Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soviets/Germans Planned Breakup of Ukraine/Eastern Europe in Advance (!!!)
Tydenik Politika | 11-14-1991

Posted on 11/29/2004 7:38:52 PM PST by TapTheSource

Soviets/Germans Planned Breakup of Ukraine/Eastern Europe in Advance (!!!)

Tydenik Politika, 11.14-11.20, 1991

The following is the translated text of the November 14-20, 1991 issue of Tydenik Politika, which appeared in Prague newsstands during that same period. Notice that the Soviets and the Germans reached an agreement to carve up Eastern Europe (to include the Ukraine) before the events themselves occured. If anyone has a scanner and a copy of the book “European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States” by Christopher Story, I would appreciate a scan of page 205, which contains a facsimile of the original Tydenik Politka document in question. Please notice that these Geneva agreements were made BEFORE the breakup of the Soviet Union and therefore anticipated the same (in other words, the breakup of the Soviet Union was a top-down affair). Notes are in brackets.

Tydenik Politika: Private Journal, for Politics and Economics November 14-20,1991 Issue

· The German Federal Republic demands (sic) from the USSR compensation for annexed eastern Prussia and for the area east of the Oder-Niesse. [Note: In the event, Chancellor Helmut Kohl announced in 1990 the final German renunciation of any revision of the Oder-Niesse border with Poland. This is one of the peculiar anomalies of this document; but it does not undermine its significance, given that the division of Czechoslovakia and the destabilization and carve-up of Yugoslavia were accurately anticipated therein].

· The German Federal Republic demand [sic] withdrawal of Soviet influence in the Bohemian-Moravian region. The Soviet Union is unwilling to tolerate in the vicinity of their borders a Czechoslovak Federal Republic regime which does not accept the Soviet gesture that allowed Husak’s regime to fall in Czechoslovakia. The Government of Czechoslovak Socialist Federal Republic is unceasing in its agitation against the USSR and is making the position of the Soviet Government and the President more and more difficult. This is a position that is different from that of the Polish and Hungarian Governments.

· The USSR will [therefore] not object to the splitting of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, due to an insufficient guarantee of political equilibrium in Central Europe and the lack of statesmanship of the Bohemian and Moravian regions within the sphere of economic interests of the German Federal Republic and the political incorporation of these regions into Germany within 12-15 years [clock started ticking somewhere between September-October 1990].

· The Federal Republic of Germany will compensate the USSR for the economic losses thus inflicted on the Soviet Union.

· The Federal German Republic will prepare for a possible decline in popularity of the present Czechoslovak Socialist Federal Republic leadership by preparing groups, having a positive attitude towards Germany and which are acceptable even to the Soviet Union, drawn as an alternative even from left-wing parties [sic], without evident interference in the process of proliferation of political parties. [Note: This represents confirmation that the Czech and Slovak ‘democracies’ are false, controlled exercises in Soviet ‘democratism’: see Part I for ‘democratism’ details].

· With regard to the willingness of Hungary to maintain political and economic stability in the Danube region, the USSR and the Federal Republic of Germany will not object to the re-establishment of Hungary with the original boarders, as stipulated by the Trianon Treaty. The Federal Republic of Germany will increase its economic aid to Hungary in order to lift the standard of living in Hungary above that [prevailing] in Slovakia, so that joining Hungary becomes attractive to Slovakia.

· The USSR has no objections to the establishment of a German university and high schools in the regions of Bohemia and Moravia, and to the financing of these schools by Germany.

· The USSR does not object to the breaking-up of Yugoslavia, and supports the transfer of Croatia and Slovenia into the economic sphere of Germany.

· The USSR has no objections to the deployment of [the means of procuring] political destabilization [as subsequently materialized in Yugoslavia].

· The Federal Republic of Germany will not become engaged in issues concerning Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, and will not consider them to be an area of [Germany’s] economic interest, above and beyond an acceptable level.

· With USSR will not object to the separation of Ciscarpathian Ukraine in the event of destabilizing activity undertaken by [controlled] Ukrainian nationalists, and its incorporation into a Hungarian Republic.

· The USSR does not object to the gradual colonization of the Czech border areas by Soviets and Germans [sic: probably a reference to Russian ethnic Germans].


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; easterneurope; eussr; germany; russia; sovietunion; ukraine; ussr
Very important material!
1 posted on 11/29/2004 7:38:53 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource; All

I think all of the above needs to be understood in light of Putin's Leninist "logic" layed out by the following excerpt taken from the book "Perestroika Deception", written by KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn (pp 17-19):

‘PERESTROIKA’, THE FINAL PHASE: ITS MAIN OBJECTIVES

‘The new method sees ‘perestroika’, not as a surprising and spontaneous change, but as the logical result of thirty years of preparation and as the next and final phase of the strategy: it sees it in a broader context than Soviet ‘openness’ has revealed.’

‘It sees it, not only as a renewal of Soviet society, but as a global strategic design for ‘restructuring’ the entire capitalist world.’

‘The following strategic objectives of ‘perestroika’ may be distinguished:

For the USSR

(a) ‘Restructuring’ and revitalization of the Soviet socialist economy through the incorporation of some elements of the market economy.
(b) ‘Restructuring’ of the Stalinist regime into a form of ‘Communist democracy’ with an appearance of political pluralism [= ‘democratism’, or false democracy].
(c) ‘Reconsructing’ a repressive regime with a brutal face into an attractive socialist model with a human façade and seeming similarity to the Swedish social democratic system.’

For Eastern Europe

‘Economic and political ‘restructuring’ of the existing regimes into pseudo-social democratic models while preserving specific national historical features such as the strong Catholic Socialist tradition in Poland and the pre-war democratic tradition in Czechoslovakia.’

For Western Europe

(a) ‘Bringing about a new political alliance between the pseudo-social democratic regimes in the USSR and Eastern Europe and the Euro-Communist parties and genuine social democratic parties in Western Europe.
(b) ‘Restructuring’ political and military blocs—NATO and the Warsaw Pact—and the creation of a singe ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals’ incorporating a reunited, neutral Germany.’

For the main US alliances

(a) ‘Splitting the United States, Western Europe and Japan.
(b) Dissolution of NATO and the US-Japan security pact, and the withdrawal of US troops from Western Europe and Japan.’

For Third World countries

‘The introduction and promotion of a new Soviet model with a mixed economy and a human face in Latin America, Africa and Asia through a joint campaign by the pseudo-social democratic regimes of the USSR and Eastern Europe and the genuine social democrats of Western Europe led by the Socialist International.’

For the United States

(a) ‘To neutralize the influence of the anti-Communist political right in the American political parties and to create favourable conditions for a victory of the radical left in the 1992 US presidential elections (In this context, Clinton’s stay with top Communists in Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union during the latter part of the Vietnam war has profound and disturbing implications—TTS).
(b) To ‘restructure’ the American military, political, economic and social status quo to accommodate greater convergence between the Soviet and American systems and the eventual creation of a single World Government.’

The paramount global objective

‘The paramount global objective of the strategy of ‘perestroika’ is to weaken and neutralize anti-Communist ideology and the influence of anti-Communists in political life in the United States, Western Europe and elsewhere—presenting them as anachronistic survivors of the Cold War, reactionaries and obstacles to ‘restructuring’ and peace. Anyone who warns about Moscow’s true objectives is automatically branded a ‘Cold Warrior’, even by people who have doubts about Moscow’s motives.’

THE ESSENCE OF ‘PERESTROIKA’: AN APPLICATION OF 1920s’ LENINISM

‘The new method penetrates the façade, tears the verbal mask off ‘perestroika’ and reveals its true meaning—which Gorbachev and ‘glasnost’ have failed to do. Lenin’s teaching and the experience of the New Economic Policy [NEP] are keys to understanding the essence of ‘persestroika’ and the reasons for Gorbachev’s downgrading and renunciation of elements of ideological orthodoxy like the class struggle and his emphasis on common interests and the benefits of close cooperation.’

‘Lenin advised the Communists that they must be prepared to ‘resort to all sorts of stratagems, manoeuvres, illegal methods, evasions and subterfuge’ to achieve their objectives. This advice was given on the eve of his reintroduction of limited capitalism in Russia in his work ‘Left Wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder’.

‘The new method sees ‘perestroika’ as an application of Lenin’s advice in new conditions. Another speech of Lenin’s in the NEP period at the Comintern Congress in July 1921 is again highly relevant to understanding ‘perestroika’. ‘Our only strategy at present’, wrote Lenin, ‘is to become stronger and, therefore, wiser, more reasonable, more opportunistic. The more opportunistic, the sooner will you again assemble the masses around you. When we have won over the masses by our reasonable approach, we shall then apply offensive tactics in the strictest sense of the word.’

THE WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST FEDERATION (should they succeed…taken from Golitsyn’s book New Lies For Old, 1984)

‘Integration of the Communist Bloc would follow the lines envisaged by Lenin when the Third Communist International was founded. That is to say, the Soviet Union and China would not absorb one another or other Communist states. All the countries of the European and Asiatic Communist zones, together with new Communist states in Europe and the Third World, would join a supranational economic and political Communist federation (this is precisely what the Soviets have in mind for the impending EU collective—TTS). Soviet-Albanian, Soviet-Yugoslav, and Soviet-Romanian disputes and ‘differences’ would be resolved in the wake, or possibly in advance of, Sino-Soviet reconciliation (Golitsyn goes to great lengths in previous chapters to show how the split between the Soviets and the Chinese was completely healed immediately after Stalin’s death…however, they continued the illusion of a split to dupe the West into backing alternating sides, depending on circumstances—TTS). The political, economic, military, diplomatic, and ideological cooperation between all the Communist states, at present partially concealed, would become clearly visible. There might even be public acknowledgment that the splits and disputes were long-term disinformation operations that had successfully deceived the “imperialist” powers. The effect on Western morale can be imagined’ (the Soviets have employed this tactic on numerous occasions—TTS).

‘In the new worldwide Communist federation the present different brands of Communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism. The process would be painful. Concessions made in the name of economic and political reform would be withdrawn. Religious and intellectual dissent would be suppressed. Nationalism and all other forms of genuine oppositions would be crushed. Those who had taken advantage of détente to establish friendly Western contacts would be rebuked or persecuted like those Soviet officers who worked with the Allies during the Second World War. In new Communist states—for example, in France, Italy, and the Third World—the “alienated classes” would be reeducated. Show trials of “imperialist agents” would be staged. Action would be taken against nationalist and social democratic leaders, party activists, former civil servants, officers, and priests. The last vestiges of private enterprise and ownership would be obliterated. Nationalization of industry, finance, and agriculture would be completed. In fact, all the totalitarian features familiar from the early stages of the Soviet revolution and the postwar Stalinist years in Eastern Europe might be expected to reappear, especially in those countries newly won for Communism. Unchallenged and unchallengeable, a true Communist monolith would dominate the world.’


2 posted on 11/29/2004 7:44:55 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource; All

And in regards to Red China/Eurasian alliance...

THE WORLDWIDE COMMUNIST FEDERATION (should they succeed…taken from Golitsyn’s book New Lies For Old, 1984)

‘Integration of the Communist Bloc would follow the lines envisaged by Lenin when the Third Communist International was founded. That is to say, the Soviet Union and China would not absorb one another or other Communist states. All the countries of the European and Asiatic Communist zones, together with new Communist states in Europe and the Third World, would join a supranational economic and political Communist federation (this is precisely what the Soviets have in mind for the impending EU collective—TTS). Soviet-Albanian, Soviet-Yugoslav, and Soviet-Romanian disputes and ‘differences’ would be resolved in the wake, or possibly in advance of, Sino-Soviet reconciliation (Golitsyn goes to great lengths in previous chapters to show how the split between the Soviets and the Chinese was completely healed immediately after Stalin’s death…however, they continued the illusion of a split to dupe the West into backing alternating sides, depending on circumstances—TTS). The political, economic, military, diplomatic, and ideological cooperation between all the Communist states, at present partially concealed, would become clearly visible. There might even be public acknowledgment that the splits and disputes were long-term disinformation operations that had successfully deceived the “imperialist” powers. The effect on Western morale can be imagined’ (the Soviets have employed this tactic on numerous occasions—TTS).

‘In the new worldwide Communist federation the present different brands of Communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism. The process would be painful. Concessions made in the name of economic and political reform would be withdrawn. Religious and intellectual dissent would be suppressed. Nationalism and all other forms of genuine oppositions would be crushed. Those who had taken advantage of détente to establish friendly Western contacts would be rebuked or persecuted like those Soviet officers who worked with the Allies during the Second World War. In new Communist states—for example, in France, Italy, and the Third World—the “alienated classes” would be reeducated. Show trials of “imperialist agents” would be staged. Action would be taken against nationalist and social democratic leaders, party activists, former civil servants, officers, and priests. The last vestiges of private enterprise and ownership would be obliterated. Nationalization of industry, finance, and agriculture would be completed. In fact, all the totalitarian features familiar from the early stages of the Soviet revolution and the postwar Stalinist years in Eastern Europe might be expected to reappear, especially in those countries newly won for Communism. Unchallenged and unchallengeable, a true Communist monolith would dominate the world.’


3 posted on 11/29/2004 7:46:29 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource; All

If you understand the importance of the document contained in the original post...PING IT TO EVERYONE YOU CAN THINK OF!!!


4 posted on 11/29/2004 8:05:38 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

And the MSM tried to tell us Communism was dead. HA!


5 posted on 11/29/2004 8:12:59 PM PST by TheExperiment_Is_Over
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
Cool stuff. What link is it from?
6 posted on 11/29/2004 8:13:28 PM PST by .cnI redruM (Idiots so love to bury a god. - Charles Buckowski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"Cool stuff. What link is it from?"

No link...it is taken from Christopher Story's book "European Union Collective: Enemy of its Collective States", by Christopher Story (2002)...Story was the editor to Golitsyn's second book "Perestroika Deception."


7 posted on 11/29/2004 8:18:51 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheExperiment_Is_Over

"And the MSM tried to tell us Communism was dead. HA!"

Don't you think it's about time conservatives (who understand) did something about it???!!!---TTS


8 posted on 11/29/2004 8:20:06 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

What a load of crap.

"(b) Dissolution of NATO and the US-Japan security pact, and the withdrawal of US troops from Western Europe and Japan.’ "

POLAND is now a member of NATO. Japan is re-militarizing and is a strong US ally. The EU is a Miserable Failure. China wants to steal Siberia.

This crap reads like LaRouchite... crap.


9 posted on 11/29/2004 8:27:01 PM PST by adam_az (Nov. 3, 2004: Our Republic is Secure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: adam_az

"(b) Dissolution of NATO and the US-Japan security pact, and the withdrawal of US troops from Western Europe and Japan.’ POLAND is now a member of NATO. Japan is re-militarizing and is a strong US ally. The EU is a Miserable Failure. China wants to steal Siberia. This crap reads like LaRouchite... crap."

LaRouche is a full-on Marxist in nebulous political disguise (research his background). Golitsyn is a hardcore anti-Communist and the highest level KGB defector to EVER defect to the West Don't be so closed minded...go back and read his predicitions/warnings...majority of them written by 1984 in his book "New Lies For Old" (and subsequent book Perestroika Deception)...might want to do a search on Golitsyn, and then compare them to what has happened thus far. Surely you can tell the difference. I will wait for your response.


10 posted on 11/29/2004 8:35:06 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Any link to the original? (I mean, the Czech original.)

(If I find one, I'll edit and post.)


11 posted on 11/29/2004 9:10:57 PM PST by erizo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erizo

No link... but I have a facsimile of the original in the book that I am quoting from (for more on the book, see original post)...if you or anyone you know can scan the page in question, I'd love to include a facsimile of the original in my posts!


12 posted on 11/29/2004 9:14:12 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Or at least tell me how to do it and I'll go to a place like Kinko's (???) and post the original myself!!!


13 posted on 11/29/2004 9:15:45 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: erizo

In other words, what do I tell them (Kinko's ect.) to save the format in so I can post the original in future posts...thanks--TTS.


14 posted on 11/29/2004 9:17:15 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Cool. I'll link this thread and check back in a day, just in case.

BTW, it's not Czech. Slovak. Apparently only published for 2 years, and in 1996 was mentioned in some trial or investigation of neo-fascist group in the Czech Republic, who had a publication with the same title as the "former anti-Semitic Tydenik politika' (Politics Weekly, for an off-hand translation)


15 posted on 11/29/2004 9:19:43 PM PST by erizo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheExperiment_Is_Over; TapTheSource
"...And the MSM tried to tell us Communism was dead. HA!..."

It IS dead, guys! The old Soviet Union was the only aglomeration of Nation-States to ever nuke itself (remember Chernobyl[sp?])

The emerging power is in the East - China. As their aging leaders die-off, a giant Capitalist Nation is happening, and it will need resources beyond belief!

Where's the oil? Hint: It ain't in the Middle East............FRegards

16 posted on 11/29/2004 10:14:28 PM PST by gonzo ("Harley-Vous Francais?=== "Can you ride a French motorbike and carry a white flag???????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Bump


17 posted on 11/29/2004 10:58:09 PM PST by nw_arizona_granny (Today, please pray for God's miracle, we are not going to make it without him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Thank you for this find.

How hard it can be for us to struggle past the revisionist history we were taught by Pravda et al.


18 posted on 11/29/2004 10:59:07 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erizo; TapTheSource; adam_az
The neo-Nazi Slovakian weekly Tydenik Politika was banned in December 1992. There are copies at the Widener Library, Harvard.

Here is info about of that weekly.
http://www.antisemitismus.net/osteuropa/tschechien.htm

The source for the article "Soviets/Germans Planned Breakup of Ukraine/Eastern Europe in Advance" is not reliable.

TapTheSource, you should check your sources better, it is very easy to lose credibility.
19 posted on 11/30/2004 12:52:32 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; erizo; TapTheSource; adam_az

"The neo-Nazi Slovakian weekly Tydenik Politika was banned in December 1992. There are copies at the Widener Library, Harvard."

Strangely enough, when I read this, it reminded me of "the protocols of the elders of zion.."


20 posted on 11/30/2004 5:10:07 AM PST by adam_az (Nov. 3, 2004: Our Republic is Secure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; adam_az

"The neo-Nazi Slovakian weekly Tydenik Politika was banned in December 1992. There are copies at the Widener Library, Harvard."

Didn't know they were banned for anti-Semitic activities. Still, I would have posted it anyway, but with the proper disclaimer had I known about this information. Just like I would have posted it if it was from a Communist, socialist or free market source (again, with the proper disclaimer). Why?...because their coverage of the Soviet-German accord did in fact come to passs (and it would appear that it is still coming to pass re: the Ukraine). But I appreciate the heads up--TTS


21 posted on 11/30/2004 6:40:45 AM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gonzo

"Where's the oil? Hint: It ain't in the Middle East............"


Check out this article, what exactly is the NYTimes trying to tell us?


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1291049/posts


22 posted on 11/30/2004 6:44:26 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson