Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Loss of Freedoms List (Vanity Post)
Cornpone | 25 Jan 2005 | Cornpone

Posted on 01/25/2005 4:37:42 PM PST by Cornpone

Dear Freepers,

I'm getting old and perhaps a little wacky but as I look back over my life I continue to try and understand how my country hasn't quite turned out the way my mother and father brought me up to believe it should be and what it was I was always raised to defend. So I've started making a list of those things that just seem to represent a betrayal of what I always thought America is about...freedom. Its a short list, I'm still working on it and I know many, if not most, will not agree with everything on it. But I'm sure everyone has something to add to it...like the state of medical care in this country which I haven't even begun to think about. Anyway, they are simple things that individually don't amount to much. But, taken together they represent a fundamental change in our culture if you think about it. Please help me add to this list. I don't know what I will do with it. Perhaps I'll just go nail it on the doors of Congress..not likely. I'd rather nail it on the doors of the White House except we can't really go there anymore...another freedom lost.

• Mandatory motorcycle helmet laws

• Mandatory automobile seatbelt laws

• Mandatory boating lifejacket laws

• Increasing erosion of property rights

• Increasing regulation of alcohol consumption, tobacco use and firearms possession

• Virtual elimination of the right to self defense

• Denial of the right to carry a weapon for self defense

• Hate crime laws that ridiculously imply that the murder of one human being is more heinous than the murder of another based on some politically motivated criteria

• Encroachment on the constitutional right to assembly

• Increasing attempts to limit our constitutional right to free speech through hate speech laws that seek to dampen dissident opinions

• Increasing restrictions on demonstrations of personal faith with a bias against Christians

• Increasing restrictions on hunting

• Increasing restrictions on fishing

• Increasing restrictions on the traditional use of fireworks

• Increasing restrictions on traditional methods of outdoor cooking

• Increasing restrictions on water rights and usage

• Increasing government incursion and attempts to regulate the possession of domestic animals which in all cases don’t happen to be ‘pets’

• Unfair taxation to fund social practices abhorrent to most Americans

• Government advocacy of socially deviant lifestyles

• Government attempts to redefine millennia-old family relationships and bonds, i.e., gay marriage

• Affirmative action laws and policies that unjustly punish and deny opportunity to current generations based on the shortcomings of generations long past

• Ridiculous product liability judgments that seek to limit access and deny choice through judicial activism rather than legislative debate

Add your thoughts to the list please.

God Bless our Forefathers and God Bless You


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anotherstupidvanity; constitution; findabetterone; freedom; future; leavethecounty; nannystate; newbiemoron; tryanny; vanityofvanities; yeahitsuckshere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-265 next last
To: Southack
Even if true, that's no loss to your freedom or rights.

Taxation is a loss of freedom. It's money you are no longer free to spend.

"Their is not greater tyranny than to force a man to pay for something he does not want simply because you think it is good for him" -- Robert A. Heinlein.

121 posted on 01/25/2005 11:19:24 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
"Taxation is a loss of freedom. It's money you are no longer free to spend."

Indeed. And you'll notice that we've lowered the top tax bracket from 70% under JFK down to almost half that today.

Thanks to the 3 federal income tax cuts under President Bush so far, a family of four earning $40,000 per year only pays fourty-eight Dollars ($48) in annual federal income taxes now (a Tax Freedom Day of January 1).

The estate tax is now dead, again thanks to President Bush. No longer do families have to sell their father's farm simply to pay their estate tax bill.

The double-tax on dividends is almost completely gone now, too.

Thus, we are moving in the correct direction on the tax issue, just as we are gaining back our gun rights, gold rights, voting rights, Internet rights, etc.

122 posted on 01/25/2005 11:23:27 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Restrictions on *companies* are very different beasts than are restrictions on individual human freedoms.

Nevertheless, the manufacturers lost some freedom to decide what kind of cars they will manufacture. And the rest of us suffer because of it.

123 posted on 01/25/2005 11:24:51 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Indeed. And you'll notice that we've lowered the top tax bracket from 70% under JFK down to almost half that today.

But governments still collect about as much as they always did. Inflation continually drives us into upper brackets. Tax codes are so complex that it is meaningless to cite one statistic in marginal income tax rates.

The best way to gauge how much they tax us is to look at how much they spend.

124 posted on 01/25/2005 11:30:50 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
"The best way to gauge how much they tax us is to look at how much they spend."

Only if the population hasn't grown, and only if there hasn't been any inflation.

125 posted on 01/25/2005 11:33:32 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yes, and the 1st Amendment allows us the freedom to disrobe in public, not just in our homes or private vehicles.

Maybe a few horny judges think nudity is the same thing as free speech but most sober people don't think so.

126 posted on 01/25/2005 11:35:41 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Southack
So yes, we are substantially more free today than in 1890, 1934, or even 2002.

Try to own a modern produced howitzer, tank or attack helicopter. In 1890-1933 you had EVERY right to own every weapon the US Army and Navy had.

127 posted on 01/25/2005 11:45:34 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Compared to being able to trade stocks over the Internet today versus going to jail for so doing if you made those Internet trades in the 1980's?

Of course, today, you can go to jail for selling a stock if you had information that the public didn't have. It doesn't do you much good to be able to trade stocks if you aren't free to use information.

128 posted on 01/25/2005 11:52:51 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Discrimination implies the right to choose..nothing more. We should all have the right to choose our associations in our private lives.

Yes, giving people the right to discriminate may bring back segregated lunch counters in some towns, but society and the free market has ways to deal with that.

But, as you say, it is much more important that people have the right to choose their associations because it is one of the best ways that free people can manage evil. And it is the best mechanism for the free market to maintain efficiency. A man should not have to worry about being sued because he has too many white males employed on his engineering staff.

129 posted on 01/26/2005 12:07:04 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G
Are you actually trying to imply that we have more gun rights now than before? Prior to 1934, there were no gun control laws whatsoever.


Yeah, but it didn't apply to everyone.


Real men don't whine.

130 posted on 01/26/2005 2:10:37 AM PST by rdb3 (The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
But I would rather that the 14th amendment were repealed because it gives way too much power to the federal government. We have state constitutions with their own bill of rights.


I don't think so. This nation has been down that road before. We can study the results.

No thank you.


Real men don't whine.

131 posted on 01/26/2005 2:15:08 AM PST by rdb3 (The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

the complete and total elimination of the 4th,5th,9th and 10th amendments to the constitution


132 posted on 01/26/2005 2:44:41 AM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Annie03; AntiBurr; Baby Bear; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; BroncosFan; Capitalism2003; dAnconia; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
133 posted on 01/26/2005 2:46:35 AM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

number of gun control laws in 1792 when the constitution was ratified 0 number of gun control laws in 2005

20,000 any questions?


134 posted on 01/26/2005 3:00:56 AM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTTT!!!!!!


135 posted on 01/26/2005 3:02:52 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Likewise, prior to 1986, you could be arrested for merely passing through a city or county that forbade guns...even if your own guns were stored in the trunk of your car.

Got a challenge for you get some guns and put them in the trunk of your car then drive through the city o f chicago and let me know when you do so i can call the police and you can see first hand how free you are to carry guns through citys that have outlawed them.

136 posted on 01/26/2005 3:04:06 AM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

I don't have the freedom to discriminate against homosexuals even though I have every moral and health reason to do so.


137 posted on 01/26/2005 3:05:35 AM PST by thoughtomator (Favorite Dish: Spotted Owl Teriyaki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Encroachment on the constitutional right to assembly

Examples please.

Churches having to hire homosexuals. No male only clubs although females fortunately still have this freedom. Attempts to ban Christian clubs on public schools. How many examples do you want?
138 posted on 01/26/2005 3:11:32 AM PST by lbmorris11 (America defeating terrorism and Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I don't worry about responsibility Al Gore said he'd take care of me.


139 posted on 01/26/2005 3:13:22 AM PST by lbmorris11 (America defeating terrorism and Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

I am 27 and I agree we are losing our freedoms.


140 posted on 01/26/2005 3:21:04 AM PST by lbmorris11 (America defeating terrorism and Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson