Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Final)
11-19-04 | Always Right

Posted on 11/19/2004 2:02:09 AM PST by Always Right

Updates:

11-19 Update:  By now you are all aware the Specter has the support of the nine current GOP members of the Judiciary Committee which will be more than enough to secure his position as Chairman.  I know many of you are disappointed and perhaps angry at the loss, but don't be.  This battle was not about Specter being chairman, this battle was about laying the groundwork so that good legislation would get pass and conservative judicial nominees would get confirmed.  From that perspective, I think we scored huge and important victories:

1. The Senate is on Notice.  Senator Graham noted that he received more calls on this than any issue since Clinton's impeachment.  Reports from other Senator offices note the same.  We have been heard loud and clear.

2.  Specter has been Neutered.  With Specter's statements and promises to every GOP Senator and to the public, it will be very difficult and politically impossible for Specter to unilaterally bottle up legislation or shelf judicial nominees.  If Specter goes back on his word, there will be enormous outrage and sufficient cause to remove him from the judiciary.  Who Chairs each committee and which members serve on each committee is determine by majority party rules, so there are solutions to Specter should he should become a problem.

3.  New Judiciary Members will be Conservative.  I think I am extremely safe in saying that the one or two additional GOP appointment to the Judiciary Panel will be conservative.  If Frist and Santorum mess this up, they deserved to be shot and killed on the spot.

4.  'Nuclear Option' is Viable.  My feeling was that the Senate had never really considered this as a viable option, but now I have heard numerous Senators, including Frisk, talk about changing the Senate cloture rules.  The so-called 'nuclear option'  would limit the use of filibusters to legislation only, so filibusters could not be used against judicial nominations.  This is an extremely positive development and will only require 51 votes.  The biggest disappointment is that Frist may only resort to this on Supreme Court nominees.  We need this option alive for all nominees.

5.  We still have 55 GOP Senators.  So we have extracted our pound of flesh from Specter and we have focused the Senate on getting judges confirmed, all while keeping our Senate majority firmly in tact.  Sure there are 3-4 RINOs and few other unreliables, but we made our point and haven't really lost anything. 

I know there are many naysayers out there who believe Republican Senators are a bunch of spineless wimps, which is true to an extent.  However, I really think this effort has empowered conservative Senators to act conservative.  So before everyone condemns the Senate, don't do so prematurely.  Let's judge the real results, the judges and the legislation.  I am very optimistic that we may have apparently lost this battle, but are on the way to winning the war.  In the end, this may have been the best possible outcome.

So let's remember folks, we control the White House, the House of Representatives, and well, we are working on the  Senate.  But this is the best position conservatives have ever been in.  So let's not get all negative and doom and gloom.  Let's get busy.

Allies:

Thomas Sowell, Laura Ingraham, Grassroots.PA, Coalition for a Fair Judiciary, Stop Specter Now!, National Right to Life Committee, NRO - The Corner, The Conservative Voice, Focus on the Family

Confused Conservatives:

Hugh Hewitt

Petitions on the Web:

We Want a Strong Leader on the Senate Judiciary Committee - GOPUSA

"New Pro-Abortion Senate Judiciary Chair?" - Voices Heard

Arlen Specter MUST NOT become Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. - nospecter

Pull chair out from under RINO Arlen Specter - Conservative Petitions

 Petition to Republican Senators Opposing the Election of Senator Arlen Specter - AFA

THE FAIR JUDICIARY OATH - Coalition for Fair Judiciary

On-line Petition - gopwing.com

Latest News Stories:

NEW! Specter Effectively Wins Senate Judiciary Chair - Reuters 11-18-04

NEW! Republicans on Senate Judiciary Panel Endorse Specter as Chair Bloomberg 11-18-04

NEW! Specter secures judiciary chairmanship after issuing statement The Philadelphia Inquirer 11-18-04

Pro-choice Specter faces GOP test Chicago Trib 11-15

Frist withholds Specter support Washington Times, 11-15

NY Times: Frist Sees Hurdles for Specter NYT 11-14

For Specter, a Showdown Over Judiciary Chairmanship Washington Post 11-14

The Specter Campaign National Review 11-11

Focus on the Family ups effort to block Specter Rocky Mountain News 11-11

Embattled Specter upset at HRC snub NY Blade 11-12

As Specter seeks a chairmanship, it's payback time for conservatives Phily Inquirer 11-12

An ominous Specter: Part III Thomas Sowell 11-12

Specter's voting record Washington Times, 11-11

Specter asks to appeal to peers  AP via Washington Times 11-11

Specter sees 'a battle for balance in the Republican Party' Philly Inquirer 11-11

An ominous Specter: Part II Thomas Sowell 11-10

Specter Seeks Meeting with Fellow Republicans  - Reuters 11-10

An ominous Specter - Thomas Sowell 11-10

Specter Still Not in the Clear - Fox News 11-9

Spat over Specter may be subsiding - Pittsburg Post-Gazette 11-9

Conservatives target Specter - Washington Times 11-9

 GOP Senators Struggle with Specter Chairmanship Focus on the Family 11-9

 Under Fire, Specter Gets Only Tepid White House Support NY Times 11-9

Why the Specter flap matters - Boston Globe 11-9

The Left's View on Specter - Limbaugh 11-9

Specter Campaign Crumbling - Human Events 11-8

Senate Chairmanship in Question for Specter - NPR 11-8

Specter blunders on Roe vs. Wade - Chicago Tribune (Novak) 11-8

Specter Opponents Pressing Senate Leaders - AP 11-8

A Specter of Trouble - OpinionEditorials 11-8

Specter: "I not only voted against Bork, I led the charge aGrassroots PAgainst him." - Grassroots.PA 11-7

Specter says he won't slow anti-abortion court nominees - CNN 11-7

Arlen Specter - "Bork" Him - Intellectual Conservative 11-6

Judges Following No Law (why Arlen Specter must go) - ****Robert Bork, 8-12-04

Keep Arlen Specter off chair of Judiciary Committee! - WND 11-6

Who's spinning? Specter or reporter? - WND 11-5

All eyes on Sen. Specter - Washington Times 11-5

Conservative wing raises fuss over Specter's views - New York Times 11-5

Specter faces battle for Judiciary chair - Washington Times 11-5

Sen. Specter Ignites Firestorm of Opposition - NewsMax 11-5

Suffering Specter - Pittsburg Tribune Review 11-5

Specter's Remarks Trigger Protest - Focus on the Family 11-5

Lawmaker wants Grassley on judiciary panel - Des Moines Register 11-5

Specter 'Borked' Himself from Senate Judiciary Committee - Concerned Women for America 11-5

Pro-Life Pray-In Planned to Stop Specter - CNSNEWS 11-5

Will Specter Chair Judiciary? - Human Events 11-5

Thank You, Arlen - National Review 11-3

GOP Sen. Specter Vows to Block Bush's Nominees - NewsMax 10-29

The Northeastern Liberal (Kerry and Specter, two peas in a pod.) - Evan-Novak 3-11-04

Background:

Actual Transcript of News Conference Wherein Specter Threatens Bush's Judicial Nominees

Specter's "Clarification" of his Threats to Pres. Bush's Judicial Nominees

Another Soros Specter Connection (The Bush-Soros Pick)

SPECTER SLAMS CONSERVATIVES IN CAMPAIGN LETTER, ATTACKS PRO-LIFERS, CHRISTIANS

Senate Judiciary Committee .

