Posted on 12/01/2004 5:50:37 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
I'm rolling on the floor laughing about that. You can't possibly be that naive to believe what you wrote....or can you?
You have totally fallen for the lib speak of "public places" and have accepted their re-defining the word public.
Please tell me I'm totally wrong and you just forgot the sarcasm tag........
AWWWWWW, come'on......you know I'm a gay bashing baby killing child abuser - and you don't want me to have any fun. No fair.
(to those that don't know me and annyokie - this is total facetious joking)
It will take him two years to catch AIDS, and then it's 39 years.
:-)
I don't see what's so wrong with banning smoking in public places. We ban public drunkenness, don't we? Anyway, cigarettes are a gateway drug that lead to marijuana abuse and eventually to consumption and sale to children of kilos of freebase crack cocaine.
What are you smoking????
What about those rats, eh?! That mold!! You, you .....ah, words fail me!
BBL. {{{hugs}}
Rats??? Mold???????
OH - you must be talking about the fleas, moUld, and mice, child abuse, and murdering of children. And we all know that I'm an uneducated, ignorant piece of trailer trash. Got ya!!!!
I'm gonna be a good girl tonight and not stay up real late.....talk soon, sis.
Since you ask. Peterson "Sweet Killarney" in a Lepeltier clay pipe, actually. ;)
Hey! We was raised together: We stay together! Rats, mold, child abuse, murder, BRING IT ON!!
I'll see you in the am, right after I beat the kids!
The kid is finally down - the dog is another story regarding a beating.
"I don't see what's so wrong with banning smoking in public places. We ban public drunkenness..."
Smoking is not drunkenness. Smoking bans inside public or private buildings do not require legislation. Businesses ban smoking now without legislative action. I do not need legislative action to ban smoking in my home. Smoking outdoors in public parks should not be banned.
Littering the parks with cigarette butts likely is already against the law, and should be enforced if so, but it should not be the perogative of government to legislate bans on an otherwise legal activity in public, outdoor areas such as parks. This is pure leftist stupidity and another of their control tactics.
Thank you very much.
I will not be smoking in your house or business if I am to visit, and I would most likely refrain from doing so if you were in my house or business. Sitting in a park at a picnic table, is an entirely different situation.
Agreed. BTW, I am not now a smoker, and if I have a guest who is dining with me and wishes to have a cigarette after dinner, I do not make them go outside to smoke.
I have do one building on my property where I do not tolerate smoking - my barn. It is full of hay in the loft, and I do not want a fire.
I respect the preferences of non-smokers and have no gripe with them. My gripe is with those anti-smokers who believe they have the right to tell others what to do on their private property.
There is a major difference between non-smokers and anti-smokers. I know the difference.
Makes me sick. There is so much more in this world to worry about, but my Gawd! DON'T SMOKE. Makes me want to throw up.
(Forgive me. I still haven't found my complete ping list yet, what with this new computer and all. Bare with me.
Everyone, please forgive me if I missed you!)
I'm pretty sure that having homosexual "relations" in North St. Paul's parks is already illegal.
Coming soon to a park near you!
But don't smoke afterward. ;^)
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.