Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist finds 'God' after 50 years
Gaurdian ^ | December 11, 2004 | Laura Smith

Posted on 12/10/2004 7:43:39 PM PST by Lorianne

A philosophy professor who has been a leading proponent of atheism for more than 50 years has decided that God may exist after all.

Antony Flew, 81, now believes scientific evidence supports the theory that some sort of intelligence created the universe. But he continues to reject traditional religious ideas of God and especially the idea of salvation after death.

He said: "I'm thinking of a God very different from the God of the Christian and far and away from the God of Islam because both are depicted as omnipotent Oriental despots, cosmic Saddam Husseins."

He still accepts Darwinian evolutionary theory but doubts it can explain the complexities of the origins of life.

Throughout his career, Flew has expounded the lack of evidence for the existence of God while lecturing at St John's College, Oxford and King's College, London. He said his change of heart had been a gradual process prompted by new scientific research.

Speaking in a new video, Has Science Discovered God?, Flew argues that the investigation of DNA "has shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce [life], that intelligence must have been involved."

The first indication of his about-turn came in a letter to Philosophy Now magazine, in which he said: "It has become inordinately difficult even to begin to think about constructing a naturalistic theory of the evolution of that first reproducing organism."

Flew, who is writing an introduction of a new edition of his work, God and Philosophy, said: "My whole life has been guided by the principle of Plato's Socrates: follow the evidence, wherever it leads."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: antonyflew; atheism; god; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Lorianne
This guy is the religious equivalent of the flat earth society. Ironically, in their intellectual superiority, they believe themselves to be the sophisticated thinkers.

They are pretty funny in their smugness. Yea, right, there is no God - whatever.

41 posted on 12/10/2004 9:42:43 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: bowzer313
It is the fatal conceit of modern man to deny God under any and all circumstances.

Well said. I refer to this as "ignorant arrogance."

When man can't "figure out" God, or be given "proof," he concludes God must not exist.

How pathetically naive. To say, in effect, "I can't explain this, therefore it does not exist."

44 posted on 12/10/2004 9:49:22 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

<< nor do i think it's insignificant when a professional atheist changes his mind...>>.


A professional athiest...there's gold in them thar hills.


45 posted on 12/10/2004 9:54:51 PM PST by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
You are closest to God just after birth and just before death. It's all the time in the middle that gets us in trouble.

I remember that as well. Thanks for reminding me and for your service as well. I worked for (not in) the Navy for quite a while but do not know what RVN71 is.
46 posted on 12/10/2004 9:59:15 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sirjohn

"Mommy, where did I come from? Why did God make me?"

"He wanted you to grow up to be a professional athiest."


47 posted on 12/10/2004 10:00:07 PM PST by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: microgood

Republic of Viet Nam class of '71


48 posted on 12/10/2004 10:04:32 PM PST by ProudVet77 (Beer - It's not just for breakfast anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PLK

<< This guy is the religious equivalent of the flat earth society. Ironically, in their intellectual superiority, they believe themselves to be the sophisticated thinkers. >>

Bingo. They want an answer that will satisfy the intellect - as if they created intellect.


49 posted on 12/10/2004 10:10:00 PM PST by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
He said: "I'm thinking of a God very different from the God of the Christian and far and away from the God of Islam because both are depicted as omnipotent Oriental despots, cosmic Saddam Husseins."

Yeah right. Suddenly I'm reminded of that famous verse of scripture from Jeremicah 96:3 that goes "and thou shalt feed thy enemies and non-believers into a plastic shredder so as to remove them from mine sight."

Oriental? Huh?

50 posted on 12/10/2004 10:15:33 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLK
How pathetically naive. To say, in effect, "I can't explain this, therefore it does not exist."

This actually started in the 1600s with Locke,Hume,Berkeley. Berkeley thought that to exist you had to be perceived. The tree in the forest was covered by God seeing it. But it seems this thinking is a spinoff of the empiricist and rationalist thinking of the 1600s.
51 posted on 12/10/2004 10:32:50 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sirjohn

>Just because you don't want something to exist, that doesn't >mean it doesn't exist.

There's no "want" in the position I espouse...as I've said, I could be wrong, but I'm much more comfortable in a position that does not rely upon the mystical to explain existence.

And of course the converse of your collary is equally valid; just because you want something to exist, doesn't mean it does.


52 posted on 12/11/2004 6:15:44 PM PST by fourthrider (fourthrider...Proud Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fourthrider

I never said I wanted anything to exist. Quite the contrary, to be scientific one should consider the possibility that nothing exists at all. Are you capable of this?

I did say that logic will get you nowhere.

For example, you seem to say you won't be satisfied without some kind of proof, i.e., a proof that answers to your intellect. But then you say that proof isn't even possible. So where does this leave you?

I agree with you that intellectual proof isn't possible. But you don't rely on the intellect to tell you water is good when you're thirsty.

I don't mean to be unkind, but since you think in terms of "A" versus "B" - it can only be one or the other, two logical opposites, both of which are absurd - this indicates to me you are a little slow of wit.

Are you the author of the intellect of which you seem so proud?

Did you ever wonder where you came from?


53 posted on 12/11/2004 8:28:02 PM PST by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sirjohn
>Did you ever wonder where you came from?

Well, given that both parents are planted and barring any genetic evidence to the contrary, I assume I occurred as the result of an exchange of fluids between my parents.

But I suspect you are alluding to an argument of "first causes" which is both pointless and circular.

The only idea I'm trying to raise here is that human existence can be understood without having to rely upon mystical explanations.

For me that works, there is for me no mystical underpinning for our being around pumping air. And when we stop pumping air we just stop, that's it....nothing else follows.

I'm not bothered by that prospect in the least...but if one feels the need to infer that there is more beyond this life, there's no harm, no foul. If they're right, they're right, if they're wrong, it won't make any difference to them -- they'll never know :)

I, speaking for myself, and only for myself, find life to be a lot more understandable proceeding on the basis that there is no underlying mystical component to it.
54 posted on 12/13/2004 9:04:39 PM PST by fourthrider (fourthrider...Proud Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fourthrider

<< For me that works, there is for me no mystical underpinning for our being around pumping air. And when we stop pumping air we just stop, that's it....nothing else follows. >>


If all you are is a hunk of protoplasm, I guess there is no sense continuing this conversation. I'm not interested in exchanging ideas with a piece of meat. Good day.


55 posted on 12/16/2004 10:41:09 AM PST by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson