Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finally - a breakthrough for oil?
Telepolis ^ | 12/06/2004 | Craig Morris

Posted on 12/08/2004 9:30:48 AM PST by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: ckilmer

I wondered how this was going. Our #2 son came home with an article about it about a year and a half ago. If investors got interested, each large metropolitan area could have it's own oil refinery! Think of how much LESS stuff would have to go into landfills!


41 posted on 12/08/2004 10:37:18 AM PST by SuziQ (W STILL the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Disagree that it some sort of complete solution.
///////////
true. not a complete solution.

the ideal that everyone seems to be looking at is hydrogen. interestingly the cheapest way so far (the atomic plant out in idaho is still theoretical)to make hydrogen is to mix hot water steam with methane gas under high pressure. as it happens--I think that methane is one of the byproducts of the process here. I've seen as well some new innovations out the oak ridge labs in tennassee that allow for better seperations in this process.

if they can just figure a way to get cheap water desalination--we'd have the makings for a plausible 21st century civilization.


42 posted on 12/08/2004 10:38:08 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

bump.

I have been following this story for several years now.


43 posted on 12/08/2004 10:38:58 AM PST by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

I don't understand this. Isn't the price of a barrel of oil over $40 per barrel? Before it is refined?
////////////////
yes the follow up article I posted is dated
4apr04


44 posted on 12/08/2004 10:43:06 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Coming soon to your metro area:
aluminum recycling
Paper recycling
plastic recycling
Organic waste recycling
non-organic waste - garbage
(yes, I know that paper and plastic are "organic" - carbon based. I also know the way governments run--once a process is enacted, in this case recycling, it never goes away.)
45 posted on 12/08/2004 10:43:13 AM PST by rightsmart (Was W '04, now W '0N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rightsmart

(yes, I know that paper and plastic are "organic" - carbon based. I also know the way governments run--once a process is enacted, in this case recycling, it never goes away.)
//////////////
well no. the ticket would be to give the waste to a private company for a fee--a small fee. so that instead of municipal waste being in the debit in government budgets--municipal waste would be an asset.


46 posted on 12/08/2004 10:46:52 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I agree, it would make sense to privatize the process and a possible revenue stream for a municipality! My comments were meant to be sarcastic about the way governments actually run - with so much already invested in the business of recycling, I would expect change to actually take place in small, incremental steps.


47 posted on 12/08/2004 10:55:47 AM PST by rightsmart (Was W '04, now W '0N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Like I said ealier N.Y. garbage is sent to Ohio landfills it would seem to me that if Ohio would put in one of these plants then charege N.Y. to dispose of their garbage then sell the oil created back to N.Y. it would be a great boom to Ohio economy.


48 posted on 12/08/2004 10:57:00 AM PST by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CONSERVE

oh I see what you mean. yeah it would be a boon for the ohio economy. but the smart thing for new york to do would be to just put one of these biomass refineries around NYC and save themselves the cost of trucking...and keep the change.

In any case Ohio would have plenty of biomass resources too--not only from its cities but--and probably more importantly --from its agriculture.


49 posted on 12/08/2004 11:13:11 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

If he succeeds in making oil from BS then Washington, DC will be the next Saudi Arabia.


50 posted on 12/08/2004 11:50:45 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

If he succeeds in making oil from BS then Washington, DC will be the next Saudi Arabia.

///////////////
well stricktly speaking BS oil would be some midwest/western milk or beef state. the refined grades of oil of course would have to come from PS oil. Not sure which state is the king of PS here. Likely the midwest somewhere. But everytime there's a hurricane come up the eastcoast it washes out the Pig farms in North Carolina and fills the rivers downstream with PS.

When Brian Appel gave a presentation of his technology to state officials in North Carolina a year or so ago--Mr Appel got a standing ovation.


51 posted on 12/08/2004 11:59:24 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Uh, Dude, last time I checked there were 6.9 billyun </carl sagan> tons of sewage sludge produced every year. Also Germany (2.5 billion tons) and the UK (1.1 billion tons) could also help reduce demand for drilled oil.

At some point, China and India (Bazillions of tons) will jump on Board.

Can you say "Total Energy Independence in Our Lifetime?"

I know I can...
52 posted on 12/08/2004 12:22:51 PM PST by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

"municipal waste would be an asset."

You are spot on, here. The municipality I work for runs a landfill and a sewage treatment plant. They are in the early planning stages to pursue this (after I showed them several articles two years ago.)

The big hold up right now? Capitalization, times are tough in California. If this had been developed 7 years earlier, we would already have had the plant built and operating. If I had the money, I'd finance it myself in a heartbeat.

It will be interesting to see how this works out in Philadelphia. I suspect they will find dozens of major cities jumping in as soon as the process shows results.


53 posted on 12/08/2004 12:33:50 PM PST by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Go_Raiders

works for me too.


54 posted on 12/08/2004 12:34:20 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Turkey guts and their contents. Took a tour of a chicken processing plant about twelve years ago and the second stage was the "removal" of the innards. That part of the plant held quite an aroma.


55 posted on 12/08/2004 12:39:10 PM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

You know, you might not be too far off! If the technology is sound and the cost of constructing a refinery could be "manageable" then lots of municipalities could generate their own fuel needs, for transportation, heating and industry.


56 posted on 12/08/2004 12:39:48 PM PST by hardhead ("Curly, if you say it's a fine morning, I'll shoot you!" - John Wayne, McLintock 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Assuming all this is true and feasible as a process for producing oil--wouldn't we have to be up to our ass in turkeys to provide all the offal necessary to make a serious addition to oil supplies?

I happen to know a little about turkey farms. They regularly have sudden diseases that can kill off 50,000 turkeys at a time. Wouldn't this cause a temporary shortfall in offal supplies--and a spike in the price of oil for turkey speculators.

And what about the cost of raising them? Wouldn't it be cheaper to simply take the corn and convert it directly instead of waiting around for blood, guts and feathers.

I have a marvelous prospectus for Labrador Retriever Ranching if anyone is interested.


57 posted on 12/08/2004 12:40:45 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp

I seem to recall that the process was somewhere around 90% of the energy put in is recovered. However, they are getting a refined product and reducing landfill and natural waste products (but I do not know how that efficiency number included the final product cost).


58 posted on 12/08/2004 12:49:47 PM PST by ScottM1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith; Sybeck1
"Offal" also means rendered fats, bones, etc. Actually, the content of animal fats is likely the most desirable product to put through the unit. It is closest in chemical consistency to light crude oil.
59 posted on 12/08/2004 12:52:32 PM PST by ScottM1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Speaking of decentralized technology: as a poor engineering undergrad I worked on a waste biomass-to-oil project which could provide small agricultural villages enough diesel grade oil to run as many large generators as they could come up with. All done with a handful of discarded 55 gallon drums... And this was in the late 70s.


60 posted on 12/08/2004 1:00:30 PM PST by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson