Skip to comments.Arid Australian Interior Linked To Lanscape Burning By Ancient Humans
Posted on 01/26/2005 12:28:52 PM PST by blam
Contact: Gifford Miller
University of Colorado at Boulder
Arid Australian interior linked to landscape burning by ancient humans
The image of a controlled burn in the interior of Australia today, featured on the cover of the January 2005 issue of Geology, illustrates how Australia might have looked 50,000 years ago. Photo courtesy Gifford Miller, University of Colorado at Boulder Click here for a high resolution photograph.
Landscape burning by ancient hunters and gatherers may have triggered the failure of the annual Australian Monsoon some 12,000 years ago, resulting in the desertification of the country's interior that is evident today, according to a new study.
University of Colorado at Boulder Professor Gifford Miller said the study builds on his research group's previous findings that dozens of giant animal species went extinct in Australia roughly 50,000 years ago due to ecosystem changes caused by human burning. The new study indicates such burning may have altered the flora enough to decrease the exchange of water vapor between the biosphere and atmosphere, causing the failure of the Australian Monsoon over the interior.
"The question is whether localized burning 50,000 years ago could have had a continental-scale effect," said Miller, a fellow at CU-Boulder's Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research. "The implications are that the burning practices of early humans may have changed the climate of the Australian continent by weakening the penetration of monsoon moisture into the interior."
A paper on the subject by Miller appears in the January issue of Geology. Co-authors include CU-Boulder's Jennifer Mangan, David Pollard, Starley Thompson and Benjamin Felzer of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder and John Magee of Australian National University in Canberra.
Geologic evidence indicates the interior of Australia was much wetter about 125,000 years ago during the last interglacial period. Although planetary and meteorological conditions during the most recent ice age caused Earth's major monsoons to waver, all except the Australian Monsoon were "reinvigorated" to full force during the Holocene Period beginning about 12,000 years ago, he said.
Although the Australian Monsoon delivers about 39 inches of rain annually to the north coast as it moves south from Asia, only about 13 inches of rain now falls on the continent's interior each year, said Miller, also a CU-Boulder geological sciences professor. Lake Eyre, a deep-water lake in the continent's interior that was filled by regular monsoon rains about 60,000 years ago, is now a huge salt flat that is occasionally covered by a thin layer of salty water.
The earliest human colonizers are believed to have arrived in Australia by sea from Indonesia about 50,000 years ago, using fire as a tool to hunt, clear paths, signal each other and promote the growth of certain plants, he said. Fossil remains of browse-dependent birds and marsupials indicate the interior was made up of trees, shrubs and grasses rather than the desert scrub environment present today.
The researchers used global climate model simulations to evaluate the atmospheric and meteorological conditions in Australia over time, as well as the sensitivity of the monsoon to different vegetation and soil types. A climate model simulating a forested Australia produced twice as much annual monsoon precipitation over the continental interior as the model simulating arid scrub conditions, he said.
"Systematic burning across the semiarid zone, where nutrients are the lowest of any continental region, may have been responsible for the rapid transformation of a drought-tolerant ecosystem high in broad-leaf species to the modern desert scrub," he said. "In the process, vegetation feedbacks promoting the penetration of monsoon moisture into the continental interior would have been disrupted."
More than 85 percent of Australia's megafauna weighing more than 100 pounds went extinct roughly 50,000 years ago, including an ostrich-sized bird, 19 species of marsupials, a 25-foot-long lizard and a Volkswagen-sized tortoise, he said.
Evidence for burning includes increased charcoal deposits preserved in lake sediments at the boundary between rainforest and interior desert beginning about 50,000 years ago, Miller said. In addition, a number of rainforest gymnosperms -- plants whose seeds are not encased and protected and are therefore more vulnerable to fire -- went extinct at about that time.
Natural fires resulting from summer lightning strikes have played an integral part in the ecology of Australia's interior, and many plant species are adapted to regimes of frequent fires, he said. "But the systematic burning of the interior by the earliest colonizers differed enough from the natural fire cycle that key ecosystems may have been pushed past a threshold from which they could not recover."
### The National Science Foundation and the Australian Research Council funded the study with additional support from Australian National University and CU-Boulder.
OH! I just figured it was Bush's fault. (/sarcasm)
I don't understand how a scientist can write tripe like this and still appear in public.
I don't understand how it could be published.
They don't say but this would imply they have evidence of largescale fires 50K years all across the continent. If so, couldn't those have been cause by lightening or natural causes? Seems it would be difficult to locate evidence that humans actually started and created massive fires of this scale. Of course, then it's also difficult to link that to climate change. The whole thing is suspect.
Colorado researchers have also been found to be ignorant of the existence of lightening.
Each year, Colorado environmentalists raised their call for the blood of any human that might be blamed for the forest fires caused by lightening. They did so until a man hating, divorcing feminist started the monstrous Hayman Fire.
I missed the part where the Aborigines were driving Escalades and Hummers around the Outback to cause such environmental devastation. How can you effect global climate change without industrialization?
And George W. Bush wasn't even President back then...although it is still his fault.
Wait a minute...isn't this good news? If burning was the cause, wouldn't gradual replanting be the cure?
lightening = lightning
But the systematic burning of the interior by the earliest colonizers differed enough from the natural fire cycle that key ecosystems may have been pushed past a threshold from which they could not recover.
Wow, humans used different fire than nature, they used "Bad Fire", and old mom nature used "Good Fire", that explains it all. Fires started by nature automatically went out after the proper amount of burning, human fires just kept on burning forever without the proper "natural" sense to go out at the proper time.
Orographic precipitation explains part of Australia's desert.
Its LATITUDE goes a long way toward explaining the rest. Deserts tend toward specific latitudes, and it AIN'T necessarily the Equator, either: those areas are lush jungles, due to the convection currents dumping moisture.
Other factors to consider, when saying Australia was once wetter back then: Earth was warmer/wetter then, Australia may have drifted, sun may not be as constant we think (or hope) it is, etc.
Now its all clear!
What are we going to do about it?
Now whudunit Tsunami? Underseaboriginites?
Oh, and one more collossal oversight on their part: Australia is the LOWEST continent in terms of median height.
No big, craggy, cloud-scrapin' (and moisture soakin') mountains. Low mean elevation.
Oh, but they DO have Ayers Rock. Smack dab in the center.
Besides the end of the ice age climate shift, the continent of Australia is slowly drifting north and east. The drift is towards a dryer and hotter area and accounts for some of the change. The drift is slow but has been going on for a couple of million years.
Joke as you wish but there is "good fire" and "bad fire". Many plants and animals have adapted to certain fire frequencies and fire intensities. Midwestern oak savannaas and prairies, for example, have unique tolerance levels for fire. Disrupt the "natural" frequency and intensity of fire and you have landscape change. Not to say landscape change is bad, its just landscape change.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.