Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington State: Scores of felons voted illegally
Seattle Times ^ | 1/23/05

Posted on 01/23/2005 5:33:31 AM PST by KidGlock

Sunday, January 23, 2005 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

Scores of felons voted illegally

By Seattle Times staff

Scores of convicted felons voted illegally in the state's 2004 general election, and officials never noticed because of serious flaws in the system for tracking them, The Seattle Times has found.

The Times, reviewing felony convictions as far back as 1997, identified 129 felons in King and Pierce counties who were recorded as having voted in the Nov. 2 election. Another 23 likely voted. Several methods were used to confirm the findings.

Either the counties failed to flag or purge felons on the voter rolls as required by state law, or they allowed them to register without checking their status. Some were even mailed absentee ballots and returned them unchallenged.

The findings are almost certain to add to an already contentious debate over whether Democratic Gov. Christine Gregoire's victory was legitimate.

After three vote counts in the race for governor, Gregoire was declared the winner by a record-close 129 votes over Republican Dino Rossi, fueling more than two months of controversy about how well — or poorly — the election was managed.

State Republicans filed a court case Jan. 7 arguing that the election was illegitimate and should be nullified. They have cited illegal votes by felons, as well as votes credited to dead people, errors in the handling of provisional ballots and problems reconciling differences between the number of people credited with voting and the total number of ballots cast.

The Times examined records from the state's two largest counties and found a number of felon voters that coincidentally equals the 129-vote margin in the election. While their votes did not change the outcome — not all of them voted for Gregoire — the finding suggests that felons could have voted illegally throughout the state.

Republicans' use of felon voting as a factor in their lawsuit has been countered by state Democrats, who say Republicans must show not only that felons voted illegally, but that if their votes were subtracted from each candidate's total, Rossi would have won. The judge hearing the case will consider that issue next month.

Election officials in King and Pierce counties say voter-registration procedures are designed to make it easy for people to vote. Instead of employing a rigorous screening process, they rely on people to be honest when registering or voting. Still, state officials say they are working to improve the system.

Washington prohibits felons from voting not only while they are in prison but until they have met all court-imposed obligations including community service and the payment of restitution and fines. If they've met all their obligations at the end of their supervision by the Department of Corrections, felons are supposed to be issued a "certificate of discharge," which restores their right to vote. If they meet all conditions later, they must petition the court for the certificate.

Despite the prohibition, though, it is relatively easy for felons to vote, as Jesse Shay Jr. discovered.

The 46-year-old former sergeant in the Washington Army National Guard was convicted of felony harassment in 2003 for making death threats to neighbors who owed $140 to his stepchildren. He vaguely recalls being told after his conviction that he had lost his right to vote. But Shay said his lawyer told him he could vote again a year after he had served 10 days in Pierce County jail.

"And then I got my absentee ballot. It just showed up. My impression was I was good to go because I received it," he said.

However, Shay's vote for Gregoire was illegal because he hadn't had his voting rights restored because of outstanding court debts. His name had remained on the voter rolls improperly.

Rossi spokeswoman Mary Lane said that because of poor enforcement of the law, Republicans have had to get a copy of the state's criminal-history database and match it against voter lists themselves.

"The voter rolls should already have been purged of felons," she said. "We are having to pay for something that already should have been done by the counties."

Secretary of State Sam Reed said he didn't fault the counties but acknowledged gaps in the system.

"The law could be improved and the execution could be improved," he said. "One of our goals is to learn from this election. There are certain weaknesses or inconsistencies in the system, and this is one of them."

How the system is supposed to work

King County last year purged more than 600 felons from voting lists, but it's a tricky task.

Here's how the system is set up to operate: When a person is convicted of a felony, the court clerk in that county sends a notice to election officials in that same county and the county where the person lives. Those officials are then supposed to remove the felon from the voter rolls. Last year, King County officials purged more than 600.

But they can't always match the felon to the name on the voter rolls.

Because courts and election officials don't use a common identifier, such as a driver's license or Social Security number, they're often forced into a bit of a guessing game. They have to look for matches using a mix of names, addresses and birth dates. The process gets especially tricky for people with common names or when family members with similar names live at the same address.

Another problem is that counties don't get a statewide list of convicted felons, so if a criminal is convicted in a county other than where he votes, election officials may not know.

Even when a felon is removed from the rolls, in most Washington counties it's simple to get back on. All the felon has to do is register again.

On voter-registration forms, people do have to sign a statement saying, "I am not presently denied my civil rights as a result of being convicted of a felony." But because that's not further explained, some felons could mistakenly believe they are clear to register.

Pierce County officials said they check new registrants against their voter rolls for those who've been previously flagged as felons. King County does not check registrants.

Perry Madsen of Kent had no problem registering to vote in 2002, after serving 3-1/2 years in prison. He had violated a protective order in 1999 by repeatedly calling and writing letters to an ex-girlfriend.

"I didn't know I was supposed to not vote," the 39-year-old said in an interview.

The Times surveyed 21 of Washington's 39 counties about their procedures for tracking felons, and in most of those counties, officials don't check new registrants against other records.

Dean Logan, director of elections in King County, said, "I don't think it's the responsibility of the election administrators to essentially do background checks on registered voters."

Pat McCarthy, Pierce County auditor, said that wouldn't even be possible: "We don't have the capacity to do that, and that's true of every county in the state," she said.

McCarthy acknowledged, "The way it works now is not as good as it can be or should be."

State officials say they are creating a special statewide database that could be used beginning next year to help counties with more thorough searches.

"The good news is we're going to get better," McCarthy said.

Logan said for now, the best deterrent to felons voting is to prosecute those who get caught.

Pierce County is doing just that, after a probation officer reported a felon who had voted, McCarthy said.

The King County prosecutor's office and elections officials say they can't recall a case in which anyone has been prosecuted for voting illegally. No one thought much about how well counties enforced the law until the state had an election with a razor-thin margin of victory.

Officials in both King and Pierce counties said they will investigate cases The Times discovered.

Wide variation nationwide

Some states' rules are easier to enforce.

Voting rights for felons vary widely throughout the U.S. All but two states (Maine and Vermont) prohibit felons from voting while in prison. Some extend the ban under various conditions after prisoners are released.

In Washington, Secretary of State Reed said, the simplest way to fix confusion over tracking felons would be to automatically restore voting rights when people are released from prison, regardless of whether they've paid all their court debts.

Other states do that now. Some people argue Washington should join them.

"If (felons) were showing up and being allowed to cast votes, it shows an inherent problem with Washington's purge list, a purge list that they obviously can't manage," said Rashad Robinson of the Right to Vote campaign, a coalition of civil-rights groups working to help restore voting rights to felons. "If you have laws you can't enforce, it calls into question the viability of the laws."

However, elections expert Larry Sabato and others say there's little excuse for not preventing people from voting illegally.

"You still can't justify having people vote illegally, especially because from time to time you'll have an extremely close election like this," said Sabato, with the University of Virginia.

One study by a felon-rights advocacy group found some states do manage their rolls more closely. New Mexico, for example, electronically sends election officials a wide range of identifying information, including dates of birth and Social Security numbers, for each convicted felon.

Voting rights and money owed

Even some of those who have served their time may not get voting rights restored.

In Washington state, some people conceivably will never be able to legally vote again because of court debts they can't pay.

Rosemary Heinen was released from prison in January 2004 after completing her sentence for embezzling $3.7 million from her employer, Starbucks. But Heinen still owes more than $2 million in restitution and so hasn't had her voting rights restored.

Nevertheless, Heinen was left on the voter rolls and voted in the general election, according to King County election records. Reached at her new workplace, a manufacturing firm in Port Orchard, she declined to comment.

The American Civil Liberties Union sued Washington state last October, alleging that withholding voting rights for failing to pay a debt violates equal protection under the U.S. Constitution.

"I don't think it makes any sense to continue to punish someone who's been convicted of a crime by banishing them from voting for the rest of their life," said Julya Hampton, legal-program director for the ACLU.

The Times found one felon who had completed his sentence and paid all debts but still hadn't had his voting rights restored.

William L. Nause completed his probation for felony possession of marijuana, attended alcohol and drug classes and paid $1,900 in court costs, so he should be eligible to vote. However, Nause never received a "certificate of discharge," the document needed to restore the right to vote.

"My probation officer said my right to vote had been restored," said Nause. It hadn't, yet Nause was allowed — inadvertently — to re-register in 2003. He voted in November for Rossi.

"You do your time you should have every right to vote," he said. "You are still a citizen of the United States."

It's plausible that some felons don't know they're not supposed to vote. Sentencing agreements signed in King County cases reviewed by The Seattle Times made no mention of voting rights, despite specifically addressing other rights such as the right to own a firearm or drive a car.

Jeff Gregory, who handles restoration of rights for the King County Prosecutor's Office, said defense attorneys should tell clients about losing the right to vote.

Shahn Divorne, a felon who voted illegally, said, "Most of your felons are so uneducated they don't know what their rights are, they just worry about reporting to a probation officer."

Divorne, the owner of Ear-Tec Hearing Aid Specialists, served 2-1/2 years in prison for defrauding the state's Department of Labor and Industries. But he said his judgment and sentencing information didn't state he had lost his right to vote.

Divorne still owes $132,000 in restitution, but he voted for Rossi by absentee ballot. His vote was recorded because officials had never purged him from their rolls.

"If [election officials] did their job, they would look it up and could tell I was a felon," he said.

Divorne said he's upset with how the election was handled and with the multiple vote counts.

"Up until now I thought my vote counted and my wife's vote, too. Now I realize the system is crooked. I don't think we will vote anymore," he said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: felonvote; fraud; revote; rossi; stealingelections; themostcorruptstate; votefraud; voterfraud
How it was done

The Seattle Times found felon voters by comparing databases of nearly 100,000 court records and more than 1 million voter records in King and Pierce counties.

The Times matched full names and birth dates, narrowing the search to more than 600 names. After checking court records for those cases, Times reporters eliminated cases in which felony charges had been reduced to misdemeanors or in which felons' voting rights had been restored.

The Times looked at all cases resolved in Pierce County since 1997 and most cases filed in King County since 1998. (The searches differed slightly because of the way the two counties archive court files.) The court database didn't include 2004 cases.

The Times then shared more than 170 names with King and Pierce county election officials. King County officials reviewed absentee ballots and voting logs: In a few cases, felons had been mistakenly credited with voting; either someone else accidentally signed on the wrong line in a poll book, or an election worker electronically scanning names from the poll book mistakenly scanned the wrong line.

Pierce County said it was unable to double-check the names because it routinely seals all of its voting records after an election.

The Times identified 129 felon voters after matching each felon's name, address and birth date to a person listed as having voted. Additional verification included further record checks and interviews with some of the voters.

Another 23 were considered likely felon voters because the felon had a distinctive name and a birth date matching the voter record, but no matching address.

1 posted on 01/23/2005 5:33:32 AM PST by KidGlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

So I wonder how many felons voted in Walla Walla, where the state pen is?


2 posted on 01/23/2005 5:36:01 AM PST by Drango (To Serve Man.....IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Throw the bea-ach out.


3 posted on 01/23/2005 5:36:49 AM PST by snopercod ( The broadcast networks are at war with the Bush administration. - powerlineblog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

I'll count the votes, you watch the door! :-|


4 posted on 01/23/2005 5:39:37 AM PST by JoeSixPack1 (Joooo need people like me, so ju can point jur finga an say, dare goes da badguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
Another voting report from THE NEW UKRAINE!
5 posted on 01/23/2005 5:48:02 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
Gomer Pyle says "surprise! surprise! surprise!"
6 posted on 01/23/2005 5:56:06 AM PST by labette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
"Instead of employing a rigorous screening process, they rely on people to be honest when registering or voting."

WHAT???! You're relying on Democrats to be honest?????!

7 posted on 01/23/2005 5:56:52 AM PST by Savage Beast (The internet is the newspaper of record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777; farmfriend


8 posted on 01/23/2005 6:00:35 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
People, people people, we gotta change this thing. Our free and open elections have been taken over by the communists. Fight for your country or "may the shackles of the slave rest easy on your shoulders". As for me, "give me liberty of give me death", cause I don't know how to live any other way.
9 posted on 01/23/2005 6:05:00 AM PST by timydnuc (I'll die on my feet before I'll live on my knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

I read that in order to have the election thrown out, it was necessary to prove that a greater number illegal votes were cast for the winner than the margin of victory -- in this case 129. If they've found over 129 in two counties alone (not all of which voted for Gregoire, the Times acknowledged -- but I'll bet a large majority of them did), then statewide, there should be way more.

Please correct me, if someone knows for sure, the rules for ordering a new election.


10 posted on 01/23/2005 6:09:48 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

"I didn't know I was supposed to not vote"
Is that like not sex?


11 posted on 01/23/2005 6:20:47 AM PST by RetroWarrior ('I will guard my post from flank to flank and take no 'crap' from any rank')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Outraged

Did you see this?


12 posted on 01/23/2005 6:23:41 AM PST by Samizdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetroWarrior
...and NPR is doing their part to help legitimize this farce. Last night they had Gregoire on "as the newly elected Governor of Washington" to give the demoncratic response to President Bush's radio address.
13 posted on 01/23/2005 6:26:55 AM PST by pajama pundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Amazing that our government can track a cow born in Canada almost three years ago, right to the stall where she sleeps in the state of Washington. And they tracked her calves to their stalls. But they can't...ah, never mind. Maybe we should just give them each a cow.


14 posted on 01/23/2005 6:31:17 AM PST by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Aw, come on now. You wouldn't want to disenfranchise those poor criminals, now would you?


15 posted on 01/23/2005 6:33:14 AM PST by BlessedBeGod (George W. Bush -- The Terror of the Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pajama pundit
I didn't hear her response, I never listen to the ba$tards, but I can just imagine what she said. Something along the line of "If Bush and friends allowed every vote to count....."
16 posted on 01/23/2005 7:01:01 AM PST by RetroWarrior ('I will guard my post from flank to flank and take no 'crap' from any rank')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
OT but I'm shamelessly promoting one of my posts (Threads.) Some, if not most, may not find it funny, but I need to feed the ego monster! Please read and post. Thank you all in advance.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1326175/posts
17 posted on 01/23/2005 7:05:10 AM PST by RetroWarrior ('I will guard my post from flank to flank and take no 'crap' from any rank')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
"I don't think it makes any sense to continue to punish someone who's been convicted of a crime by banishing them from voting for the rest of their life," said Julya Hampton, legal-program director for the ACLU.

Well there you have it. An ACLU lawyer thinks our laws don't make sense, so they are obviously unconstititional. Find a liberal judge to throw these laws out and make The Provisional Governor permanant.

18 posted on 01/23/2005 7:38:53 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timydnuc

As Stalin said, it's not who votes, it's who counts the votes.


19 posted on 01/23/2005 7:48:43 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
Another article in the Washington election event....

Wash. GOP Files Governor's Race Challenge
By MELANTHIA MITCHELL, Associated Press Writer

SEATTLE - The state's Republicans, still pressing their court challenge to the disputed governor's election, have filed a separate challenge with the state Legislature.

"We did this to cover all our bases," said Mary Lane, a spokeswoman for Dino Rossi, the Republican who narrowly won the original vote count and a mandatory recount. In a hand recount, he lost to Democrat Christine Gregoire by 129 votes out of 2.9 million cast.

Gregoire was sworn into office Jan. 12.

Republicans have filed a legal challenge against the hand recount in Chelan County Superior Court, saying mistakes were made and calling for another statewide vote. That same challenge was filed with the Legislature Friday evening, "as an insurance policy," Lane said Saturday.

The challenge, however, goes to the Democrat-controlled Legislature, which certified the election Jan. 11 despite a GOP request for a two-week delay.

State Democratic Party spokeswoman Kirstin Brost said the move indicated Republicans are afraid they won't win in court.

"The Republicans are in a hopeless situation," Brost said. "What we have seen in the last couple weeks is them floundering and grasping at straws trying to find some way to undo the election results."

The next court hearing is scheduled for Feb. 4, when several counties and Democrats present motions to dismiss the case.


20 posted on 01/23/2005 8:00:06 AM PST by deport (It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
Scores of convicted felons voted illegally in the state's 2004 general election...

Bet they all voted for Gregorie too.

21 posted on 01/23/2005 8:08:31 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maria S

There's a good possibility, though, that that Canadian cow was able to vote in King County.


22 posted on 01/23/2005 8:15:45 AM PST by Excuse_Me (How small, of all that human hearts endure, that part which laws and kings can cause or cure. --S.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; knews_hound; ...


23 posted on 01/23/2005 9:13:04 AM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

If it comes from the Times I distrust it.

That isn't to say that this might info be true, but the Times is hardly indepentent of dispassionate here.

I wonder what they're up to?


24 posted on 01/23/2005 9:13:20 AM PST by rockrr (Revote or Revolt! It's up to you Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
That is just the tip of the iceberg. Felon votes coupled with dead voters, ineligible votes, and registered in more than one county votes are additional arguments. There is plenty here for a revote, it will be up to the judge though, and in Washington that is scary.
25 posted on 01/23/2005 9:29:53 AM PST by carolinacrazy (www.JackassDemocrats.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTTT!!!!!


26 posted on 01/23/2005 9:31:23 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.
They have cited illegal votes by felons, as well as votes credited to dead people, errors in the handling of provisional ballots and problems reconciling differences between the number of people credited with voting and the total number of ballots cast.

Why is it that felons and dead ppl always vote Democratic?

27 posted on 01/23/2005 1:46:12 PM PST by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: randita
I read that in order to have the election thrown out, it was necessary to prove that a greater number illegal votes were cast for the winner than the margin of victory

No, that is not correct.

It is only necessary for the court to find that, because of irregularities, it is impossible to determine who got the most votes.

Given that there are so many more votes than voters, the duplicate ballots mailed to absentee voters, the "enhanced" ballots, the ballots magically "found" weeks after the election, the felon problem, the 300+ provisional ballots that were counted before they could be checked, the poll workers who witnessed people walking right past the poll workers and just dropping in ballots....well, I'd say there's enough to find that we don't know who won.

28 posted on 01/23/2005 3:30:40 PM PST by Timeout (What's the chromosome, Kenneth?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

bump for later read


29 posted on 01/23/2005 3:31:49 PM PST by MissouriConservative ( Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more; you should never wish to do less. - Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock; Drango
SOURCE: http://www.conservativeaction.org/resources.php3?nameid=votefraud

How Democrats Steal Elections - Top 10 Methods of Liberal Vote Fraud

1. Over-Voting. In Democrat strongholds like St. Louis, Philadelphia and Detroit, some precincts had 100% of their registered voters voting, with 99% of the ballots going to Gore. Clearly, multiple voting resulted in extra tallies for Gore in the 2000 election. (New York Post, 12/09/00).

2. Dead Voters. This classic Democratic method of vote fraud goes all the way back to 1960 in Chicago and Dallas. The 2000 election was no exception. In Miami-Dade County, for example, some of the 144 ineligible votes (those which officials actually admitted to) were cast by dead people, including a Haitian-American who's been deceased since 1977 (Miami-Herald, 12/24/00).

3. Mystery Voters. These "voters" cast votes anyway but are not even registered to vote. In heavily Democratic Broward County, for example, more than 400 ballots were cast by non-registered voters. (Miami-Herald 1/09/01)

4. Military ballots. Many of these votes were disqualified for the most mundane and trivial reasons. At least 1,527 valid military ballots were discarded in Florida by Democratic vote counters (Drudge Report, 11/19/00).

5. Criminals. Felons are a natural Democratic voter and they're protected on voter rolls across the country. In Florida at least 445 ex-convicts - including rapists and murderers -- voted illegally on November 7th. Nearly all of them were registered Democrats. (Miami-Herald 12/01/00)

6. Illegal aliens. These voters have long been a core liberal constituency, especially in California. In Orange County in 1996, Rep. Bob Dornan had his congressional seat stolen from him when thousands of illegal aliens voted for Loretta Sanchez (Christian Science Monitor, 9/2/97).

7. Vote-buying. Purchasing votes has long been a traditional scheme by Democrats, and not just with money. In the 2000 election in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Democratic workers initiate a "smokes-for-votes" campaign in which they paid dozens of homeless men with cigarettes if they cast ballots for Al Gore (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, 11/14/00).

8. Phantom Voters. These voters don't really exist, but their ballots do. In the 1996 Lousiana Senate race, GOP candidate Woody Jenkins had the election stolen from him when he discovered that 7,454 actual votes were cast but had no paper trail to authenticate them (Behind the Headlines, F.R. Duplantier, 4/27/97).

9. Dimpled chads. Those infamous punch-cards were a ballot bonanza for Al Gore. Democratic poll workers in Palm Beach, Dade and Broward counties tampered and manipulated thousands of ineligible ballots and counted them for Gore, even though no clear vote could be discerned. (NewsMax.com 11/27, 12/22, 11/18, 11/19/00).

10. Absentee ballots. Normally it's assumed that Republicans benefit from absentee ballots. But in the case of Miami's 1997 mayoral election, hundreds of absentee ballots were made for sale or sent out to non-Miami residents. Fraud was so extensive in the race that the final results were overturned in court (FL Dept. of Law Enforcement Report, 1/5/98)."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=votefraud

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=electionfraud

30 posted on 01/23/2005 8:51:49 PM PST by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
I wonder what [the Times is] up to?

It just might be that they (and the rest of Washington MSM) are professionally embarrassed by the job blogger Stephan Sharkansky has done in unearthing the "irregularities" in the King County election process.

He's been single-handedly doing their job.

31 posted on 01/23/2005 9:03:14 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: okie01

"It just might be that they (and the rest of Washington MSM) are professionally embarrassed by the job blogger Stephan Sharkansky has done in unearthing the "irregularities" in the King County election process.

He's been single-handedly doing their job."

Totally agree - I believe the papers have even been using some of the enormous amount of 'leg work' he's done in writing their articles - at least they're making an attempt to get some of the word out. (see my post of today on the additional work Stefan's done).


32 posted on 01/24/2005 6:35:09 AM PST by Seattle Conservative (Seattle Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson