Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Stole the Holy Land? [absolutely Hilarious!]
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | December 9, 2004 | Steven Plaut

Posted on 12/09/2004 7:15:50 AM PST by Tolik

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Tolik
From "History of Palestine"

Ruler of Palestine from 70AD - 1840AD

In the year 3828 (70), at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem, Palestine was under the dominion of the Romans.

In the year 4092 (332), under Emperor Constantine, the Greek — Romano-Greek Empire.

In the year 4374 (614), under King Kusarai (Chosroes?) for a brief space, Persian, but later, again under the government of the Greeks.

In the year 4397 (637) under Calif Omar, Arab or Mahomedan.

In the year 4502 (742), it was for a short time under the dominion of the Turks or Tartars, but at a later period again under the Arabs.

In the year 4628 (868), under the Califs of Egypt.

In the year 4800 (1040), again under the Turks or Tartars.

In the year 4859 (1099), under the European Christians.

In the year 4947 (1187), under Saladin, Calif of Egypt.

In the year 5004 (1244), under Casiunus, i.e. under Turks or Tartars.

In the year 5051 (1291), under Sultan Asa of Egypt, under Mameluks.

In the year 5161 (1401), under Timurlan [Tamerlane], for a short time, i.e. under Mongols, than again under the Mameluks.

In the year 5278 (1518), under Selim of Constantinople, under Ottomans.

In the year 5591 (1831), under Mahmud Ali, Pacha of Egypt.

In the year 5600 (1840), under Abd al Medjid, Ottoman.

Here would well apply the passage from Judges 9:2: “What is better for you, that seventy men, all the sons of Jerubaal, should rule over you, or that one man should be your master?”

21 posted on 12/09/2004 8:10:37 AM PST by Alouette ("Who is for the LORD, come with me!" -- Mattisyahu ben Yohanon, father of Judah Maccabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik; IAF ThunderPilot

Great posting, Tolik, thanks, it gave me a good chuckle! Thanks for the ping, IAF!


22 posted on 12/09/2004 8:15:22 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (tired of shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Also,
The Romans (Italy) were those who named the land of Israel as Palestine when it was under their occupation. So this is just another name to the land of Israel as same as the old name Zion.


23 posted on 12/09/2004 8:22:28 AM PST by IAF ThunderPilot (Israel Defence Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

"The other claim by the anti-Zionists is that Jews have no rights to the lands of Israel (historic Palestine) because they moved there from some other places."

Weren't the Jewish people forced out of Judea at some point in history? And didn't their descendents return to the homeland to flee persecutions and pogroms in Europe and Russia?


24 posted on 12/09/2004 8:31:04 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

"The other claim by the anti-Zionists is that Jews have no rights to the lands of Israel (historic Palestine) because they moved there from some other places."

Weren't the Jewish people forced out of Judea at some point in history? And didn't their descendents return to the homeland to flee persecutions and pogroms in Europe and Russia?


25 posted on 12/09/2004 8:31:07 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

This is excellent!!!


26 posted on 12/09/2004 9:00:39 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (If Chanukkah celelbrates "religious freedom," why did Mattityahu cut the man's head off???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Steven Plaut is great!


27 posted on 12/09/2004 9:02:42 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (If Chanukkah celelbrates "religious freedom," why did Mattityahu cut the man's head off???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tolik
If it does, then it goes without saying that the Americans and Canadians must lead the way and show the Israelis the light, by returning all lands that they seized from the Indians and the Mexicans to their original owners and going back to whence they came. For that matter, the Mexicans of Spanish ancestry also need to leave. The Anglo-Saxons, meaning the English, will be invited to turn the British isles over to their rightful original Celtic and Druid owners, while they return to their own ancestral Saxon homeland in northern Germany and Denmark. The Danes of course will be asked to move aside, in fact to move back to their Norwegian and Swedish homelands, to make room for the returning Anglo-Saxons.

But that is just a beginning. The Spanish will be called upon to leave the Iberian peninsula that they wrongfully occupy, and return it to the Celtiberians. Similarly the Portuguese occupiers will leave their lands and return them to the Lusitanians. The Magyars will go back where they came from and leave Hungary to its true owners. The Australians and New Zealanders obviously will have to end their occupations of lands that do not belong to them. The Thais will leave Thailand. The Bulgarians will return to their Volga homeland and abandon occupied Bulgaria. Anyone speaking Spanish will be expected to end his or her forced occupation of Latin America. It goes without saying that the French will lose almost all their lands to their rightful owners. The Turks will go back to Mongolia and leave Anatolia altogether, returning it to the Greeks. The Germans will go back to Gotland. The Italians will return the boot to the Etruscans and Greeks.

This is the best puncturing of the Leftist/"Palaeo" myth of "indigenousness"/"autochthony" I have ever read! Only 'Adam HaRi'shon ever sprung from the soil and everyone is an "invader"/"occupier" from somewhere else!!!

28 posted on 12/09/2004 9:08:51 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (If Chanukkah celelbrates "religious freedom," why did Mattityahu cut the man's head off???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notigar

Sure this article wasn't written by Straw Man?


?


29 posted on 12/09/2004 9:10:06 AM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Valin

The straw-man rhetorical technique (sometimes called straw person) is the practice of refuting weaker arguments than one's opponents actually offer.


30 posted on 12/09/2004 9:15:29 AM PST by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

BTTT


31 posted on 12/09/2004 10:19:40 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
A billion Chinese would have to trek back to the central Asian steppes. Ditto for all Koreans & Japanese.

Hawaiians must immediately start building kontiki rafts and study the Pacific's currents, because they have to set sail for their original South Pacific islands.

32 posted on 12/09/2004 5:26:16 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Bump for later read. :)


33 posted on 12/09/2004 7:41:35 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

I LIKE this explanation...Logical, simple!


34 posted on 12/10/2004 12:33:00 AM PST by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson