Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weighing the Evidence: An Atheist Abandons Atheism
BreakPoint with Charles Colson ^ | January 10, 2005 | Charles Colson

Posted on 01/10/2005 2:47:28 PM PST by Mr. Silverback

Antony Flew, the 81-year-old British philosophy professor who taught at Oxford and other leading universities, became an atheist at age 15. Throughout his long career he argued—including in debates with an atheist-turned-Christian named C. S. Lewis—that there was a “presumption of atheism,” that is, the existence of a creator could not be proved.

But he’s now been forced to face the evidence. It comes from the Intelligent Design movement, led by Dr. Phillip Johnson and particularly the work of Michael Behe, the Lehigh biochemist who has proven the “irreducible complexity” of the human cell structure. Though eighty-one years old, Flew has not let his thinking fossilize, but has faithfully followed his own dictum to “go where the evidence leads.”

Christian philosophy professor Gary Habermas of Liberty University conducted an interview with Flew that will be published in the winter issue of Philosophia Christi, the journal of the Evangelical Philosophical Society and Biola University. Flew told Habermas that a pivotal point in his thinking was when he realized two major flaws in the various theories of how nature might have created itself. First, he recognized that evolutionary theory has no reasonable explanation for “the first emergence of living from non-living matter”—that is, the origin of life. Second, even if a living cell or primitive animal had somehow assembled itself from non-living chemicals, he reasoned it would have no ability to reproduce.

Flew told Habermas, “This is the creature, the evolution of which a truly comprehensive theory of evolution must give some account. Darwin himself was well aware that he had not produced such an account. It now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design.”

Flew has, thus, become a Deist—that is, he acknowledges God as creator but not as a personal deity. In his opinion, “There is no room either for any supernatural revelation of that God or any transactions between that God and individual human beings.” In fact, he told a group last May that he considers both the Christian God and the Islamic God to be “omnipotent Oriental despots—cosmic Saddam Husseins.”

But a crack is beginning to develop in his opinion that God hasn’t spoken through Scripture. When he reads the first chapter of Genesis, Flew says he’s impressed that a book written thousands of years ago harmonizes with twenty-first-century science. “That this biblical account might be scientifically accurate,” says Flew, “raises the possibility that it is revelation.” A book containing factual statements that no human knew about at the time of writing seems to argue that the authors must have had coaching from the Creator.

The evidence is there for all who will look, as his one-time adversary C. S. Lewis discovered, and as more and more thinking intellectuals are discovering today. So it is that Antony Flew, perhaps the most famous philosopher of atheism, is just a step or two away from the kingdom.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: antonyflew; atheism; atheist; breakpoint; creation; deist; god; revelation; science; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-366 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2005 2:47:28 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Amazing how some atheists come around the closer they get to meeting their Creator...
2 posted on 01/10/2005 2:49:00 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (Stop Hillary - PEGGY NOONAN '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

And another potential thousand plus post thread exits the womb...

I like the mention of C. S. Lewis at the end. He is my favorite author.

It is also nice that he brings up one of my favorite points. To wit, that a book written thousands of years ago and has quite a bit to say about creation, still cannot be refuted by modern science. Oh, peoples interpretations of it can be, but it cannot. Kind of like it's prophesies...

Cool.


3 posted on 01/10/2005 2:54:50 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agenda_express; Annie03; applemac_g4; BA63; banjo joe; Believer 1; bethelgrad; billbears; ...

BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

4 posted on 01/10/2005 2:55:29 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Why the heck isn't Randy Moss prperly potty trained?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
"This is the creature, the evolution of which a truly comprehensive theory of evolution must give some account."

Someone needs to tell this 81 year professor from Oxford University that the Theory of Evolution does not speak to the issue of origins, therefore it must not, and cannot, be held accountable in this regard.

5 posted on 01/10/2005 2:55:37 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Well, as ones life becomes more and more mortal, one usually finds themself spending more mental energy on the subject.


6 posted on 01/10/2005 2:56:09 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

>>Theory of Evolution does not speak to the issue of origins, therefore it must not, and cannot, be held accountable in this regard.<<

Heh, heh. WHICH theory of evolution?


7 posted on 01/10/2005 2:57:08 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I don't believe in atheists...I can prove their nonexistance.


8 posted on 01/10/2005 2:57:21 PM PST by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

AT 81, he may not have much time left to make up his mind whether he should follow up on his realization of a deity.


9 posted on 01/10/2005 2:59:28 PM PST by TexasRepublic (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

C. S. Lewis used to be an atheist. He finally concluded, and documents his reasons, that it is the most logically unsupportable position to the point that he did not believe there was really any such thing as an atheist, no matter how much someone would claim to be one.


10 posted on 01/10/2005 2:59:56 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

My assertion is based on Lewis's writing....:-)


11 posted on 01/10/2005 3:00:58 PM PST by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

I tend to believe that if the only thing that is keepine a person from accepting Christ is their intellect, then they are, in fact, probably destined to become a Christian.


12 posted on 01/10/2005 3:01:31 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I actually suspected, but was not sure. ;^>


13 posted on 01/10/2005 3:02:31 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Amazing how some atheists come around the closer they get to meeting their Creator...

Perhaps he's hedging his bets?


14 posted on 01/10/2005 3:03:20 PM PST by Sterrins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Atheism is a religion too. To say you know there is no God is logically the same as saying you know there is.
15 posted on 01/10/2005 3:04:08 PM PST by wolfpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dAnconia

Induldge me ping :D


16 posted on 01/10/2005 3:08:32 PM PST by Annie03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Interesting article....looks like intelligent design is gaining some traction.


17 posted on 01/10/2005 3:09:58 PM PST by Annie03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
and as more and more thinking intellectuals are discovering today

And that is the key phrase. The brain-dead ones still cling to a theory only a real idiotic or and religious fanatic could believe in.

18 posted on 01/10/2005 3:11:12 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

Wow. What a succinct way to put it. I've had raging arguments with atheists on FR on the impossibility of atheism.

You summed it up in a single sentence.

Generally, I get riled and ask them to lay out their proof for me so that I can have my Sunday's back.

I never get a response, but my approach isn't half as elegant as your summation.


19 posted on 01/10/2005 3:12:52 PM PST by RinaseaofDs (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
does not speak to the issue of origins, therefore it must not, and cannot, be held accountable in this regard.

If the Theory of Evolution states humans evolved from another species, it most certainly speaks to the issue of origins.
20 posted on 01/10/2005 3:14:58 PM PST by microgood (Washington State: Ukraine without the poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-366 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson