If I were G W Bush... I wouldn't use it either...
Posted on 12/20/2004 2:23:27 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Firing Rumsfeld over this flap would only encourage the jihadis
During the presidential campaign, John Kerry vacillated between two anthems: Bruce Springsteen's "No Surrender" and "I Won't Back Down," by Tom Petty.
Bush used "Still the One" until its composer, John Hall, told him to cease and desist. There is no indication the President cared. He's not a music lover. But every administration needs a theme song. Since Kerry no longer needs one, Bush should borrow one of his.
"No Surrender," despite its title, is a melancholy tale of youthful determination gone soft. Petty's hard line - You can stand me up at the gate of hell, but I won't back down - is a better fit for the President.
Of course, it is Bush's pugnacious self-confidence, even more than his Texan Christianity, that drives critics berserk. Sophisticates trained to value irony, self-doubt and skepticism (except, of course, regarding global warming), they see uncertainty as the mark of intellectual honesty. In fact, they're certain of it.
During the election campaign, Democrats begged Bush to cop to a mistake - just one teensy-weensy error. He refused, partly, I think, out of sheer sadism. A class-traitor if ever there was one, the President enjoys pushing the indignant squeal button of his fellow Ivy Leaguers.
Now Bush's critics (including some self-interested Republicans) want him to admit that the war in Iraq has gone wrong by firing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The immediate justification is equipment shortages, an issue that made headlines when a G.I. complained to Rumsfeld that he and his buddies had to rummage in scrap heaps to "up-armor" their vehicles.
The President has no reason to do this. For one thing, his policy in Iraq is not a failure. But it will be if he listens to his detractors.
The U.S. can't lose a shooting war in Iraq. Its military might is too great. But insurgencies are fueled by optimism. The hope of the jihadis and Saddamites is that they can persuade Americans that this war, like Vietnam, is unwinnable.
Bush's job is to take that hope away by making America's enemies, in Iraq and beyond, believe that the U.S. cannot and will not be stopped.
Reelection helps. Nobody in the Middle East read the results as a vindication of Republican principles on gay marriage, abortion or Social Security reform. It was seen as a mandate for war. Bush is the strong horse, and he has been given four more years to run.
The Arab world understands the determined use of force almost as much as it is mystified by irony (bitterly cynical humor is another story). Bush's victory, followed by the successful election in Afghanistan and the brutal capture of Fallujah, has had a clarifying effect.
Suddenly, the Sunnis in Iraq are talking seriously about participating in the Jan. 30 election. This is not due to a spontaneous outbreak of Jeffersonian enlightenment in Saddamland. On the contrary, it is a cool appreciation of which way the strong horse is running.
Similar appraisals are taking place around the region. Cairo wants to help the U.S. broker a Palestinian peace with Israel, and pro-American articles are breaking out in the usually poisonous Egyptian media. The Palestinian leadership has admitted that armed uprising is counterproductive and is preparing for its own free election.
It's too early to declare victory, but this is progress. Nothing would halt it faster than Rumsfeld's forced resignation. Everyone from Casablanca to the Khyber Pass would take it as declaration of defeat.
No wartime President can afford to be Hamlet, or even Bruce Springsteen. This is Tom Petty time: Gonna stand my ground, won't be turned around/And I'll keep this world from draggin' me down/... I won't back down.
Bush should get the song translated into Arabic, Persian and French and have the Marine band - conducted by Donald Rumsfeld - play it at his inauguration.
I'm wit dat...what 'e said...
Of course that's why the rats are pressing the issue, even though it is a NON-ISSUE...
Excellent article...adding some keywords for later search...
Bush should get the song translated into Arabic, Persian and French and have the Marine band - conducted by Donald Rumsfeld - play it at his inauguration.
ROFL!!!!!
What a great Idea........
I thought Kerry's theme song was the old Slade standard:
"Run, Run Away!"
bttt - Tumbleweed_Connection - what a great idea
The media knows this. And hates him for it...
I suggest we send all those Senators who voted AGAINST the funds for up armoring the Hummers, yet are now screaming from Rumsfiled's head, to Iraq to explain to our troops WHY they voted AGAINST giving them the tools for the job.
I also suggest we tell the troops it is open season on US Senators and their is no bag limit.
Scum, pure unadulterated scum is all these Media Whores are.
I would like to see a list of the nay votes.
Because of his great overall direction of the war effort, Rumsfeld was able to actually send letters to the 1000+ dead. Johnson and the instigators of other Democrat wars have had to send telegrams to the families of the thousands of casualties their 'conflicts' caused. The only people writing letters then were the officers who suffered from their mismanagement.
Rummy 2008!
Patton was made to apologize for slapping a GI. Rumsfeld tells troops asking for armor 'tough sh-t' and there must have been too many deaths for him to take the time to sign his name. Bush took the time. Troops deserve respect. Rumsfeld should go back, call the troops together and apologize as Patton did before he was allowed to continue in command.
This is a wise man.
We are winning.
Everything (except the media) says it.
Those who don't admit it are the deluded or the deceitful.
Get Nancy Sinatra to redo her famous These Boots are made for Marching song. (That is, if she is still alive!)
Merry Christmas to Our Troops
Armor fiasco could backfireExcerpt:Now Bush's critics (including some self-interested Republicans) want him to admit that the war in Iraq has gone wrong by firing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The immediate justification is equipment shortages, an issue that made headlines when a G.I. complained to Rumsfeld that he and his buddies had to rummage in scrap heaps to "up-armor" their vehicles.
The President has no reason to do this. For one thing, his policy in Iraq is not a failure. But it will be if he listens to his detractors.
The U.S. can't lose a shooting war in Iraq. Its military might is too great. But insurgencies are fueled by optimism. The hope of the jihadis and Saddamites is that they can persuade Americans that this war, like Vietnam, is unwinnable.
Bush's job is to take that hope away by making America's enemies, in Iraq and beyond, believe that the U.S. cannot and will not be stopped.
Reelection helps. Nobody in the Middle East read the results as a vindication of Republican principles on gay marriage, abortion or Social Security reform. It was seen as a mandate for war. Bush is the strong horse, and he has been given four more years to run.
The Arab world understands the determined use of force almost as much as it is mystified by irony (bitterly cynical humor is another story). Bush's victory, followed by the successful election in Afghanistan and the brutal capture of Fallujah, has had a clarifying effect.
Suddenly, the Sunnis in Iraq are talking seriously about participating in the Jan. 30 election. This is not due to a spontaneous outbreak of Jeffersonian enlightenment in Saddamland. On the contrary, it is a cool appreciation of which way the strong horse is running.
< snip>
No wartime President can afford to be Hamlet, or even Bruce Springsteen. This is Tom Petty time: Gonna stand my ground, won't be turned around/And I'll keep this world from draggin' me down/... I won't back down.
Bush should get the song translated into Arabic, Persian and French and have the Marine band - conducted by Donald Rumsfeld - play it at his inauguration.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.
Thanks.
Someone explain to me, again, how weighing down a humvee with armored floorplate makes it less susceptible to 155mm IEDs. Isn't it better to get the bad guys, and get rid of the bombs? I mean, if you run a Bradley over this kind of IED mine, what happens to the Bradley? And you're not going to turn a humvee into a Bradley.
giving them the tools for the job.
Someone explain to me, again, how weighing down a humvee with armored floorplate makes it less susceptible to 155mm IEDs. Isn't it better to get the bad guys, and get rid of the bombs? I mean, if you run a Bradley over this kind of IED mine, what happens to the Bradley? And you're not going to turn a humvee into a Bradley.
Agreed. We have even lost Abrhams in Iraq and that is a LOT more armored. My point is not weather up armoring is a GOOD idea, my point is that the VERY Senators who voted AGAINST funding the troops are NOW SCREAMING the loudest about how under equipped the troops are. The ones who gutted the Military in the 1990s NOW posture as these great defenders of the military. They are SCUM. Pure 100% SCUM.
Bump
George Patton Speech
I want you to remember that no bas*ard ever won the war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bas*ard die for his country. Men, all this stuff you’ve heard about America not wanting to fight – wanting to stay out of the war - is a lot of horse dung! Americans traditionally love to fight! All REAL Americans love the sting of battle …..
And HERE is the full statement (both the MOVIE version and Patton's actual speech are here).
He was great. Someone today's liberals would despise.
You know he did no such thing.
I agree. Get the bombs. Didn't they used to have ENTIRE SQUADS devoted to securing and clearing roads in WWII? They need to get anti-mine units on the roads, and clear them every day. Certain roads are high traffic. That doesn't mean they won't miss something, or one of these shells won't be placed after they leave. But I haven't heard anything about that.
Ken's thread puts all of this Rummy Phobia into a real clear perspective.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1305415/posts?page=1
Flashback: Nov 17,1995: Clinton has a BJ in the WH, while on the phone deploying US troops to Bosnia
A BLAST FROM THE PAST!!!
Posted on 12/20/2004 3:37:50 PM PST by ken5050
Great article. Thanks to you for posting it. :^D
He was great. Someone today's liberals would despise.Yes he was.
The Libs/Media/RINO's are zeroing in on Rumsfeld, it appears to me ....
Rumsfeld doesn't need to apologize to me. I think he's the best defense secretary that we've ever had. Are you a "troop"? I am active duty Air Force right now, and I just got back from the desert. You don't speak for me.
' suggest we send all those Senators who voted AGAINST the funds for up armoring the Hummers, yet are now screaming from Rumsfiled's head, to Iraq to explain to our troops WHY they voted AGAINST giving them the tools for the job.'
so that's why we haven't heard from sKerry and Backwards about this issue.
Heard Rush read this whole article on-air today...
it's as good as it gets.
Yeppers.
Look at what has happened in Libya with weapons, capturing Saddam, getting the Pakistanis to cooperate in Afghanistan with us, the list goes on. The liberals see something on the horizon and don't want Rumsfeld in Office. Maybe they see the best way to remove Bush is to tear down those around him.
HECK FREEPERS! LETS HELP!
Very good...... that Rush got the word out....
The media cares little about what a given policy is or whether it is producing results or not. All they care about is which party promulgated it.
If a Republican policy, being executed successfully by Republicans, they are intrinsically hostile and attempt to destroy the principals, without any concern whatsoever as to the national interest.
If a Democrat policy, being executed by Democrat office holders, they are unvaryingly and unquestioningly supportive. Again, irrespective of the ramifications regarding the national interest.
No media report can be taken on face value, ever again. If they were to report that the sky is blue and the grass is green, viewers/listeners/readers are advised to consider the political context and undertake further research to determine the veracity of the report.
He won't. I'm confident that Rumsfeld will stay. This is a lot of hot air from the Democrats and sad to say, from some Republicans as well.
He won't. I'm confident that Rumsfeld will stay. This is a lot of hot air from the Democrats and sad to say, from some Republicans as well.You are right. And it makes me more than a little unhappy, too. There are some Freepers insisting on Rummy stepping down, too.
I could just spit! :^O
Thanks.
Which is exactly why the Liberals and clueless RINOs are attacking Rumsfeld.They want us to cut bait and run.
Thanks for the ping!
LOL. Classic.
Thank you.
Armor installed within 24 hours of soldiers' complaint (97.6% Complete When Reporter "Faked" News)
Great idea. And they can make sure the Jihadi Patsies McCain, Hagel, Collins are seated as far in the back as possible....behind a post.
He's got to songs to use as a theme for tough decision making, and he can't decide which one to use! :^D
BTW, I seem to bump into you a LOT, Petronski!
This demonsrates your brilliant sense of humor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
