PING...
Posted on 12/30/2004 4:53:47 AM PST by syriacus
There are also a couple of other links on Rush's website to a couple of articles that aren't as complete as the LA Times editorial. The best place to go, however, is the audio transcript. Gorelick's name came up when a caller called and told Tom Sullivan about her involvement.
She and her ilk gave/gives both the Pentagon and the State Department a bad name......honesty is not the name! Private sand box for PPPs should be exposed as well as Ms. Gorelick...keep the heat on that woman...is she the reason Ms. Clinton found a slot on the Armed Services Committee? Maybe some of the Super Bloggers can connect the dots!
What's gonna be interesting, PGalt, is how the Dim-Demmers and the MSM'ers are gonna spin the Oil For Food by-line mentioned by Volcker the other day . . . that "most" of So-Dumb Insane's misbegotten funds derived from the smuggling trade versus the bribery scams.
I suspect this is right, but I find it highly suspicious that Volcker is drifting off course. He was assigned to audit the Oil for Food transactions . . . yet he's mysteriously veering off course -- a course that'll give Kofi-boy some cover. I'm not surprised though. I'm only surprised that it's so blatantly obvious what he's doing.
In any event . . . let's say Volcker manages to change the subject as it appears he's trying to do. To make Topic One the smuggling. One wonders how the Dim-Demmers and the MSM'ers are gonna blame this on GW since their Main Man was in charge for eight years . . . with Maddy Albright giving the smugglers cover . . . and GW was only around for months.
I believe they'll give it their best shot . . . but we've got their numbers now. LOL. Like shooting fish in a barrel.
http://www.ofheo.gov/media/pdf/f3jg03312003.pdf
or
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:2-zTrYxHSVMJ:www.ofheo.gov/media/pdf/f3jg03312003.pdf+OFHEO+gorelick&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
Jamie S. Gorelick March 31, 2003
INITIAL STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES
Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Beneficially Owned
Table II - Derivative Securities Beneficially Owned
(e.g. , puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
Explanation of responses:
(1) 60,697 options are currently exercisable; the balance vests on November 16, 2003.
(2) Vesting of the options is contingent upon the achievement of an aggressive earnings per share (“EPS”) goal established in January 2000. If EPS equals or exceeds $6.46 per share by December 31, 2003, the options will become exercisable in January 2004. If the EPS goal is not met, then the options instead will vest and become exercisable in 25 percent annual increments beginning in January 2005. However, if the EPS goal is not met,
the Board of Directors has retained the discretion to reduce or eliminate future compensation awards to offset this vesting.
(3) 44,865 options are currently exercisable; 22,432 options vest on November 21, 2003; and 22,433 options vest on November 21, 2004.
(4) 21,798 options are currently exercisable; 21,799 options vest on November 20, 2003; 21,798 options vest on November 20, 2004; and 21,799 options vest on November 20, 2005.
LIMITED SIGNATORY POWER
By this Limited Signatory Power the undersigned authorizes and designates each
of Ann Kappler and Scott Lesmes to execute and file on behalf of the undersigned all
Forms 3, 4 and 5 (including any exhibits, attachments and amendments thereto) that the
undersigned may be required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a
result of the undersigned’s ownership of or transactions in securities of Fannie Mae.
The authority of Ann Kappler and Scott Lesmes under this Limited Signatory Power shall
continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Forms 3, 4 and 5 with regard
to his or her ownership of or transactions in securities of Fannie Mae, unless earlier
revoked in writing. The undersigned acknowledges that Ann Kappler and Scott Lesmes
are not assuming, nor is Fannie Mae assuming, any of the undersigned’s responsibilities
to file Forms 3, 4 and 5 or otherwise comply with any related laws or regulations.
/s/ Jamie S. Gorelick
Date: March 31, 2003
Martha Stewart languishes in jail for much less.
Paging Buckhead!! Go get 'em!! Bring this Gore-Licker down!!
What would the "right wing" media do if Gorelick was a Republican?
Now there's a picture.
She and her fellow cronies will never let this huge scandal blossom into another ENRON...the media will be on their side and will make excuses for not covering the details or will make excuses for their actions...
Oh, yes, she was; she was dying for that job!
Wow...I wouldn't think someone so ethically-compromised would be nominated fer AG, but thankfully, we'll never have to find out...MUD
Me, too.
I'm beginning to think she is another Hillary...a shining star of her college class who gets so many headlines that her misdeeds can be hidden in plain sight.
Radcliffe To Honor Nine for their Achievements
As the U.S. deputy attorney general from 1994 to 1997, [snip]Come to think of it, after reading her write-up, I'd say she has much more on her resume than Hillary does.She has recently been named vice chair of Fannie Mae, [snip]
From 1975 to 1993, Gorelick was a litigator with the Washington, D.C., firm of Miller, Cassidy, Larroca and Lewin, served as vice chair of the task force on the Evaluation of the Audit, Investigation and Inspection Components of the Department of Defense, and was assistant to the Secretary and counselor to the Deputy Secretary of Energy.
In 1993, Gorelick was appointed general counsel of the Department of Defense, serving as chief legal officer among the 6,000 lawyers within the department. [snip]
Gorelick graduated magna cum laude from Harvard and Radcliffe with an A.B. in 1972 and earned a J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1975.
Honored as the Woman Lawyer of the Year by the Women's Bar Association in 1993,[snip]
From 1992 to 1993, she was president of the D.C. Bar, then a 60,000-member association. [snip]
Why doesn't this law apply to Gorelick & the 9-11 Commission?
Wow. The Gorelick corruption doesn't seem to end...
A little help, please.
From the WASHINGTON Times article: Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and Treasury Secretary John W. Snow have long campaigned to impose tougher oversight on both companies. Greenspan and Snow have warned that serious troubles at either company could threaten the nation's entire financial system. And lawmakers who were defeated this year in overhauling the regulatory system plan to try again next year.
Who were the lawmakers? Dims, GOP, both?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.