White House Reaction to CBS Report, Firings

White House Press Briefing ^ | 1/10/2005 | White House press briefing

[Tribune7]

ping

[oldbrowser]

But CBS is not being contrite, the standard that must be met before any screw-up by a Republican is considered by the MSM for forgiveness.

This organization has attempted to hijack the election of an American president. They used forgery, lies, colluded with the other side. This is not about being contrite.
This was an attempted "coup d'état", in many other countries they would be executed. Here we are saying "no harm no foul" and patting ourselves on the back because we embarrassed the MSM a little bit.

[beyond the sea]

Hannity helped getting the GOP fired up to vote in November.

Very CORRECT!

But, not time for him to stop now as he did today!

[beyond the sea]

Cheerios....... ;-)

[cyncooper]

What was the question Hannity asked of Goldberg he didn't and should have asked of Schieffer?

[John Lenin]

Go start a seperate thread for your rant. And take your followers with you.

[cyncooper]

He's a freeper and he's noted in the above transcript this very thread is based on as asking questions about the report released today!

[Liberty Valance]

I wonder of ol' Dan will report this news on SeeBS tonight...

[John Lenin]

Useful Idiots of the Left

[ladyinred]

And what about Sandy Burger

Exactly. This is one of the most important questions of our lifetimes I think! The implications are staggering!

[beyond the sea]

What was the question Hannity asked of Goldberg he didn't and should have asked of Schieffer?

I do not have the transcripts in front of me. Sorry.

If you really don't want to believe that Sean was soft on Scheiffer.... go for it! Sean was like a Tim Wakefield knuckleball without the knuckle with Scheiffer!

Check it out, I am not kidding you!

That's a baseball reference if you missed it.

[cyncooper]

I'm out west and will read FR to see as he'll air well before it's shown here and I get to avoid the sickening program. I said earlier on another thread that I bet he paints the report as vindication of a sort. "Mistakes" not "intentional".

Unbelievable (in other words, too believable)

[Windcatcher]

They aren't contrite because they wanted Bush to lose the election. Next time the powers at CBS will be more subtle. They will seek revenge in '08, and we'll have to watch them like hawks.

[clyde260]

That is such a funny thought!!!!!!

After all, he did say he wanted to "break the story"

[clyde260]

Sandy WHO??????

</sarcasm>

[plain talk]

Get over it. No one is perfect. Sean is a great advocate for conservatives. We need more Sean's out there in the media and fewer Bob Sheiffer's.

[beyond the sea]

"Look, I'm not your Effin parents!"

If you don't get that, John Lennon(in), stay off the concept.

trampy clothes, peace symbols..................

Just a joke, I hope you're hip.

[cyncooper]

If you really don't want to believe that Sean was soft on Scheiffer

That is completely uncalled for.

You said Hannity asked a question and I asked in good faith what it was. I didn't ask for an exact transcript. It is bad form, IMO, to post about an event like a radio show and say a question was asked and not be willing to impart the details when politely asked for same and then add insulting and baseless commentary such as you have here.

You were way off the mark in perceiving my question as hostile.

[John Lenin]

Believe my bro, you are attacking the wrong person on this thread. I see you have a bash Hannity thread. Good for you.

[beyond the sea]

He's a freeper and he's noted in the above transcript this very thread is based on as asking questions about the report released today!

Great that he's a FReeper! But WRONG QUESTIONS from him, and, not enough of them.