Posted on 01/27/2005 2:46:02 PM PST by Marguerite
From those wonderful folks who brought you the Iraqi oil-for-food corruption scandal, we have United Nations-coordinated Tsunami disaster relief. And what a relief that will be.
Shortly after the tsunami struck, two things happened.
First, the United States went into action. Hundreds of thousands of tsunami survivors were -- and are still -- threatened by disease, thirst and starvation. President Bush directed all branches of the US military to deliver on-scene, as soon as possible, all available assets capable of providing assistance and relief.
When it comes to providing immediate, tangible aid -- emergency medical treatment and water purification facilities coordinated on a large scale -- the rest of the world put together (particularly in the form of the United Nations) cannot do what the American military can do all by itself. Within a matter of days, the tsunami-struck areas had about 13,000 US military personnel, 20 ships and 90 aircraft delivering supplies and saving lives. These operations, which will continue into the indefinite future, cost the United States $5.6 million per day, and that figure will probably increase. The United States also organized a core group of nations, including Australia, India and Japan, to aid victims immediately, rather than wait for the United Nations to dither and debate as people die.
Second, UN "emergency coordinator" Jan Egeland criticized the United States for the "stinginess" its response to the tsunami. A crowd of enlightened European politicians and pundits quickly joined Egeland in chorus. The basis of their disapproval? An early estimate of $35 million in US tsunami relief (which soon rose to $350 million).
In contrast, the obscenely oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia, self-proclaimed leader of the Muslim world and "protector of the Muslim holy places," pledged a measly $30 million in relief aid -- despite the fact that a Muslim country, Indonesia, was hardest hit by the tsunami. Every week, the United States military spends more on tsunami relief operations than Saudi Arabia's total pledge. Yet the sanctimonious UN bureaucrats have no complaints about Saudi "stinginess. The odor of the Saudis' pathetic $30 million pledge hung in the air for a few days and would not dissipate, so the country held a telethon that raised $82 million for tsunami relief. The "generosity" of this effort compares unfavorably with a recent Saudi telethon that raised $150 million for Palestinian terror bombers.
Tsunami survivors will not feel the chill of America's "stinginess" for much longer. Leadership of the relief efforts now goes to the UN, which will control the multi-billion-dollar program designed to aid desperate people in Southeast Asia.
Sound ominously familiar? In case anyone has forgotten, under the UN oil-for-food program, UN bureaucrats demonstrated their willingness to steal medicine from the sick and food from the starving. Simply put, the United Nations is so tainted with venality and corruption that the last thing it should do is disburse large amounts of money.
It is too late to do anything about UN "leadership" in the tsunami relief effort. The transfer of control is a done deal. The Bush administration, particularly the State Department, nurtures the forlorn hope that the UN may be of some assistance in dealing with international crises such as stabilizing Iraq and containing Iran's nuclear ambitions. The United States simply cannot keep these options open if it acknowledges that UN bureaucrats are morally unfit to control the tsunami aid funds.
Over the next few years, the United States, its government and its people, will spend billions of dollars in the tsunami relief effort. We do this because it is the right thing to do, and because we are a good and generous country. We must be careful, though -- lest our generosity support another UN "Baksheesh for Bureaucrats" program.
The UN is a dangerous operation and they have outlived their usefulness... if in fact it ever had any usefulness!
I am glad to see that you too are not a UN fan. : ^ )
What, you don't trust an organization that once had a Nazi running it?
A considerable chunk of that money's long gone. Deal with it.
You some kind of UN-loving freak?
BTTT
You can take that to the bank! A former nazi before and a bunch of islamo-fascists NOW!!
Well, they are a group of united nations alright. Isn't that special?
Poinant as well. : ^ {
You re-read the post Twit - all I'm saying is that ANYONE who had ANY confidence in the majority of tsunami money making it the victims is a more than a bit thick. There are far too many STICKY fingers it has to pass through.
BTW - Grow up.
Oh yes - one more thing - the UN sucks!
Note: "Isn't that special" See: Church Lady (Dana Carvey).
Never was ;-)
You don't ever tell me to "deal with" ANYTHING... you rude jerk.
I am almost 80 years old and a Korean War vet and I don't take your kind of crap off ANYBODY! GOT IT PUNK!
I learned ALL I could ever want to know about the UN in Korea. They almost got me killed!!
I don't give a flick how old or young you claim to be or your 'war record.'
YOU entirely missed the point in my post regarding the funds and decided to engage in name calling. If you have something of substance to say, say it. Otherwise, well, if your self-description is accurate you know what you can do.
Your post MAKES NO SENSE at all.
If somebody dislikes the UN why you you ORDER THEM TO DEAL WITH IT....... UNLESS YOU AGREE WITH THE UN????
You are a punk!
It's an STD, silly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.