Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rossi v. Gregoire: What Matters Now
Timothy Goddard's Blog ^ | 12 January 2005 | Timothy Goddard

Posted on 01/12/2005 9:54:00 PM PST by Publius

In all the hubbub if this election and all its accouterments, it’s easy to lose sight of what matters. Broadly speaking, the only thing that matters is the Washington State Supreme Court decision that will be made after the Chelan court decision is appealed. Within that, though, there are a lot of things that matter, based on Washington law, and a lot of things that don’t–and it can be easy to confuse the two. First off, let’s look at what the law actually says:

RCW 29A.68.020
Commencement by registered voter – Causes for.

Any registered voter may contest the right of any person declared elected to an office to be issued a certificate of election for any of the following causes:

RCW 29A.68.070
Misconduct of board – Irregularity material to result.

No irregularity or improper conduct in the proceedings of any election board or any member of the board amounts to such malconduct as to annul or set aside any election unless the irregularity or improper conduct was such as to procure the person whose right to the office may be contested, to be declared duly elected although the person did not receive the highest number of legal votes.

RCW 29A.68.080
Misconduct of board – Number of votes affected – Enough to change result.

When any election for an office exercised in and for a county is contested on account of any malconduct on the part of any election board, or any member thereof, the election shall not be annulled and set aside upon any proof thereof, unless the rejection of the vote of such precinct or precincts will change the result as to such office in the remaining vote of the county.

RCW 29A.68.090
Illegal votes – Allegation of.

When the reception of illegal votes is alleged as a cause of contest, it is sufficient to state generally that illegal votes were cast, that, if given to the person whose election is contested in the specified precinct or precincts, will, if taken from that person, reduce the number of the person’s legal votes below the number of legal votes given to some other person for the same office.

RCW 29A.68.100
Illegal votes – List required for testimony.

No testimony may be received as to any illegal votes unless the party contesting the election delivers to the opposite party, at least three days before trial, a written list of the number of illegal votes and by whom given, that the contesting party intends to prove at the trial. No testimony may be received as to any illegal votes, except as to such as are specified in the list.

RCW 29A.68.110
Illegal votes – Number of votes affected – Enough to change result.

No election may be set aside on account of illegal votes, unless it appears that an amount of illegal votes has been given to the person whose right is being contested, that, if taken from that person, would reduce the number of the person’s legal votes below the number of votes given to some other person for the same office, after deducting therefrom the illegal votes that may be shown to have been given to the other person.

Let’s go through the irregularities one at a time, and see how they stack up.

WHAT MATTERS:

50,000 ballots enhanced illegally: This matters immensely. These King County ballots were not read correctly by the vote tabulating machines, and so were taken out and “enhanced” so that the machine could read them. This is perfectly legal -- however, the election workers enhanced them to the point that it was impossible to review those ballots, which was supposed to be done. This is in violation of state law. Even if only 1% of those ballots had been determined to be invalid, that may have be enough to throw the election back to Rossi. This is an irregularity (or misconduct) that is certainly material to the result.

1,800 voterless ballots: It sure seems like this should matter, based on the RCW noted in this Sound Politics post. If the votes really are from voters who voted without signing in, as claimed by Dean Logan, it certainly should matter. If they didn’t sign in, we have no way of knowing whether they were registered voters, or voted twice, or even citizens. If it’s something more sinister, then it matters even more. It could, conceivably, be beaureaucratic incompetence, losing thousands of voter names. But I somehow doubt that -- and there’s no way to tell at this point. So obviously, this matters, even if Logan says it doesn’t. “This always happens” may be an excuse when “this” is smaller than the margin of victory, but it isn’t one now–again, it’s either an irregularity or misconduct material to the result.

348 unverified provisional ballots mixed with the real ballots: Once again, while this wouldn’t matter in a normal election, it matters here, because these disputed ballots are a great deal larger than the margin of victory. There’s no way of knowing if these ballots were signed by registered voters, unregistered voters, illegal aliens, space aliens or Mickey Mouse. This may be the strongest piece of the contest, as it has been well documented and was even anticipated before the election. This is clearly misconduct material to the result.

Felons voting: This obviously matters -- it says as much right there in part 5.a.ii of the first quoted RCW. So far, having looked at only Pierce and Snohomish counties, the BIAW has found 89 felonious votes. If there are just 40 more found in King County or elsewhere, that invalidates the election ipso facto. If those aren’t found, of course, they won’t matter at all. According to the second-to-last RCW cited abote, the names of all the voting felons will have to be produced in court, which will be all sorts of fun -- but it should be enough all by itself, let alone lumped in with everything else.

WHAT DOESN’T MATTER:

Dead voters: It makes for some catchy headlines and some amusing pictures, but there aren’t nearly enough dead voters to even come close to having an effect on this contest. I’m glad they were found, though. It provides an example of election fraud that is easy to relate to, and has no doubt helped convince most of Washington that a revote is needed. It will not, however, convince a judge.

Systemic problems: Systemic problems, problems with election law as written, as important as they are to fix, will not help with the contest -- namely, because the same systemic problems will almost certainly be in play in any revote. What needs to be shown -- and clearly has been -- is unique instances of illegal voting, or voting irregularities, that can be avoided in the next vote. Again, I’m still glad systemic problems are being brought to light, so that they can be solved. But again, it won’t matter to a judge.

Gregoire’s inauguration: This doesn’t matter a whit, according to the law. Don’t let anyone tell you different.

Polls and petitions: While these matter immensely in gauging the mood of the people, and certainly affected Rossi’s decision to go forward with the contest, they won’t actually come into play once the trial starts. This will be good to remember if the populace, understandably, starts getting tired of the mess (though I hope they’re in it for the long haul).

(Care to see something kind of spooky and completely irrelevant? If you take the total difference between Rossi’s initial margin of 261, and Gregoire’s current margin of 129, you get 390. If you subtract from that Rossi’s second margin of 42 votes, you get 348 -- which is the exact number of provisional ballots mixed in with regular ballots. Ooooh -- spooky.)

Looking at the facts right next to the law, this looks for all the world like an open-and-shut case. I can’t imagine the legal backflips and distortions that would be needed to not throw out this election. If any readers would care to give it a shot, I’m all ears. I certainly look forward to hearing the Democratic arguments in court. So far, they haven’t responded substantively to the facts, and I’m curious to hear what they say if they ever do.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: dinorossi; fraud; gregoire; revote; rossi; stealingelections; themostcorruptstate; washingtonstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last
Good legal analysis of our problem.
1 posted on 01/12/2005 9:54:00 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius

bump for later read


2 posted on 01/12/2005 9:54:43 PM PST by MissouriConservative ( Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more; you should never wish to do less. - Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; MarMema; Chad Fairbanks; Splatter; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; Clemenza; cmsgop; ...

Ping.


3 posted on 01/12/2005 9:55:23 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

bttt


4 posted on 01/12/2005 9:55:56 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777

Please ping the chapter.


5 posted on 01/12/2005 10:02:05 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

A question for my Democrat State Senator and Democrat State Legislator:

Can you tell me that if all legitimate ballots cast were perfectly counted that you are certain Christine won?

If yes then you are an dishonest, unprincipled partisan hack and if no then how dare you certify the results of an election that you don't even claim to know who won.


6 posted on 01/12/2005 10:02:55 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

I'm no lawyer but this looks like a straight-forward analysis by this guy.


7 posted on 01/12/2005 10:05:12 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

He's damn good. His brief is tightly argued, and as a non-lawyer, a tightly argued brief is the only kind I can understand.


8 posted on 01/12/2005 10:06:15 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Good analysis by the blogger. It would appear that the Republican case is very sturdy. Kudos to Washington Republicans and all others who aren't taking this fraud sitting down.


9 posted on 01/12/2005 10:07:33 PM PST by GiveEmDubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
50,000 ballots enhanced illegally: This matters immensely.

I would like to know the source for this (including especially that 50,000 number).

King County has admitted the 348 illegally-counted provisionals, and Dean Logan himself has said that much of the 180-vote discrepancy can probably be explained by "voters" who didn't sign the poll books, so I'm willing to assume that we're talking about several hundred there as well.

But so far, the ballot enhancement issue seems to be merely an allegation. That's not to say it isn't true, but if King County has admitted it, or if it has been conclusively proven, I'd like to know.

10 posted on 01/12/2005 10:09:06 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


11 posted on 01/12/2005 10:09:55 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
It gets better.

One of the key Democratic arguments against a revote is that the Washington State Constitution says that the governor must be elected with the legislature. Let's say that the Democrats are correct. To make a revote constitutional, wouldn't that simply require putting the legislative races of 2004 on the same revote ballot with the gubernatorial race?

If this is a correct legal argument and if I were a Democratic legislator, I'd be scared $hitless at the anger of the electorate come revote day. Rossi would not only win, he would bring in a solidly Republican legislature.

12 posted on 01/12/2005 10:11:39 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane
180-vote discrepancy

That should, of course, be "1800-vote discrepancy."

By the way, Washington GOP Chairman Chris Vance will be holding a press conference tomorrow at 2 pm in Spokane.

13 posted on 01/12/2005 10:12:09 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

My bad. It was my editing (and my bifocals with a small font).


14 posted on 01/12/2005 10:13:26 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius

No, I was correcting my own post.


15 posted on 01/12/2005 10:14:34 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Pithy analysis, scathing implications.


16 posted on 01/12/2005 10:16:10 PM PST by Lexinom (www.revotewa.com - Go DINO! www.illegitimategovernor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Here is the letter I got from King County elections today:

Thank you for taking the time to voice your concerns and giving us the opportunity to respond. Please give us a moment of your time to consider the facts, and not simply the political rhetoric.

We are not aware of any evidence of fraud or misconduct parting the administration of King County's election or recount processes. The rate of accuracy in any election in Washington State is approximately 99.9 percent. In a race this close, there is little room for even the smallest amount of human error; however, when errors do occur, election officials refer to our longstanding laws in place to ensure the errors are corrected in an open, fair and transparent manner. The record shows King County has done just that.

The standard by which King County Elections conducted this election is the same standard used in every county in accordance with state law.

Unlike Florida in 2000, Washington State has explicit election laws in place when human errors or discrepancies in the election process occur. This provides county canvassing boards and election officials' structured and consistent guidance to correct mistakes (RCW 29A.60.210).

When staff became aware that a group of ballots were incorrectly categorized and rejected, we researched and corrected the error, a decision which was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court (read the decision at http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.opindisp&docid=763992MAJ ).

We understand in a race this close, political rhetoric is at an all time high; however, it is important to step back from these accusations and look at the facts in a nonpartisan manner.

The facts show:

* All 39 counties added votes to their original election returns during the machine and manual recounts. This is expected. Five counties added ballots during the recount process, King County being one of those. The other four counties used the same state law to correct discrepancies and add previously uncounted ballots to their election returns. The additional 566 previously uncounted ballots included in the manual recount represents a .06% fraction of change in King County's election return.

* King County did not change the way it conducts elections along the way. In fact, the county resisted efforts by the political parties to change procedures. Twice the Washington State Supreme Court validated King County's election decisions in two separate cases filed by the State Democratic Party and the State Republican Party.

* King County military and overseas ballots were mailed on time and alternative faxed and e-mailed ballots were offered to voters whose ballots did not arrive in time. All voted ballots received prior to certification of the General Election were counted as long as the ballot was signed on or before November 2. In fact, only 16 ballots from the "military/overseas/Federal Write-in" grouping were received too late to be counted. For more information, please visit: http://www.metrokc.gov/elections/news/2005_01_05.htm

* The remaining difference in the number of votes cast versus the number of registrations credited with voting in the 2004 General Election is approximately 1,800 - an accuracy rate of 99.8% based on close to 900,000 ballots cast. This number is consistent with historic reconciliation rates for King County. In 2000 this number was 1,230.

* Election officials conduct every election in an open and transparent process and work together with the parties to hire poll workers and official party observers. To ensure questions were answered on time and in an efficient manner, election supervisors met with party observer representatives throughout the day and every night during the recount to address any questions or concerns.

* With nearly 900,000 ballots cast, King County issued and counted more ballots than almost any other jurisdiction in the country, second only to Los Angeles County, California.

We welcome your feedback and appreciate the opportunity to provide additional information in response to your concerns.

Thank you,

King County Records, Elections & Licensing Services Division
King County Admin. Bldg., #553
500 4th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104


17 posted on 01/12/2005 10:16:21 PM PST by Edgewood Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

(It's late. I'm getting punchy.)


18 posted on 01/12/2005 10:17:28 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Publius

BTTT. The dead voter issue is something I'd like to see some follow-up on. Perhaps that may not be a major factor, but damn, someone submitted those votes and needs to be called on the carpet. That trail leads back to who gave the marching orders. Omerta is breaking


19 posted on 01/12/2005 10:19:16 PM PST by Horatio Gates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

Yes, it's full of pith. (And as any FReeper can tell, I'm thoroughly pithed off at this whole mess.)


20 posted on 01/12/2005 10:19:36 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Publius

So what do we do now?


21 posted on 01/12/2005 10:21:03 PM PST by PureSolace (A Conservative bases his politics from his morals, and a Liberal bases his morals from his politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
It would sure be nice to not have to wait four years to get rid of Jim Kastama.
22 posted on 01/12/2005 10:21:18 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shotokan
If Rob McKenna is on his toes -- and once he cleans the Democrats out of his AG shop -- I suspect we'll see election workers Mirandized, turn and then implicate certain King County councilpeople.

A purge is coming -- a genuine political enema.

23 posted on 01/12/2005 10:23:11 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane; Pride in the USA
Ping!

Vance Holds Spokane Press Conference to Discuss Status of Election Contest

On Thursday, Washington State Republican Party Chair Chris Vance will be in Spokane to discuss the current situation in the election contest. The initial hearing of the election contest is scheduled in the Chelan County Superior Court this Friday.

Date: Thursday, January 13, 2005

Time: 2:00 P.M.

Place: Davenport Hotel, Isabella Room

10 South Post Street, Spokane

24 posted on 01/12/2005 10:24:04 PM PST by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PureSolace
So what do we do now?

Hope that the courts give an honest ruling in this case. And keep the political pressure on. Judges are elected in this state.

25 posted on 01/12/2005 10:24:48 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Publius

If you have a ping list for this topic, could you add me please?


26 posted on 01/12/2005 10:25:14 PM PST by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

I've heard the 50K number a few times, I believe from John Carlson and also soundpolitics.com but I'd have to check to be sure.


27 posted on 01/12/2005 10:26:51 PM PST by 4woodenboats (I see Dead People - and they're voting in Seattle!! New Washington State Governor election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Edgewood Pilot

LOL..they couldn't find a single soul to sign that...hahahahahaha


28 posted on 01/12/2005 10:28:54 PM PST by 4woodenboats (I see Dead People - and they're voting in Seattle!! New Washington State Governor election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
I have mixed feelings about Kastama.

Right after the courts let the California recall go ahead, I had lunch with Kastama and found him to be as smart politically as anyone I've ever met. He predicted that Davis would be recalled handily and that Schwarzeneggar would win. He laid out succinctly what was wrong with California, the corruption in the legislature, and said that Cailfornia needed a political enema, something he thought Arnold would administer.

Kastama was one regular Democrat I thought would break ranks with his party and vote to hold off on certification. I was disappointed when he folded.

29 posted on 01/12/2005 10:30:38 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Publius
What a wonderfully thorough treatment of the topic.

I'm hoping that our Washingtonian friends stand for a pitched battle on this election fraud and theft.

Anything less would be a signal to the dark side that cheating works.

BTW, the normally excellent WSJ had a pretty wimpy ed on this important topic. (Definitely not worth reading.}

30 posted on 01/12/2005 10:35:19 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Very good analysis and I agree with everything except the following which I find questionable under the classification of what does and does not matter to a court:

Systemic problems: Systemic problems, problems with election law as written, as important as they are to fix, will not help with the contest -- namely, because the same systemic problems will almost certainly be in play in any revote. What needs to be shown -- and clearly has been -- is unique instances of illegal voting, or voting irregularities, that can be avoided in the next vote.

The reason I question this is because of the military vote. We might agree that the 'disenfranchisement' here is something that 'does not matter' in court but....

there are reports of possible violations of meeting post office deadlines and there is the strange 'back dating' just recently observed.

If there is evidence that a deadline was in fact missed although published otherwise, then that should be material to the courts.

In short, if King County promised to meet a deadline for mailing out military ballots and reported that they had indeed met the deadline but instead had lied or otherwise obfuscated the actual mailing dates that were after the deadline, then this could amount to misconduct as well.

I'd be interested in your views on this.

31 posted on 01/12/2005 10:35:24 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
I am still trying to figure out how Kastama came from behind to beat Joyce Macdonald in the 2000 election by a few hundred votes.
32 posted on 01/12/2005 10:37:02 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Publius
WHAT DOESN’T MATTER... Gregoire’s inauguration: This doesn’t matter a whit, according to the law. Don’t let anyone tell you different... . I can’t imagine the legal backflips and distortions that would be needed to not throw out this election. If any readers would care to give it a shot, I’m all ears.

I still think that, judges being human, may be extremely tempted to say that the disruption to the state from unseating a sitting governor outweighs the irregularities in this election. I hope I'm wrong.

What happens to Gregoire's appointments if she's ousted? Are her appointments considered null and void? Will the Democrats raise a stink if a Governor Rossi demands the resignations of Gregoire-installed politicos?

-PJ

33 posted on 01/12/2005 10:38:19 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I got word this past weekend that the FBI was nosing around the King County election offices because of the military ballot issue. There was a possibility of violations of federal law concerning military absentee ballots. This probably wouldn't affect the state civil case in Wenatchee, but it sure as hell would open the door to a federal criminal prosecution.

The real issue of systemic problems is that you would have to have the state AG and the Washington State Patrol watch the vote counting like hawks to get an honest count out of King County.

34 posted on 01/12/2005 10:41:06 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

Bump


35 posted on 01/12/2005 10:42:02 PM PST by ride the whirlwind (It is nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
If the court annuls the election, it declares the governorship vacant. Lt. Gov. Owen would become the acting governor until after the revote. Once Rossi wins -- and I see that as a foregone conclusion -- he has the right to fire anybody Gregoire appointed to an appointive office.

Are her actions since the inauguration null and void? I don't know. The legislature spends its first week figuring out where the bathrooms are, and they won't have anything for Gregoire to sign until April at best. I suspect there is little mischief she and her pals in the legislature can do in that limited time.

36 posted on 01/12/2005 10:45:13 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Publius

placemarker


37 posted on 01/12/2005 10:45:41 PM PST by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgewood Pilot

When staff became aware that a group of ballots were incorrectly categorized and rejected, we researched and corrected the error,

By utilizing a marker to designate voter intent?


38 posted on 01/12/2005 11:21:17 PM PST by taxesareforever (Then there's the theory it happened 13 billion years ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Hope that the courts give an honest ruling in this case.

Thanks for posting this informative blog. I'm not familiar with WA politics. Could you please tell me the political make up of the Washington State Supreme Court? Just a general left leaning or right leaning is fine.

39 posted on 01/12/2005 11:24:36 PM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Publius
there is plenty of mischief for a Democrat to do....I notice the outgoing Democrat just had to name some commission heads just before his term ended.....they can't help themselves...their all about their power and how to keep it within the family....

to me, naming judges, and commissions, and regents, and the like is trying to button down more power......

40 posted on 01/12/2005 11:29:15 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: ScottFromSpokane

I don't believe that anyone was allowed to vote who didn't sign the poll book. They may be completely incompetent in WA at running elections, but this is out and out fraud. I have been voting for 3 decades now and have never seen anyone get in a polling place without signing in. Has anyone else?


42 posted on 01/12/2005 11:58:27 PM PST by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Publius; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; knews_hound; ...


43 posted on 01/13/2005 12:01:06 AM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulation. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

I hope you are right about the purge coming. Please, please, please, let Ron Simms be 2nd on the list after Fraudoire.


44 posted on 01/13/2005 12:01:44 AM PST by allmyheroeshavebeencowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP

please add me to ping list on this subject if available. I'm a Washingtonian, and I'm fighting mad.


45 posted on 01/13/2005 12:03:49 AM PST by allmyheroeshavebeencowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: allmyheroeshavebeencowboys

Just a question. I'm in NC, and I haven't been hearing much coverage of this on the news. What I have heard is mostly negative about Rossi. One commentator I listened to said 'Rossi told Gregorie to conceede for the good of the state while he was winning, but the second the tables flipped and he was losing, he forgot his own words and was fighting her tooth and nail for a revote.' I've also been hearing of Marine outrage over a picture that was taken of a march in Washington that displayed the GOP flag over the Marine Corp flag (according to flag code that means its more important being displayed on top, and the Marines are viewing that as Rossi thinking partisanship is more important than the military that is defending them).

Is all the media coverage this negative all over the nation? (or non-existant?) I don't know if all this information is true or not (the Marine flag and the Rossi statement). Acutally, I don't know much about what's going on AT ALL, other than she was sworn in in the last few days or something. Most of the sentiment around here is just 'get over it', at least the people that know anything about it. The media isn't reporting any facts (you know, 'how can dead people vote?') The biggest problem I see are those pesky Dems that still think that the presidental election was stolen (knowing our luck, half of the WA congress). They either shrug and ignore it, or when presented with facts, say something along the lines of 'When Kerry gets his revote, then we'll give Rossi a revote too.'

I mean, like, I want to help, but I live in a small, but very blue area here in NC. (someone come rescue me! lol) Really, I'm just now finding out details of this thing. Could anyone point me to other threads or articles or whatever that have more information? (statistics, ect.)


46 posted on 01/13/2005 12:52:29 AM PST by AngieWhite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: allmyheroeshavebeencowboys; Publius

I wrote this op-ed/vanity and posted it overnight last night -- so late that few saw it. FYI.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1318990/posts


47 posted on 01/13/2005 12:57:33 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (REMEMBER THE ALGOREAMO--relentlessly DEMAND the TRUTH, like the Dems demand recounts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
I'm in eastern WA. The court is left - appointed by demo governors, then run for office at the next election. One Justice - Bobby Bridge- had a DUI (0.21), hit and run (hit a parked car with her Mercedes) in 2003 . She "apologized" and got to keep her job.

They recently ruled that if you killed someone during an assault, it wasn't a felony murder if you didn't intend to kill the victim. A number of scumbags are getting new trials...
48 posted on 01/13/2005 1:08:02 AM PST by alpo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Thank you for the post. Please add me to the ping list on this topic as well. I have written to all 3 of my district representatives, 2 Republicans, 1 democrat. So far I have got responses from both Republican representatives, but not the democrat one.


49 posted on 01/13/2005 1:10:40 AM PST by loyalfandownunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Great post. I love the photo. Bless those troopers out there with the signs, fighting for a just cause. Wish I could be there to join them.


50 posted on 01/13/2005 1:17:39 AM PST by loyalfandownunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson