Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who is going to die?
World Net Daily ^ | December 1, 2004 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 12/01/2004 1:04:29 AM PST by eakole

"Yossef Bodansky, the former director of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and a man I respect immensely for his intelligence insights, says the United States faces an "inevitable" al-Qaida attack with weapons of mass destruction.

"What would be the U.S. response to such an attack?

"Now is the time to think about the unthinkable.

"Contingency plans need to be made. And those plans, at least some of them, need to be known to the whole world to serve as a deterrent against such an attack. …"

"… * The Islamist world and its allies need to know there will be an unprecedented nuclear response to any attack on the United States with weapons of mass destruction. We don't need to be specific about which major cities and installations will be vaporized. But it needs to be clear that the response will be overwhelming, resulting in far greater death and destruction than what is inflicted upon the United States. We need to let the terrorists know that addresses of response have been determined. Those counseling the terrorists that such an attack on the United States is justified should be among the first to experience the horror."

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: alqaida; bodansky; destruction; deterrence; deterrent; farah; islam; jfarah; jihadinamerica; josephfarah; muslims; osamabinladen; presidentbush; retribution; terrorists; war; wmd; yosseffbodansky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2004 1:04:29 AM PST by eakole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eakole
Who is going to die?

Everybody, eventually.

2 posted on 12/01/2004 1:06:47 AM PST by asgardshill (November 2004 - The Month That Just Kept On Giving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Grampa Dave

well now.......


3 posted on 12/01/2004 1:09:37 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eakole
"The Islamist world and its allies need to know there will be an unprecedented nuclear response to any attack on the United States with weapons of mass destruction. We don't need to be specific about which major cities and installations will be vaporized. ""

hhhmmmm....

If the US says that Syria or Iran will be nuked then it provides incentive for small-time enemies of Syria or Iran to launch a WMD attack against the US (anthrax, sarin, ricin or radiological bomb, all fairly available to smaller countries...) and then provide clear evidenc it was Syria or Iran.

Otherwise how does the US know for sure the origins of a WMD attack. There is no missile trail.

4 posted on 12/01/2004 1:10:27 AM PST by Mark Felton (We are free because we are Christian. There is no other reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eakole

Terrorism is a cancer that can only be cured with a massive dose of radiation.


5 posted on 12/01/2004 1:10:38 AM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eakole
Guilty of aiding and abetting:
Saudi Arabia
Iran
Pakistan
Syria
Palestine
North Korea

Without the moral and material support of those nations, the terrorists would not get WMD.
6 posted on 12/01/2004 1:14:56 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

What's this guy trying to say, Squantos? It's a bit of a mystery. Thanks in advance. :)


7 posted on 12/01/2004 1:16:14 AM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
Unfortunately Russia is a major supplier too.

Just look at Iran...
8 posted on 12/01/2004 1:16:34 AM PST by DB ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eakole

I vote for the Samson Option.


9 posted on 12/01/2004 1:16:59 AM PST by shibumi (John Galt is alive and well. He tends bar in a casino restaurant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

I much prefer FAE's to nukes, no radioactivity to worry about afterwards. You can go right in after the firestorms have abated. We already used them in DS and OEF, we will just have to use a few more at a time.


10 posted on 12/01/2004 1:18:11 AM PST by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Here's a fun topic. / tongue in cheek


11 posted on 12/01/2004 1:19:00 AM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476

I think he's wishing more than speaking......I like the way he wishes . Short version IMO he's selling the threat as it should be ....to other countries. Not ours.

Stay safe !


12 posted on 12/01/2004 1:20:36 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: eakole

Excellent. The engineering solution to this problem begins to creep in around the edges of the mainstream. Yes, we need to have this discussion.


13 posted on 12/01/2004 1:20:49 AM PST by Nick Danger (Want some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eakole

The MSM could only dream of such a scenario: Bush fails to protect the US, and them kills millions overseas in "cowboy-like" retaliation, blah, blah, blah. And the images would immediately shift from dead Americans to dead people overseas, "Bush started WWIII" protests in Europe, blah, blah, blah.


14 posted on 12/01/2004 1:23:12 AM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Started and ended...


15 posted on 12/01/2004 1:27:31 AM PST by DB ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton

You are applying rationality to a Joseph Farah screed. Cut that out!


16 posted on 12/01/2004 1:28:44 AM PST by AntiGuv ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eakole
Prime Target


17 posted on 12/01/2004 1:29:39 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Thank you, Squantos. I was interpreting it in a completely different way. Now that I've read the entire article, all I can say is that I hope this is already planned out.

We certainly have the addresses of the monsters who are giving approval to the terrorists. I hope we do.

This needs to be beyond the planning stages by now. Discussion yes. Resolve yes. Ready time, yesterday.

18 posted on 12/01/2004 1:30:40 AM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

One problem to consider is the event that we elect a muslim, internationalist, milquetoast or "Benedict Arnold" President.


19 posted on 12/01/2004 1:36:11 AM PST by eakole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bd476

You pinged me to THIS as a fun topic/tongue in cheek?
Am I still sane or is my head hurting too much? LOL!

I want you to know, I read the whole article.
For once, I agree with JF.

We do need to tell the Islamic world that we'll nuke all of them
if we're attacked with WMD's.


20 posted on 12/01/2004 1:40:53 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson