Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
If Glassgold believes that any system which defines some behaviors as normal and others as not, is an oppressive one and one must be resisted, wouldn't she be advocating a system of thought which would also accept homosexual pedophilia?

Isn't it oppressive to suggest it is not acceptable to define some behaviors as normal and others not? Oh, wait, we are only supposed to embrace her theory tentatively.

If Glassgold believes that we should not reify her theories as truth then that means we can throw this one in the crapper, eh?

Shalom.

47 posted on 12/22/2004 11:19:07 AM PST by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: ArGee
I wonder if she believes that suggestions about whether or not certain behaviors are normal or not is oppressive, or must one enter the realm of defining certain behaviors as normal or not, to risk the wrath of the leftist Glassgold thought-police?

Either way, it appears that she desires a mix of leftist amoral philosophy and leftist amoral psychiatry. Then again, psychiatry is just barely above philosophy to begin with.

Oh no, was I being 'oppressive' by even bringing up these points?

No, no, no... leftist, amoral theories must never, ever be thrown in the crapper. To throw their ideas in the crapper is one of the most oppressive things one can do, or didn't you know that?
58 posted on 12/22/2004 2:35:53 PM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson