Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gene fights off HIV ^ | 06 January 2005 | Helen Pearson

Posted on 01/06/2005 7:43:13 PM PST by neverdem - the best science journalism on the web Close window

Published online: 06 January 2005; | doi:10.1038/news050103-8

Gene fights off HIV

Helen Pearson
Extra copies generate protein that confers disease resistance.

Treatments for HIV could one day be tailored to a person's genes.© WHO/ P. Hugo

A gene that partly explains people's different susceptibility to HIV has been identified by US scientists. The discovery may help doctors tailor treatment to patients' genetic make-up.

Researchers know that certain people are naturally resistant to HIV. Some people develop full-blown AIDS several months after infection by the virus, whereas others remain disease-free for decades.

Differences in a gene called CCL3L1 may underlie some of this resistance, say Sunil Ahuja of the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, and his colleagues. They report in Science that individuals carrying extra copies of this gene are less likely to contract HIV or to progress to full-blown AIDS1.

The finding strengthens the prospect that, in future, people might be screened for this gene and others linked to HIV resistance. Those who are particularly vulnerable might, for example, be advised to follow a more aggressive course of therapy. "We are getting to a point where it would be worthwhile trying that," says geneticist Mary Carrington of the National Cancer Institute in Frederick, Maryland.

Patients could also be divided up according to their genetic make-up in trials for potential HIV vaccines, to identify groups most likely to respond. "It's a very nice piece of work, and very important," comments Michael Lederman, an infectious disease specialist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.

Cell block

Scientists already know about a handful of other genes that are linked to HIV resistance, including one called CCR5. Normally, the virus latches on to CCR5 protein on the surface of some types of white blood cell, and uses it to get into the cell. Certain mutations in CCR5 render people far more immune to HIV.

CCL3L1, the gene identified in the new study, makes a protein that also binds to CCR5. Ahuja suggests that people with extra copies of this gene are more resistant to HIV because they make more CCL3L1, and cuts the amount of CCR5 around for the virus to attach to and therefore prevents it from entering white blood cells.

In the study, the team counted the number of gene copies in a range of populations from around the world. African populations have an average of six copies, whereas non-African populations have half that number, the researchers found.

They compared groups of HIV positive and negative people within different populations, and counted their gene copies. They found that, regardless of the absolute number of gene copies in a population, those with a below-average number within their population are more likely than their fellows to contract HIV, and more likely to develop AIDS if they are infected.

This heightened disease susceptibility is exacerbated in those who also have a 'high-risk' variation of the CCR5 gene. The team estimates that around 40% of the risk of HIV infection can be explained by these two genes.

And yet HIV researchers believe there is a range of other, as yet unidentified, genes that determine a person's susceptibility to HIV. "We're missing a whole bunch," says Ahuja.

A variety of non-genetic factors are also important. For example, infection by other sexually transmitted diseases is thought to boost the risk of picking up HIV.


  1. Gonzalez E., et al. Sciencexpress, 0.1126/science.1101160 (2004).

Story from

Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works © 2004 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aids; ccl3l1; ccr5; hiv

1 posted on 01/06/2005 7:43:14 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I read the title and immediately though, "Gene who?"

LOL, it's been a long day of freepin'.

2 posted on 01/06/2005 7:47:02 PM PST by prairiebreeze (What did Jamie Gorelick know, and when did she know it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

could one day

the marketers dream...

im tired of one day bs propaganda

either do it f'n shut up about the one day's...

3 posted on 01/06/2005 7:47:54 PM PST by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They have a cure already...but Bush is holding onto it until 2006 so he can win the mid-term elections and looked at as a hero.

sarcasm folks...

4 posted on 01/06/2005 7:53:55 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (I Watch TV, What Do You Want From Me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I thought old Gene only fought off rustlers, bandits and land grabbers.

5 posted on 01/06/2005 7:56:40 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (McCain will slay a slew of Republican initiatives if he is able.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
They have a cure already

Yeah - keep it zipped unless you are in a monogamous relationship.

But liberals don't want to hear that.

6 posted on 01/06/2005 7:57:42 PM PST by dirtboy (To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
I read the title and immediately though, "Gene who?"

Gene Simmons, of course.
7 posted on 01/06/2005 7:58:17 PM PST by Ryan Spock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

8 posted on 01/06/2005 8:07:19 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You would think that after all these years, we would have a cure for HIV and other viruses.

9 posted on 01/06/2005 8:22:38 PM PST by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

It's all right--I thought the same thing, too.

10 posted on 01/06/2005 8:24:07 PM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Stupid grandma leaver-outers!"--Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Ooops, not a Siskel and Ebert thread.


11 posted on 01/06/2005 8:24:59 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider

"Glad I could be of service."
12 posted on 01/06/2005 8:32:34 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Rap - the other Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy

There is one for HIV, it's called lifestyle

13 posted on 01/06/2005 8:36:56 PM PST by squirt (POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED, FOR THE SAME REASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Jeans? Keeping them on will help fight HIV.

14 posted on 01/06/2005 8:41:35 PM PST by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squirt

That's for sure. But, what about those people who got it through blood transfusion?

15 posted on 01/06/2005 8:51:12 PM PST by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson