Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Like magic: A purifying powder can turn muddy water clear, and safe.
The Philidelphia Inquirer ^ | Wed, Jan. 05, 2005 | Tom Avril

Posted on 01/07/2005 4:15:31 PM PST by nickcarraway

They took a bucket of muddy, bacteria-laden water. Added a bit of white powder. Stirred.

And within minutes, standing amid 100 refugees in war-torn Liberia, researchers from Johns Hopkins University had produced what seemed like a magic trick:

Clear, drinkable water.

"I couldn't believe it when I saw it," Hopkins researcher Shannon Doocy said of her work last year. "The people in Liberia couldn't believe it."

The powder, developed by Procter & Gamble Co. with the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is now headed for its biggest test yet: the tsunami zone.

Relief agencies, led by AmeriCares of Stamford, Conn., are sending over at least 15 million packets of the stuff - enough to purify 40 million gallons of water. Health officials yesterday said the lack of potable water represented a grave threat to survivors. Water and sewer plants have shut down, and pipes are ruptured, leading some victims to drink sewage water.

Relief workers have been treating water for decades with chlorine bleach, which kills most germs but does not improve the water's appearance.

The new powder, called PUR, contains chlorine but has other ingredients that give it two key advantages. PUR gets rid of toxic "heavy metals," such as arsenic and mercury, and it makes muddy water look clean - a key to winning acceptance from those who may be leery of aid from outsiders.

"People need to believe that they're drinking water that's purified," said Jeff Albert, an environmental scientist at Brown University who is helping raise money for AmeriCares.

The added ingredients - primarily iron sulfate and clay - cause particles in the water to clump together and settle to the bottom, so they can be strained out through cloth. The process, known as flocculation, is used in many municipal water-treatment plants, including Philadelphia's, but the powder has not previously been made in small packets for widespread public use.

PUR has other advantages. Unlike boiling water, it does not require energy on site. And it is much lighter and easier to transport than fresh water.

It costs Procter & Gamble about 8 cents to make each packet, or "sachet," of powder, said Gregory S. Allgood, director of safe drinking water for the Cincinnati-based corporation. The company has donated most of the sachets, which are about the size of a ketchup packet.

About one-third were sold for a nominal fee - 3.5 cents per packet - as a signal to relief workers that it has some value, to encourage that it be used correctly and responsibly, Allgood said.

For now, the supply is limited. The amount being shipped to Sri Lanka and other tsunami-ravaged nations represents the company's entire global inventory.

P&G formerly made the powder in the Philippines, through a contractor, and has switched to its own plant in Karachi, Pakistan, where it is ramping up production.

In addition to providing the product to nonprofit groups, the company tried in the past to sell the powder for profit. That effort had limited success, but P&G will continue to manufacture the product for humanitarian use, Allgood said.

The PUR brand also is used for the company's home water-treatment filters, which use a different technology involving carbon.

The powder packets, besides being used in emergencies, are gaining favor as a long-term solution in countries where clean water is unavailable. Population Services International, a Washington-based nonprofit, recently has used PUR in Uganda and Kenya, vice president Sally Cowal said.

Worldwide, the number-one goal for PUR and other treatments is to prevent diarrhea, which is believed to kill 5,000 children every day.

The product is not a panacea. It will not purify raw or undiluted sewage.

But the powder has proven its worth. Last year in Liberia, the Johns Hopkins researchers found that people using PUR were one-eighth as likely to contract diarrhea as those drinking untreated water. Children under 5 were one-twelfth as likely to get the disease if they drank treated water, said Doocy, who works at the university's Bloomberg School of Public Health.

As for the Indian Ocean disaster, P&G suffered its own loss. Its country manager in Thailand, Orapim Milindasuta, was killed in the tsunami.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut; US: Iowa; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: desalination; environment; johnhopkins; liberia; medicine; proctergamble; science; tsunami; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2005 4:15:32 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder if it contains alum?


2 posted on 01/07/2005 4:17:20 PM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oxiclean?


3 posted on 01/07/2005 4:18:07 PM PST by zygoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Flocculating agents can seem miraculous to the unfamiliar.


4 posted on 01/07/2005 4:18:39 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zygoat

Clorox?


5 posted on 01/07/2005 4:21:17 PM PST by SoDak (Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


6 posted on 01/07/2005 4:22:50 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hope it really works, and can help.


7 posted on 01/07/2005 4:25:49 PM PST by Christian4Bush ("Dear Dems: Your message got out. A popular and electoral majority of voters rejected it. The End.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
My scientist brother has told me that the Saudis are spending untold billions on desalination plants over in the Middle East, anticipating water to be the next natural resource everyone will be fighting over. Apparently the process is very very expensive.

Can anyone else confirm that?

8 posted on 01/07/2005 4:27:34 PM PST by Lizavetta (Modern liberalism: Where everyone must look different but think the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You could make some killer consume with this stuff.


9 posted on 01/07/2005 4:27:56 PM PST by Lx (If dolphins are so smart, why do they live in igloos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

There goes another evil corporation trying to exploit people again.


10 posted on 01/07/2005 4:27:59 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

There goes another evil corporation trying to exploit people again.


11 posted on 01/07/2005 4:28:20 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I'm in my 70's. I remember when we first got TV
back in the 40's the wife wouldn't pass in front of the
console until I closed the doors over the screen. It
took months for her to realize that Jack Paar and others could not see her in her undies.

Over the decades my generation has witnessed so many
scientific marvels we've lost count. But this one by
P&G has to stand up there with the Biggies. Just a
little packet in the First Aid kit, the glove compt.
or with your camping gear could be a life saver in
an unexpected crisis. Hey! I still keep canned veggies
and gallons of distilled water in my basement storage room.


12 posted on 01/07/2005 4:29:41 PM PST by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The process, known as flocculation,...

If they're going to have that going on shouldn't they include condoms with the packets of powder? Wine connoisseurs should be able to decant the container without using a cloth strainer.

13 posted on 01/07/2005 4:36:53 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9
I'm in my 70's. I remember when we first got TV back in the 40's the wife wouldn't pass in front of the console until I closed the doors over the screen. It took months for her to realize that Jack Paar and others could not see her in her undies.

LOL! The way things are going, pretty soon the 'TV People' will not only be able to see us in our living rooms, they'll be offering money for people to walk in front of the tube in their undies...or less!

Over the decades my generation has witnessed so many scientific marvels we've lost count. But this one by P&G has to stand up there with the Biggies. Just a little packet in the First Aid kit, the glove compt. or with your camping gear could be a life saver in an unexpected crisis.

You're absolutely right. And imagine, it was a "stingy" American company like P&G that chose to donate most of their inventory to the victims of that tsunami.

Hey! I still keep canned veggies and gallons of distilled water in my basement storage room.

You're a smart man. I'm not quite in your age bracket yet, but I do the same thing. I grew up with Civil Defense, and learned a great deal about survival both rural and urban.

Best Wishes,

MM
14 posted on 01/07/2005 4:37:07 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oh we evil American corporate profiteers, will our evil never cease!


15 posted on 01/07/2005 4:38:35 PM PST by jocon307 (Ann Coulter was right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
It can't be that expensive, every US Navy ship has evaporators to produce fresh water for the crew...

and further all submarines have "scrubbers" that can recycle the air they breath.

16 posted on 01/07/2005 4:39:47 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
25 yrs. ago our biology teachers were telling us of the new marvel of the day:

genitally engineered bacteria which eats and digest oil.

I have yet to see it work or in production.
17 posted on 01/07/2005 4:40:56 PM PST by Coleus (Let us pray for the 125,000 + victims of the tsunami and the 126,000 aborted Children killed daily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder if this will be another one of those magnificent inventions that in ten years time will be proven to cause some other horrific disease in anyone who ever handled it?


18 posted on 01/07/2005 4:42:43 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Actually I think there is a product like that...

it is just that the conditions, such as sea state and precipitation, in the affected area are are not conducive to effective utilization of the product.

19 posted on 01/07/2005 4:46:19 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: zygoat

Naw its simply DDT ;-)


20 posted on 01/07/2005 4:51:04 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
My scientist brother has told me that the Saudis are spending untold billions on desalination plants over in the Middle East, anticipating water to be the next natural resource everyone will be fighting over

Not likely when you look at a map of the middle east. Most of that region of the world is sand, sand and more sand........

Such plants are more than likely for personal consumption or the exporting to the other sandy regions.

OTOH, maybe they're thinking about creating freshwater lakes in order to boost their bass fishing tourism........ :)

21 posted on 01/07/2005 4:51:19 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Michigan's last great flock of penguins left for the west coast in 1823 never to be heard from again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zygoat
Oxiclean?

LOL!

(that crap did nothing for my laundry except add more powdery lumps)

22 posted on 01/07/2005 4:51:36 PM PST by martin_fierro (</pith>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9

I bet you even remember those water-filled magnifiers we used to hang in front of the early TV tubes to make the picture look bigger... '-)


23 posted on 01/07/2005 4:52:25 PM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Water is necessary for life, fortunately it is the most abundant renewable resource on earth.

Evaporator tanks and collect the condensation. The water will be clean but not necessarily sterile. A bottle of bleach will deal with the rest.

The sediment in the evaporator vats can be gleaned for real money. Will contain a huge variety of minerals including gold and silver.


24 posted on 01/07/2005 4:53:49 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Black Dogs are my life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
...they'll be offering money for people to walk in front of the tube in their undies...or less!

Don't know when it'll come to TV but there are plenty of web sites available where people display their home activities to viewers for a membership fee. You don't have to look very hard to find them if they haven't already solicited your business. I would be curious enough to look for free but I'm too much of a cheapskate to pay for something like that.

25 posted on 01/07/2005 4:55:21 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

thanks for posting...this got good mention on The Paul Harvey News and Comment today


26 posted on 01/07/2005 4:56:49 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

High-output de-salination processes -- whether distillation or reverse osmosis -- are, indeed, inherently expensive and/or energy-intensive.


27 posted on 01/07/2005 4:57:49 PM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
My scientist brother has told me that the Saudis are spending untold billions on desalination plants over in the Middle East, anticipating water to be the next natural resource everyone will be fighting over. Apparently the process is very very expensive.

I sincerely hope so and I am thinking about cranking up a group of folks for the OWEC and am thinking of charging about $50 a barrell.

Only fair that the Saudi's and other oil producers share in "what's good for the goose, is good for the gander".

28 posted on 01/07/2005 5:01:44 PM PST by Y0K (IRS@BeGone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nitro

It is THAT expensive. The sailors must have water to live, that is why that have the distillers. Sea water must be boiled using fuel.


29 posted on 01/07/2005 5:02:03 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zygoat

LOL! That's what I was thinking!


30 posted on 01/07/2005 5:08:24 PM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Israel is in the forefront when it comes to desalinization plants.


31 posted on 01/07/2005 5:10:21 PM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
"Clorox?"

More likely something like calcium hypochlorite.

32 posted on 01/07/2005 5:10:46 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

The aquifers here in the U.S. are already dropping a lot.


33 posted on 01/07/2005 5:12:17 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
Well, on a ship the boilers are already running to power the steam turbines. So it is not at all difficult to bleed off a little steam to the evaporators or even use the residual heat after it powers the turbines.

I was an Operations Specialist (radar, navigation, communication) so I was not very familiar with the goings on down below.

But that is neither here nor there, my point was...

producing the water is or can be done relatively cheaply... it is the fact that they can only be effective fairly close to a large body of salt water and the subsequent distribution of the potable water produced would be the most expensive component of the equation.

34 posted on 01/07/2005 5:16:29 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Such plants are more than likely for personal consumption or the exporting to the other sandy regions.

Actually, the Saudi's use most of the desalinated water to create steam for an injection process to help facilitate the extraction of oil.

35 posted on 01/07/2005 5:24:16 PM PST by Go Gordon (If at first you don't succeed...skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
It is THAT expensive. The sailors must have water to live, that is why that have the distillers. Sea water must be boiled using fuel.

Not a problem. Most are nuke powered.

36 posted on 01/07/2005 5:26:04 PM PST by Go Gordon (If at first you don't succeed...skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Yes very expensive but Saudies have ton of cash...


37 posted on 01/07/2005 5:33:38 PM PST by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

its all over the place


38 posted on 01/07/2005 5:34:31 PM PST by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Flocculating agents can seem miraculous to the unfamiliar.

But are great for cleaning a pool after a storm!

39 posted on 01/07/2005 5:51:02 PM PST by balrog666 (I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
My scientist brother has told me that the Saudis are spending untold billions on desalination plants over in the Middle East, anticipating water to be the next natural resource everyone will be fighting over. Apparently the process is very very expensive.

Can anyone else confirm that?

Desalination is expensive; the cheapest way is through reverse osmosis. The cost comes from the energy required to pump the water through the RO membranes. However, recent years have seen dramtic improvement in RO systems with improving salt reject ratios (a good thing) and lower pressure requirements. But still needing pressures in the neighborhood of 200 - 250 PSIG is still very expensive when you are talking of the quantity of fresh water a city or town goes through. But its a lot better than the 600 - 800 PSIG needed only ten years ago or so.

40 posted on 01/07/2005 6:09:05 PM PST by lafroste (gravity is not a force, dangit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
It can't be that expensive, every US Navy ship has evaporators to produce fresh water for the crew...

They also have a ready source of waste heat to evaporate the water then recondense it after it has left the brine. Further, they don't care about efficiency beause they can recover small amounts of seawater and dump the rest. Great process, if you have a handy supply of waste heat nearby.

41 posted on 01/07/2005 6:12:40 PM PST by lafroste (gravity is not a force, dangit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
genitally engineered bacteria

LOL! I want to see that!

maybe you meant genetically engineered...

42 posted on 01/07/2005 6:14:25 PM PST by lafroste (gravity is not a force, dangit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

No... no, you don't.

/c;


43 posted on 01/07/2005 6:16:44 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"...genitally engineered bacteria which eats and digest oil."

I believe you meant to type genetically engineered...but your version sounds a lot more..uhh..interesting...;-)

44 posted on 01/07/2005 6:20:50 PM PST by Khurkris (That sound you hear coming from over the horizon...thats me laughing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

"genitally" engineered bacteria which eats and digest oil.

Uh, I think the word you want there is genetically.


45 posted on 01/07/2005 6:22:35 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
"The sediment in the evaporator vats can be gleaned for real money. Will contain a huge variety of minerals including gold and silver."

By taking these minerals and refining them, you should arrive at a net profit from your desalination process. But they won't tell you that slight detail. (If this weren't true, no one would bother with the process.) Removal of gold salts is not that difficult - especially from RO filtration equipment. I've often wondered what municipal water companies do with their filters when they change them, and where the resulting profits go.

46 posted on 01/07/2005 6:24:15 PM PST by datura (Destroy The UN, the MSM, and China. The rest will fall into line once we get rid of these.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lx
You could make some killer consume with this stuff.

Read the article, and/or do a Google search.

This "stuff" has been on the market for years.

We have friends in Charlotte, NC who had a severe Ca H2O problem. They employed the PUR system, and now, their water is clean, crisp, and Ca free. BTW, PUR also addresses other H2O borne chemicals...

47 posted on 01/07/2005 6:24:58 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"genitally engineered bacteria which eats and digest oil."

That is an accepted means of decontaminating land areas of oil spills.
Even though every crude oil has it's own bacteria which nature provides for long term eradication of the oil, if some genetically engineered bacteria is introduced the process is speeded up considerably.
The critical factors for reproduction of the bacteria and eventual clean up of the spill are plentiful oxygen and warm temperature.

48 posted on 01/07/2005 6:25:10 PM PST by TexasCowboy (Texan by birth, citizen of Jesusland by the Grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Uh, I think the word you want there is genetically. >>

Uh, who gives a crap, you and everyone else knew what I meant. It's called a typo.


49 posted on 01/07/2005 6:26:06 PM PST by Coleus (Let us pray for the 125,000 + victims of the tsunami and the 126,000 aborted Children killed daily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What a great invention, and P&G is doing a wonderful thing.


50 posted on 01/07/2005 6:26:55 PM PST by McGavin999 (Senate is trying to cover their A$$es with Rumsfeld's hide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson