Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stone Blames ‘Unsophisticated’ American Audience, Flees to France
Utopia Unmasked ^ | Jan. 16, 2005 | William R Alford

Posted on 01/16/2005 11:03:29 AM PST by walford


Stone Blames ‘Unsophisticated’ American Audience, Flees to France
by William R Alford - Jan. 16, 2005

Apparently the ill-advised heat is coming to Oliver Stone from all sides in the United States, so he is abandoning us to our galling ignorance.

Quoting the clearly exasperated director from a recent New York Post article: “The gays lambasted me for not making Alexander openly homosexual and in the Bible Belt, pastors were up in the pulpit saying that to watch this film was to be tempted by Satan.”

It doesn't matter so much that Stone affixes a few arguably plausible character traits upon an ancient historical figure. One can empathize with the rationale: These are people about whom we know little more than what they did, when they did it and where. Insofar as specific personality style, we can only speculate. So why not try and flesh them out a bit to make them more three dimensional?

Stone’s historical dramatizations consistently get him into trouble because he fails to appreciate that many will not take kindly to having events that never happened and characters who never existed inserted into a storyline that is out of phase with the way things actually occurred. Suspension of disbelief has its limits.

Stone's product comes off as more of a fantasy world made of real people whom he can manipulate to suit his biases and whims. This is merely an adult version of a child playing with caricature dolls who muses, “it would be neat if THIS happened.”

Thus his period pieces are more about Oliver Stone than they are about anything else. The fact that he is willing to blame those on all sides of the political/cultural spectrum who lack the sophistication to appreciate his work clearly demonstrates his essential narcissism and arrogance.

Stone is certainly a gifted director who is capable of presenting a lavishly appointed cinematic canvas with nicely developed, believable characters. To that effect, his purely fictional works can generally withstand greater scrutiny. However, when Stone transparently decides to use an entertainment vehicle to open our eyes to his Superior social perspective, this only serves to alienate the skeptical.

An early example of his veering from entertainment in favor of proselytism appears in his 1987 movie Wall Street. None of these people ever existed, but the fictional format is eclipsed by his apparent urge to create an evil capitalist bogeyman. Thus the film aptly serves to illustrate Stone’s distorted/uninformed views of venture finance. The likes of this will in turn placate the like-minded, confuse those not in the know and alienate those who ARE aware of how things really work.

Stone’s films increasingly seem to be borne of a necessity to construct an archetypical Straw Man of that with which he disagrees and a romanticized superhero representing his own predispositions. Then the latter either topples the former or is tragically thwarted.

It is impossible to do all of that AND make it entertaining. The fact that he blames the audience for not ‘getting it’ and fleeing to a country he hopes will be more wisely receptive indicates that he is as of yet incapable of the necessary self-examination that could promise to redeem his career. That truly is a shame. Otherwise he likely would have a number of good movies left in him.



HOME | EDUCATION | IDEOLOGY | THEO/ETHICAL | MEDIA



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: arrogant; distortion; elitist; francophile; movie; narcissist; whiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2005 11:03:30 AM PST by walford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Oliver, get over yourself. The movie sucked.


2 posted on 01/16/2005 11:04:23 AM PST by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

Which movie?


3 posted on 01/16/2005 11:06:01 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
Which movie?

Alexthander the Fabulous.

4 posted on 01/16/2005 11:06:53 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

galling ignorance!! Is that why he fled to France(Gaul... get it)!


5 posted on 01/16/2005 11:07:08 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: walford

BYE OLLIE!

You want me to kick you in the butt to help boarding the plane go faster?


6 posted on 01/16/2005 11:07:54 AM PST by ChefKeith (Apply here to be added to the NASCAR Ping List, Daytona is comming soon...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
I was unfortunate enough to sit through it--I've seen better film on teeth.
7 posted on 01/16/2005 11:07:54 AM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

I was just wondering which movie of his sucked. Seems to me that ALL of his movies sucked!


8 posted on 01/16/2005 11:08:07 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: walford

I think Stone's "Alexander" got second worst film of 2004 on The Hugh Hewitt Show.


9 posted on 01/16/2005 11:09:15 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
Given His surname, this is actually a triple pun. Hard to do, especially inadvertently
10 posted on 01/16/2005 11:09:30 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: walford

Since Americans are so stupid and unsophisticated, Stone, go to France and don't come back. And take the rest of Hollywood with you.


11 posted on 01/16/2005 11:09:47 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Gun-control is leftist mind-control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford
Oliver Stone from all sides in the United States, so he is abandoning us to our galling ignorance....

heh heh heh...one more bites the dust.

I hope 'ol Ollie Stone has a happy life in FRANCE.

12 posted on 01/16/2005 11:10:17 AM PST by B.O. Plenty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

"Oh, poor, poor, pitiful me...."


13 posted on 01/16/2005 11:11:20 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

After all the Hollywood types promising to leave if Bush won re-election it's a relief to see one (Stone) actually do it, even if was really because his latest movie bombed.


14 posted on 01/16/2005 11:12:18 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Quick! Somebody steal his passport so he can't get back in.


15 posted on 01/16/2005 11:13:14 AM PST by McGavin999 (Senate is trying to cover their A$$es with Rumsfeld's hide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Tijeras_Slim

LOL!


18 posted on 01/16/2005 11:16:42 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad
...I've seen better film on teeth.BWAHAHAHA!....Thanks...now to clean up the phlegmonitor!

FMCDH(BITS)

19 posted on 01/16/2005 11:19:28 AM PST by nothingnew (Kerry is gone...perhaps to Lake Woebegone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: walford
Quoting the clearly exasperated director from a recent New York Post article: “The gays lambasted me for not making Alexander openly homosexual and in the Bible Belt, pastors were up in the pulpit saying that to watch this film was to be tempted by Satan.”

If he had made a film about Alexander the warrior, or Alexander the leader, or Alexander the conquerer, or all three, he would not have had to mention his sexuality at all. That would have avoided the controversy altogether and made for a better film. But no, he had to make his sexuality a prime focus of the story. Imagine a film about Patton that focused on his sexuality! How would that have been received?

20 posted on 01/16/2005 11:19:55 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seek
Gotta agree with Ebert on Alex, it was quintessential Stone, Leftest aristocratic foppery of the worst sort. I disagree with Ebert on Troy ( and just about every other word out of his mouth) I was pleased that it was a close to the Iliad as it was; I found it very watchable and the cats liked it as well.
21 posted on 01/16/2005 11:21:13 AM PST by SeaWolf (Orwell must have foreseen the 21st Century Democratic Party when he wrote 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty
Wouldn't that be "our Gauling ignorance"?
22 posted on 01/16/2005 11:22:34 AM PST by Paladin2 (SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: walford

How many did he take with him?


23 posted on 01/16/2005 11:24:33 AM PST by mountainlyons (alienated vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Say goodbye, Ollie, and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. I hope you like making only those films that the Imams will allow you to make when they take over France.


24 posted on 01/16/2005 11:26:10 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (Conservatism pays off. Liberalism just wants to be paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

The movie stank. Not one preacher in the Bible Belt had to say a word about it. Word of mouth killed Alexander.


25 posted on 01/16/2005 11:27:23 AM PST by thathamiltonwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Well, y'know I did kind of enjoy that interrogation scene in "Basic Instinct".

Oh wait a second...that was Sharon Stone.

Never mind.

26 posted on 01/16/2005 11:30:10 AM PST by Fintan (Take your hands out of your pockets and turn on your lovelight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Hey Ollie, do us a favor and say your goodbyes by giving us one last glimpse of your waving a French lace hankie while pausing to dab your eyes. Be sure an wear a pinky ring and don't forget to point your pinky in the air all prissy like.


27 posted on 01/16/2005 11:30:31 AM PST by demkicker (I'm Ra th er sick of Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Say goodbye, Ollie, and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. I hope you like making only those films that the Imams will allow you to make when they take over France.

Perhaps an homage to Theo van Gogh's "Submission?" Its critics might well end up giving Stone a red lens filter like the ones he overused in "NBK" and "Alex" with blood in his eyes.

28 posted on 01/16/2005 11:36:30 AM PST by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: walford
Next "sophistication" will mean we have to watch a film of people having "sexual relations" with animals. That is coming next you know..why be prejudice to animals? So what if it's not "natural"....???</sarcasm>

I vote we make Stone the leading man in the "politically correct" film for 2025, "OBL Of Man and Beast".

Like Stone, my imagination just took a wild turn to the left and collided with a "yea right!".

29 posted on 01/16/2005 11:37:58 AM PST by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Oliver Stone is as relevant as Paris Hilton!


30 posted on 01/16/2005 11:40:51 AM PST by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

And I had always thought Oliver Stone was just some character from a Flintstones cartoon...like the lawyer Perry Masonery.


31 posted on 01/16/2005 11:44:02 AM PST by joe_broadway (Do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

hahahahahahahaha!! Oh lord, my sides hurt!! thanks, needed the good belly laugh!


32 posted on 01/16/2005 11:46:56 AM PST by SAMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: walford
Yeah, right! Stone takes a guy who changed the face of the world during his time and makes it more about him being a sexual deviant than his apparent genius in warfare. Yeah Stone, we're the idiots.

How 'bout main stream American just doesn't like homo movies? Did that thought ever cross your mind?

Ya know, I bet the "Frogs will get it. They think M. Moore is a genius too. They have to be smarter than us.

33 posted on 01/16/2005 11:47:49 AM PST by Allosaurs_r_us (Idaho Carnivores for Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

"A gifted director"? He's a leftwing propogandist. Period.


34 posted on 01/16/2005 11:47:57 AM PST by thombo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChefKeith
You want me to kick you in the butt to help boarding the plane go faster?

He probly wants you to do somethong with his butt, but I'll bet kicking it is not it. LOL

35 posted on 01/16/2005 11:50:00 AM PST by Allosaurs_r_us (Idaho Carnivores for Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: walford

Replace "Unsophisticated" with "Unperverted" in that headline and it would be much more accurate.


36 posted on 01/16/2005 11:54:36 AM PST by Let's Roll (Democrats - What happens when mental illness manifests itself as a political party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist

Yep! Now Oliver is a Gaul Stone.


37 posted on 01/16/2005 11:55:13 AM PST by ALinArleta (One shot! One kill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ALinArleta
Yep! Now Oliver is a Gaul Stone.

And Bravo to that!

38 posted on 01/16/2005 11:56:38 AM PST by joe_broadway (Do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us
"He probly wants you to do somethong with his butt, but I'll bet kicking it is not it."

Ghastly!!! Hilariously ghastly. Bahahahahah!!!!

39 posted on 01/16/2005 11:56:58 AM PST by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: walford
Like I suggested on a previous thread. I hope that he visits a US embassy in France and renounces his citizenship.
40 posted on 01/16/2005 11:58:15 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaWolf
Our cats enjoyed Troy, too. In fact, they asked to watch it again right after we ran it. Troy was a much better movie than Alexander. Troy had characters and a story. When I said the movie differed in some places from The Iliad, her take was that Wolfgang Peterson was trying to make a movie that perhaps more closely followed what really happened. I don't know if that was the case, but it was good, nonetheless.
41 posted on 01/16/2005 12:02:41 PM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

I agree. Troy was very good. The characters were very good and made it believable. After reviewing the Illaid, I was very happy that this movie cut out all the Gods and their machinations. It made a better story.
Plus I did like Archille's mother statement in the beginning that if he did not join the war and he married he would live a long and prosperous life with children and be eventually forgot. But if he did go to war then he would die and his name would live forever. I telling point about what glory is versus what people try to say it is. Being glorified is have your name known forever. Like Napoleon. Most of us will never reach that pinnacle.


42 posted on 01/16/2005 12:28:58 PM PST by Rhiannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: walford

Somebody, please: STEAL HIS PASSPORT AFTER HE ARRIVES!


43 posted on 01/16/2005 12:42:23 PM PST by solitas ('Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.3.6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Alexthander the Fabulous.

lol!

44 posted on 01/16/2005 12:53:56 PM PST by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: walford

Translation - "I'm going where the government controls the media and where opinion and diversity are so highly regarded they must be tightly controlled by those more educated and intelligent than the stupid "masses"."


45 posted on 01/16/2005 1:05:33 PM PST by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

It's more like, "I'm going where people will appreciate and buy my smut."


46 posted on 01/16/2005 1:15:07 PM PST by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: walford

Buh-Bye now!

Or should I say Au Revoir?

In any case, good riddance.


47 posted on 01/16/2005 1:25:40 PM PST by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

What a plan! Make a movie that was crap, insult Americans, go to France to make more crap. That's the way to financial success.


48 posted on 01/16/2005 1:35:26 PM PST by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

...and stay there!


49 posted on 01/16/2005 1:41:35 PM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaWolf
I disagree with Ebert on Troy....

I agree with you, I liked "Troy". It was very watchable, esp. compared with "Alexander". The storyline was believable and moved along at a rapid pace. The action scenes were great. Orlando Bloom and Eric Bana are stars to watch. And anyway, I'm a sucker for any film dealing with the classical world.

50 posted on 01/16/2005 1:47:27 PM PST by Ciexyz (I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson