Posted on 12/29/2004 7:47:22 AM PST by crushelits
The dramatic rise of the number of deaths came Wednesday as officials were finally able to reach remote regions -- like Indonesia's Aceh province, India's Andaman and Nicobar Islands and the Maldives.
More than half of those deaths were reported in Indonesia, the nearest land mass to Sunday's undersea earthquake that triggered the deadly waves and flooding in about a dozen countries, from Thailand to East Africa.
Four days after the quake, Indonesian authorities said they had found mass destruction in Aceh. The capital of Banda Aceh, which was closest to epicenter of the quake, was described as largely destroyed.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
WTF? Are you insane?
Just because there have been worse death tolls through various wars and holocausts in history doesn't make this a non-issue or us manipulated by the media.
I'm 34 years old and I cannot remember a time where so many have died at once in my lifetime.
This is in the ballpark of Hiroshima as far as death toll is concerned. I don't know what kind of freaking heartless sociopath one has to be to file this away under media manipulation.
"Take away the pictures and this is virtually a non-story."
Oh, My Gosh. What a horrible picture. Pray for these people and their families.
as huge a disaster as this is, the ONE fact to consider is this:
this horrendous loss of life was not brought about by war or malice: it was a natural disaster, not intentional mass murder, like 9/11. Maybe that was what he meant.
Sometimes you just can't see what's coming.
God bless you, maddie-- it's rough stuff to see, but the juxtaposition of that nice hotel and all those jumbled corpses- just reminds you of how frail life is. "In the midst of life, we are in death."
100,000+ people die within a matter of minutes and you call it a non-story?
My friend, I am ashamed that you are from Texas.
"Let's get things in perspective. As tragic as this is for the people involved, we are again being manipulated by the media. Take away the pictures and this is virtually a non-story"
There are possibly 20 times more people dead from this than died on 9-11. Was that a virtual non story? Or do you think the world lost all perspective on that one too? I suspect your trying to be controversial and fishing for a response.
Dear God, all those dead people. Pls watch over their souls. There must be 500-1,000 in that pic alone.
Each year, 300 to 500 million people develop malaria and 1.5 to 3 millionmostly childrendie -- World Health Organization
The tsunami will probably end up killing 150,000 to 200,000 people directly and indirectly from wounds, infections and disease...
(34 * 3,000,000) = 102 million
It's a ghastly thing to see so many bodies packed up like a logjam- it makes you remember just how fragile life is.
Excellent point - thanks.
The vast majority of those Malaria deaths can be prevented by applying DDT. But since the media decided decades ago that DDT was BAD, it can't be used to stop the suffering.
An interesting, but little reported story on the WTC - there is a chance that the WTC could have survived the effects of the fires, had they used asbestos insulation over their steel framing - but the media decided that asbestos was BAD, and drove our government to outlaw it also, just as the bottom floors of the WTC were being built.
My only point - the media has so much blood on its hands that it offends me when they report a story like this - to this extent.
Bob:
I don't know you, but you are entitled to your opinion. I find it to be very annoying when people hiding behind internet anonymity lash out at others for sharing their opinion. Just my 2 cents.
I do feel for the victims, as we all surely do...I do have a problem with people already criticizing the USA for "not doing enough", etc. I feel that material aid should be sent, along with liberal tree huggers, to help those in need. I do, however, feel that what aid we send should be proportionate to the aid we have received relative to the War on Terror. Help our allies, let the UN help the rest. One prime example...India. India has refused to send troops b/c the UN did not support the USA.
I do not endorse sending financial aid to certain relief groups as that leaves room for corruption and abuse. See UN Food For Oil, United Way, and 9/11 funds for examples. After all, it is our tax money...and we are carrying the lion's share of the burden and risks in Iraq.
But that's my opinion, for what it's worth...
PS--how many American flags were torched this year in some of these countries?
Indonesia:
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/ar/Qindonesia-us-bush.RHRw_DOL.html
So true, b.
By the time the various diseases take their toll, this will surpass both of the Atomic bombs. This is the worst tragedy I can remember.
The amount of human grief and suffering is unfathomable. When its all done, there will hardly be a surviving soul in this region who didn't lose someone. So many of them children.
Heart-wrenching....(prayers)
Plus the many that will never be found - washed out to sea.
For everyone:
The real story about this tragedy is on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1310131/posts
Again - it comes back to Malaria. Many, many, more people than necessary will die because the media, in essence, outlawed DDT.
But we'll never know that, because the media can do no wrong.
SOmebody in another thread pointed out that the average amount of people that die everyday is 150,000 world wide.
You are too young to remember the November 1970 disaster in Bangladesh, when an Indian ocean typhoon slammed into the low-lying islands off the cost. No one will ever know the actual death toll from this disaster, but the best estimate is that between 300,000 and 500,000 people died in the storm surge.
Bangladesh was hit again in 1991. This typhoon killed over 130,000.
In this part of the world with major populations clustered around the coasts, abnormal conditions in the Indian Ocean will always be deadly.
you did not lash out at me...just commenting over the abuse heaped at you for your opinion...
NOT BUSH'S TO GIVE
"The UN's Under-Secretary for Humanitarian Affairs has criticized the USA for only giving $15 million to the effort to help those effected by the quake and tsunami. I have to admit that when I heard on the radio yesterday that Colin Powell had announced that each of the affected countries would immediately receive $100,000, that it was the smallest amount of money I had ever heard mentioned in the same sentence with the words 'United States.' I mean that is less than a loaded Hummer. But then I remembered the old Davy Crockett story where-in Congressman Davy voted against giving aid to the victims of a Washington, DC fire because it wasn't his to give.
"I think this would be a great time for Bush to announce that he could not give anything from the country, as the country itself has no legitimate authority to dispense monies for those kinds of purposes. I bet if he then asked the American people to do what they could, the folks in Sri Lanka and Sumatra would see the real spirit of American generosity.
"I guess I have finally become dependent on the government myself. When I imagine the horror experienced by those who survived the events I want to help. Then I hear my government is going to do it for me and I think 'Great, I already gave....on April 15th.' Then I realize all over again that when the government does it one is never sure it will be done right."
- News & Views reader Dr. Michael E. Clifford of Las Vegas, NV (Editor's Note: If you haven't done so recently, go to www.citizenoutreach.com and click on the "Not Yours To Give" button to read the Davy Crockett story Dr. Clifford refers to above)
FOUNDING WISDOM
"Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."
- James Madison
SURVEY SAYS!
Should President Bush provide financial disaster aid to tsunami victims directly from the U.S. treasury...or make a public appeal for Americans to donate voluntarily to private relief efforts?
* Give the money from the government treasury
* Ask for voluntary, personal donations
* Huh?
Cast your vote by clicking the "Survey Says!" tab at www.citizenoutreach.com
Should President Bush provide financial disaster aid to tsunami victims directly from the U.S. treasury...or make a public appeal for Americans to donate voluntarily to private relief efforts?
Give the money from the government treasury
7%
Ask for voluntary, personal donations
90%
Huh?
3%
Total Votes: 178
I understand your point. You aren't saying this is not a major event or a major story, but that some media are using the images to sensationalize (beyond reporting) the story. although I don't know how much this catastrophe can be sensationalized beyond reality. I am too numb from the enormity of it to take it all in.
I think I have seen others hang onto the coattails of this time of sympathy outpouring and using it to scam well-meaning people.
I get your point, but the timing of it might have been off, not sure.
This is what the United Nations is for and we are the prime funder of the UN and also the only country capable of the airlift required.
The actual dollar figure donated annually by the US directly and indirectly to charitable funds is more than most/all other countries combined.
Why would any sane person contribute any more money to UN controlled efforts?
we pay 21% of UN budget...I never said give more $ to the UN. Screw that.
what, Russia and China have no planes? France, Germany?
I know we pay more than our fair share, that's what I was talking about. I said we should send material aid proportionate to the help we've received in Iraq.
Well, thank you so damn much for giving us your stamp of approval.
Quite frankly, YOU are the type of poster who gives the MSM ammunition to call Free Republic a whack site.
Go away.
As you have only been here less than a month, let me give you a few facts and some advice.
There is absolutely no reason for you to feel that you need to warn the people at FR about being "manipulated" by the press. This is the absolute LAST place on earth that will believe one word the media says without checking it out.
And if we did need to be warned, we certainly wouldn't be listening to a newbie making snotty remarks about a disaster of biblical proportions.
Oh, sure, there have been events with more deaths, but this one happened LAST SUNDAY; if you don't mind, we, as a forum, will handle our grief and our knowledge of this disaster as we have long before you got here.
This isn't a chat room, nor a blog. Watch your nasty remarks on threads that involve the death of thoussands of people.
I think that my attacks have been clear and they have not denigrated the people that were in the path of the tidal wave.
I'm sorry if I haven't been on this site very long, but, even in my short time, I've seen many cases where people are being manipulated, so I comment where I see fit.
Bob, I find myself doing the same thing. I'm always assuming there is a spin to everything. The tragedy withstanding, the media will somehow use this to blame America and Bush I'm sure.
Well I don't think they should under-report it either especially in favor of reporting "other" news.
My problem is when it will become so Greta-Van-Susternized that we become numb to the reality of it.
It will have a major effect on the rest of the World, even if it is an area made up mostly of false religions. But it won't alter our society, if that's what you meant.
The magnitude of this loss is big enough that we don't have to compare it to others.
And, as I said, you don't need to warn us; we invented that right here.
Hmmm. That comment should be the title of its own thread created by the Admin Moderator. My main beef right now...too many new folks within the last few months using FR to pimp their sites for traffic/hits.
I agree with your assessments in that post. Your earlier post was deleted before I could read it. What I have gleaned from what others have quoted from it leads me to the following:
Although I agree with the thought process that led to your statement - myself being do distrustful of the media that I dumped tv almost eight years ago - I think you may be fighting the wrong battle here.
A natural disaster which kills this many people in this many diverse places is a news story - one of the biggest of the century. The pictures in this case merely drive the point home.
Now, the Scott peterson case...that's a different story.
No kidding.
Your post is insensisive and very un-PC.
I believe it is also accurate.
Unless it happens to YOU, my friend. Some people are just out-of-sight out-of-mind kinda people I guess.
This is one of the biggest, most tragic, worldwide,"non-story" of our lifetime.
Ain't that the truth, bigger is not always better.
And you see more fights between the old guard and the newbies on all the threads.
BigMack
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.