Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACADEMY AWARDS ABOUT TO "JUMP THE SHARK"?
Network America ^ | 25 Jan 2005 | Jim Condit, Jr.

Posted on 01/25/2005 11:45:29 AM PST by Robert Drobot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-222 next last
To: Robert Drobot

Have any Martin Cuz Smith novels been made into movies?


81 posted on 01/25/2005 12:52:47 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Re: "What was the cut-off for you?"

When "Out of Africa" won when "Ran" was clearly the better movie. Hollywierd is racist.
82 posted on 01/25/2005 1:01:17 PM PST by Mark in the Old South (Note to GOP "Deliver or perish" Re: Specter I guess the GOP "chooses" to perish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

On the Laura Ingraham show yesterday Monday morning, Michael Medved was talking about the demise of Johnny Carson. He mentioned that Carson's following was so strong that the wedding of Tiny Tim drew more watchers than this year's Academy Awards ceremony will.

Wow, that sure put the Academy in the proper perspective for me.


83 posted on 01/25/2005 1:02:42 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
The Oscars are supposed to be about what are the best in each category, not which are the most popular (that would eb the People's Choice Awards). Of course, "best" is a very subjective term, and the choices reflect heavily on the voters' states of mind and biases.

Shouldn't the 'academy' choose films that did well? Shouldn't they at least try to pretend to be in touch with their customers?The writer is correct about this much, it's an incredibly powerful movie, and for the academy to ignore it, well, if we needed any more proof.....}-(

IMO, if The Passion had been about any other historical or mythical person, the left would have shoved it down our throats.

84 posted on 01/25/2005 1:03:39 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mhking

The Awards jumped the shark long ago, when "Hearts and Minds" got the "best documentary", in fact a propaganda piece for Hanoi. Upon accepting the award, the directors' speech praised the Khmer Rouge for taking over Cambodia. I was a kid then, and my folks saw me giving the bird to the TV and saying things like ******* Commies, go back to ******* Hanoi". The reaction was What is that all about? I said "Just wait and watch." A few years later was the news of the genocide in Cambodia.


85 posted on 01/25/2005 1:08:44 PM PST by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Each category is nominated by their own. Actors for actors, directors for directors. No commitee meetings to decide. Secret ballots that go righ tto a private accounting firm that counts em up. No deals made amongst groups of people. One group has no control over how another votes.

*snicker*

Come on, you're saying they don't talk? There's no politics involved?

86 posted on 01/25/2005 1:15:31 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

A few people may talk with each other but there are almost 6000 members. They don't communally decide anything.


87 posted on 01/25/2005 1:17:49 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Mark in the Old South

Sarcastic? Ran was the better film but it won the Foriegn Language cateogory.


88 posted on 01/25/2005 1:18:48 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I've always wanted to see Clancy's "Red Storm Rising" made into a movie. Guess that will never happen.


89 posted on 01/25/2005 1:19:14 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Grateful Heart Tour 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
The Oscars are supposed to be about what are the best in each category

What was the best documentary of the past decade?

(Clue: It didn't win an Oscar.)

ML/NJ

90 posted on 01/25/2005 1:23:46 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I'm not defending the Oscars, I'm just pointing out that criticizing the nominations based on the relative film popularity is a strawman. In fact, my next statement pointed out that the process is highly subjective, and the resulting nominations say a lot about the voters, and not so much about the films, per se.


91 posted on 01/25/2005 1:26:57 PM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Re: "Sarcastic?"

Usually
But not this time "Ran" is one of my all time favorite films. Along with Gibson's masterpiece it out did "Out of Africa" in every way. It was based on "King Lear" and the performances were the best I have ever seen. The woman who got revenge on her father-in-law was without a doubt the most memorable. Pity some people can not get past subtitles.
92 posted on 01/25/2005 1:29:15 PM PST by Mark in the Old South (Note to GOP "Deliver or perish" Re: Specter I guess the GOP "chooses" to perish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Look I used to run a video store and I have seen and been deluged at times with advance screeners of all types of movies including Art House pictures.
I have found most of the Art House type films overblown, boring and pretentious. Now I like very offbeat films and I have no trouble finding them, although most of those types are not nominated for the Oscars.
Most film critics do not write for the everyday person just looking to be entertained. Most of them think they are writing for the New York Times or heaven forbid the Village Voice or some other overblown elitist snob Eastern , L.A. or even worse San Francisco paper with pretensions of grandeur.
I don't take any of these critics seriously and can find and make my own decisions on what to watch.
Granted there is once and awhile a gem picture out there worth publicizing but not very often. Most of it is absolute trash.
93 posted on 01/25/2005 1:36:58 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Oscars = ego display = emetic = projectile vomiting. So, I don't watch in order to protect my TV, floor, and toilet.


94 posted on 01/25/2005 1:37:54 PM PST by Orca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It's pointless to cry that Passion of the Christ wasn't nominated for best picture. It didn't even qualify. It's not in ENGLISH or any other language commonly spoken on the planet today.


95 posted on 01/25/2005 1:40:34 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (Shake a man's hand with dog poop on your glove and he will never forget you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
I've always wanted to see Clancy's "Red Storm Rising" made into a movie. Guess that will never happen.

I've wanted to see that one on the screen, too. I don't thing it's possible to squeeze a credible version in three hours - but it would make a fine miniseries. Of course, the book begins with some Muslims blowing up a Soviet oil refinery, IIRC, so that'd have to be revised to avoid hurting anyone's feelings.

Come to think of it, I'll just read the book again. Hollywood can only diminish it.

96 posted on 01/25/2005 1:52:30 PM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mhking
"What was the cut-off for you? Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man or The Last Emperor?"

- Rain Man.
Dustin Hoffman sleepwalked through this movie showing no more emotion than a slack jawed Mongoloid on Prozac and still won Best Actor. After that, I realized that the Awards were nothing more than a PR promotion and I stopped watching.
It's one thing to be taken for a fool by the "Academy" each year by watching this over hyped circus, it's quite another to really be one by doing so.
97 posted on 01/25/2005 1:53:51 PM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

While I never really wanted the Passion to be on the Oscar "Red Carpet"-- this might be a good year to boycott the Oscars just to let Gomorrah know we noticed. Nobody turn the TV on, period, for the time that the Oscars are on? Wonder how that'd work.


98 posted on 01/25/2005 1:57:55 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

Uum OK. Calling people with who's taste you disagree snobs doesn't go very far. A critic can only say they think about a movie not what they think you want them to think. One of my favorite films of all time is 2001: A Space Oddyssey which you would probably call "overblown, boring and pretentious." It's just a matter of taste.


99 posted on 01/25/2005 2:01:11 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2


He was playing a withdrawn mentally ill man!

100 posted on 01/25/2005 2:01:56 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson