![]() Joseph Lieberman
|
Posted on 11/21/2004 8:52:02 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
Jobs rotate in rumor millLieberman key to possible changes for state, local politicians
Johnson gets an 'F' from GOA and a 47 life time rating from ACU. Not exactly "one of us."
Lieberman would be a masterful choice as Homeland Defense Secretary!
She may be the best chance you get for an "R" in Connecticut.
ONe this is...it would get us one vote closer to 60 in the Senate...which is why I don't think Lieberman will go for it...
Lieberman for Homeland Security??? What on earth for? First, what are his qualifications (slim or none) and second, if he is one of the more conservative democRATs in the Senate, why give a blue state the opportunity to replace him with a Kennedy / Hillary clone?
I don't think so. Lieberman is a conservative democrat (more or less) and he would not filibuster in any case. Besides we would probably lose a post in the House. The problems are many!
And don't forget Nelson from Nebraska for Secretary of Agriculture. That would make +2 for the GOP.
And it's just fine now for a Governor to fill a vacant opposition seat with someone from their own party, after what the Democrats did in Georgia with Zell Miller.
It's not our fault that Zell did them more harm than good...
;-)
YA! There ya go! Wouldn't THAT antagonize lefties! SENATOR ANN COULTER! Poor Alan Combs, he would jacktitate like a squirrel on a high-tension line...
True. But would she be there for us on key votes?
Are you dreaming or kidding? I don't wont too many rats in the next Bush Cabinet!!! Expecially these rats, who would not filibuster.
Huh. I don't see legislators as making good department heads. So Lieberman isn't a great pick. Nancy Johnson's a RINO... Its kind of an everybody sorta wins but sorta loses scenario. But it just about is plausible... Demonrats DeLauro and Larson are extremists, so Rell would have grounds for preomoting a Republican.
More reason to do it. She is next in line for the House Ways and Means Committee chairmanship.
Hubby suggested that Bush nominate Lieberman to the Supreme Court. I'm not sure if he heard that somewhere or just came up with it on his own.
Any comments?
I don't think any of this will happen. Even though I think out of all the contenders Lieberman would have been the toughest Dem for Bush to beat in the 2004 election.
I also think that even though Lieberman campaigned for Kerry... when he got in that voting booth he pushed Bush.
A DINO is still a DIMO (not an error in spelling;)
Remember him and Gore. ::shudder::
"...when he got in that voting booth he pushed Bush."
LOL, I bet you are right!
I don't see much of a downside. The reasonable wing of the Democratic Party gets a boost by having an influence in the White House. Republicans are seen as reaching out. I see no reason why Lieberman wouldn't do an excellent job.
I don't know that her promotion to Ways and Means is certain.
This is the second or third Democrat senator from a state with a Republican governor that has been mentioned as a possible Cabinet member. Come on, people. They aren't that stupid.
Remember this:
http://www.local10.com/politics/3804933/detail.html
Zell would be even better [since he is retiring from the Senate - it would look as less of crass politics and more like an appointment in the national interest]. And Zell is much more of no-nonsence guy, IMHO.
MAYBE he'd know what to do with it? Oh, I see. Let's promote Senators into executive positions so they can use their highly honed skill of managing a relative handful of staffers. Gov. Ridge had the necessary executive experience to bring together the management infrastructure to set up the reorganization of existing agencies and departments into DHS. Remember, that's all it was: a reshuffling of agencies; there was limited change of the actual doers (operatives? guys at the pointy end of the stick?). Sorry, but Ridge DID have the qualifications and all Lieberman did was propose legislation and I doubt it was an original idea.
I think Lieberman is a great choice if he will take it.
I don't get it. Joe Lieberman is unacceptable because he campaigned for his own political party?
Agreed and Conn. does have a (small r) republican governorship. But a New England "r" generally = RINO if for nothing more than their political survival. I'm not sure that flipping the party of a Senator would go over well with the Kerry-voting majority of people in Conn. I suspect a lot of backlash at the eventual special election. Regardless, Lieberman is not the guy for the job. Not only is he not qualified, he sold his soul to the devil once already and is to never be trusted again.
Far-left dems would blow a gasket if Lieberman were to take up this position. The implosion would be fun to watch!
heh heh heh
Well, I think Lieberman is a good man, and putting him in a non-political position could give him the opportunity to final show it.
There's talk about filibusters and that Lieberman wouldn't, so there's no reason to replace him with a Republican. But that's a hard sell coming from people who advocate throwing out "RINOS" even. Surely Lieberman still votes more often with the Democrats than not. And while Lieberman may not filibuster, as far as I know he's stuck with his party and hasn't voted for cloture either.
I'm rather suspicious of people who always seem to call for replacing "bad" Republicans with Democrats, and keeping "not so bad" Democrats in place.
He was an assistant district attorney in Erie.
He was in the House for twelve years.
He was Governor of Pennsylvania for six years.
It depends who he replaces. Ginsberg. Souter, Stevens - Yes. Any of the other Reps, NO.
Did Nelson say no?
Frankly, I would hope that Bush would have learned from his first term that every time he reaches across the aisle, his draws back a nub. Teddy Chappaquiddick did it to him as did others.
As Dem, Lieberman is tolerable, but he's no Zell Miller. And, I haven't heard that Ridge is on the chopping block. I'm not overly fond of Ridge and, particularly, I don't care for his unequivocal support of Bush's open borders policy. That's NOT what a DHS Secretary should be endorsing.
Still, we were led to expect a significant attack around the elections and it never materialized and, for that, I have to give Ridge and the DHS kudos. We weren't "Spain'ed" on 11/2 and Kerry didn't win.
So, IMO, there's no need to change this horse; he's still running just fine.
Pray for W and Our Troops
According to NRO, he did.
If Ben Nelson of NE said no to Sec Ag then he WILL be defeated in 2006 by Gov Johanns.
I think Bush would be able to name at most one sitting Democrat Senator to his cabinet (or some other such position), from a state with a Republican Governor.
Being at 55 in the Senate is a very strong position. Being at 56 would be even stronger. However, those remaining in the Democratic Caucus would become increasingly paranoid with each defection.
That somebody is now floating the idea of Lieberman for Homeland Security, following the decline of Senator Nelson of Nebraska for Secretary of Agriculture, indicates that Bush is pursuing the idea of appointing a sitting Democratic Senator with some vigor.
Let's keep in mind that these guys - Nelson of Nebraska, Lieberman, and maybe Nelson of Florida and Conrad of North Dakota - are among the few Democrats we might be able to work with, to overcome Democratic filibusters on judicial appointments and in major reform legislation.
Here are my wild card appointment ideas:
Conrad for a Governor of the Federal Reserve (not Chairman), Nelson of Florida for head of NASA, and Lieberman for Ambassador to the U.N. (after Danforth is given a new appointment).
While I am appointing people, what about Colin Powell to replace Kofi Anon. as Secretary-General of the U.N.?
As for Nelson of Nebraska, I hope he enjoys his last two years in the Senate.
Too touchy-feely for me. Let's get qualified people heading important agencies. Homeland Security is not the agency in which to park people, especially when the administration will need to integrate in the inevitable changes to the intelligence structure.
Are any of the Republicans being mentioned as conservative as Lieberman? (/sarcasm)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.