Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Magnetic Bubble Could Protect Astronauts on Long Trips
The Universe Today ^ | 11/16/04 | Nancy Atkinson

Posted on 11/18/2004 6:38:49 PM PST by KevinDavis

Nov 17, 2004 - New research has recently begun to examine the use of superconducting magnet technology to protect astronauts from radiation during long-duration spaceflights, such as the interplanetary flights to Mars that are proposed in NASA’s current Vision for Space Exploration.

(Excerpt) Read more at universetoday.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; radiationshielding; space
I remeber reading a book by Ben Bova.. In his book there is some type of field that protects the astronauts from the solar flares going to the asteroid mining field..
1 posted on 11/18/2004 6:38:49 PM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

2 posted on 11/18/2004 6:39:27 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

This would surely erase all their video tapes!


3 posted on 11/18/2004 6:40:38 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Suppose we solve the Grand Unified Theory and find that magnetism and gravity are related in such as way as to subject to manipulation. Then we could shield the craft and power using one combined magnetic/anti-grav drive.
4 posted on 11/18/2004 6:42:06 PM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Ben Bova was an alien from the future and just describing what to him was (is? will be?) current technology...


5 posted on 11/18/2004 6:42:49 PM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Maybe the charged particles, but not the neutrons and gamma rays.


6 posted on 11/18/2004 6:43:32 PM PST by Diogenesis ("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Cool! Force field technology!


7 posted on 11/18/2004 6:43:39 PM PST by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

8 posted on 11/18/2004 6:43:50 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

9 posted on 11/18/2004 6:44:16 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Supercondutors are the single most worthwile endeavor for scientists. If we developed a room temperature superconductor the effects would be profound.
Having said that, the government throwing money at it is not the answer. A few million here and there to help ease the burden on a few scientists, but no Manhattan style project, or Big Dig project.
10 posted on 11/18/2004 6:45:38 PM PST by ProudVet77 (Just say NO to blue states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Next you'll be telling me they're using di-lithium crystals and tachyon beams.


11 posted on 11/18/2004 6:46:46 PM PST by oldsalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

BTTT


12 posted on 11/18/2004 6:48:18 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Now if they could just get it off the refrigerator they'd be in business.


13 posted on 11/18/2004 6:48:44 PM PST by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

So you can live in a bubble.


14 posted on 11/18/2004 6:50:43 PM PST by myvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Raising shields?


15 posted on 11/18/2004 6:52:50 PM PST by dts32041 (bortaS bIr jablu'DI' reH QaQqu' nay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Suppose we solve the Grand Unified Theory and find that magnetism and gravity are related in such as way as to subject to manipulation. Then we could shield the craft and power using one combined magnetic/anti-grav drive."

Soon to be released as a feature of Microsoft Office 2005.

16 posted on 11/18/2004 6:55:05 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
This would surely erase all their video tapes!

I don't wanna watch video tapes! I want a window seat. :-)

17 posted on 11/18/2004 6:55:16 PM PST by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

And credit cards...it would ruin them. " I've got a bad feeling about this."


What ever happened to the Wave Motion Engine from Star Blazers ?


18 posted on 11/18/2004 6:56:41 PM PST by JediForce (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Maybe the charged particles, but not the neutrons and gamma rays.

Yep. Don't through out your old fashioned barrier technologies yet. I heard one plan were the craft would be double-hulled and filled with water.

19 posted on 11/18/2004 6:56:44 PM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

"Force field technology!"
We already have it. Don't lefties refer to the right as "forces of darkness"? Well, that's it. Right here, on FR, there is "darkness force" field, and all of us are quanta of it.


20 posted on 11/18/2004 6:59:15 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
...but not the neutrons and gamma rays.

Well, for the neutrons, I believe one proposal is to use the liquid hydrogen fuel -- while
it lasts -- as shielding.

I think I read that the density of said atoms is higher than lead, AND there are no nasty
neutrons to get butted around by cosmic particles.

21 posted on 11/18/2004 7:00:38 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I wouldn't think of going on a long trip without my magnetic bubble, and I'm not even an astronaut.


22 posted on 11/18/2004 7:02:25 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Maybe the charged particles, but not the neutrons and gamma rays.

The gamma rays are negligible and the neutrons are non-existent. The real threat to the astronauts is the possibility of a solar flare.

23 posted on 11/18/2004 7:04:25 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

More dangerous than that inane tapping sound?


24 posted on 11/18/2004 7:10:55 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

ping


25 posted on 11/18/2004 7:45:09 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Let's see . . . do I want to go hurtling though the comos trusting my life to a MicroSoft application? Uhhhh . . . . mmmmmm . . .


26 posted on 11/19/2004 7:43:35 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Magnetic Bubble Could Protect Astronauts on Long Trips

Nov 17, 2004 - New research has recently begun to examine the use of superconducting magnet technology to protect astronauts from radiation during long-duration spaceflights, such as the interplanetary flights to Mars that are proposed in NASA’s current Vision for Space Exploration.

The principal investigator for this concept is former astronaut Dr. Jeffrey Hoffman, who is now a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Hoffman’s concept is one of 12 proposals that began receiving funding last month from the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC). Each gets $75,000 for six-months of research to make initial studies and identify challenges in developing it. Projects that make it through that phase are eligible for as much as $400,000 more over two years.

The concept of magnetic shielding is not new. As Hoffman says, “The Earth has been doing it for billions of years!” Earth’s magnetic field deflects cosmic rays, and an added measure of protection comes from our atmosphere which absorbs any cosmic radiation that makes its way through the magnetic field. Using magnetic shielding for spacecraft was first proposed in the late 1960’s and early 70’s, but was not actively pursued when plans for long-duration spaceflight fell by the wayside.

However, the technology for creating superconducting magnets that can generate strong fields to shield spacecraft from cosmic radiation has only recently been developed. Superconducting magnet systems are desirable because they can create intense magnetic fields with little or no electrical power input, and with proper temperatures they can maintain a stable magnetic field for long periods of time. One challenge, however, is developing a system that can create a magnetic field large enough to protect a bus-sized, habitable spacecraft. Another challenge is keeping the system at temperatures near absolute zero (0 degrees Kelvin, -273 C, -460 F), which gives the materials superconductive properties. Recent advances in superconducting technology and materials have provided superconductive properties at higher than 120 K (-153 C,
-243 F).

There are two types of radiation that need to be addressed for long-duration human spaceflight, says William S. Higgins, an engineering physicist who works on radiation safety at Fermilab, the particle accelerator near Chicago, IL. The first are solar flare protons, which would come in bursts following a solar flare event. The second are galactic cosmic rays, which, although not as lethal as solar flares, they would be a continuous background radiation to which the crew would be exposed. In an unshielded spacecraft, both types of radiation would result in significant health problems, or death, to the crew.

The easiest way to avoid radiation is to absorb it, like wearing a lead apron when you get an X-ray at the dentist. The problem is that this type of shielding can often be very heavy, and mass is at a premium with our current space vehicles since they need to be launched from the Earth’s surface. Also, according to Hoffman, if you use just a little bit of shielding, you can actually make it worse, because the cosmic rays interact with the shielding and can create secondary charged particles, increasing the overall radiation dose.

Hoffman foresees using a hybrid system that employs both a magnetic field and passive absorption. “That’s the way the Earth does it,” Hoffman explained, “and there’s no reason we shouldn’t be able to do that in space.”

One of the most important conclusions to the second phase of this research will be to determine if using superconducting magnet technology is mass effective. “I have no doubt that if we build it big enough and strong enough, it will provide protection,” Hoffman said. “But if the mass of this conducting magnet system is greater than the mass just to use passive (absorbing) shielding, then why go to all that trouble?”. But that’s the challenge, and the reason for this study. “This is research,” Hoffman said. “I’m not partisan one way or the other; I just want to find out what’s the best way.”

Assuming Hoffman and his team can demonstrate that superconducting magnetic shielding is mass effective, the next step would be doing the actual engineering of creating a large enough (albeit lightweight) system, in addition to the fine-tuning of maintaining magnets at ultra-cold superconducting temperatures in space. The final step would be to integrate such a system into a Mars-bound spacecraft. None of these tasks are trivial.

The examinations of maintaining the magnetic field strength and the near-absolute zero temperatures of this system in space is already occurring in an experiment that is scheduled to be launched to the International Space Station for a three-year stay. The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) will be attached to the outside of the station and search for different types of cosmic rays. It will employ a superconducting magnet to measure each particle’s momentum and the sign of its charge. Peter Fisher, a physics professor also from MIT works on the AMS experiment, and is cooperating with Hoffman on his research of superconducting magnets. A graduate student and a research scientist are also working with Hoffman.

NIAC was created in 1998 to solicit revolutionary concepts from people and organizations outside the space agency that could advance NASA's missions. The winning concepts are chosen because they "push the limits of known science and technology," and “show relevance to the NASA mission,” according to NASA. These concepts are expected to take at least a decade to develop.

Hoffman flew in space five times and became the first astronaut to log more than 1,000 hours on the space shuttle. On his fourth space flight, in 1993, Hoffman participated in the first Hubble Space Telescope servicing mission, an ambitious and historic mission that corrected the spherical aberration problem in the telescope's primary mirror. Hoffman left the astronaut program in 1997 to become NASA’s European Representative at the US Embassy in Paris, and then went to MIT in 2001.
Hoffman knows that to make a space mission possible, there’s a lot of idea development and hard engineering which precedes it. “When it comes to doing things in space, if you’re an astronaut, you go and do it with your own hands,” Hoffman said. “But you don’t fly in space forever, and I still would like to make a contribution.” Does he see his current research as important as fixing the Hubble Space Telescope? “Well, not in the immediate sense,” he said. “But on the other hand, if we ever are going to have a human presence throughout the solar system we need to be able to live and work in regions where the charged particle environment is pretty severe. If we can’t find a way to protect ourselves from that, it will be a very limiting factor for the future of human exploration.”


27 posted on 03/09/2005 7:11:36 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson