Posted on 11/20/2004 11:15:24 PM PST by LibWhacker
New book on urban warfare
Generals think of urban combat the way vampires view garlic. But in Fallujah, Iraq, U.S. forces have rewritten the book on urban military operations, producing what have been, so far, better-than-average results with lower-than-average casualties.
Military leaders hate fighting in cities because it's hard to find the enemy, to tell him apart from civilians and to use supporting weapons such as artillery and tanks. Combat can occur on multiple levels simultaneously (on the street, on rooftops, in basements), communication and resupply are difficult, and there really is no way to clear buildings except to send soldiers or Marines into them.
(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...
You don't find this on too many front pages...
Bad news for the NY Times, Rather and the Dems.
Urban warfare tactics:
http://www.occupationwatch.org/article.php?id=6451
Very disturbing how the MSM can ignore or deny simple, easily verifiable truths. It's gotta end.
You are right, unfortunately no end is in sight.
Hi, LibWacker:
The Marines took the Lessons Learned from the siege of Hue City during the Tet Offensive in 1968 very seriously.
Developing new tactics (Forget "Hey, Diddle Diddle. Right Up The Middle!") during the late 1970s under Carter. Fleshing out and actually training those tactics under Reagan. Maintaining Urban Warfare "cities" on several bases and using them. Much like the Army has used and trained Armor Units at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, CA.
Running training "scenarios" where one or more radios may be inoperative. Marines picked randomly to be wounded and tended to by Corpsmen and other Marines. While the "scenario" continues. Securing buildings and shuttling ammunition forward. Adapting to constantly changing situations. Developing options and overcoming.
The reason for the small munber of Marines and soldiers killed is constant and intense "real world" training in these facilities and enviornments.
Recognizing mistakes and working to correct them here in the states, instead of the battlefield.
Jack.
Yep, I've been calling for this kind of assault on Fallujah since day 1. I would've liked to have seen much, much more heavy bombing beforehand, though. I think that would have saved some of those 50 Americans who were killed and 450 who were wounded . . . But overall . . . A big A+ for the Pentagon and our troops!
'Ya know, I'm just blown away that we could go into Fallujah like that and come out with "only" 50 dead. Absolutely amazing! And it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing that the Pentagon is not satisfied with that and is looking for ways to get it down to zero next time, while not completely obliterating a city in doing it.
Impossible, good news!? No, it must be mistake!
It could well be that this battle will mark the turning point in WOT.
I am impressed with the footage I’ve watched of our people – and not at all impressed with the tactics of the terrorists.
Kneeling in the middle of the street to fire machine guns, RPGs and mortars – and often the mortars have no sights.
On the subjects of gun sights – has anyone actually seen them used by the terrorists – even with the AKs?
Walking in a cluster down the middle of the street.
War without some American casualties would be a terrible thing – American casualties are the only restraint we have on going to war.
Don't worry, the costly military budget will help us to think twice before going to war once mass production model of "Terminators" rush into enemy territory.
Hopefully.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.