Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
The NEH seems to have made a good pick in L'Engle, but the NEH and the NEA shouldn't exist. Art is not a legitimate government function.

That statement is rather misleading since the NEA isn't a government entity, but rather a private organization.

29 posted on 12/29/2004 2:26:39 PM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Melas
That statement is rather misleading since the NEA isn't a government entity, but rather a private organization.

First...from the NEA website:

The National Endowment for the Arts is a public agency dedicated to supporting excellence in the arts--both new and established--bringing the arts to all Americans, and providing leadership in arts education. Established by Congress in 1965 as an independent agency of the federal government, the Endowment is the nation's largest annual funder of the arts, bringing great art to all 50 states, including rural areas, inner cities, and military bases.

Second, even if the NEA were private, or didn't exist, there is no justification for bushels of U.S. tax dollars going to art. Art is a wonderful thing, but it is not one of the legitimate responsibilites of American government.

34 posted on 12/29/2004 2:40:01 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A mike ruler, an old schooler...drivin' in my car, livin' like a star...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson