Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Navy's failure to throw this bum into the brig speaks volumes about our new, sensitive military.
1 posted on 12/07/2004 9:07:02 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: pabianice

Shouldn't they have arrested him before he made that grandstand play?


96 posted on 12/07/2004 10:14:15 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
. Troops “are not told what exactly is the reason behind it,” he said. “I think oil is pretty much the reason.”

I was not aware that troops had to have an explanation of exactly what the reason is behind every order.
And then if they don't like the reason behind the order, then the order is canceled?
Whatever happened to having to walk the plank ?
100 posted on 12/07/2004 10:22:37 AM PST by oldbrowser (You lost the election.....................Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Another poster boy for retroactive abortion! As a US Navy Viet Nam Veteran, I say place him on the fantail before a firing squad with TV news cameras present.


119 posted on 12/08/2004 9:46:01 AM PST by ORECON (Condi Rice/Ann Coulter - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Troops “are not told what exactly is the reason behind it,” he said.

1. Probably a lie.

2. If not a lie, the reason they weren't all sat down like little kids and "told the reason" is because the American fighting man is pretty smart and can figure out that killing terrorists is a good thing.

120 posted on 12/09/2004 10:31:05 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance copywriter looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The Navy's failure to throw this bum into the brig speaks volumes about our new, sensitive military.

As was discussed in this thread, the Navy, by their own regulations, cannot arrest him until the official roll call aboard ship marks him as officially absent. As far as the Navy was concerned, he hadn't actually committed a crime yet. Don't worry, his days will soon be filled with regret, especially if he hasn't yet served enough time to "pay back" his signing bonus.

I say we keep sending these girliemen to Canada, and Canada keeps sending us their doctors. Can't think of many better trades.

121 posted on 12/09/2004 10:38:50 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance copywriter looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Correction: The bit about him not actually being AWOL yet wasn't explicitly mentioned in the thread I linked to, it was in this article:

Navy spokesman said Paredes, 23, wasn't taken into custody because he hadn't violated any regulations. Navy procedures stipulate that an officer can't be listed as missing until an official roll has been called aboard ship.

"Paredes is considered (to be) in an unauthorized absent status," said Cmdr. William Fenick, spokesman for the 3rd Fleet. "He is encouraged to check into any naval facility as soon as possible. Sailors have an obligation to get under way when their ships deploy, and today over 5,000 sailors and Marines met that obligation and began their deployment."

Paredes believes he wasn't detained because of the media presence. On Sunday, he had called newspapers and radio and TV stations to announce his anti-deployment intentions.

Paredes had planned to publicly throw his military I.D. into the ocean to underscore his stand against the war. But yesterday, he changed his mind after learning that he could be charged with destruction of government property.

Note that last para, the wussy little moron wants us to believe he was afraid to get arrested for destruction of government property, but eager to be arrested for being a deserter. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

122 posted on 12/09/2004 10:48:18 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance copywriter looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The original "Bonhomme Richard" was the ship of John Paul Jones wasn't it?

The founder of the American Navy would be ashamed of this punk little jailhouse lawyer.

PS - Jones himself was an immigrant of sorts (Russian ancestry, etc.).


148 posted on 12/09/2004 3:15:44 PM PST by relictele (so there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson