Maureen Dowd: Don't know much about algebra (Or manners, or decency, or journalism...)

The New York Times ^ | 21 January 2005 | Maureen Dowd

[NeoCaveman]

I've only seen it twice.

I'm getting my DVR this week, so I will be catching more of the episodes.

[tai-pan]

Any reason is a good one.

[tet68]

Dowd!
She can't do simple equations. She doesn't even know that X times zero equals zero. If you multiply 1,370 dead soldiers times zero weapons of mass destruction, that equals zero achievement for Dowd, for her, millions freed from the clutches of the tyrant mean nothing, bringing freedom
and democracy to the heartland of terrorism, means nothing,
positioning our forces on the borders of our enemies, means
nothing.

I give her an F in Mathematics.

[tet68]

she isn't fit to serve Condoleezza Rice breakfast
she isn't fit to:
(insert the colorful reference of your choice here).

[AnnaZ]

quite nice...but relevant?

How can such an old-timer ask such a question?!

 

It is an FR oft-stated rule -- all MoDo threads must be accompanied by hot pix of CZJ as a) Michael Douglas dumped Maureen for Catherine and thus set off the Dowd-y-one's increasingly naked downward spiral to mad, sealed spinsterhood, and b) the pix are like salve to the open wounds left by the aforementioned "writer's" acid droppings.

[tai-pan]

old-timer?? listen here little missie, I just turned 35 lol