Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miraculous Visions - 100 years of Einstein
Economist.com ^ | December 29, 2004

Posted on 01/02/2005 1:30:09 AM PST by snarks_when_bored

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
100 years after Einstein's so-called annus mirabilis of 1905, The Economist attempts to characterize his scientific achievements.
1 posted on 01/02/2005 1:30:09 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry

Ping


2 posted on 01/02/2005 1:30:59 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
The second consequence is that the world is "non-local". That is to say, quantum interactions occur instantaneously over arbitrarily long distances. What is more, there is no mechanism in quantum mechanics which explains how particles "communicate" to match up their quantum properties in this way. For example, if one particle is spinning in one direction, its partner must spin in the opposite. However, the first particle does not have a definite direction until it is measured (Schrödinger's cat again), so the second particle cannot "know" how to point until a measurement is performed on the first particle, by which time the second particle may be millions of kilometres away. Einstein termed this "spooky action-at-a-distance".

In re-reading the article, I find that I must quibble with the use of the word 'interactions' in the first and second sentences of the above-quoted paragraph. As commonly understood in modern physics, interactions involve exchanges of virtual force particles, and the rate of such exchanges never exceeds the speed of light. Hence when the next sentence goes on to say that "quantum interactions occur instantaneously over arbitrarily long distances", this is not accurate. The word that should have been used in these sentences is 'correlations'; this word does not imply that information/energy/momentum are being exchanged instantaneously between the distant quantum particles (an impossibility).

Quibble's end.

3 posted on 01/02/2005 3:31:36 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

From reading the article Einstein certainly was a great scientist. But what real impact has his discoveries made in every day life?


4 posted on 01/02/2005 3:50:19 AM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored; RadioAstronomer

Nice thread, but it's in Chat, where it will surely die. No reason to ping the list. A pity.


5 posted on 01/02/2005 4:27:58 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Where do you want to start? How about lasers? How about use of atomic energy? Two biggies; there are more.


6 posted on 01/02/2005 4:41:03 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; All
Nice thread, but it's in Chat, where it will surely die. No reason to ping the list. A pity.

A question: what does the forum location of a thread matter if most of the potential readers of the thread are going to get a 'ping' about it?

7 posted on 01/02/2005 4:47:21 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
"But what real impact has his discoveries made in every day life?"

Let's turn the question around. What real impact would it have on everyday life if we lived out our lives for hundreds of generations abysmally ignorant of how the universe really worked?

I think it makes a difference to at least be on the right track

8 posted on 01/02/2005 4:53:28 AM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Very interesting post, thanks!
9 posted on 01/02/2005 5:14:30 AM PST by RAY (They that do right are all heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY

Thanks!


10 posted on 01/02/2005 5:20:00 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
... what does the forum location of a thread matter if most of the potential readers of the thread are going to get a 'ping' about it?

Hard to explain, but it happens. Even threads that were very active will die quickly when moved to Chat. It may be related to the way most people have their browsers set up to look at "News/Activism", and not the other forums.

11 posted on 01/02/2005 6:44:15 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Wavicle Bttt.


12 posted on 01/02/2005 6:54:57 AM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
It's been suggested to me by a source who knows about such things that I should request that you move this thread to the News/Activism forum because of the timeliness of the 100-year anniversary of Einstein's 'miracle year' of 1905 (a year in which he wrote 5 papers that revolutionized physics as it was then known).

I hope you won't mind that I'm placing the matter in your hands.

13 posted on 01/02/2005 7:00:03 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; balrog666; BikerNYC; Dimensio; Doctor Stochastic; Ernest_at_the_Beach; general_re; ...
Ping

I'll be away from my computer for most of the day, but I thought ya'll might enjoy a little light Sunday reading.

Happy New Year!

14 posted on 01/02/2005 7:06:53 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Done, thanks.


15 posted on 01/02/2005 7:08:37 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Thanks for the quick work!

Happy New Year!

16 posted on 01/02/2005 7:10:17 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Welcome, and Happy New Year :)


17 posted on 01/02/2005 7:11:18 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Heaviside showed in the 1880s that a charge in motion has a compressed electromagnetic field in the direction of motion and that there's an increase in effective mass.

You don't need quantum mechanics to explain the Compton Effect.


18 posted on 01/02/2005 7:25:45 AM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
The Compton Effect shows that photons have momentum. But photons carry no charge, nor was it even guessed in 1880 that light had a particulate aspect. So it's not clear to me that Heaviside's work, however brilliant (and he was a brilliant, if eccentric, man), explains the Compton Effect.

What's your information source?

19 posted on 01/02/2005 7:36:23 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
From reading the article Einstein certainly was a great scientist. But what real impact has his discoveries made in every day life?

Ask any WW II vet who didn't have to die in an invasion of Japan.

20 posted on 01/02/2005 8:04:19 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson