Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian 'Sputnik' Could Be Trojan Horse for Tehran's Ballistic Missile Program
Prnewswire ^ | Sunday November 28, 10:30 am ET

Posted on 11/28/2004 7:39:05 AM PST by Brian Mosely

NEW YORK, Nov. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- Aviation Week & Space Technology reports in its November 29 issue that U. S. intelligence analysts are concerned about the planned launch from Iran, by early 2005, of an Iranian built satellite on an upgraded version of Tehran's largest ballistic missile, the Shahab-3.

The preparations for and launch of one or more Iranian satellite "is something that needs to be watched closely," a U. S. government missile analyst familiar with Iranian capabilities told AW&ST.

Such an "Iranian Sputnik" would elevate the stature of the Iran in the Middle East.

Tehran's satellite launch plans could also be a "Trojan Horse" to further advance ballistic missile or nuclear warhead related technologies, sources told the magazine. Some of the materials and micro-electronic technologies necessary for Iranian satellite design could also be important for the development of tiny high quality components needed to produce small nuclear weapons, AW&ST reports.

The U. S. intelligence community was taken by surprise in 1998 when a North Korean satellite launch attempt unexpectedly demonstrated a long range North Korean missile capability. U. S. intelligence officials said they do not want to be surprised again, this time by Iran.

Even if they fail initially, Iranian satellite launch attempts would help Iran develop both range and warhead improvements to the Shahab-3 missile under the cover of a civilian space program, AW&ST reports.

If the Iranians are successful with the space launch program, it will have political and technological ramifications in both the U. S. and Middle East. "It would move the Iranians from the junior varsity into the big leagues," an analyst told the magazine.

And as previous experience with North Korea shows, such a space launch demonstration can have significant impact in a weapons context. "Something like that from Iran would certainly have a similar effect in the Middle East," sources told AW&ST.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; southwestasia; space

1 posted on 11/28/2004 7:39:06 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11224top.xml


2 posted on 11/28/2004 7:40:51 AM PST by Brian Mosely (A government is a body of people -- usually notably ungoverned http://spinswimming.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Ability to launch satellite = ICBM.

At that point we either stop them or really buff up our Missle defence.


3 posted on 11/28/2004 7:41:40 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Oops...wrong article.


4 posted on 11/28/2004 7:41:56 AM PST by Brian Mosely (A government is a body of people -- usually notably ungoverned http://spinswimming.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

What a great chance for the USAF to test our anti-satellite missle capability.


5 posted on 11/28/2004 7:42:26 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Perhaps somehow a little misdirected space trash could accidentally fall out of orbit and make an incalculable coincidental impact with this Iranian-inter-continental-ballistic-uh-satellite-launcher.


6 posted on 11/28/2004 7:47:55 AM PST by Xcoastie (If you think education is expensive, try ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reg45
I was thinking the exact same thing.

The only good thing is they should not have the technology to hit the US before we are able to stop it cold.

The US's policy on the employment of WMD is as follows. I got this from a USA Professional Development course I took several years ago:

1.) Biological Weapons - we will never use them.
2.) Chemical Weapons - only in retaliation for their use against us and only in a quantity sufficient to stop their proliferation
3.) Nuclear Weapons - In response to their use against us or to quickly de-escalate a situation that could lead to their widespread use.
7 posted on 11/28/2004 7:49:43 AM PST by SSG USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Let's send a shuttle up and take it.


8 posted on 11/28/2004 8:02:12 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

"Tehran's satellite launch plans could also be a "Trojan Horse" to further advance ballistic missile or nuclear warhead related technologies"

DUH


9 posted on 11/28/2004 8:05:21 AM PST by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
US may want to rent one of these...
10 posted on 11/28/2004 8:14:30 AM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Brian Mosely

Can we unleash our viking kitties against this missle thingy ? ;-)

Zot that missle program right off the sand.........

And WTF is this BS with "may be" or "might be" or what not the press is so enamored with. The idjits were all chanting "Death to America Death to Israel" in their statehouse when they voted to fire up the nuclear program. This is NOT a joke.

But we'll just have to wait and see maybe they are going to make the world a better place........

Time to unleash the kitties of war.


12 posted on 11/28/2004 11:22:00 AM PST by festus (Old growth timbers make the best campfires....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45
What a great chance for the USAF to test our anti-satellite missle capability.

Bad idea.

13 posted on 11/28/2004 11:24:06 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

All sorts of mysterious things can happen to a satellite...


14 posted on 11/28/2004 11:40:40 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
All sorts of mysterious things can happen to a satellite...

Yes and no.

You might be amazed at what can be determined from a postmortem.

15 posted on 11/28/2004 11:43:32 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

And just how are the Iranians going to retrieve it?


16 posted on 11/28/2004 11:47:29 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Shouting "Death to America," and "Death to Israel," Iranian lawmakers decided unanimously Sunday to back the outline of a bill that would require the Islamic government to resume uranium enrichment. World Net Daily November 2nd, 2004

If the above leaves any questions what the Iranians are thinking then the person with the questions is brain damaged. Why the press didn't report the above I can't fathom because they would be one of the first sets of folks to get whacked if the mullahs get control.
17 posted on 11/28/2004 11:50:24 AM PST by festus (Old growth timbers make the best campfires....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
They don't need to. Telemetry is good enough. However, if there is limited coverage (in other words "satellite passes") and the satellite is lost out-of-view, the postmortem is a bit stickier. But often it can still be accomplished.

BTW, how do you intent in destroying a satellite without leaving a debris field?

18 posted on 11/28/2004 11:53:36 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: festus

The Iranians have been uttering those sort of threats for a long time now. There isn't any doubt what their plans are. I don't think they can put it any clearer. They are going to nuke israel, collateral damage means nothing to them. If they west tries to stop them... blah blah blah..

Even if some are foolish enough to think this is all hot air, I don't think it's worth taking that chance. Better a little mess now than a bigger one later. Iran is a big obstacle to stability in the Middle east, as well as everywhere else, and has been for a long time now. It's time to put them out of their misery. Sterilize the place.


19 posted on 11/28/2004 11:58:59 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Does it have to be smashed into a million peices? Or can it just drift away powerless, leaving Team Iran scratching their heads? Im sure there are many ways thought up by those in that field of interest.


20 posted on 11/28/2004 12:10:24 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Does it have to be smashed into a million peices? Or can it just drift away powerless, leaving Team Iran scratching their heads? Im sure there are many ways thought up by those in that field of interest.

Unless you induce some sort of delta-v, the vehicle will remain in its present orbit. Completely silencing it, to even include emergency or battery power to its transmitters, would be pretty tricky without taking it out completely.

I am not in favor of purposely destroying someone else’s satellites just because of the nationality.

21 posted on 11/28/2004 12:18:04 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Do you not think other nations, such as China has not thought of taking out ours?
As far as Iran's goes, It all depends on what they want to use it for. What is your guess based on everything they have done so far?
I would imagine it will be spyed on for a while to determine that in anycase, if they are successful in getting it up there.


22 posted on 11/28/2004 12:26:44 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
I would imagine it will be spyed on for a while to determine that in anycase, if they are successful in getting it up there.

All satellites in orbit are tracked. It will be interesting to see how many nations acquire/develop orbital launch capability over the next number of years.

23 posted on 11/28/2004 1:01:44 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Iran's nuclear-terrorist threat must be addressed & real soon.
24 posted on 11/29/2004 10:28:35 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

25 posted on 11/29/2004 10:41:16 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson