To: Tax Government
If one believes that life and civilization arise naturally, then there is no need to take extraordinary steps to (re)create or preserve them.
But there's always that nagging little doubt, the contemplation of which induces a shudder (or ought to):
What if this cosmos, our current home, is the one and only cosmos that has ever been or will ever be?
To: snarks_when_bored
Protect the thalamus. Patience.
32 posted on
01/21/2005 9:26:49 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
To: snarks_when_bored
What if this cosmos, our current home, is the one and only cosmos that has ever been or will ever be?Every morning when I wake up, the whole universe gets recreated instantly from scratch, right up to last night. That's how I think it works, anyway.
46 posted on
01/21/2005 9:44:29 AM PST by
Tax Government
(Boycott and defeat the Legacy Media. Become a monthly contributor to FR.)
To: snarks_when_bored
If one wants to survive the demise of the universe, then plan to die.
48 posted on
01/21/2005 9:46:14 AM PST by
Tax Government
(Boycott and defeat the Legacy Media. Become a monthly contributor to FR.)
To: snarks_when_bored
"What if this cosmos, our current home, is the one and only cosmos that has ever been or will ever be?" Asking of 'ever
been or will ever be is the wrong question. Future time is merely one variable expression of dimension Time, as are present and past, much the way linear, planar, and volumetric (for want of better terms) are variable expressions of dimension Space.
The expansion quotient is directly proportional to the energy condensed into matter, kind of like latent heat of eveporation.
133 posted on
01/22/2005 5:30:16 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson