Skip to comments.
Compulsory voting means ignoring Election Day is not an option
Seattle Post Intelligencer ^
| Wednesday, November 24, 2004
| GREG BARNS
Posted on 11/24/2004 11:44:16 AM PST by freeparella
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Voter turn out in America is pathetic. I like the idea of making voting compulsory here.
To: freeparella
To: freeparella
I don't want people who don't care enough to vote on their own, voting.
3
posted on
11/24/2004 11:46:08 AM PST
by
JenB
To: freeparella
Already posted
here earlier today.
4
posted on
11/24/2004 11:46:09 AM PST
by
Publius
To: freeparella
Liberty includes the freedom not to vote.
To: freeparella
The average voter is dumb enough already. (48% voted for the most unqualified person a major party has ever nominated)
Compulsory voting would elect that person.
To: freeparella
But I don't want stupid people voting!!
7
posted on
11/24/2004 11:48:55 AM PST
by
FreeKeys
("There is always an easy solution to every human problem: neat, plausible and wrong."- H. L. Mencken)
To: Semper Paratus
Yeah, that's what we need...MORE uninformed voters!!!
8
posted on
11/24/2004 11:49:27 AM PST
by
jdsteel
To: freeparella
Voter turn out in America is pathetic. I like the idea of making voting compulsory here.Too "1984"-ish for me.
9
posted on
11/24/2004 11:49:47 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: freeparella
If an individual is too apathetic to even come to the polls, do you honestly believe they'll do the research necessary to make informed decisions about who'll best lead our nation if they're forced to vote? That's all we need - apathetic idiots pulling random levers to decide who's going to lead you and me; the ones who actually do give a damn.
If someone doesn't want to vote, more power to them. If that's their attitude, I'd much rather they sit down, shut up, and stay out of the electoral process.
"Compulsory voting - putting the intelligent, informed, and motivated under the control of the apathetic, the ill-informed, and the lazy."
10
posted on
11/24/2004 11:50:57 AM PST
by
NJ_gent
(Conservatism begins at home. Security begins at the border. Please, someone, secure our borders.)
To: freeparella
"Voter turn out in America is pathetic. I like the idea of making voting compulsory here."
If a citizen does not like the candidates, he can express that dissatisfaction by not voting. It is a little thing called FREEDOM. And if a citizen is so disinterested that he does not know the candidates or issues, why would you want him to vote? His vote would dilute those of that are involved.
11
posted on
11/24/2004 11:50:59 AM PST
by
MPJackal
("If you are not with us, you are against us." That includes demonrats)
To: freeparella
I don't want more people voting. I want fewer.
I'm also in favor of IQ tests for qualification - If someone's IQ isn't as high as an average turnip they shouldn't be allowed to vote, thereby assuring Republican rule.
12
posted on
11/24/2004 11:51:03 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Ignoranus: A person who's both stupid and an a**hole)
To: freeparella
Great idea! Make people who don't give a damn vote ........
I much prefer that you have a college degree, a 120 IQ, own a home or at least a car, be a veteran and get handed a ballot with nothing but the position on it and if you're too damn dumb to fill in the correct name you don't get to vote.
To: freeparella
Too many people vote in this country as it is.
In more enlightened times only land owners were allowed to vote.
Welfare recipients and non-english speakers definitely have no business voting.
14
posted on
11/24/2004 11:52:49 AM PST
by
hang 'em
(If I want to listen to the shrill misery of some pus-gut, gas-bag shrew, I'll call my ex-wife.-anon)
To: monkeywrench
I like freedom better.
Oh, I love freedom just fine. But making voting a requirement seems to solve a lot of problems according to the article. It costs less in terms of time and money and forces the candidates to listen to everybody's concerns. I especially love the part about candidates not having to have a zillion dollars in their back pocket.
15
posted on
11/24/2004 11:53:15 AM PST
by
freeparella
(I will always thank the Lord; I will never stop praising Him.)
To: freeparella
Compulsory voting forces people to engage with their democracy -- maybe the United States should try a doseHell no. If someone is too ignorant or apathetic to vote on their own, they have no business voting because they are generally clueless.
16
posted on
11/24/2004 11:53:21 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
To: freeparella
I have Australian friends, and one thing I've asked them about is their compulsury voting laws. They don't like it. My one friend is very apolitical and she votes for herself, because she really doesn't care to understand the issues. I respect that more than her voting for one person or another without investigating them.
I like freedom. Freedom means being able to be stupid. Freedom means being able to hurt yourself. Freedom means not voting if you don't want to.
I'm 24. A lot of people my age don't care about the issues. I have more respect for people who don't know about the issues and don't vote, than I do for people who have no idea what the hell they're talking about and don't shut up about it.
I hope you don't argue for removal of the Electoral College. One terrible thing we did was change the Constitution to directly elect Senators.
17
posted on
11/24/2004 11:53:35 AM PST
by
t_skoz
("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
To: freeparella
If 'none of the above' is not an option, compulsory voting would probably be unconstitutional.
18
posted on
11/24/2004 11:54:18 AM PST
by
Spok
To: HoustonCurmudgeon
Owning a car or home isn't necessary, but I think in order to vote one must have actually PAID TAXES in their life!
19
posted on
11/24/2004 11:54:35 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
To: freeparella
I prefer the freedom of voting...or not voting.
20
posted on
11/24/2004 11:54:37 AM PST
by
nyconse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson