Skip to comments.
BRITS MOCK BUSH INAUGURATION
drudgereport.com ^
Posted on 01/21/2005 10:03:27 AM PST by scottybk
BRITS MOCK BUSH INAUGURATION Thu Jan 20 2005 23:05:29 ET
Editors of major London newspapers wasted no time mocking President Bush's inauguration address.
Assorted splash headlines will greet readers on Friday morning:
"BUSH: HAVE I GOT NUKES FOR YOU, George Bush pledged all-out global war on terrorists and tyrants," headlines the STAR.
"POMP AND CIRCUMSTANCE, The band played Hail to the Chief. A 21-gun salute sounded. Then, protected by a bullet-proof shield, President George Bush repeated his message to the enemies of democracy," screams the INDEPENDENT.
MORE
The TELEGRAPH slapped: "DEFIANT BUSH DOESN'T MENTION THE WAR, President George W Bush began his second term in unapologetic style yesterday, pledging to maintain his muscular foreign policy and spread freedom "to the darkest corners of the world."
The TIMES rips: "HIS SECOND-TERM MISSION: TO END TYRANNY ON EARTH, Four years ago he was the Accidental President, scion of a ruling family propelled into the highest office more by genetics and duty than by political zeal and ideological mission."
The GUARDIAN: "SMILES FOR THE FAMILY, A FIERY WARNING FOR THE WORLD."
Developing...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: badteeth; eurotrash; eurotwitsforkerry; godblessourprez; mediabias; radicalleftists; retards; socialists; sorelosers; w2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-241 next last
1
posted on
01/21/2005 10:03:28 AM PST
by
scottybk
To: scottybk
and you expected what from self-righteous pagans?
2
posted on
01/21/2005 10:05:57 AM PST
by
odoso
(Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
To: scottybk
Euro-rags make good American butt-wipe.
3
posted on
01/21/2005 10:06:04 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(WOODY: "Hey Mr. Peterson, there's a cold one waiting for you." NORM: " If she calls I'm not here.")
To: scottybk
At least our national leaders don't show up to costume parties dressed as nazi soldiers.
4
posted on
01/21/2005 10:06:11 AM PST
by
bobjam
To: scottybk
Meanwhile their little prince runs around in Nazi shirts.
5
posted on
01/21/2005 10:06:39 AM PST
by
Lil'freeper
(Error 404. The requested file was not found.)
To: odoso
It's all part of the collective British inferiority complex. It makes them feel better to tear down their more successful, more respected, better led American cousins.
Spent three years in the UK, felt like 10.
6
posted on
01/21/2005 10:07:31 AM PST
by
koba37
To: scottybk
They're just jealous 'cause Bush got a 21 gun salute.
7
posted on
01/21/2005 10:08:51 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
(I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
To: Lil'freeper
Why don't they go have a cup of tea with their Candien buddies and the French poodles!
8
posted on
01/21/2005 10:09:07 AM PST
by
LYSandra
To: odoso
Plain and simple...their green with envy!!
To: scottybk
Yet all our pomp, ceremony and parade, etc dims by comparison to similar "royal" events in in the UK - so what is their beef?
10
posted on
01/21/2005 10:09:25 AM PST
by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: scottybk
Mocking is their forte. .....and what they've been reduced to.
11
posted on
01/21/2005 10:09:40 AM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: ladiesview61
To: scottybk
These are the Nazis citizens of England who are saluting the prince and the german government.
Afterall the crown of England, is of German heritage.
So I say to alol Nazis Pigs, You lost once and you will lose again.
Ops4 God Bless America!
13
posted on
01/21/2005 10:10:47 AM PST
by
OPS4
(worth repeating)
To: scottybk
Thank you for the Declaration of Independence, Mr. Jefferson. And thank you, George Washington for kicking British butt on the field of battle....as well, thank you to Winfield Scott for whupping them at Chippewa in 1814, and Andy Jackson for driving that lesson home at New Orleans in 1815.
American by grace of God!
14
posted on
01/21/2005 10:10:52 AM PST
by
Bombardier
(Jihad, Nazism....Umma, Deutsches Reich.....no diff.)
To: scottybk
Bush didn't mention the war, and man, the whole country completely forgot about the war because of that, huh?
Shouldn't they focus on more outrageous speech--such as their law against "hate speech" that restricts freedom of expression?
To: Bombardier
And I almost forgot....thank you, as well, to Major George Armistead for not surrendering Fort McHenry, and for keeping the Star Spangled Banner flying, thus showing those English pigs we would NEVER return to being their subjects!
16
posted on
01/21/2005 10:13:18 AM PST
by
Bombardier
(Jihad, Nazism....Umma, Deutsches Reich.....no diff.)
To: odoso
re-read these... i kind of like them. in fact, i think the headlines are great. will make them think over there. if there is an oppressed person out there, you have a friend in us.... being bullyed at your school? you have a friend in us.
i like the headlines.. means that not only did they take him seriously, but even more seriously... nothing wrong with a little uneasiness.
he'll wow them when he visits them later this year...
nick
To: scottybk
Please use original titles to prevent duplicates.
To: OB1kNOb
it is like those rags are run by the kids on my block. They get to the point where it is not even worth getting upset about anymore...........just shaking my head and moving on. I agree with the other poster though, part of it is due to jealousy that they can't admit
To: bobjam; jjbrouwer; just too late; flitton; pau1f0rd; tjwmason
At least our national leaders don't show up to costume parties dressed as nazi soldiers.OK.........
Firstly, I do not condone the fancy dress that Harry wore that evening. He's young and out for a good time. Weren't you once?
But, could you tell me exactly when he became a national leader?
To: scottybk
Now you've gone and ruined my whole weekend!
I won't be able to sleep a wink now because of what the Brit rags have printed? ROFLMAO
21
posted on
01/21/2005 10:16:07 AM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: ladiesview61
their green with envyI believe that's their tooth.
22
posted on
01/21/2005 10:16:30 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: odoso; jjbrouwer; just too late; flitton; pau1f0rd; tjwmason
and you expected what from self-righteous pagans? Pardon? I'm not quite sure you understand what you are saying there.
To: insider_uk
That's excuse me, eurotrash.
24
posted on
01/21/2005 10:19:19 AM PST
by
odoso
(Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
To: odoso
C'mon be fair - not all Brits are priggish pecksniffs. We've all met a few cool ones:)
25
posted on
01/21/2005 10:20:07 AM PST
by
skeeter
(OBL "Americans" won't honor any law that interferes with their pocketbooks)
To: skeeter
26
posted on
01/21/2005 10:20:36 AM PST
by
odoso
(Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
To: scottybk
Criticism from a nation of snaggle-toothed, mush-mouthed buffoons....who still have kings, queens, princes, princesses, etc.
Gosh - I just don't know why in the world we shouldn't take them more seriously.....
27
posted on
01/21/2005 10:20:53 AM PST
by
Don Simmons
(Annoy a liberal: Work hard; Prosper; Be Happy.)
To: insider_uk
But, could you tell me exactly when he became a national leader? September 15, 1984
;)
28
posted on
01/21/2005 10:24:46 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
("My only regret in life is neither of my kids is gay." Sharon Osborn)
To: scottybk
They should all be speaking german
To: scottybk
The British news organizations stink!
They are so angry they can't convert us to socialism.
To: scottybk
The Brit government runs the BBC, enuff said.
To: scottybk
Geez, the anglophobes are out today. This is the UK's MSM press, fer cryin'out loud, not necessarily John Q. Bull. None of us are defined by ABC, CBS, MSNBC, NYT, CNN, WaPo, etc.
32
posted on
01/21/2005 10:27:09 AM PST
by
niteowl77
(Socialist: someone who can't find his ass despite using other peoples' hands in addition to his own.)
To: scottybk
Make that Brit government controls the media.
To: scottybk
The Telegraph must be under new management. They have always been solid conservative. I once called it the best newspaper in the world. If this headline is accurate they have changed missions.
To: scottybk
Do not forget, the Brit's fought with us and supported us in the Iraqi war.
It was Blair though, against expressed enmity of the Brit's press.
But then again the loudest foul mouthpiece, the BBC got attacked by one of their own correspondents for reporting a defeat that did not take place.
Remember the announcement and jubilation of defeat when there was a sandstorm and brief delay.
BBC another Government supported mouthpiece and a blood relative to National Public Radio.
No surprises there, firmly with comrades in arms.
35
posted on
01/21/2005 10:34:34 AM PST
by
hermgem
To: BritishBulldog
British screaming headlines ping.
36
posted on
01/21/2005 10:35:29 AM PST
by
Sender
(Team Infidel USA)
To: insider_uk
I like "BUSH: HAVE I GOT NUKES FOR YOU".
Why are these Yank dorks trying to censure our press?
37
posted on
01/21/2005 10:36:55 AM PST
by
jjbrouwer
(Chelsea for the Championship!)
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: koba37
Spent three years in the UK, felt like 10. It probably felt like 20 for the people unfortunate enough to have to come into contact with you.
39
posted on
01/21/2005 10:39:32 AM PST
by
jjbrouwer
(Chelsea for the Championship!)
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
To: Lil'freeper
Meanwhile their little prince runs around in Nazi shirts No more. He works now in his father's farm pigstry.
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: just too late
Bwwahahaha! Glad to provide the demand for the product supplied!
43
posted on
01/21/2005 10:47:07 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(WOODY: "Hey Mr. Peterson, there's a cold one waiting for you." NORM: " If she calls I'm not here.")
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: scottybk
The Brit rags are good for maybe lining rat cages.
They're not good enough for any self-respecting bird.
45
posted on
01/21/2005 10:48:48 AM PST
by
JFK_Lib
To: edskid
Really? As I recall the British papers and the majority of the people put Blair through hell. He became physically and emotionally ill, and did not look well.
He was called horrible names, was disrespected, shunned, accused of murder, and the cause of a suicide.
All while Saddam and Sons were defended, as innocent and not worthy of an invasion, Arafat worshiped as a victim of the evil Sharon, and OBL is crafty and brilliant for eluding the US.
To: insider_uk
Go back to yer buggery, Tory! ;-)
47
posted on
01/21/2005 10:49:22 AM PST
by
Clemenza
(Europhiles and Monarchists should be purged)
To: scottybk
Yeah, the Anglophobe tossers are out today. Probably Frogophiles trying to stir up discord. Snail-eating, Garlic-breathed wankers, the lot of 'em.
Comment #49 Removed by Moderator
To: scottybk
I try not to judge the British people by what the jerks in their press corps write. Similarly, I have little in common with the people who write headlines for the NYTimes. The only thing I don't understand about the British is how they could allow the government to take away their firearms.
50
posted on
01/21/2005 10:51:07 AM PST
by
Richard Kimball
(We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-241 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson