Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saskatchewan Commissioners Resigning or Refusing to "Marry" Homosexuals
Life Site ^ | January 4, 2004

Posted on 01/06/2005 4:58:44 AM PST by NYer

REGINA, January 5, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Eight Saskatchewan marriage commissioners have resigned because of new laws requiring them to "marry" same-sex couples, according to Justice Minister Frank Quennell. Three others said they would go to court if they were fired for refusing to "marry" same-sex couples, according to Saskatoon Conservative MP Maurice Vellacott.

If same-sex couples are refused "marriage" by a commissioner, the complaint will be reviewed by the Justice Department, Quennell said Tuesday, as reported by the Saskatchewan News Network.

"We'd have to investigate the circumstances and potentially remove their power to perform civil marriages because they weren't willing to administer the law as it stands," he said.

Vellacott said the government should be willing to accommodate the religious convictions of its marriage commissioners, as prescribed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code. "You've got specifically the conscience right and religion right that are very explicit (in the charter)," Vellacott said.

Regina marriage commissioner Orville Nichols said he would sue the government rather than resign if challenged for refusing to officiate at a same-sex "marriage."

"I will definitely not resign," Nichols said. "If something like this happens, I'm prepared to go to court . . . We got a letter from them saying that we must do it and if we don't, we're breaking the law and we could lose our commission appointment."

"My definition of marriage is opposite -- male and female -- not two males and two females," Nichols emphasized. "That's why I oppose it."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canada; gayunions; homosexualmarriage; marriage; saskatchewan

1 posted on 01/06/2005 4:58:45 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer

CHAOS IN CANUCKISTAN!


2 posted on 01/06/2005 4:59:37 AM PST by HMFIC (US Marines, you yell, we shell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K; little jeremiah

Ping!


3 posted on 01/06/2005 5:00:37 AM PST by NYer ("In good times we enjoy faith, in bad times we exercise faith." ... Mother Angelica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I knew conservative provinces would start to get smart about East Canada's radical rampage. And they are getting smart.


4 posted on 01/06/2005 5:01:39 AM PST by The Teen Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
An excerpt from: In Their Own Words: The Homosexual Agenda:

"Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile, who writes periodically for The New York Times, summarizes the agenda in OUT magazine: ...to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society's moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution... The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake --and one that would perhaps benefit all of society-- is to transform the notion of family entirely ." "Its the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statues, get education about homosexuality and AIDS into the public schools and in short to usher in a sea change in how society views and treats us."

* * * * *

Vatican Document On Homosexual Unions

“Homosexual unions are totally lacking in the biological and anthropological elements of marriage and family which would be the basis, on the level of reason, for granting them legal recognition. Such unions are not able to contribute in a proper way to the procreation and survival of the human race. The possibility of using recently discovered methods of artificial reproduction, beyond involving a grave lack of respect for human dignity,(15) does nothing to alter this inadequacy.”
CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING PROPOSALS TO GIVE LEGAL RECOGNITION TO UNIONS BETWEEN HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS

Catholic Ping - please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


5 posted on 01/06/2005 5:03:50 AM PST by NYer ("In good times we enjoy faith, in bad times we exercise faith." ... Mother Angelica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Teen Conservative

Why don't we trade Massassassassaachusetts to Canada for 3 or 4 provinces?


6 posted on 01/06/2005 5:05:29 AM PST by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Teen Conservative; NYer; headsonpikes
I knew conservative provinces would start to get smart about East Canada's radical rampage. And they are getting smart.

I wish Alberta and a few other conservative western Canadian provinces would seceed and joing the US. It would for one thing allow the US to build a gas pipeline from Alaska to the rest of the US without having to cross Canada.

7 posted on 01/06/2005 5:08:47 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; AlbertWang

Unfortunately, I suspect that many of our own (US) city clerks and officials will be facing the same problem in a very few years. The gay lobby is not going to rest until they get their way.


8 posted on 01/06/2005 5:12:09 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: livius
The gay lobby is not going to rest until they get their way.

Or until they all croak from AIDS...whichever comes first.

9 posted on 01/06/2005 5:18:03 AM PST by TonyRo76 (American by birth. Patriot by choice. Christian by grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: livius
Unfortunately, I suspect that many of our own (US) city clerks and officials will be facing the same problem in a very few years.

I don't think so. I think the gay lobby's power was seriously weakened when 11 out of 11 states passed referenda or constiutional amendments on the ballot on November 2 to restrict marriage to being between one man and one woman. The minimum vote for such an amendment was 58% in Oregon. The maximum was about 85%.

10 posted on 01/06/2005 5:19:17 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Its nice to see that everyone in Canada isnt crazy.


11 posted on 01/06/2005 5:20:41 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang; The Teen Conservative
Why don't we trade Massassassassaachusetts to Canada for 3 or 4 provinces?

Even better. Let the leftist demographics play out for another generation or two in MA. MA has the lowest fertility of any US state, and their leftists have even lower fertility. They will be losing congressional represention and electoral votes in Washington, and would could still pick up three or four western Conservative provinces.

12 posted on 01/06/2005 5:24:55 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang

LOL!


13 posted on 01/06/2005 5:48:49 AM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer

In Canada, the general trend is that public officials must check their religious and personal views at the door when they go to work. The Supreme Court will uphold their firings because they were not doing their jobs by marrying queers. To be against gay marriage in Canada, would be discrimination under the law and may even border on a hate crime. It would be like opposing an interracial marriage.


14 posted on 01/06/2005 5:58:06 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
SELLING HOMSEXUALITY

"Their strategy came dressed up in marketing jargon: Desensitize, jam and convert. As it turns out, though, you could use one word to summarize all those others: manipulation.

15 posted on 01/06/2005 6:14:24 AM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Woo Hoo!!

Let's get the ball rolling. Boston Tea Party time.


16 posted on 01/06/2005 8:42:58 AM PST by little jeremiah (The "Gay Agenda" exists only in the minds of little jeremiah and his cohort. - Modern Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Looks like some Canadians are willing to standing up to oppose sodomarriage. There may be hope.

If you want on/off the list let me know.

17 posted on 01/06/2005 9:59:50 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (''Go though life with a Bible in one hand and a Newspaper in the other" -- Billy Graham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson