Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steve Forbes: Expel 'Murderous' U.N. From New York
NewsMax ^ | 12/27/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 12/27/2004 5:33:53 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Uncle Vlad
I don't care about the building.....the UN infestation is what I want out of our country. Plus I want to not fund the nest of vermin.......
41 posted on 12/27/2004 8:08:38 PM PST by marmar (Faith is a beautiful thing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ken21
when someone like forbes makes his doubts public.

It's nice to see this. He's a top establishment insider - no necessarily the LM, lib establishment. But still.

I PRAY it's just a matter of time before the UN is just a bad memory, like Bill Clinton. Ship it off to Brussels, and let Clinton himself run the thing. Fine. But just get it OUTTA HERE!

42 posted on 12/27/2004 9:19:24 PM PST by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

First he went to bat for the flat tax ( a spectacular idea if there ever was one in politics) when it wasn't popular to do so, now this. Sharp words from a sharp man.

Quick, somebody remind me why we didn't pick Forbes over whiny internationalist Bob Dole back in '96. Oh, yeah. Dole was more "electable".
BWAHAHAHA!


43 posted on 12/27/2004 9:36:34 PM PST by RockAgainsttheLeft04 (Chaos is great. Chaos is what killed the dinosaurs, darling. -- from Heathers (1989))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It COULD happen if enough of the American people decided
to be relentlessly vocal and uncompromising about it:
a prime impetus COULD have been a complete exposure of the Oil-for-Food
scandal, but that's already lost steam (very predictably)
NO ONE in the major media is going to take the initiative to cover the investigation
or conduct one of their own, because, simply speaking, THIS
Administration does NOT want that to happen. To examine why THAT is so would be more and more depressing the further you went into it.


44 posted on 12/27/2004 10:10:34 PM PST by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willyboyishere

I guess this means Malcolm is running.


45 posted on 12/27/2004 10:17:27 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Shaking nine point oh - With a deadly wave goodbye - oh four departed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

After everything we've been through, THIS is impossible?


46 posted on 12/27/2004 10:19:30 PM PST by Vision ("We ride, never worry 'bout the fall. I guess that's just the cowboy in us all")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ; HangFire

Dare to Dream?


47 posted on 12/27/2004 10:20:54 PM PST by Feiny (MERRY NEW YEAR!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I'd like to see him run again, but all the same regrettable problems would crop up, like years ago,last
time he ran (lack of charisma, vulnerability to charges of
"inexperience", never run for public office, etc. etc.)
All these charges would be levelled by both DEMS AND PUBS,who , when push comes to shove, and REAL change looms as a possibility, always reveal themselves to be thoroughly Establishment politicians ultimately only interested in preserving their precious status quo.


48 posted on 12/27/2004 10:26:11 PM PST by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: willyboyishere

He's a good man. I'm glad he's on our side. But he is a truly bad candidate. I've never seen a politician who was more ill-at-ease in front of a crowd.

And he has a bad habit of sort of halfway supporting conservative principles.

This article contains an example of this tendency on his part.

He makes a bold call, a righteous one, and then immediately takes every drop of force out of it by saying, "But it will never happen."

Why does he even bother?

It's like saying, "I demand you surrender the city! I surrender!"


49 posted on 12/27/2004 10:33:05 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Shaking nine point oh - With a deadly wave goodbye - oh four departed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That land, that prime real estate, was donated to the UN by the Rockerfellas.

If by some happy circumstance the UN were to vacate, I'm sure the Rockerfellas would put in their claim for the land.

CA....


50 posted on 12/27/2004 10:37:07 PM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass; AnnaZ
Dare to Dream?

Dreams, the blueprints of life;-)

51 posted on 12/27/2004 10:37:25 PM PST by HangFire (Imagine a world with no hypothetical situations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks Howlin.

We should pull the plug!


52 posted on 12/28/2004 1:47:50 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

He did. Now it's your turn.


53 posted on 12/28/2004 6:58:40 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HangFire; feinswinesuksass
There's not much to disagree with here.
54 posted on 12/28/2004 9:39:15 AM PST by AnnaZ (Repent. The end is the nigh. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Steve Forbes nailed Jan Egeland who seems to be deliberately picking a fight with the United States. Corrupt Globalists and Kleptocrats want the US to raise taxes on her citizens to fund even more of their "humanitarian" work - lately that "humanitarian" work seems to involve more sex and slavery than aid and food. The Undersecretary and Secretary General have a habit of turning a blind eye on trouble as they have done in Somalia - a terrible situation that has gone one for years with some of the UN's best running the show and doing nothing!

Mr. Egeland's own country is basically bankrupt morally and financially due to the Egeland types that use other people's money to run entitlements in Sweden and rather than helping people, in the long run it bankrupts them. The entitlement mentality of Egeland now wants the "stingy" United States to cough up more aid money for southern Asia's tsunami disaster by, I'll say it again…by raising the taxes on United States Citizens...the United States has NEVER been stingy with aid to others Mr. Egeland! Amore egregious remark could not have been made.

THE UNITED NATIONS IS RUN BY FLAGRANTLY CORRUPT NINCOMPOOPS! IT IS TIME FOR THE UNITED STATES TO GET THE HECK OUT OF THAT PLACE!!

55 posted on 12/28/2004 10:36:01 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

The place to go is www.MoveAmericaForward.com. They have a petition calling for the UN to get kicked out of the US and for us to reduce our contribution to that corrupt agency.

Also, they have a great TV spot that needs support so it can run on the air in January.


56 posted on 12/28/2004 4:14:11 PM PST by RWGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson