Skip to comments.Kerry meets Assad in Damascus
Posted on 01/08/2005 12:26:53 PM PST by Ooh-Ah
click here to read article
showing Kerry is indeed and enemy of America
"Thank you but you are showing me more important than I was! You are showing me as a General!"
Wait a minute, he went to Nam for 4 months, actually 3 real months,wrote himself 3 Purple Hearts for self inflicted niches covered by Bandaids and came out a LTjg just as he went in after four years with almost none of his Peers liking or respecting him.You only hide your discharge papers when there is something to hide.
As in his days of purple heart collectin this chap is sufferin from delusions of relevancy......
Uh, he does realize he lost, doesn't he?
How in the world does john F'n have permission from anyone in authority to meet with out enemy? Of course consorting with the enemy is old hat to F'n.
Former U.S. presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry, sips Arabic coffee in the ancient Omayyad Mosque in old Damascus on Saturday, Jan. 8, 2004. Kerry toured old Damascus following his talks in the Syrian capital regarding Iraq, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the U.S.-Syria strained bilateral relations.
After spending time with Syrian officials, Kerry took his coffee black because even John Kerry couldn't stand the fact that he had spent too much time smelling that dairy air! (Derriere.)
Is this picture hanging in any of their war museums yet.
Logan Act, anyone?
IMO, this is a clear violation. But I don't think the Logan Act has ever been enforced, unfortunately. GWB has enough to do without picking a fight about this. So he gets away with it.
Didn't he always?
Isn't there some sort of law against impersonating a President?
This is a good article to send to people who understand the Middle East and may have voted for Kerry.
I saw this on FOX. What's the deal? I have to say this really bothers me -- a lot! So many thoughts going through my head on this; none of them good... this after his meeting over there with Jimmy Carter!
"Peace in our time."
My blood is boiling!!!!
This traitor was running for POTUS and was privy to classified information & intelligence briefings.
I want to know what he told Assad!
I agree, but realistically how could the Bush administration put a stop to it?
Unfortunately, there is no easy solution. That is one of the problems with allowing inappropriate and dishonest ideas and actions to set precedents which become so entrenched they are almost impossible to undo.
In this particular case, if I were Bush I would make a high-profile public statement that Senator Kerry does not speak for the American government and any foreign leaders who treat with him do so at their own risk. I would further amplify this by stating that this same stricture applies to any other non-administration officials or former officials, such as Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton, unless they are explicitly authorized by the administration. In addition, I would have our ambassador to Syria formally call on Syrian President Assad and inform him of this policy position face-to-face.
I realize this would cause an incredible media firestorm against Bush and would entail enormous political risk, but I believe the potential gain justifies the risk. It is my sincere belief that there is a huge potential of untapped energy and support in the American populace that is simmering under the surface and is just waiting for the right leader to inspire it, galvanize it and direct it into action.
I believe that the vast majority of Americans are just flat-out fed-up with the MSM, political correctness run amuck and the shameful dishonesty and venality of our self-annointed ruling elites. I believe the people are just waiting for someone with the courage to challenge these corrupt institutions head-on while they are still reeling from the blows they sustained during the recent election campaign. I believe Americans would rise-up and cheer and support President Bush if he stepped forth and loudly issued the call.
In order for this to happen, however, Bush has to make the leap of faith and courage. As long as he continues to tiptoe through the politically correct minefields of media approval and world opinion, the people will continue to merely watch and observe. This is precisely analogous to the situation in Iraq, where the people are waiting and watching to see if we have the national will and determination to stay the course before they're willing to commit themselves.
In practical terms, the Bush administration needs to adopt a policy of immediately and forcefully responding to each and every instance of kibitzing, grandstanding and deliberate attempts to subvert official policy by the Kerry/Carter/Clinton types. The Logan Act needs to be publicly invoked and explained to the American people, and then enforced. And to do this, they must get some forceful, articulate spokespeople to compensate for Bush's communication deficiencies. What they need are more Zell Miller types, not the pathetic White House press spokeman they have now. The Clinton administration had a "war-room" response team for just such a purpose, and regardless of our personal dislike of them, it was damned effective, even when used to defend their obvious lies. Imagine how effective it could be when used to defend the truth.
You Know Kerry:
"I actually spilled my guts to Assad, before I decided to tell him nothing."
see post 23.
But then again I understand that Mrs Heinz's poodle was in Vietnam so maybe there's a loophole!?