Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Risks Posed by South America's Growing Ties to China
Insidecostarica.com. ^ | Thursday 06 January 2005 | Diana Cariboni

Posted on 01/06/2005 10:12:09 PM PST by hedgetrimmer

MONTEVIDEO, (IPS) - While the United States has its gaze trained elsewhere, China has been nudging its way into South America.

Its influence could perpetuate a weak economic model based on commodity exports, and exacerbate the already serious problem of corruption, according to analysts, who identify these as the immediate risks posed by the sudden interest in this region expressed by the Asian giant.

Given that China has the potential to become a major new presence in South America over the next two decades, it could also contribute to a significant change in the balance of geopolitical and economic forces in the hemisphere, say some observers.

The importance of this region for China was underscored by President Hu Jintao's visit to three South American countries in November: Brazil, Argentina and Chile. (He also stopped over in Cuba).

Latin America and the Caribbean currently account for just 3.2 percent of China's trade with the rest of the world.

But for this region, China represents a market of 1.3 billion people.

For Brazil, which accounts for half of South America's combined gross domestic product (GDP), China is now the second biggest export market. Brazil's sales to China climbed 153 percent in 2003, with respect to 2002.

Beijing has signed a free trade accord with Mexico, and is negotiating another with Chile, a country with which it did 3.29 billion dollars in trade in 2003, up 35 percent from the previous year.

”China's planners are well aware of the country's internal strengths and weaknesses” and ”operate with anticipation, lining up markets and business platforms that guarantee long-term growth,” Sergio Cesarin, an Argentine economist who holds a masters degree in economics from the University of Beijing, told IPS.

Companies and the government form a ”symbiosis of interests that is part of the success of the model of 'Chinese capitalism' or 'Chinese-style socialism',” he said.

China is a powerful motor that needs raw materials to sustain its growth, which has averaged more than eight percent a year over the past decade. Its enormous appetite has been responsible for the overall rise in commodity prices.

According to the Asian Development Bank, China is the world's biggest consumer of copper, tin, zinc, platinum, steel and iron. Last year it gobbled up 40 percent of the world's steel, 30 percent of coal, 30 percent of steel and 25 percent of aluminum and copper.

Economists link Latin America's strong economic growth in 2004 to the rise in Chinese imports of raw materials.

Furthermore, China is among the five leading investors in this region, and for the first time overtook Japan in 2003, which put it in fourth place, after the United States, Britain and France, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).

In his speech in the Brazilian parliament in November, Hu said his country would invest 100 billion dollars in Latin America over the next 10 years. He also talked about strengthening the ”strategic partnership” between the two countries.

China is seeking to ”expand its political influence, markets and networks of business contacts for its companies,” said Cesarin, coordinator of Pacific Studies in the Institute of Social Science Research at the Argentine National Council on Scientific and Technological Research.

Several heavily indebted countries in this region, especially Argentina and Brazil, are finding relief in their rising exports of farm commodities like soy beans to China, while others are seeking a route to growth that differs from the free market, structural adjustment model followed in the past 20 years, largely as a result of prescriptions from the international financial institutions in Washington.

The nations of Latin America are in need of liquidity and financing. In 2003, foreign direct investment (FDI) in the region dropped nine percent, to 36.7 billion dollars. In 1998, the year that privatisations peaked, FDI amounted to 88 billion dollars.

At the same time that ties with China have been growing, the United States has distanced itself from this region. Washington's top priority has been the ”war on terrorism”, and progress towards its project for hemispheric integration, the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), has stalled.

Without any traumatic history of relations with Latin America, China's overtures have not awakened a sense of wariness or apprehension.

Beijing, which is stepping into ”a vacuum of ties left by the United States, has well-oiled political relations with the centre-left governments that predominate in the region, a positive public image, and the overseas networks of Chinese nationals, who are involved in bilateral relations,” said Cesarin.

But South America, and more specifically the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) trade bloc that consists of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, do not seem to have any clearly defined strategy for developing business ties with the Asian giant.

Despite the high-level meetings that Beijing and Mercosur have held since 1997 (the most recent took place in July), the bloc is just beginning to ”build” a strategy to guide the forging of closer ties with China, Eduardo Sigal, under-secretary of integration in the Argentine foreign ministry, admitted to IPS in November.

But while Mercosur attempts to come up with a coherent strategy, Hu found it to be a relatively simple matter to get Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Peru to recognise China as a market economy - a status it does not enjoy in the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

That step drew protests from industrialists in Brazil and Argentina, who are traditionally divided by trade disputes, but are now united in their complaints about the threats to the barriers that currently protect them from the ”dumping” - the export of products at prices deemed artificially low - of cheap Chinese goods.

South America is running a risk ”if we establish relations that increase our vulnerability to the ups and downs of commodity prices,” said Cesarin.

The error, he said, ”is not sitting down to reflect.”

”We need China to help drive an improvement in the manufacturing capacity and the diversification of the export base in our countries,” he maintained.

Mexico is one example not to be emulated. Many businesses in industries like footwear, clothing and glass have found it impossible to compete with Chinese products, which are up to 60 percent cheaper.

China's exports to Mexico soared from 195 million dollars in 1989 to over four billion in 2002, and 300 ”maquiladoras” or export assembly plants have left for China.

Corruption is another grey area in the newfound proximity between South America and China.

Graft, rather than drug trafficking, is the source of 70 percent of the ”dirty money” laundered in Brazil, where only one-third of the resources disbursed by the government actually reach their intended destination, according to the director of the international legal department of the Brazilian Attorney General's Office.

In the Corruption Perceptions Index 2004 report released by the global anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International, China received a score of 3.4 on a scale of one to 10, with 10 representing squeaky clean.

In South America, Brazil was given a score of 3.9, Argentina 2.5 and Paraguay 1.9. Chile and Uruguay stood out in the region, with scores of 7.4 and 6.2, respectively.

In China, ”the level of corruption is high, as it is in Latin America,” said Cesarin. The Chinese ”are often involved in money laundering, as is a large part of the Latin American elites.”

A business source involved in the promotion of Asian investment in the region admitted to IPS that there is a ”sensation” of ”shady” business dealings and money coming from China or Hong Kong for apparently unprofitable business endeavours that could mask money laundering activities.

Since China prohibits the withdrawal of deposits, ”money from corruption has to be laundered somehow,” said the source, who did not want to be identified.

According to a 2002 report by the official Chinese newspaper the People's Daily, money laundering was equivalent to nearly two percent of GDP in 2001 and to 11 percent of the country's foreign reserves.

The fourth generation of Chinese leaders, who rose to power in March 2003, are aware of the ”Trojan horse” of corruption, according to the book ”China's New Rulers: The Secret Files”, published in November 2002 by The New York Review of Books.

But they are divided over how to tackle the problem, say the authors.

While Hu defends strict regulations for the recruitment, training and promotion of members of the ruling Communist Party, including investigations and interrogations, other leaders believe that is not sufficient.

They advocate measures of popular oversight, which they describe as ”democracy”, like limited competitive elections and partially free media, as ways to put some limits on power.

But in China there is no movement like the perestroika that brought down the Soviet Union in 1991, say the authors Andrew Nathan, a professor at the University of Columbia, and Bruce Gilley, a doctoral student at Princeton University and a former contributing editor at the Far Eastern Economic Review.

Anyone who would have dared to express the view that the party's monopoly on power should come to an end would not have survived the selection process for the Politburo's Standing Committee, says the book, which is based on leaked information provided by a Chinese informant.

”The question is how to keep corrupt politicians in our countries from doing business with similar agents from China,” said Cesarin.

But in his view, ”the problem is not these people themselves, but those who govern us, who have the obligation of designing collective policies and strategies” to fight graft.

The coming year will be key, because the agreements and negotiations in progress will begin to delineate the magnitude of China's influence in the region.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; ftaa; geopolitics; hujintao; latinamerica; mercosur; oil; southamerica; trade
Companies and the government form a ”symbiosis of interests that is part of the success of the model of 'Chinese capitalism' or 'Chinese-style socialism',” he said.

Paid for by the USA.
1 posted on 01/06/2005 10:12:10 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii; Jeff Head; ninenot; neutrino; tallhappy; Dr. Marten; ETERNAL WARMING; RightWhale; ...

'nother PING


2 posted on 01/06/2005 10:14:21 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Yep. For the last decade the mercs for China have been hawking the theory that if we didn't trade with China, we would become isolated. Well, evidently creeping ties with China in South America and elsewhere is going to achieve that rather handily.

Europe hates us. Russia is suspect of us. The Arab world wants us dead. Asia is rock solid on hating Christians.

China with 4.5 times our population, is going to become an economic engine that will make our economy look like an infant in a baby carriage.

Well Free Trader sellouts, mercenaries for China, congrats. You've achieved your goal.


3 posted on 01/06/2005 10:25:57 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

China is the equivalent of "Mordor." The Orcs and Trolls roam the world now.


4 posted on 01/06/2005 10:32:52 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Chinese corporations with ties to the chineese military control container corporations that dominate teh entrances to the Panema Cannal.

The Chinese are using ecconomics as an invasion tactic.


5 posted on 01/06/2005 10:42:55 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I kid you not, but it looks like the only long term hope for the US is outer space exploration and settlement. But the United Nations has sucessfully prevented us from further progress in outer space with the Outer Space Treaty of 1967.


6 posted on 01/06/2005 10:52:59 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

To me, its pretty clear. But to others on this board, they all say free trade will fix everything!

Should the Chinese communist government be allowed to buy a US corporation of such strategic importance? Ask your senators and see what they say.


7 posted on 01/06/2005 10:57:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

The corporation is UNOCAL.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1315775/posts


8 posted on 01/06/2005 10:58:06 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

That's my take as well.


9 posted on 01/06/2005 11:35:16 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

The really strange thing is, that our government actually pays attention to the U.N.


10 posted on 01/06/2005 11:35:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
This ain't nothing. Chicoms are working double time to gain influence with where...?

The new Iraq.

11 posted on 01/06/2005 11:50:05 PM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Companies and the government form a ”symbiosis of interests that is part of the success of the model of 'Chinese capitalism' or 'Chinese-style socialism',” he said.
Latin America has never really latched on to the standard "-isms": Cardenasismo in Mexico wasn't exactly European-style "socialism", Peronismo wasn't the same as European-style "fascism"... and I'm beginning to think the old political terms are becoming obsolete everywhere. Chinese "communism" is more fascist than anything else... and, everywhere, we're seeing corporations -- purely economic beings -- supplanting the state or the will of the governed. "China Inc" and the U.S. aren't that different in this respect... in both the corporations see citizens as consumers, and will pursue their purely economic interest regardless of the citizen's needs or wants. These corporations are going to look for the best consumer market, and the Chinese people are a good market. The U.S. as a nation, not a market, NEEDS Latin America, but has consistently ignored the region or taken it for granted. The Latin American states are pursuing their own interests, and will be selling more to China. Unless the U.S. establishes better ties in the region, say goodbye to cheap Mexican and Venuzualan oil, Chilean copper, Bolivian tin, Argentine and Brazilian grains, Mexican vegatables (and labor), etc. etc. etc.
12 posted on 01/07/2005 12:19:32 AM PST by rpgdfmx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The money-grubbing whores have destroyed this nation.

They'll be no turning back barring something drastic. China was created by us. The entire margin of growth was provided by America. Check front page of the Financial times today RE: China/Oil.

Btw: What ever happened to the Monroe Doctrine? I'd settle for that now.


13 posted on 01/07/2005 12:52:04 AM PST by Finalapproach29er (I can no longer discern real stories from satire on this site. America is losing her common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/4c32b332-5fed-11d9-bd2f-00000e2511c8.html

I hear ya. Sad. The average U.S. citizen couldn't think their way out of a paper bag.


14 posted on 01/07/2005 12:57:49 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; DoughtyOne
The corporation is UNOCAL.

Ain't it interesting ? It's the corporation that employed Afghan President Hamid Karzai, IIRC. And Afghanistan, who shares a small border with China is where the pipelines are.

In the Soviet-era, it was said that Beijing funded some Afghan groups. Will they try to do the same, playing the warlords against the government ?
15 posted on 01/07/2005 1:30:25 AM PST by Atlantic Friend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Thanks a lot free trade and outsourcing. This is saddening. We could win if we fought china right now but I'm thinking 10-20 years down the road. Could China actually best us as military superpower with the money they made?


16 posted on 01/07/2005 1:39:15 AM PST by Paul_Denton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atlantic Friend

Well, you never know. They very well could. I'm not sure China want's strife in that region though. They have a Moslem presence in their western region that they don't want to stir up.


17 posted on 01/07/2005 1:47:54 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
but I'm thinking 10-20 years down the road. Could China actually best us as military superpower

That appears to be China's plan. In the mean time citizens of the USA are helplessly watching the very astute geopolitical maneuvering of the Chicoms, while our own government falls over itself implementing trade agreements and UN treaties that give China a greater and greater edge over us. What is it with the federal government? Don't they see what China is attempting, or could it be possible that the Chinese government is bribing them like they bribe the officials in Nigeria and Sudan? How is it that our government appears ignorant of the implications of the China juggernaut?
18 posted on 01/07/2005 10:27:38 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Yeah. It is just too bad Congress (the most anti-chicom part of our government) does not have enough power to do somthing. They tried to ban oursourcing of textiles to Chinese slave labor (not much but a step in the right direction) but that ruling was overturned. If our government becomes a puppet of the chicoms the time may come where we have to take matters into our own hands. Only a remote possibility now but think in the long term here.


19 posted on 01/07/2005 1:59:59 PM PST by Paul_Denton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

The Chinese are unable to feed themselves. This is a tough position for a military power to be in.


20 posted on 01/11/2005 7:39:55 PM PST by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson