Defining Bias Downward: Holding Political Power to Account Is Not Some Liberal Plot

Columbia Journalism Review ^ | Issue 1: January/February | CJR

[Peach]

I do believe you're right. The oil for food scandal, if conducted honestly, will lead a lot of Democrats to realize just how complicit Clinton was in 9/11.

[Fruitbat]

What’s disturbing is not the way that Graham is whining into his champagne but his little two-step away from reality. He and others are defining bias downward, as anything that challenges a GOP point of view.

As somebody once noted, facts are stubborn things.

Oh, those that whine the loudest when their "pot is called black."

It is amusing, and now that the American people can see for themselves via any number of varying media, it is entertaining to be certain.

[Fruitbat]

I do believe you're right. The oil for food scandal, if conducted honestly, will lead a lot of Democrats to realize just how complicit Clinton was in 9/11.

I wouldn't be so sure of that. Most of the remaining democrats seem to be not too concerned with truth, rather they treat politics as if it's some sort of popularity contest. I don't think most of them actually educate or inform themselves other than things that they believe only finding "sources" to "support" their beliefs which are usually flawed or altogether false.

[Admin Moderator]

MEGA BARF ALERT: CJR implies that "honest conservatives" must stop questioning liberal bias in media

Please don't change titles.

[indcons]

Sure, Mod. Will take care of that in the future.

[RJL]

Do they actually believe the tripe they write?

No, but that's what they want the reader to believe.