Contact Information:

Bill Frist:  E-mail:  senator.frist@senate.gov
461 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON DC 20510
PHONE: (202) 224-3344
Web Form (Email his office): http://www.frist.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=AboutSenatorFrist.ContactForm

Contact Information for all Senators

Sen. Orrin Hatch, UT, current Committee Chair PH: 202-224-5251 FX: 202-224-6331

Sen. Jon Kyl, AZ PH: 202-224-4521 FX: 202-224-2207

Sen. John Cornyn, TX PH: 202-224-2934 FX: 202-228-2856

Sen. Charles Grassley, IA PH: 202-224-3744 FX: 319-363-7179

Sen. Mike DeWine, OH PH: 202-224-2315 FX: 202-224-6519

Sen. Jeff Sessions, AL PH: 202-224-4124 FX: 202-224-3149

Sen. Lindsey Graham, SC PH: 202-224-5972 FX: 202-224-3808

Sen. Larry Craig, ID PH: 202-224-2752 FX: 202-228-1067

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, GA PH: 202-224-3521 FX: 202-224-0103

Homepages of Judiciary Committe Members:

Orrin Hatch   Chuck Grassley     Jon Kyl    Mike DeWine    Jeff Sessions     Lindsey Graham    Larry Craig    Saxby Chambliss    John Cornyn    Arlen Specter

Media Contacts:
Special@foxnews.com; rush@eibnet.com; hannity@foxnews.com; editor@weeklystandard.com; beltwayboys@foxnews.com; tblankley@washingtontimes.com; jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com; gpierce@washingtontimes.com; jseper@washingtontimes.com; Templar119@aol.com; malkin@comcast.net; letters@charleskrauthammer.com; ben@cspc.org; adams_mike@hotmail.com; ballen@t3energy.com; greg@therightbalance.org; VAlpher@aol.com; friends@atr.org; ruddy@spectator.org; editor@spectator.org; rjbacak@sbcglobal.net; online.editors@barrons.com; me@glennbeck.com; carol@carolbernhard.com; jennifer.biddison@heritage.org; kotta@foxnews.com; briankbodine@yahoo.com; jimbohannon@1050wevd.com; JeffBolton@woai.com; wackerma@bowdoin.edu; chrisb@unt.edu; erniebrown@americaatnight.com; bucc@bucknellconservatives.org; calpundit@cox.net; chairman@cyr.org; joshcampbell@mail.utexas.edu; info@capitolhillblue.com; castellanopj@earthlink.net; charles@littlegreenfootballs.com; bobcole@clearchannel.com; cn@isi.org; letters@commentarymagazine.com; lauren.conner@bba02.bus.utexas.edu; dj@flipsideshow.com; copleyd@wharton.upenn.edu; tom@anncoulter.org; info@collegegop.org; cugop@colorado.edu; crider@mail.utexas.edu;
hill2@cp.chemeketa.edu; j0annaz@yahoo.com; rcuster@yaf.org; pundit@dailypundit.com; lukerval@hotmail.com; davidson@collegegop.org; txtau@yahoo.com; holiday.dmitri@foxnews.com; sara@studentsforacademicfreedom.org; larry@larryelder.com; tpelia@yahoo.com; elizabeth@cspc.org; cfennell@ucsd.edu; mfinch@cspc.org; sarahfloerke@mail.com; rforest@ev1.net; rachelzfriedman@yahoo.com; mike@mikeonline.com; cdganske@yahoo.com; bubbgarcia@yahoo.com; ggermany@austin.rr.com; presACG@aol.com; lynn.gibson@heritage.org; giselarm@san.rr.com; jglazov@rogers.com; fgonzalez@isi.org; opeds@gopusa.com; redshift_7@yahoo.com; MJGriffing@hotmail.com; frn@freeper.org; bac@compuserve.com; michaelh@ductape.net; Hannity@aol.com; khart@crnc.org; johnhawkins@rightwingnews.com; roger@rogerhedgecock.com; jchenry_628@mail.utexas.edu; hhewitt@hughhewitt.com; holco004@mailhost1.csusm.edu; suggestions@lauraingraham.com; pundit@instapundit.com; feedback@intellectualconservative.com; Rollye@rollye.net; calidawl217@yahoo.com; niucrchair@yahoo.com; amw@judgemendozawaterhouse.com; rdj@mail.utexas.edu; gk3385@yahoo.com; kfir@protestwarrior.com; kinghorn1836@yahoo.com; becky@becky4congress.com; pklinkne@hamilton.edu; dks@wava.com; comments.kurtz@nationalreview.com; JCL159522@yahoo.com; lars@larslarson.com; mark@marklarson.com; jleo@usnews.com; binghamtonreview@yahoo.com
 

Previous Threads:

Priority 1: Remove Specter from Judiciary (Thread 1)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judciary (Day 2)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 3)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 4)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 5)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 6)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 7)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 8)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 9)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Days 10-12)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 13)



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: specter; specterisasnake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last
Thanks everyone for an outstanding effort, your efforts were not in vain. There are several very positive developments. We have laid important groundwork and I see nothing but good coming from all this.
1 posted on 11/19/2004 2:02:10 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The thanks is to you! I appreciated your motivation and initiative to keep me moving.

I personally feel that Specter will have to watch himself from here on, he certainly must be aware he will be in the spotlight for some time to come.

Our GOP Senators are also waking to the fact that WE are watching how they conduct themselves and that they will be treated accordingly.

It's not discouraging at all. It was a wake up call to the Senate, and they know it.
2 posted on 11/19/2004 2:08:45 AM PST by borntobeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I really hope your correct, but Chambliss has lost any future vote from me in any case.

I'll not vote for Frist either.

Spineless Republican leadership is leadership we don't need.


3 posted on 11/19/2004 2:12:33 AM PST by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The question remains.... why keep Specter in the first place?

Any idea why they were so hell-bound-for-leather to allow him to keep the chair?

4 posted on 11/19/2004 2:14:04 AM PST by Ready4Freddy (Carpe Sharpei !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: borntobeagle

Ditto on the BIG thanks to you AlwaysRight for all your efforts. You inspired us to act - and act we did! While I'm not happy Specter is Chair, I do believe the fear of G*D was put in him. The GOP mobilized us for the campaign, now we have the structure in place to hold our representatives responsible - AND WE WILL.


5 posted on 11/19/2004 2:15:07 AM PST by Elkiejg (The Democratic Party is no longer the party of H.S. Truman & Zell Miller - their loss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Any idea why they were so hell-bound-for-leather to allow him to keep the chair?

The Seniority rules in the Senate are a sacred cow. While the House has on occasion bypassed Seniority rules for Chairman positions, the Senate never has. It doesn't make sense, just the way the Senate always operates.

6 posted on 11/19/2004 2:20:26 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

My computer ate my ping list. I think I have a copy at my office, but it probably doesn't have a few late additions.


7 posted on 11/19/2004 2:26:12 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; bobo1; GeronL; lminchi; Dems_R_Losers; paul in cape; mickie; Poser; HiTech RedNeck; ...

Specter is a snake ping. Thanks all for your effort.


8 posted on 11/19/2004 2:29:03 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Add Peggy Noonan to your list of "confused conservatives".

You are correct, we are in good shape, but we must not sit back and relax. The left has been on a 40 year crusade to destroy this country, their actions since the election show that they do not feel discouraged, they intend to fight on. We have gained considerable ground, but we too must resolve to fight on.


9 posted on 11/19/2004 2:30:41 AM PST by jocon307 (Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

A perhaps minor point; NRO *as a whole* has been opposed to Specter, not just the corner...


10 posted on 11/19/2004 2:33:30 AM PST by swilhelm73 (Dowd wrote that Kerry was defeated by a "jihad" of Christians...Finally a jihad liberals oppose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
You are correct, we are in good shape, but we must not sit back and relax.

Absolutely.

The left has been on a 40 year crusade to destroy this country, their actions since the election show that they do not feel discouraged

I have no doubt the left will still fight hard, but I do think they are demoralized. I have never heard so much silence from the left as I have in the past couple of weeks.

11 posted on 11/19/2004 2:37:01 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

That's true. NRO has put out some of the best articles on the subject.


12 posted on 11/19/2004 2:37:53 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Heculean effort.....but I think Specter is in..it's a done deal.


13 posted on 11/19/2004 2:48:46 AM PST by stylin19a (the smell of success is a mixture of cordite and rotting bodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Heculean= Herculean


14 posted on 11/19/2004 2:49:55 AM PST by stylin19a (the smell of success is a mixture of cordite and rotting bodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Thanks you for the kind comment. I am aware that Specter is pretty much a done deal, that's why this was the 'final' post on this.


15 posted on 11/19/2004 2:53:08 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Specter, from now on will do our bidding. How he got through the primaries, the election and then this firestorm is beyond me though.


16 posted on 11/19/2004 3:05:46 AM PST by Moderate right-winger (We won 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger
Specter, from now on will do our bidding.

I don't believe that. Specter is on a short lease and won't obstruct, but I expect Specter to oppose Bush on some key appointments.

17 posted on 11/19/2004 3:10:50 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Thanks everyone. We have had great response on these threads. 135 comments on day 1, 285 comments on day 2, 183 on day 3, 104 on day 4, 137 on day 5, 70 on day 6, 90 on day 7, 74 on day 8, 90 on day 9, and 119 on the last two. So about 1300 comments in all.


18 posted on 11/19/2004 3:39:45 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I think the effort has put the Senate Republicans on notice and they in turn have Specter much more a partner than he would be as a pouting non chairman..The dems will,of course, do all the obstructing they can.


19 posted on 11/19/2004 3:54:45 AM PST by MEG33 ( Congratulations President Bush!..Thank you God. Four More Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: borntobeagle

"It was a wake up call to the Senate, and they know it."

The big wake up call was when South Dakota dumped Daschle. The democrats heard that one loud and clear.


20 posted on 11/19/2004 4:03:19 AM PST by chainsaw ( ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
In supporting Specter my Republican Judiciary Committee member has unquestionably gone against the overwhelming majority of his constituents.

Am I wrong to at least expect him to give us an explanation and some degree of personal assurance that he will assume responsibility if Specter fails to get our nominees confirmed?

21 posted on 11/19/2004 4:12:54 AM PST by bayourod (Specter's litmus test : "No Christian Judges")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Am I wrong to at least expect him to give us an explanation and some degree of personal assurance that he will assume responsibility if Specter fails to get our nominees confirmed?

Nope, he should justify his position and take responsibility for it. You should call his office and ask the Senator to publicly explain his position so he is on record. Tell them you are disappointed with his decision, but be polite and ask for a public explaination.

22 posted on 11/19/2004 4:21:43 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I agree with your assessment. Now, if only conservatives would coalesce around candidates the same way, it would have a similar impact. This will become extremely important when the globalists try to impose Rudy or McCain on us when Hillary runs in '08.
23 posted on 11/19/2004 4:22:05 AM PST by Nephi (AIDS: The disease originally known as GRIDS (Gay Related Immune Deficiency Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
This will become extremely important when the globalists try to impose Rudy or McCain on us when Hillary runs in '08.

I am very concerned with the way McCain and Hillary are positioning themselves, it could very well come down to a race between those two phonies. I would take Rudy over McCain, just because I think Rudy is genuine and McCain is unstable eventhough McCain has a more conservative background. As of now, 2008 does not look good for getting a conservative into the White House. Can we somehow reincarnate Dan Quayle from his political death?

24 posted on 11/19/2004 4:28:19 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I will vote third party before I will vote for a liberal like Rudy for president.


25 posted on 11/19/2004 4:30:43 AM PST by Nephi (AIDS: The disease originally known as GRIDS (Gay Related Immune Deficiency Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Hope it IS the final post on this. That means specter is doing the job. Bookmarked...just in case.

thanx again...great effort.


26 posted on 11/19/2004 4:38:34 AM PST by stylin19a (the smell of success is a mixture of cordite and rotting bodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Excellent campaign and summary!


27 posted on 11/19/2004 4:51:55 AM PST by Ed_in_NJ (Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I think we scared the you know what out of Specter. He won't be putting up much resistance to conservative appointments now. If he wants to keep his seat next election, he will support the President.


28 posted on 11/19/2004 4:53:24 AM PST by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

It was fun while it lasted...


29 posted on 11/19/2004 5:04:49 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
I think we scared the you know what out of Specter. He won't be putting up much resistance to conservative appointments now. If he wants to keep his seat next election, he will support the President.

Specter will be somewhat a good soldier for the next couple of years. But Specter is getting old and I don't think he is too concerned with next election. The biggest problem with letting Specter be chairmen, will be in years 2-4. This fiasco will be forgotten and Specter will be himself agian.

30 posted on 11/19/2004 5:06:01 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
It was fun while it lasted...

Don't worry, soon we will be worried about real issues and real appointments. That is when the real fun will begin.

31 posted on 11/19/2004 5:07:23 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: clee1
I really hope your correct, but Chambliss has lost any future vote from me in any case. I'll not vote for Frist either.

You don't vote in two different states, do you, as in "I voted in Georgia before I voted in Tennessee"? :-) I assume you mean that if you happen to live in either of those states when either of them are running...they won't get your vote.
32 posted on 11/19/2004 5:47:31 AM PST by TheCornerOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Ready4Freddy
Why keep Specter? Because getting rid of him also might have consequences. Just because we've got a majority...doesn't mean we've got a majority.

Specter is a particularly vain and preening little strut of a Senate rooster. Outrage his ego by denying him a traditional perk, and he might be able to do more damage off the chair than on it.

Politics is generally just surviving the lesser of two evils. Conservatives, and I am one, don't believe in perfectability, just endurability.

34 posted on 11/19/2004 6:33:49 AM PST by Mamzelle (Nov 3--Psalm One...Blessed is the man...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Thanks for these threads every day.

Confused Conservatives: Hugh Hewitt

I still wish you'd not refer to Hewitt as a conservative, as he is not.

35 posted on 11/19/2004 6:39:58 AM PST by jmc813 (J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
I still wish you'd not refer to Hewitt as a conservative, as he is not.

I really don't know Hewitt that well. I know some people call O'Reilly a conservative, so I know the label is thrown around loosely. I do know that he was confused on this subject. We may have come up short on this fight, but we did good. We damaged Specter some, we got the attention of every GOP Senator, and important issues were brought to the front burner. Overall, the effect of the campaign was positive although not as positive as it could have been.

36 posted on 11/19/2004 6:53:35 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ed_in_NJ

Thanks.


37 posted on 11/19/2004 6:54:15 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"If Frist and Santorum mess this up, they deserved to be shot and killed on the spot."

I know this is written in mere jest, but could we refraim from using such harsh language. It really is uncalled for!!

WE are champions for LIFE and the above statement, even in mere jest, serves no purpose.

Thanks!


38 posted on 11/19/2004 7:03:56 AM PST by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Pro-Life Campaign Ready to Go to the Mat to Block Specter
39 posted on 11/19/2004 7:08:23 AM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
THANKS FOR YOUR HARD WORK - this fight will not go unnoticed!

What do you think of Bush appointing Pat Toomey to the OMB?

Hopefully the conservatives in PA have been heard!

40 posted on 11/19/2004 7:13:47 AM PST by sandalwood (Vote Pat Toomey for Governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Thanks for the threads and updates. I do intend to keep a close watch and when (not if) Specter oopses out of the lines, it will be interesting to see what will happen. It's not clear to me what leverage there is when he reverts to being himself, but I suspect that the leadership feel that they have some.

Laura Ingraham as I am writing this, is pointing out that Specter had to scramble to assure his fellow republicans. She points out that conservatives across the land are educated and mobilized to the importance of the Judiciary and its processes. It's overall a victory.

We are going to get Filibuster reform.

We had an effect. We are integral in the process now. And she continues to point out that we are ready to fight the next fight.


41 posted on 11/19/2004 7:19:51 AM PST by TEXOKIE (Father in Heaven, take command of America and her Mission, her leaders, her people, and her troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandalwood
What do you think of Bush appointing Pat Toomey to the OMB?

Hadn't heard that, but sounds like an excellent move on Bush's part. Bush ran a solid campaign, but in hindsight supporting Specter may have been his biggest blunder. But at the time, PA was an important battleground state. One would have assumed Specter might actually help Bush, but it might have surpressed more conservative voters. Who knows, I am not even sure hindsight is 20-20.

42 posted on 11/19/2004 7:22:28 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Well, as someone who has generally opposed this campaign (after all Specter did not threaten Bush as claimed) I have to confess you all probably did some good. Specter has been put on a tighter leash than I thought he would be.
And that's a good thing!

BTW: here's the public statement he made:
November 19, 2004

"...If a rule change is necessary to avoid filibusters, there are relevant recent precedents to secure rule changes with 51 votes. "

43 posted on 11/19/2004 7:30:10 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger

Oh, don't you know that they are "put on notice"? Yeah, right, and they continue to ignore the notice.

I want Specter GONE, REPLACED, now, it that clear enough? Lessee, what do they not understand about that?

RB


44 posted on 11/19/2004 7:35:45 AM PST by brushcop (American first, last, always--no hyphens here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

Thanks, I don't get to hear Laura around here only when I get up towards Chicago. She did a wonderful job on this and was the most vocal big name host leading this issue. We are in a real grey area on what can be done to Specter down the road. I know in the 40's there was a Senator who did not even show up for a couple years but retained his chairmanship, so getting rid of one would be new ground. The GOP rules dictact who they appoint, so I assume every two years the GOP can appoint whomever they please. During a session is a lot more questionable.


45 posted on 11/19/2004 7:39:31 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Here's where I read it...

We'll see what happens, but I think it would be a great move, especially if Toomey wants to go after Rendell!

46 posted on 11/19/2004 7:39:40 AM PST by sandalwood (Vote Pat Toomey for Governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
"...If a rule change is necessary to avoid filibusters, there are relevant recent precedents to secure rule changes with 51 votes. "

Thanks for posting that to this thread. I hadn't seen his final statement yet, and that is a positive sign. That statement is going to raise the fur of some Democrats. I am convinced that Specter will hurt us a couple years down the road, but over the short term things look good.

47 posted on 11/19/2004 7:44:49 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: borntobeagle

Why would Specter have to watch his step? He likely will never run for election again, and a little bit of flack from the vast right wing is just part of the job.


48 posted on 11/19/2004 7:53:04 AM PST by jeremiah (Sunshine scares all of them, for they are all cockaroaches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
We are in a real grey area on what can be done to Specter down the road.

One possibility (believe it or not) is impeachment. If Specter fails to do his job, impeachment charges can be brought against him in the House.

I found out about this "nuclear solution" a few days ago, and haven't had time to investigate it thoroughly. But we do have a stronger voice in the House, and tort reform (opposed by Specter) is high on their list of things to do.

Wouldn't that be the first great irony of the 21st century -- impeaching a Senator who follows Scottish law.

49 posted on 11/19/2004 7:53:25 AM PST by reformed_democrat (Just a red-state woman trapped in a blue-state nightmare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Prolifeconservative
WE are champions for LIFE and the above statement, even in mere jest, serves no purpose.

OK, maybe you were right, but at 4:00 in the morning it sounded alright. Of course it was just figuratively speaking, but I should have used more appropriate language such as 'hung them up by their toes' or something nonlethal.

50 posted on 11/19/2004 7:54:15 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson