wife's illness. Stay tuned because these people, especially the Old Media, cannot deal with reality and their rejection by the American people


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ambulancechaser; badhairday; hanoijohnny; ichabodcrane; katiehussein; loserman; lurch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2004 4:47:02 AM PST by Jose Roberto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

STFU Edwards. Your wife sang. It's over.


2 posted on 11/18/2004 4:49:11 AM PST by The G Man (The "Red States" ... the world's only hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Sounds like fun

Katie: You must be devastated about your LOSS to President Bush.
John: Yes, the LOSS was hard on us but blahblahblah
Katie: We were all devastated when you LOST

I just love hearing the word.


3 posted on 11/18/2004 4:50:10 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Surely he will sue. After all, it's someone's fault.


4 posted on 11/18/2004 4:50:29 AM PST by Enduring Freedom (Leftist Traitorous Weasels Are NOT 'Progressive' - they are Domestic Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

"...and he gave up his seat..."

You lost your seat. You not only lost your seat, but the voters gave it to the GOP.

The guy is either in denial, or a better liar than PT Barnum.


5 posted on 11/18/2004 4:51:23 AM PST by OpusatFR (If only all the stupid anchorettes and numbskull journobimbos had Condi Rice's brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Edwards said, "Bush has never had a man-date like Kerry and I have."


6 posted on 11/18/2004 4:52:30 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

THE REAL DEAL:

Edwards and Kerry would NOT LET Ms. Edwards get her
growing lump examined BEFORE the election

7 posted on 11/18/2004 4:52:52 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

LOL! good one


8 posted on 11/18/2004 4:53:25 AM PST by William of Orange (from the Netherlands, who are undefeated in wars against France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

That's right, North Carolina had no time for Johhny Lightweight and that is why he "gave up" his seat and now it is in the GOP's hands. Talk about denial!!!

And did you see Ann COulter slam Bob Beckel in "Hannity and Colmes"???? He imploded like Larry O"DOnnell!!!!


9 posted on 11/18/2004 4:54:09 AM PST by Jose Roberto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
"Lightweight John Edwards also said that Bush has "no mandate" and "The election was so close" "

43% mandate.

10 posted on 11/18/2004 4:55:36 AM PST by Rebelbase (Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
I love seeing these losers stomp their feet and cry like children.

BTW, is Katie still wearing her sack-cloth and ashes?

11 posted on 11/18/2004 4:56:24 AM PST by Jackknife (.......Land of the Free,because of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Katie: We were all devastated when you LOST

She acutually said that? Well, at least they make no pretense of journalistic impartiality anymore.

2000 taught us that every vote is important.

2004 taught us that the media is the enemy.

12 posted on 11/18/2004 4:57:01 AM PST by Samwise (This day does not belong to one man but to all. --Aragorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
Beckel had the nerve to call John O'Neil a disgusting liar (or, something equivalent). These people don't know when to let a sleeping dog alone. If they keep it up, they are going to cause something bad enough to turn up, that even Massachusetts will be forced to vote out their lame awol junior senator.
13 posted on 11/18/2004 4:57:31 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
Katie Couric pathetic... and the woman doesn't know absolute truth from absolute vodka. Plain and simple she's an abomination to women, period!
14 posted on 11/18/2004 4:57:39 AM PST by odoso (Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
Stay tuned ...

Why bother? If I wanted to throw up I would use Syrup of Ipecac.

15 posted on 11/18/2004 4:58:17 AM PST by Jeff Gordon (Now is the time for all wise men to gloat. FOUR MORE YEARS,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Perhaps John-Boy might tell us why he and John-John will not release the 45 million dollars they kept and give it back to their supporters....who are demanding it back.


16 posted on 11/18/2004 4:58:25 AM PST by smiley (Watch out Dems! I'm a William F. Buckley Conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Beckel had the nerve to call John O'Neil a disgusting liar

Can't O Neil start suing these people for deformation
17 posted on 11/18/2004 5:01:27 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Samwise

Nah I made that up.

But she might have said it.


18 posted on 11/18/2004 5:01:34 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

I saw that last nite. I am still pissed about it.


19 posted on 11/18/2004 5:03:29 AM PST by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
"will continue to fight to move America forward"

The more these imbeciles "fight to move America forward" the further we backslide!

20 posted on 11/18/2004 5:07:45 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Couric.....making millions with Liberal bias...who watches that crap in the morning????


21 posted on 11/18/2004 5:11:38 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
Katie Couric and John Edwards are disgusting

"...and in other news..."

$hit says it doesn't stink...

Sun rises in East, women & minorities most affected...

Islamazis scream for "tolerance" while cutting off the heads of non-believers...

Gimme-girls and lazt-a$$ inner-city types cry for more welfare/gubmint funds at a noon-time City Hall rally/protest, while wearing more gold than Ft. Knox and getting into their Cadillac Escalade after the protest rally to go home!

22 posted on 11/18/2004 5:12:22 AM PST by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Beckel was disgusting,so was Colmes, these liberals will lie til their dying day.

LOSERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


23 posted on 11/18/2004 5:18:30 AM PST by sweetiepiezer (We stopped Kerry for our grandkids sake!!!!!!!! Thank you America!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase


When did the colors reverse?

TOTALS

Clinton(43.0%) 44,909,326

Bush(37.4%) 39,103,882

Perot(18.9%) 19,741,657

Perot was/is scum...
24 posted on 11/18/2004 5:19:46 AM PST by Time is now (We'll live to see it......or something like it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
2000 taught us that every vote is important.

2004 taught us that the media is the enemy.

Important points to remember for 2006 and 2008!

25 posted on 11/18/2004 5:25:12 AM PST by rocksblues (No more Kerry, no more polls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jakkknife

With her from-the-grave voice ...yakk!


26 posted on 11/18/2004 5:27:22 AM PST by haikim39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

The election was so close. Poor baby. And if a few thousand votes had shifted in OH or some other state and given the victory to Kerry and Edwards, but they still lost the nationwide vote by 3 million, what would they be saying then?? The Dems and the media would be saying of course they have a mandate. That would have been total bull.

I will predict Edwards will do even worse in '08 than Lieberman did this year. Lieberman at least remained visible in the Senate. Edwards will be off the map after January. VP losers rarely seem to get a second chance.


27 posted on 11/18/2004 5:40:20 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Katie is a Komunist!


28 posted on 11/18/2004 5:47:23 AM PST by ladiesview61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Time is now

Re: When did the colors reverse?

I believe that blue used to be the color used for the incumbent. But, the MSM & Republicans used reference to "Red States" so much after the 2000 election that the colors will probably always refer as they did in 2000 & 2004. Coined.


29 posted on 11/18/2004 5:58:46 AM PST by NutmegDevil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Route101

These are the people I won't watch:

msnnbc - none of them.
the network news.
the morning talk shows.
Greta Van Peterson.

I find out what the wackos said on Free Republic. Keeps my blood pressure down, and my televisions don't get broken from me throwing objects at the screen.


30 posted on 11/18/2004 6:36:01 AM PST by wewon (i fought the moderator, and the moderator won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
I will predict Edwards will do even worse in '08 than Lieberman did this year.

And we've already done all the opposition research on the Silky Pony! Sounds good to me.

31 posted on 11/18/2004 6:38:26 AM PST by asgardshill (November 2004 - The Month That Just Kept On Giving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Samwise

Reminds me of Paula Zahn the day after the election. She was asking some Dem hack why Republicans did so well. After the hack's first reply, she then responded, " ...and what else hurt us...eh, I mean Kerry, that is..."


32 posted on 11/18/2004 7:05:51 AM PST by Baytovin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Do you think so? I'd think it would have gotten a few sympathy votes.


33 posted on 11/18/2004 7:08:31 AM PST by tiki (Won one against the Flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Time is now

The color's reversed when the Media leftist's realized they couldn't be called what they really are..."Reds"


34 posted on 11/18/2004 7:16:43 AM PST by Osage Orange (Dems...those unaccountable looking, gargoyle-like scarecrows looking to party, and raid the pantry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

I just looked at my recording of the morning after the election again. I recorded Katie on the Today show, and LAUGHED MY ASS OFF when she looked DEVASTATED, and sounded like she was going to break out and CRY at any minute! All the while, she was TRYING to "bravely" put on a "happy" face and project her trademark "perky" attitude. Liberal LA-OOOOSER!!!


35 posted on 11/18/2004 7:17:11 AM PST by DocH (Release ALL your Navy records AND your private journal Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutmegDevil
I believe that blue used to be the color used for the incumbent.

Uh..if true, I didn't know that.

36 posted on 11/18/2004 7:21:02 AM PST by Osage Orange (5 out of 4 people have a problem with fractions....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

I'm sick of this 'election was close' bs. It wasn't 50K votes, it was 35 million that rejected Kerry/Edwards. That's the real number.


37 posted on 11/18/2004 7:23:12 AM PST by juggernaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
>Katie Couric and John Edwards are disgusting

Need Help with Bic pen (VANITY)

38 posted on 11/18/2004 7:25:54 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juggernaut

"I'm sick of this 'election was close' bs. It wasn't 50K votes, it was 35 million that rejected Kerry/Edwards. That's the real number."

Sorry...I meant 59 Million.


39 posted on 11/18/2004 7:25:54 AM PST by juggernaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

pay no attention to the primedial newscasts


40 posted on 11/18/2004 7:26:27 AM PST by InvisibleChurch (Good ol' Coney Island College. Go WhiteFish. / pay no attention to the primedial newscasts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Time is now
Perot was/is scum...

Just so. You'll also note not a single electoral vote for the scum, the fundamental flaw of third-party Presidential candidates, now and forever (with the exception of George Wallace, who racked up 46 of them back in 1968.)

41 posted on 11/18/2004 7:27:11 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Samwise

Who comprises "We"? Perhaps she has a frog in her designer pocket?


42 posted on 11/18/2004 7:29:56 AM PST by Dionysius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
The guy is either in denial, or a better liar than PT Barnum.

Or a lawyer.

43 posted on 11/18/2004 7:30:44 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Can't O Neil start suing these people for deformation?

Don't you mean defecation?

44 posted on 11/18/2004 7:33:39 AM PST by TChris (You keep using that word. I don't think it means what yHello, I'm a TAGLINE vir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
"Perot was scum"

I, of course, disagree. I also disagree that Nader is scum, or any third party candidate. What these candidates do is keep the 2 parties HONEST. If the republicans start leaning too far to the left, they'll anger a majority of their base (who will stay home), and the fringe lefties and so-called "moderates" will drift to the 3rd party candidate. This means that the party is out of touch, uncommunicative, taking its members for granted. Same goes with Nader and the dems. The dems lost touch with their message and many folks went green in 2001. In 2004, the dems got back on-message and the green party stole less votes. Granted, the dem message sucks, but I'm not talking about the quality of the message, only the ability of the two parties to stick to their guns on things.
45 posted on 11/18/2004 7:42:22 AM PST by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mudblood
What these candidates do is keep the 2 parties HONEST.

Rubbish. What keeps the main parties honest is a balance in the political center of gravity -- that's because unlike quixotic third-party candidates, the majors run for a whole slate of offices, from local to national. Thus, they must compile some kind of overall party philosophy or ideology in order to govern.

The only possible good thing a third party can accomplish is placing some item on the national agenda that otherwise might not receive the attention it deserves. For Wallace in 68, it was "law and order"; for Perot in 92, it was a balanced budget. That's the only real legacy a third party Presidential candidate leaves, and in some cases, they don't leave even that (e.g., John Anderson in '80).

46 posted on 11/18/2004 7:54:35 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
"Rubbish"

3rd party candidates are like prophets - in times of trouble, they rise up and shake castles from the sky, expose various emperors as naked and generally put people in power on notice that we won't tolerate their BS. You can call it rubbish if you'd like, but you do so at your peril.
47 posted on 11/18/2004 8:02:33 AM PST by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mudblood
3rd party candidates are like prophets

Indeed -- see Monty Python's Life of Brian for details.

48 posted on 11/18/2004 8:04:58 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto

Really intersting that cutie-pie Katie, "America's Sweetheart" and her fellow band of sweat-hogs find it necessary to advertise on FOX News and spoil my dinner.


49 posted on 11/18/2004 8:06:55 AM PST by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jose Roberto
Stay tuned because these people, especially the Old Media, cannot deal with reality and their rejection by the American people

If they can't deal with reality, why stay tuned? I'd rather fantasize about Rachael Ray than Katie Couric. That's why my TiVo is set to 30 Minute Meals instead of the Today Show.

50 posted on 11/18/2004 8:08:58 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson