Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerik's Position Was Untenable, Bush Aide Says
New York Times ^ | 12/12/04 | ELISABETH BUMILLER and ERIC LIPTON

Posted on 12/11/2004 1:40:41 PM PST by wagglebee

WASHINGTON, Dec. 11 - President Bush readily accepted Bernard B. Kerik's decision to withdraw his nomination as homeland security secretary after the White House quickly concluded on Friday evening that it would be impossible for him to win confirmation for a post that supervises enforcement of the nation's immigration laws if he had had immigration problems in his own household, White House officials said on Saturday.

Only hours earlier on Friday, Mr. Kerik informed the administration that, contrary to assurances he had given the White House counsel's office before the president nominated him on Dec. 3, a nanny he had employed appeared to have been in the country illegally and that he had failed to pay taxes on her behalf. He told President Bush in a brief phone call about 8:30 p.m. Friday of his decision to withdraw, said a White House official.

White House officials were clearly annoyed at Mr. Kerik for not determining the nanny's immigration status prior to this week, but said they had no evidence he had sought to mislead them. "It was Kerik's screw up, it was that simple," the official said. "But it's a mistake you can't tolerate with someone who has oversight for immigration."

The nanny Mr. Kerik had employed, who has not yet been identified, left the country about two weeks ago, just prior to the announcement of his nomination, a former New York City official said on Saturday, adding that her departure had been planned for at least two months.

At a news conference today, Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former mayor and now a business associate of Mr. Kerik's, called the discovery "an embarrassment to me and to Bernie and to those of us that supported him because we should have disclosed this, we should have found out earlier." But he said he thought that the issue of the status of any domestic help was "the second or third question" that White House officials asked Mr. Kerik in the preliminary vetting they do of all potential nominees, "and he said he didn't believe he had a problem here."

Mr. Kerik's withdrawal was the first major blunder in the administration's process of assembling its second-term cabinet, but not a new experience for Mr. Bush's team. Four years ago, when Mr. Bush nominated Linda Chavez as labor secretary, it was discovered after the initial vetting process that she had given shelter to, and employed, an illegal immigrant. At the time, Mr. Bush's aides were outraged and promised to change their methods for reviewing potential nominees, but on Saturday several officials said that because Mr. Bush wanted to make his decisions speedily their initial review had been quick.

Mr. Kerik's housekeeper situation was only the latest question to be revealed about the nominee. A series of critical news reports about questionable actions had begun to surface about Mr. Kerik, threatening to turn his Senate confirmation into a lengthy embarrassment for the administration. The reports looked at Mr. Kerik's use of city personnel while in office, potential conflicts between his business life and the role of the homeland security department, and events growing out of his personal financial difficulties several years ago.

One Democratic Senate staff member, who had been following the nomination process closely and asked not to be identified because of the political sensitivity of the matter, said he was convinced that the nanny question was not the sole reason that Mr. Kerik had dropped out. "Multiple media organizations were pursuing multiple stories," that would be potentially damaging to Mr. Kerik, he said. Because many of these questions had not yet been answered by the administration, the staff member said, "fundamentally, he was a bad pick."

The staff member added: "The process worked here."

Another Senate staff member, who works for a Democrat on the Government Affairs Committee, which oversees the homeland security secretary nomination process, said that from the start, there was a sense that the White House had not properly examined Mr. Kerik's background.

"They rushed this nomination and did not look as closely as they should have," he said.

Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and the chairwoman of the Government Affairs Committee, said that among the possible candidates to succeed Mr. Kerik, at least in her mind, would be Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, or Asa Hutchinson, the assistant secretary at homeland security. Other names mentioned on Saturday included Frances Fragos Townsend, the domestic security adviser; Joe Allbaugh, the former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, who now runs his own Washington-based consulting firm; and Michael O. Leavitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. Those options had apparently also been considered before Mr. Kerik was nominated.

"I am confident that President Bush will move swiftly to find a replacement for Bernie Kerik," Senator Collins said in a statement on Saturday.

On Saturday morning, Mr. Kerik emerged from his two-story yellow house in Franklin Lakes, N.J., and spoke to reporters in his driveway, flanked by two security guards. He said he believed he could have made it through the confirmation process, but decided the process would be a burden to the administration.

"It would have been messy, ugly and an embarrassment to President Bush, so I withdrew my name," he said. He added, "I think when you're in a position like this, the press, the media and all your enemies try to find things that a person has done wrong. But I don't think that there would have been problem with the nomination."

He refused to disclose the name or nationality of the nanny, and would not say how long she had worked for him or provide any other details about her.

"Out of respect for her privacy, I'm not going to go into details except to say that she is a good woman," Mr. Kerik said.

A former city official who asked not to be identified said Mr. Kerik had acknowledged that he had said "no" when the White House originally asked if he had a nanny problem. According to the former official, Mr. Kerik now says that he did not pay enough attention to the details of the nanny's hiring and that he did not realize until the last few days that she had been in the country illegally.

Mr. Giuliani, who had spoken on Mr. Kerik's behalf to the White House, said he felt partly responsible for what had happened.

"I wish for everybody's sake, including mine, that this had been focused on earlier," said Mr. Giuliani, who brought Mr. Kerik to prominence as his commissioner of both corrections and police. "Then you would never have gotten to this position. I take my share of responsibility for that."

Mr. Giuliani said he never gave the White House any broad assurances that Mr. Kerik's background was entirely clean, saying that the president's staff was going through its normal process of evaluating a cabinet nominee.

"I never had a conversation in which I vouched for him or was asked about this issue or any other issue," Mr. Giuliani said. "Obviously, everyone would have preferred if this was discovered earlier," he said

Both Mr. Giuliani and the White House official said the administration had reviewed any potential nanny problems as part of a full vetting process of Mr. Kerik prior to the confirmation hearings.

"We went through a full vetting process that includes everything that could be of issue," the official said. "I believe it was only when he started going through the specific compliance process that the problem became a little more acute and that's when he brought it to us."

Asked if the White House felt it had been misled by Mr. Kerik, the official said, "I wouldn't characterize it in that way."

The official bristled when asked whether the White House regretted listening to Mr. Giuliani.

"There's a misperception out there," the official said. "Giuliani was obviously a strong supporter of Bernie Kerik, but we don't make decisions based on recommendations or the faith of other people's word. We do our own independent vetting and selection process."

Many people, the official added, had made recommendations on behalf of Mr. Kerik. "But the president had his own independent relationship with Kerik that had formed over the last several years and he made his own decision," the official said.

Mr. Giuliani said the White House had not expressed any anger to him or to Mr. Kerik.

Mr. Kerik, who said he had first uncovered the problem as he and his lawyers went through the paperwork required for Senate confirmation of his job on Friday, had been in contact earlier in the day with the White House counsel's office. He later called Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff, and the phone call with Mr. Bush was arranged.

"We are disappointed because President Bush believes he was the right person for the challenges our country faces," the White House official said. "He also respects his decision. Unfortunately, these things happen during a confirmation process."

The withdrawal of Mr. Kerik was a disappointment not only for the former police commissioner and the former mayor, but also for elected officials from New York who thought Mr. Kerik would be attuned to the needs of the city.

"I am disappointed that Bernie Kerik will not be homeland security secretary," said Senator Charles E. Schumer, a Democrat from New York. "Few have better understood the needs of New York and of our nation when it comes to doing more to keep us safe from terrorism here at home. I hope the president will nominate someone who exhibits Bernie's deep commitment to keeping New York - and America - safer from terrorism."

In the three years since Mr. Kerik left city government, he has made millions of dollars in the private sector, much of it working for companies that do business with the Department of Homeland Security, and which are seeking to expand their sales. His single biggest source of income was Taser International, an Arizona-based manufacturer of stun guns that added Mr. Kerik to its board and gave him stock options that Mr. Kerik has since sold, earning $6.2 million in pre-tax profits.

Most of Taser's sales come from local and state police departments, but it has also been trying to sell its shock guns to Customs and Border Protection, a division of the Department of Homeland Security. Mr. Kerik also has served on the board of CamelBak, a company based in Petaluma, Calif., that sells water supply backpacks to the United States military and law enforcement branches, including the border patrol.

Mr. Giuliani said he was convinced that these and other business ties to homeland security companies were not a factor in Mr. Kerik's decision to back out. Mr. Giuliani said that the effort to collect a past due debt on a condominium he owned in East Rutherford, N.J. - including, apparently, an arrest warrant that was issued for Mr. Kerik in 1998, based on the outstanding condominium fees - also did not play a role.

"That was a civil proceeding that was resolved. That fits into the category of something that you can easily explain," he said. The arrest warrant was first reported by Newsweek.

"Whenever this happens, there is always the idea that it must be something else, it must be something else," Mr. Giuliani said. "But that is when there is not a good reason. This is a good reason. Who would actually think he could go forward with this issue?"

He added that Mr. Kerik, who spent about half an hour on Saturday outside his house putting up Christmas decorations, including miniature Santas and wire reindeer of white lights, would do "great things" in the future.

"This is a sad day for him and his family," he said. "But we all have complex lives. Sometimes it trips you up."

White House officials said that in their initial review of nominees, they run down a list of questions involving potentially embarrassing problems: legal difficulties, the status of household workers, past divorces or relationships and tax problems, among other issues. "We try to go through public records," said one senior official. "But without guidance from the nominee, there is only so much you can do."

Mr. Kerik's nomination had not even been formally presented to the Senate; it had not planned to hold hearings on Mr. Kerik until late January or perhaps early February. So the formal vetting process, particular for the Senate, had only just begun.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; bernardkerik; bushcabinet; dhs; homelandsecurity; kerik; napalminthemorning; religionofpeace; term2; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last
What pisses me off the most is that these people are more forthcoming about such easily discovered problems BEFORE the nomination is announced.
1 posted on 12/11/2004 1:40:41 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

no better way to get your name out into the public


2 posted on 12/11/2004 1:43:47 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Mr. Kerik informed the administration that, contrary to assurances he had given the White House counsel's office before the president nominated him on Dec. 3, a nanny he had employed appeared to have been in the country illegally and that he had failed to pay taxes on her behalf

If the above is true, the guy lied. Better to find that out now, rather than later, that the guy has a character flaw (he's a liar) that renders him unfit to serve.

3 posted on 12/11/2004 1:44:40 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Dubya's fan
Shouldn't the W/H had an FBI SPIN done on Kerik before his nomination was announced?  Or was that something that just fell by the wayside durring the reign of The Arkansas Love Machine?  Not good, W, not good.
Owl_Eagle

"You know, I'm going to start thanking
the woman who cleans the restroom in
the building I work in.  I'm going to start
thinking of her as a human being"

-Hillary Clinton
(Yes, she really said that
Peggy Noonan
The Case Against Hillary Clinton, pg 55)

4 posted on 12/11/2004 1:49:12 PM PST by South Hawthorne (Enrage a liberal- "Happy Birthday Jesus!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

and it's not like this hasn't happened enough times before. It's not the crime of the century, but you know it's an issue for every nominee, you know whether or not you have an illegal and whether or not you've been paying her taxes, and you know you're going to be asked about it. What was he thinking?


5 posted on 12/11/2004 1:49:23 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

The entire thing really p***** me off. Wouldn't you think someone with his connections could have made sure that he HIRED a legal person in the first place,DHS appointment or not.

I could have done a better job hiribg someone than he did and we're better off without him.

So long,Bernie,it's been just terrific!


6 posted on 12/11/2004 1:50:31 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Torie

"...a character flaw (he's a liar) that renders him unfit to serve."

That small point renders 93.78462534768% of the US Congress unfit to do anything, except dig ditches and flip burgers.


7 posted on 12/11/2004 1:51:28 PM PST by 7.62 x 51mm ( veni vidi vino visa "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A lot of government officials have had "nanny problems" in recent years. Maybe the real problem is that we pay our public servants too much damn money. I never had a nanny problem because I can't afford one!


8 posted on 12/11/2004 1:52:54 PM PST by SamAdams76 (No intolerant liberal is going to take my Christmas away from me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Of course the $7 million or so he made by being on the board of Taser didn't hurt.


9 posted on 12/11/2004 1:56:10 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Travis McGee; gubamyster; ApesForEvolution; NewRomeTacitus; A CA Guy; FITZ
White House officials were clearly annoyed at Mr. Kerik for not determining the nanny's immigration status prior to this week, but said they had no evidence he had sought to mislead them. "It was Kerik's screw up, it was that simple," the official said. "But it's a mistake you can't tolerate with someone who has oversight for immigration."

She just came here to derail a Bush nomination that an American couldn't derail.

10 posted on 12/11/2004 1:57:40 PM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"The nanny Mr. Kerik had employed, who has not yet been identified, left the country about two weeks ago, just prior to the announcement of his nomination, a former New York City official said on Saturday, adding that her departure had been planned for at least two months".

This says it all. It means he knew about it and tried to cover it up by having the Nanny leave just before he accepted the nomination. I don't for one minute believe his Nanny had planned to leave even before he knew of the nomination.

11 posted on 12/11/2004 1:58:13 PM PST by JustAnAmerican (Being Independent means never having to say you're Partisan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Isn't this the tortured path that led to Janet Reno being AG?


12 posted on 12/11/2004 1:59:41 PM PST by Old Professer (The accidental trumps the purposeful in every endeavor attended by the incompetent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Four years ago, when Mr. Bush nominated Linda Chavez as labor secretary, it was discovered after the initial vetting process that she had given shelter to, and employed, an illegal immigrant. At the time, Mr. Bush's aides were outraged and promised to change their methods for reviewing potential nominees, but on Saturday several officials said that because Mr. Bush wanted to make his decisions speedily their initial review had been quick.

"We'll fix it in the second term." LOL

13 posted on 12/11/2004 2:02:31 PM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
LOL, oh the things some try to blame on Clinton.

If current noms aren't vetted by the FBI, that's W's fault, not Clinton's. Geez.....

Shouldn't the W/H had an FBI SPIN done on Kerik before his nomination was announced? Or was that something that just fell by the wayside durring the reign of The Arkansas Love Machine?

14 posted on 12/11/2004 2:03:10 PM PST by Ready4Freddy (Carpe Sharpei !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis

I cannot traduce the Bush administration too much for assuming that Kerik would not flat out lie to them. Who could have imagined that he would be that stupid and character flawed?


15 posted on 12/11/2004 2:04:28 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Torie

The nanny thing was the tip of the iceberg...there were a lot of other things for the Democrats
to make hay with...a New York street cop cannot come out of that urban swamp squeaky clean.


16 posted on 12/11/2004 2:06:34 PM PST by Bushbacker (ttlGe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kms61

"It's not the crime of the century, but you know it's an issue for every nominee, you know whether or not you have an illegal and whether or not you've been paying her taxes..."

Exactamundo. We (and by we I mean they) are so two-faced on the whole subject of illegal workers. See, Kerik and others, do NOT pay remit taxes for these workers, so, of course they are cheaper to hire. Because they, and their employers are BREAKING THE LAW. Criminal activity is very often a route to obtaining things on the cheap. What galls me is that these criminal employers are at the highest level in our society, there aren't too many middle and working class folks with live-in nannys, gardeners, or chauffers.

It's not the crime of the century, of course you are right, but it is not a victimless crime either. The victims are American workers who don't have a shot at getting these jobs legally, since that would cost too much.

I'm amazed that Kerik's nanny actually LEFT the country, I can only wonder when she'll be back.


17 posted on 12/11/2004 2:07:22 PM PST by jocon307 (Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

" a nanny he had employed.... been in the country illegally and that he had failed to pay taxes on her behalf "

This seems to be a pattern. There were several nominees (different admin.)

The rich get richer by hiring illegals for a song....


18 posted on 12/11/2004 2:08:00 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

the confirmation process, and the inability of our party to want to fight, means that only squeaky clean empty suits can hold positions in Republican administrations. In the meantime, the Dems can stand up to anything - Ron Brown as Commerce Sec'y, Janet Reno is AG during WACO, no pressure to ask her to resign, does anyone think anything will happen to Sandy Berger in the stolen documents incident?

But Kerik doesn't pay taxes on a nanny (unless there is more to the story), and he goes down.


19 posted on 12/11/2004 2:10:12 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Not good, W, not good.
You appear to have quit reading mid post.
Are you suggesting that FBI  SPINs were conducted with cooperation from the Clintonistas?
Owl_Eagle

"You know, I'm going to start thanking
the woman who cleans the restroom in
the building I work in.  I'm going to start
thinking of her as a human being"

-Hillary Clinton
(Yes, she really said that
Peggy Noonan
The Case Against Hillary Clinton, pg 55)

20 posted on 12/11/2004 2:10:22 PM PST by South Hawthorne (Enrage a liberal- "Happy Birthday Jesus!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker

indeed, and what that means is that no person with any real life experiences can hold these positions. so we get empty suits. that's what destroyed the CIA - Ivy League empty suits.


21 posted on 12/11/2004 2:11:22 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

It's frightening to think that Reno was the most ethical and honest person that Klintoon could find to be Attorney General, I believe Reno was the third choice.


22 posted on 12/11/2004 2:11:59 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

"Isn't this the tortured path that led to Janet Reno being AG?"

Yes it certainly is. And it was an affront to aesthetics amoung other things.



23 posted on 12/11/2004 2:12:15 PM PST by jocon307 (Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis

I am going to lay down like a big animal with a big arm over my cutie little woman. She likes not having to cook either:


24 posted on 12/11/2004 2:12:28 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Oh but the Nanny was only doing work that legal Americans won't do. Yeah thats right I won't work for 85 cents a hour.


25 posted on 12/11/2004 2:12:55 PM PST by daddyOwe (If God wanted me to be a liberal he would of given me less brains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I hope that the nanny left a forwarding address so that President Bush can send her a thank-you note...she may have saved him greater embarrassment (if Kerik had gone through the confirmation process).


26 posted on 12/11/2004 2:13:30 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I have a hunch that there is more to the story and this may have just been the most convenient out.
27 posted on 12/11/2004 2:13:32 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

.....LOL, my exact thoughts.


28 posted on 12/11/2004 2:14:25 PM PST by SweetCaroline (Give thanks to the GOD of heaven, for His mercy and loving kindness are forever!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Freepers, please answer a question. Why does anyone need a nanny?


29 posted on 12/11/2004 2:14:35 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
The rich get richer by hiring illegals for a song....

Absolutely. It doesn't get any clearer than this about why the power elite love illegal aliens.

30 posted on 12/11/2004 2:15:26 PM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Torie

So how did the Klintons get all the way to the White House???


31 posted on 12/11/2004 2:16:02 PM PST by SweetCaroline (Give thanks to the GOD of heaven, for His mercy and loving kindness are forever!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: daddyOwe

"The Nanny was only doing work that legal Americans
won't do... 85 cents a hour"

GOOD POINT


32 posted on 12/11/2004 2:16:23 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is disgusting.

'Oh my goodness, I just forgot that this nannie that I forgot to pay properly might be here illegally...'

Do none of these people feel they should obey the law???

Dang!


33 posted on 12/11/2004 2:18:28 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I for one do not yet know if Mr. Kerik lied. How is it that everyone on this thread seems to know it?

I heard things that leave me open-minded to the facts, whatever they turn out to be. I heard she had phony but convincing documents of her status. I heard his wife hired her when he was in Iraq training the police force. If any of that is true, then I don't conclude that he lied, but that at a minimum he and his vetters failed to do a decent job in nailing down any possible problem.
If it is proven to me that he lied, I will accept it but not until. The man risked his life in Iraq trying to help America and the Iraqi people. He did not have to to that. For that alone, he should not be treated like pond scum, in my opinion.


34 posted on 12/11/2004 2:21:24 PM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meema
Do none of these people feel they should obey the law???

Isn't it supposed to be against the law to hire illegal aliens? Will Kerik be prosecuted for doing so?

No, I thought not.

35 posted on 12/11/2004 2:22:25 PM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SweetCaroline

Character is but one box in the matrix. It is all about how one weights the boxes.


36 posted on 12/11/2004 2:24:49 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Kerik took himself out. So I doubt it was a matter of convincingly phony documents. It is barely possible that he left it all to his wife, and didn't know what she did, and rather than get into that, is bowing out.


37 posted on 12/11/2004 2:28:32 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn

My chances of having a nanny are about as likely as Michael Moore getting down to 185 pounds.


38 posted on 12/11/2004 2:29:10 PM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (In the smiling twilight of the new political morning, the unwashed told their betters to shove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SilentServiceCPOWife

He might get down to 285 :-)

For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone would turn their kids over to a stranger who cannot even speak English.


39 posted on 12/11/2004 2:33:22 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Well, we can clearly see why Republican leaders don't want to do anything about illegal immigrants. They employ them.


40 posted on 12/11/2004 2:33:36 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro

Hmmm... I guess that would make President Bush a "power elite". He absolutely adores illegal aliens, and wants more and more to enter our country. In fact, he wants nothing to do with enforcing the preexisting immigration laws, for that would make it tougher for them to arrive and never leave. Ah yes, "homeland security", brought to you by the White House.

Clinton sold our country out with espionage and stolen military secrets. Mr. Bush is systematically selling us out economically, allowing our country to be overun by illegal aliens, and letting it bleed to death.


41 posted on 12/11/2004 2:33:57 PM PST by CTpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro

do you think people who hire landscapers are inquiring as to their immigration status? are all those people criminals, if their landscapers are illegal aliens?


42 posted on 12/11/2004 2:36:03 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn

many american households where both mother and father work full time jobs, have a babysitter that they pay to watch their children.


43 posted on 12/11/2004 2:37:51 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn
"For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone would turn their kids over to a stranger who cannot even speak English. "

I'll taka a shot. Their careers are more important than their kids?

44 posted on 12/11/2004 2:38:43 PM PST by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Well said! Bravo!


45 posted on 12/11/2004 2:39:57 PM PST by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
do you think people who hire landscapers are inquiring as to their immigration status? are all those people criminals, if their landscapers are illegal aliens?

I don't know. Does the landscaper live in your house?

46 posted on 12/11/2004 2:40:55 PM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CTpatriot

I think that it's safe to say that the President of the US is a power elite. It kind of goes with the job.


47 posted on 12/11/2004 2:42:13 PM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: meema
You would have thought the Bushies would have learned their lesson. This numb scull nomination is something I would expect from the dumb Republicans but not from the Bushies.

Source FAIR
Linda Chavez, syndicated columnist and former Chair of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission under President Reagan, withdrew her nomination for Secretary of Labor in the Bush administration after a media firestorm erupted over her harboring an illegal alien during the early 1990s.

Chavez’s saga was similar to that of Clinton nominee for attorney general in 1993, Zoë Baird. Baird had employed an illegal alien nanny and housekeeper without paying taxes.

Chavez claimed that her situation was different, in that she was sheltering a battered woman who had fled her abusive husband in Guatemala.

After initially maintaining that she had not known that her “houseguest,” Marta Mercado, was illegal, Chavez admitted in her withdrawal news conference that “I think I always knew that she was here illegally.” Chavez continued to assert, however, that Mercado was not an employee. But INS officials told the media that even if Mercado were not an employee, her presence in Chavez’s house constituted the crime of “concealing, harboring, or shielding from detection” an illegal alien.

Chavez’s nomination was ultimately derailed because she tried to conceal her relationship with Mercado. Bush transition team officials were initially surprised by the story, which Chavez had concealed during the “vetting,” or screening process used for Cabinet nominees. A Wall Street Journal story on the day she withdrew probably sealed her nomination’s fate; the story revealed that Chavez’s conversation with a neighbor of hers was under investigation by the FBI. Chavez had called the neighbor, to whom she hired Mercado out, hoping to “refresh” her recollection of Mercado’s non-employment.

The controversy, which lasted only a few days, was highlighted by the irony of Chavez’s previous criticisms of Zoe Baird. In 1993, during the Zoë Baird controversy, Chavez said on national television that “I think most of the American people were upset during the Zoë Baird nomination that she had hired an illegal alien. That was what upset them - more than the fact that she did not pay Social Security taxes.” Chavez’s comments came the same year that Mercado was living in her home, doing domestic work.


48 posted on 12/11/2004 2:42:18 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All
Sorry for the paragraphing problem in my original post.

I for one do not yet know if Mr. Kerik lied. How is it that everyone on this thread seems to know it?

I heard things that leave me open-minded to the facts, whatever they turn out to be. I heard she had phony but convincing documents of her status. I heard his wife hired her when he was in Iraq training the police force. If any of that is true, then I don't conclude that he lied, but that at a minimum he and his vetters failed to do a decent job in nailing down any possible problem.

If it is proven to me that he lied, I will accept it but not until. The man risked his life in Iraq trying to help America and the Iraqi people. He did not have to to that. For that alone, he should not be treated like pond scum, in my opinion.

49 posted on 12/11/2004 2:42:30 PM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro

what difference does it make. and even I I asked that person, and they produced a fake SS card or a fake green card - what am I supposed to do, polygraph them?


50 posted on 12/11/2004 2:43:15 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson