Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush prepares to take oath of office (Reuters bias alert)
Reuters ^ | Jan 20, 2005 | Steve Holland

Posted on 01/20/2005 8:14:15 AM PST by Freedumb

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush prepared to take the oath of office for a second term on Thursday and will tell Americans "the survival of liberty in our land" increasingly depends on advancing freedom abroad, in an allusion to his hotly contested Iraq policy.

Three hours before his swearing-in ceremony on Capitol Hill, Bush, who has considerably less popular support than other recent incumbents after their re-election, attended a morning church service with his family at St. John's Episcopal Church, attended by presidents since it was organized in 1815.

At noon (1700 GMT), Bush will stand on the steps of the U.S. Capitol on a wintry day with a coat of snow on the ground before perhaps 100,000 people, put his hand on a Bible used for his 2001 inauguration and repeat the brief oath to uphold the Constitution administered by ailing Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

After a 21-gun salute, Bush is to give a lofty 17-minute speech that will promote liberty abroad and offer to work with Democrats stewing over their defeat in November and angered by an Iraq policy they consider flawed.

But the rest of the world is watching his inauguration with anxiety. Many leaders, alienated by Bush's go-it-alone foreign policy and the Iraq war, would have preferred the Republican incumbent to lose. Since his victory, they have been urging him to listen and consult more.

"We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: the survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands," Bush will say, according to White House excerpts.

"In a world moving toward liberty, we are determined to show the meaning and promise of liberty."

First lady Laura Bush told ABC's "Good Morning America" that her husband's speech "will be a very nice philosophical speech about the importance of democracy and how we stand at this crossroads."

Bush emphasized a unity theme in remarks to supporters on Wednesday night, saying, "An inauguration is a time of unity for our country."

UNITER OR DIVIDER?

But Democrats are suspicious of Bush's talk of unity and say the proof will be in how he acts. They are already gearing up for a fight over his proposals for revamping the Social Security retirement system and other domestic goals.

Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic leader, said he hoped Bush would reach out to the minority party.

"I think we were all excited four years ago when the president said he wanted to be a uniter, not a divider. It didn't work out that way. This time he doesn't have to run for re-election, and I hope he follows through on that theme, a uniter, not a divider. This city needs some unification," Reid told CNN.

A number of "counter-inaugural" protests were being planned for Thursday, such as an anti-war march at Malcolm X park. Along the route of the inaugural parade, there were plans by protesters to turn their backs on Bush.

Cindy Sheehan, whose son was killed last April while serving the U.S. military in Iraq, came from her home in California to protest the inauguration and said she strongly disagreed with the celebratory tone.

"It's the most inappropriate time right now, I believe, to celebrate. We could have an inaugural but let's tone it down a little bit because there will be people dying elsewhere as they are partying tonight," she told ABC.

But Mrs. Bush disagreed that the $40 million inaugural celebrations were too lavish. "It's been focused on the troops. I think there is a tone for this inauguration that recognizes what our situation is in the world and that we have troops in harms way," she said.

Security was extremely tight for the festivities, with police erecting steel barricades and shutting down about 100 blocks of the city.

Many downtown streets were deserted, while out-of-towners wearing Stetson hats and wrapped up in scarves and woolly hats were spotted at some subway stations.

Bush, the 43rd U.S. president, starts his second term with an approval rating in the 50 percent range. That is well below the support enjoyed by Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

Analysts see Bush as offering a far more vigorous agenda than in his first term, which became dominated by his response to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the Iraq war. (Additional reporting by Sue Pleming and Christopher Doering)

© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; bush; inaugaration; msm; reuters; w2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
So in Reuters mind, the fact that Bush received 15 million more votes than Bubba got in 1996 (not to mention a higher percentage of the popular vote) shows that he has "considerably less popular support"!! Idiots.
1 posted on 01/20/2005 8:14:15 AM PST by Freedumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freedumb
Bush, who has considerably less popular support than other recent incumbents after their re-election

Must be the latest Dnc talking points. We've been deluged with this statement the past 48 hours.

2 posted on 01/20/2005 8:17:05 AM PST by PLOM...NOT!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb
This city needs some unification

It's about time for Reid to make his contribution to that effort!

3 posted on 01/20/2005 8:18:05 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb

Cannot believe how a newsservice like Reuters is so horribly biased. They feed this garbage down to all the other news outlets, something needs to be done about this.

They need to stop this ridiculous attack on our President, what they are doing is unAmerican.


4 posted on 01/20/2005 8:18:41 AM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLOM...NOT!

"Must be the latest Dnc talking points. We've been deluged with this statement the past 48 hours."

And Reuters would never use DNC talking points as "news", right? Right? /sarc


5 posted on 01/20/2005 8:19:03 AM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb

They mean that Bush has less popular support from Reuters and al Jazeera than previous incumbents.


6 posted on 01/20/2005 8:19:07 AM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb

Live coverage of Inaugural ceremonies:

Rev. Wintley Phipps just gave a wonderful rendition of “Heal our Land”.

Go here to read the moving lyrics:
http://www.oprah.com/tows/pastshows/tows_past_20010917_lyrics.jhtml

The song "Heal Our Land" was written by Senator Orrin Hatch and Janice Kapp Perry in 1997. The version was recorded in 2000 by Reverend Wintley Phipps, as a song of comfort.

QUOTE:
Heal our land
Please grant us peace today
And strengthen all who lack the faith to call on Thee each day

Heal our land
Please keep us safe and free
Watch over all who understand the need for Liberty

Heal our land
Heal our land
And guide us with thy hand
Keep us ever on the path of Liberty

Heal our land
Heal our land
And help us understand that we must put our trust in Thee
If we would be free

Protect us by the power of thy rod
And keep us as one nation under God

Heal our land
Heal our land
And guide us thy hand
Keep us ever on the path of Liberty

Heal our land
Heal our land
And help us understand
That we must put our trust in Thee

If we would be free


7 posted on 01/20/2005 8:20:44 AM PST by i_dont_chat (Remember this: Jesus loves you and Allah wants you DEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb

MAN OH MAN you could do a great story on MEDIA BIAS today!!!!!!!!!


8 posted on 01/20/2005 8:22:23 AM PST by Mr. K (all your tagline are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb
What in the world do they mean by hotly contested? It is truly amazing how the press twists and perverts things. This president got more votes than any other president in history. He was elected mostly on the basis of his foreign policy in Iraq. The only contest was how badly the dems would lose. The MSM tried their best, but the Freepers kept them in their oldschool place.
9 posted on 01/20/2005 8:24:18 AM PST by Mikmur (Will somebody please tell them they have food in their teeth? How embarrassing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLOM...NOT!
We've been deluged with this statement the past 48 hours.

I'm eight-freakin'-thousand miles away and we've been hearing it constantly.

Give it a rest, liberals!

10 posted on 01/20/2005 8:24:35 AM PST by Allegra (Jet Lag...Just Short of a Good Buzz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sender

Performed live at the inaugural ceremonies

Let the Might Eagle Soar
written by John David Ashcroft

Let the eagle soar
like she's never soared before
from rocky coast
to golden shore
let the mighty eagle soar

So with healing in her wings
as the land beneath her sings:
'Only God, no other kings'
let the mighty eagle soar

This country’s far too young to die
We’ve still got a lot of climbing to do
And we can make it if we try
Built by toils and struggles
God has led us through

Let the eagle soar
like she's never soared before
from rocky coast
to golden shore
let the mighty eagle soar

So with healing in her wings
as the land beneath her sings:
'Only God, no other kings'
let the mighty eagle soar

This country's far too young to die
Though she's cried a bit for what we've put her through
she's soared above the lifted lamp
that guards sweet freedom's door
in the dews, the damps, the watchfires
of a nation torn by war
oh she's far too young to die
you can see it in her eye
she's not yet begun to fly
it's time to let the mighty eagle soar

Let the eagle soar
like she's never soared before
from rocky coast
to golden shore
let the mighty eagle soar

So with healing in her wings
as the land beneath her sings:
'Only God, no other kings'
let the mighty eagle soar


11 posted on 01/20/2005 8:25:29 AM PST by i_dont_chat (Remember this: Jesus loves you and Allah wants you DEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
Cool song. Written by the John Ashcroft?
12 posted on 01/20/2005 8:27:02 AM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb
Unfortunately, this isn't Reuters bias, it's fact. From Rocky Mountain News:

Bush's approval rating is at 49 percent in the AP poll with 49 percent disapproving among all of those polled. His job approval is in the high 40s or low 50s in several other recent polls - as low as any job approval rating for a re-elected president at the start of the second term in more than 50 years.

Presidents Reagan and Clinton had job approval ratings near six in 10 just before their inauguration for a second term, according to Gallup polls.

President Nixon's approval was in the 60s right after his 1972 re-election, slid to about 50 percent right before his inauguration and then moved back over 60 percent. President Eisenhower's job approval was in the low 70s just before his second inauguration in 1957.

As much as I like President Bush, saying he got 15 million more votes than whoever is essentially meaningless. Popular support is measured in percentages, not in absolute numbers.

13 posted on 01/20/2005 8:29:51 AM PST by Terabitten (Live a life worthy of those who have gone before you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb

"I think we were all excited four years ago when the president said he wanted to be a uniter, not a divider. It didn't work out that way."

The rats felt he didn't win the 2000 election so when he tried to reach out they basically slapped back. They've got no one to blame but themselves on that. It looks like a repeat during these next 4 years because they're stonewalling on nominations already.


14 posted on 01/20/2005 8:31:48 AM PST by MadAnthony1776 ("liberalism" = "do as I say, not as I do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikmur
This president got more votes than any other president in history.

So? He still only got 51% of the vote. As conservatives, we have to be intellectually honest with ourselves. 51% does not a landslide make. Reagan won re-election by 18%.

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade, but we do have a responsibility to be honest with ourselves. Remember, conservatives use facts, liberals use feeeeeeeeeeeelings.

15 posted on 01/20/2005 8:33:24 AM PST by Terabitten (Live a life worthy of those who have gone before you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

You can stop spamming the thread anytime you want.


16 posted on 01/20/2005 8:33:51 AM PST by Terabitten (Live a life worthy of those who have gone before you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Freedumb
Has anyone seen the one-woman comedy routine there?

That clown would be Barbara Boxer-Snorts. She's the senator who so daintily snorted, like a Valley Girl, each time she was about to say something nasty about Condi to her fellow Senators in her closing comments yesterday.

17 posted on 01/20/2005 8:38:47 AM PST by syriacus (Title as Queen of the BOXER SNORTS goes to Sen. Babs for her performance on 1/19/2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
Unfortunately, this isn't Reuters bias, it's fact.

I don't think anyone is questioning the fact.

But why is it trumpeted so much, if not bias??

18 posted on 01/20/2005 8:47:34 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
Landslide, who said anything about a landslide. My point is that alot of people voted for him. Those people constituted a majority (which is more than Clinton ever had). That majority of voters has a right to expect their duly elected president to institute those policies for which we he was elected. The opposing viewpoints lost. They have a right to try to get their viewpoints next election. That is how it works. I will say that even with a landslide the MSM would still be saying the exact same things they are now.
19 posted on 01/20/2005 8:50:05 AM PST by Mikmur (Whine, whine, whine...someone give them some cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

FACT? Anyone see the phrasing of the questions for the polls, or any of the internals? I haven't, but I will bet you they are not skewered in favor of the prez.


20 posted on 01/20/2005 8:53:01 AM PST by Mikmur (Whine, whine, whine...someone give them some cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson