Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Signs Landmark Legislation Prohibiting Forced Psychiatric Drugging of Schoolchildren
Citizens Commission on Human Rights (Scientology front) ^ | December 6, 2004

Posted on 12/06/2004 1:02:52 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative

Celebrities, Parents, Legislators and Civil Rights Groups Win Victory for Children's Rights with Passage of the "Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment"

Los Angeles - Celebrities Lisa Marie Presley, Kelly Preston, Kirstie Alley, Jenna Elfman and Juliette Lewis joined the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), a mental health watchdog established by the Church of Scientology, in applauding Congress for passing precedent-setting legislation that bans school personnel forcing parents to drug their children for classroom or behavioral problems. In order to receive federal funds under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), the "Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment," was signed into law by President Bush today and requires schools to implement policies that prohibit schoolchildren being forced onto psychiatric drugs as a requisite for their education.

Hundreds of parents across America have been pressured to put their school-aged children onto cocaine-like stimulants or antidepressants for which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just ordered a "black box label" warning of the drugs' high risk of causing suicide among children and adolescents. Ms. Kelly Preston, who met with members of Congress in June last year to enlist support of the amendment, said, "Every mother has an inherent right to protect her child from harm. However, many mothers have been denied that right because psychiatrists have inundated unwitting teachers with the false opinion that educational and behavioral problems are symptoms of 'mental disorders' that require mind-altering drugs. This law gives hope for a new era in education, one where teachers are free to work with parents to find academic solutions instead of unworkable and harmful psychiatric treatments that benefit no one but the psychiatric industry."

Many groups supported the amendment, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the National Foundation of Women Legislators (NFWL), Parents for a Label and Drug Free Education, as well as numerous state and federal legislators.

Bruce Wiseman, the U.S. President of CCHR says, "Psychiatrists did not want to let go of their stronghold of American schools and launched massive counter efforts to kill this legislation. However, people are waking up to the fact that psychiatric 'mental disorders' have absolutely no scientific/medical validity and that psychiatrists falsely portray them as a disease or physical condition to convince teachers and parents that these are medical issues, which is a complete fraud. Psychiatric 'disorders' are simply checklists of behaviors‹symptoms presumed to be related‹and voted by members of the American Psychiatric Association to be included in their insurance billing bible, the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This has been used to justify the administration of dangerous drugs to more than 8 million children. Parents and teachers were never informed about documented side effects of many of these drugs, including suicide, violence, mania and psychosis."

CCHR says the next step in educational reform is to remove psychiatric and psychological testing and screening from schools which are the feeder lines to psychiatrists who have made turning schools into mental health clinics a business. Millions of students are now dependent upon psychiatric drugs or are taking them illegally. CCHR, joined by scores of parents and civil rights groups, say the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health's recommendations for mandatory mental health screening in school is a frightening representation of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, in which Huxley describes a controlled "utopian" civilization achieved with the "technique of suggestion‹through infant conditioning and, later, with the aid of drugs." While the "Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment" will help prevent some of psychiatry's propensity to drug all normal childhood behavior, many charge that the spurious sounding "Freedom Commission on Mental Health" and its recommendations will open another door to dangerous conditioning leading to massive increases in psychotropic drugging of a new generation.

Dr. Julian Whitaker, director of California's Whitaker Wellness Center warns that the motive behind mandatory mental health screening of children is obvious: "That means drugging them!" For psychiatry, this means, "52 million potential customers." He offers this advice to parents: "First of all, refuse to sign those consent forms when they come home from your child's school‹if they can't test them, they can't drug them."

CCHR will monitor the implementation of this law so that any parent who may still experience coercion to drug their child can contact CCHR to report this and for assistance.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bush43; cult; education; idea; mentalhealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last
While the news is welcome, I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology...
1 posted on 12/06/2004 1:02:53 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

i agree and had the same reaction. what's in it for them?


3 posted on 12/06/2004 1:04:53 PM PST by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

The article's title is misleading. Children cannot be forced to take psychotropic medications with parental consent or a court order.


4 posted on 12/06/2004 1:05:09 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

"applauding Congress for passing precedent-setting legislation that bans school personnel forcing parents to drug their children for classroom or behavioral problems."

The fact that such a law was needed is frightening.


5 posted on 12/06/2004 1:05:20 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

...strange bedfellows, eh?

I actually like to see odd groups find commonalities- gets people otherwise unwilling to listen to one another talking..I think this is great!


6 posted on 12/06/2004 1:05:39 PM PST by SE Mom (God Bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
...I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology... The only reason Scientology has not progressed to it's natural conclusion; i.e. handing out the grape kool-aid in Guyana, or a stand off with BATF; is that there is lots of money to be made peddling the mad rantings of L. Ron Hubbard.
7 posted on 12/06/2004 1:06:59 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
...I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology...

The only reason Scientology has not progressed to it's natural conclusion; i.e. handing out the grape kool-aid in Guyana, or a stand off with BATF; is that there is lots of money to be made peddling the mad rantings of L. Ron Hubbard.

8 posted on 12/06/2004 1:07:15 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

bump


9 posted on 12/06/2004 1:07:37 PM PST by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Yeah! Who the hell issued MEDICAL LIcences to teachers who can't even TEACH our children let alone give them medical diagnosis!!!


10 posted on 12/06/2004 1:07:54 PM PST by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Hopefully the next law will require schools to implement policies that prohibit schoolchildren being forced to learn/hear Liberal ideas as a requisite for their education.


11 posted on 12/06/2004 1:11:37 PM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Aren't the scientologists the ones who'll let their folks die rather than permit medical intervention?


12 posted on 12/06/2004 1:12:08 PM PST by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

The fact that Scientologists think it is a bad thing is almost enough to send me running to the pediatrician to get some 'scrips for my daughter.


13 posted on 12/06/2004 1:12:15 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
I didn't see anything in the article about Bush signing the legislation. I hope he does.

I know very little about the "church" of scientology, but I suspect they are opposed to the use of psychotropic drugs as a solution to anyone's problems.

14 posted on 12/06/2004 1:13:40 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Think in terms of "even a stopped clock is right twice a day."


15 posted on 12/06/2004 1:14:30 PM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

I wonder how persuasive school officials are with weak-willed or ignorant parents in getting their consent to dope-up their kids.


16 posted on 12/06/2004 1:14:50 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Even though this comes from this group....I've listened to the followers of this sect on this and they are very well informed...I'm glad they went after this legislation on a big time bases....keeps us Christian conservatives from having to fight another battle. We've got enough to fight as it is.
17 posted on 12/06/2004 1:15:43 PM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor

That would be "Christian Science."


18 posted on 12/06/2004 1:16:13 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

No one's allowed to compete with the Church of Scienfictionology!


19 posted on 12/06/2004 1:17:37 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARridgerunner

ping


20 posted on 12/06/2004 1:18:02 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Thanks. I had always wondered if that were the same thing. Sounds a lot alike, must be different then.


21 posted on 12/06/2004 1:19:08 PM PST by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Ah, the wonders of Public (Gov't) Education!

Pen them up all day and don't let them play outside lest they COMPETE and damage tender ego and brittle self-esteem. Then when they are overcome with the energy of youth, punish them by KEEPING them inside instead of letting them run outside for recess and put them on brain frying drugs. Send them home wound to the max to sit in front television and video games, spinning their minds completely out of control whilst wasting their physical bodies down to impotent diabetic wards of the State.

Excellent plan executed by intelligent Blue-State geniuses. </sarcasm type='gagging'>


22 posted on 12/06/2004 1:19:08 PM PST by UseYourHead (Smith & Wesson: The original point-and-click interface)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
You might find this interesting...
23 posted on 12/06/2004 1:19:40 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor
Aren't the scientologists the ones who'll let their folks die rather than permit medical intervention?

You are thinking of Christian Science. This is Scientology.

24 posted on 12/06/2004 1:19:57 PM PST by Database
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
I hope that 2 points of interest come out of this discussion.

1. Schools were getting kickbacks for every Attention Deficit student they could create and get medicated.

and

2. Drugs such as covered in this subject would act to prevent the student from being able to serve in the Armed Forces when (if) they grow up.

If these subjects surface, look to the era where ADD became popular, who controls the teachers and which party would further their agenda of dependence and anti-war.

Hint: the same administration was dismantling the military hand over fist at the same time ADD became stylish (and a potential profit center).
25 posted on 12/06/2004 1:20:19 PM PST by Dalite (If PRO is the opposite of CON, What is the opposite of PROgress? Go Figure....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
"Aren't the scientologists the ones who'll let their folks die rather than permit medical intervention?'

Yes they are, which is why they most likely supported it.

Someone call Tom Cruise.

26 posted on 12/06/2004 1:20:33 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Eh, broken clock...right time of day.


27 posted on 12/06/2004 1:21:02 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Wasn't there talk a few weeks ago of Bush doing the exact opposite (allowing forced drugging of students in schools?)

Glad to hear it didn't happen, nonetheless!

Way to go, Dubya!


28 posted on 12/06/2004 1:21:02 PM PST by RockinRight (Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Hopefully the next law will require schools to implement policies that prohibit schoolchildren being forced to learn/hear Liberal ideas as a requisite for their education.

Ha! Won't happen!

29 posted on 12/06/2004 1:21:38 PM PST by RockinRight (Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Database

There are cases on both sides.


30 posted on 12/06/2004 1:22:20 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.


31 posted on 12/06/2004 1:23:02 PM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative; kallisti; SE Mom; Wneighbor; lugsoul; My2Cents; shield

This is one of the ways the "Church" of Scientology recruits new members. Parents come in with problem kids, and the "Church" directs them to alternative programs (its own, though often not openly identified as such) that don't involve medication. Unfortunately, they do involve having the whole family brainwashed by Scientology, and turning over lots of money to Scientology. Scientology doesn't want the psychiatric/pharmaceutical establishment making money on these kids, because they want to take all the money themselves!


32 posted on 12/06/2004 1:23:32 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Operation Clambake
33 posted on 12/06/2004 1:23:45 PM PST by Ladysmith (Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

There's been some discussion of federally mandated mental health evaluations of kids...a horrible idea. But I've never seen anything official from the White House suggesting Bush supports this policy. (I hope he doesn't.)


34 posted on 12/06/2004 1:26:20 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
While the news is welcome, I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology...

Your concern is well-founded. The Crutch of $cientology never does anything for free. There's something rotten here...

35 posted on 12/06/2004 1:26:41 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Funny how well good old Proverbs works for raising kids huh? No need for recruiting and brainwashing. Just do it God's way.


36 posted on 12/06/2004 1:27:09 PM PST by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

ahhh, soo desu ne. thanks, that makes sense. i knew it wasn't altruism.


37 posted on 12/06/2004 1:27:40 PM PST by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: UseYourHead; All

I am so glad that this legislation has passed. When my son was young (2nd grade), he attended public school. As a punishment for getting ansy during a long class session, he and others (happened to be all boys) were kept inside for recess---robbing them of the necessary time to work off their steam! It was always the same band of boys that were punished in this way. At one point, the principal suggested to some of us parents that medication might be necessary! I couldn't believe my ears. One parent actually caved, but we wouldn't. My son got older, learned to settle down naturally (particularly after a healthy stint of homeschooling for 2 years), and now he's a star student in his private middle school (great grades, high test scores. Too often parents, particularly those of spirited boys, are cornered into submission. As the slogan goes: It's important to just say no to drugs!


38 posted on 12/06/2004 1:28:25 PM PST by julymoon (Just Say No)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ARridgerunner

A Canadian onlooker asks:

Why is such legislation necessary?

Is not forced drugging of schoolchildren by teachers outlawed by the Bill of Rights?

/sarcasm off


39 posted on 12/06/2004 1:28:28 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

I have some concerns about the fact that this law seems to have emanated from California, not because California is so prone to forcing kids on to drugs, but just the opposite. In Orange County special ed students who are on medication are seen by the county mental health dept, and evaluated by a psychiatrist. They believe that the family practioners are not qualified to hand out psychotropic drugs. The head psychiatrist interviews not only the child but the whole family before deciding whether drugs are the proper remedy. Then the child is seen by a psychologist and monitored weekly to see if the drugs help and offer counselling in study habits and social relationships. It's a very complete program. They even visit the school periodically to observe the child in the classroom (and the teacher at the same time).


40 posted on 12/06/2004 1:31:23 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor

There have been cases where Scientology has held members captive in forced re-indoctrination situations, when they were trying to leave the group, and made them very ill in the process. At least one woman died this way.


41 posted on 12/06/2004 1:31:38 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor
Aren't the scientologists the ones who'll let their folks die rather than permit medical intervention?

As was the case with Lisa McPherson and many others.

42 posted on 12/06/2004 1:32:16 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
I can tell you why the Scientologists are interested in this: because Scientology preaches that psychotropic drugs are evil and that Scientology's rites are what can help people get their lives together. I believe that Scientology is itself a crock, but I do appreciate the group's support of legislation like this, in addition to its teaching that homosexual behavior is abnormal.
43 posted on 12/06/2004 1:32:46 PM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
I'm generally opposed to forced psychiatric drugging. Then again, there are times . . .


44 posted on 12/06/2004 1:32:56 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
At least one woman died this way.

Several, actually. See http://www.whyaretheydead.net/ for details.

45 posted on 12/06/2004 1:33:01 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Is not forced drugging of schoolchildren by teachers outlawed by the Bill of Rights?

According to the Bill of Rights, our right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, either. That hasn't exactly slowed down the Liberals or their RINO littermates.

46 posted on 12/06/2004 1:34:16 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Spok

"The fact that such a law was needed is frightening."

You can bet the teacher's union had it's grubby little hand in this. All they want is money, a job they can't be fired from or held accountable for, and for your kid to just sit there and watch the TV. If your kid makes a fuss, drug him/her into submission.


47 posted on 12/06/2004 1:34:25 PM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

I think you are on the short list for a middle-of-the-night door-kicking visit from John Travolta.


48 posted on 12/06/2004 1:35:27 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

I'm sure your right...the establishment of this cult is also extremely interesting....Being a Christian conservative... I would never step into teachings by the many cults throughout America and the world. Many have hooks not easily eliminated.


49 posted on 12/06/2004 1:35:45 PM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
There's been some discussion of federally mandated mental health evaluations of kids
. ...a horrible idea.
But I've never seen anything official from the White House
suggesting Bush supports this policy.
(I hope he doesn't.)


He does:

Attempt to stop mandatory mental screening fails

50 posted on 12/06/2004 1:37:41 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson