NOWHERE do they mention that the birth mother no longer considers herself to be a lesbian. A BIG issue for those who push the homosexual agenda.
She will be villified.
This child was not "born to" two women. And they say it's the fundies who don't believe in science.
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
|
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
Ping
Homosexual Agenda Ping. Another very important article.
I agree with tuesday afternoon's comment #13 (as well as some other comments).
If this case is decided in favor of the lesbian ex-shackup, it is very bad. Two women don't "have" a child. One of them has a child, the other one has no relationship to it other than as babysitter.
Let me and ItsOurTimeNow know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
This case is an attempt to test the "Full Faith and Credit" clause. These two were "married" in VT and now the "gay" agenda pushers want to test the limits. That's why the big guns are in on it.