Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
So, in your reasoning, the fact that most people don't mean "bow-legged" when they say "cute" is irrelevant? If it used to mean that to some people, it must always mean that to all people?

It's used as an irreverent, Christ-rejecting, cutesy short-cut. Christians shouldn't participate.

Dan

68 posted on 12/03/2004 8:23:01 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: BibChr

The initial question was about its origins. The answer is what it is.


74 posted on 12/03/2004 8:28:30 AM PST by AntiGuv ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
It's used as an irreverent, Christ-rejecting, cutesy short-cut. Christians shouldn't participate.

I find "BibChr" to be an irrevent, Christ-rejecting, cutesy short-cut for "Biblical Christianity." The fires of Hell are gonna feel mighty uncomfortable for you if don't repent and stop using that abbreviation right now!
75 posted on 12/03/2004 8:30:26 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson